|
Substance abuse and criminal involvement are two of the most serious
problems among today's youth. Substance abuse is common among
juvenile offenders with an estimated 82% of youth committed to
the Juvenile Rehabilitation Association (JRA) in Washington defined
as being either dependent on, or abusing, alcohol or other drugs
(JRA, 1997). A recent report prepared for the Washington State
Division of Alcohol and Substance Abuse on adolescent drug treatment
reported that following treatment 36% of treated youth had remained
abstinent for six months (New Standards Inc., 1995). Similar
post-treatment relapse rates for adolescents have been noted elsewhere
(Brown, 1990). In order to better meet the needs of juvenile
offenders by providing interventions which research has demonstrated
to be effective in reducing substance use and criminal behavior,
the legislature approved HB 3900 (Sec 26-28) which requires the
development, implementation, and evaluation of the CDDA program.
While drug treatment is at the core of CDDA, it is essential that
other issues which contribute to the problems these adolescents
face, and in turn the crimes they commit, be addressed concurrent
with treatment for chemical dependency. Mental health problems,
for instance, are extremely common among adolescents who abuse
drugs. A study of 192 adolescents who received inpatient chemical
dependency treatment in Washington during 1996 found that 65%
of the youth had received mental health services and 45% were
taking prescription medication for mental health problems (Peterson,
1997).
A. Adults Versus Adolescents
Prior to 1985 most substance abuse treatment programs for adolescents
were the same or very similar to those for adults. In fact, adolescents
were frequently treated in the same physical settings as adults
(Brown, 1990). Research has since demonstrated that it can not
be assumed that salient factors in the establishment, maintenance,
and treatment of substance abuse and to a lesser degree, delinquency,
are the same for adults and adolescents. Compared to adults,
adolescents have shorter periods of substance abuse, greater involvement
with alcohol and marijuana, are more likely to be poly-drug abusers,
and have shorter criminal histories. The need for family support
and educational assistance is more significant for adolescents
in substance abuse treatment compared to adults (Friedman, 1986).
A recent study by Martin (1995) reveals further differences between
adults and adolescents. In this study of 181 adolescent drinkers,
half of whom were males, Martin found that the severity and pattern
of alcohol use differed for adults and adolescents. Adolescents
had fewer formal symptoms of alcohol abuse or dependence as measured
by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders,
Fourth Edition (DSM-IV), than did adults, as well as fewer difficulties
in occupational functioning. Adolescents had more difficulties
in meeting obligations in the home, family, and school domains
compared to adults, and were half as likely to report alcohol
withdrawal symptoms. With respect to gender differences, adolescent
males with alcohol abuse or dependence reported more legal problems,
physical fights, and hazardous use of alcohol compared to females
with alcohol abuse or dependence. Compared to males, females
reported more difficulty maintaining their grades, more impact
on their involvement in social activities and more continued
alcohol use despite psychological problems as a result of drinking.
No racial differences were revealed in the symptom patterns related
to alcohol abuse or dependence. It is worth noting, however,
that there were a disproportionate number of African Americans
who received no diagnosis of alcohol abuse or dependence.
B. Substance Use, Abuse or Dependence
In the majority of research studies no distinction between dependency,
abuse, and misuse, of alcohol or drugs is made. To avoid confusion,
throughout this report we will refer to adolescents who are reported
to have a substance use problem or be a substance abuser as adolescents
with substance use problems. If the reviewed study did
indicate a formal diagnosis of chemical abuse or dependency, those
terms will be used. It should be kept in mind that the CDDA program
proposes to treat chemically dependent youth who may have more
severe substance use histories than adolescents included in many
of the reviewed studies.
| PREVIOUS | NEXT |
Rutherford, M ; Banta-Green C. Effectiveness Standards for the Treatment of Chemical Dependency in Juvenile Offenders: A Review of the Literature. Seattle: University of Washington. Alcohol and Drug Abuse Institute, January 1998. (ADAI Technical Report 98-01)
Updated
7/2/99
http://depts.washington.edu/adai/pubs/tr/9801/back.htm