|
II. PREDICTORS OF ALCOHOL AND OTHER DRUG USE
| A. | Internal Factors |
| B. | External Factors |
| C. | Effectiveness Standards: Changes in Adolescent Behavior |
Although treatment programs for adolescent substance abuse have
proliferated over the last 10 years, there have been relatively
few treatment efficacy studies of these programs. Results from
the studies that do exist, provide little evidence as to the efficacy
of any single approach for treatment of adolescent substance use
problems. Across studies there is, however, consistent support
for the view that individual characteristics, family, peer, and
school variables contribute directly or indirectly to variance
in chemical dependency treatment outcomes. The greater the number
of risk factors the greater the risk for development of substance
abuse and delinquency (Battistich, 1996; Hawkins, 1995). In general,
factors influencing treatment outcome can be divided into two
groups which are discussed in detail below. These two groups
of variables are internal, or personal, variables related to the
individual's functioning in a variety of domains (e.g. psychological,
academic, interpersonal), and external, or environmental variables
(e.g. family situation, peers, community setting).
1. Developmental aspects
Substance use does not invariably lead to a diagnosis of substance
abuse or dependence.
In a study of 49 males and 52 females followed from age 3-18,
adolescents who had experimented with drugs and alcohol were found
to be psychologically better adjusted (less anxious, greater social
skills, more flexible) than adolescents who had never tried drugs
or alcohol, and better adjusted than adolescents who became heavy
users of alcohol and drugs (Shedler & Block, 1990). Research
has demonstrated that there is a group of adolescents who try
minor delinquent behaviors, such as shoplifting and drug use as
part of normal rebelliousness during the maturational process.
Among these 'normal' adolescents delinquent behavior typically
peaks between 15-17, while drug involvement increases during the
teen years and peaks in the early twenties. There is, however,
another group of adolescents that becomes seriously involved in
substance use and criminal activity during their youth and continues
that involvement into adulthood. It is likely that there are
different etiologies involved in the development of 'experimental
substance use' and the more 'life persistent substance use' (Hawkins,
1995; Moffitt, 1993). It is also likely that the majority of
JRA adolescents are not merely experimenting with substance use
and criminal behavior as part of normal rebelliousness and development,
but that these adolescents constitute the group at high risk for
ongoing, or life persistent, involvement in substance use and
criminal activity as adults.
For those adolescents that are at highest risk for on-going problematic
substance use and criminal activity it has been found that the
greater the variety, frequency, and seriousness of childhood delinquency
prior to age 10, the greater the risk that substance use problems
and delinquency will continue into adulthood (Dobkin, 1995; Hawkins,
1995). For females, delinquency often takes the form of truancy,
sexual acting out, and prostitution. For males it is more likely
to be stealing, aggressive or noncompliant behavior toward authority,
sexual and criminal offenses, and academic problems (Moran, 1994).
2. Substance use history
The most important predictor of chemical dependency treatment
outcome in adolescents is the severity of prior substance use
(Dembo, 1994c, Braukmann, 1985). Early onset of substance use
has been associated with more severe psychiatric disorders, more
family problems, more academic and occupational problems, greater
health problems, and heavier substance use in mid-adolescence
(Mezzich, 1992). An earlier age of onset of substance use, greater
frequency of recent substance use, and use of drugs other than
alcohol or marijuana have all been associated with negative treatment
outcomes regardless of the treatment modality (Hawkins, 1995).
Adolescents who begin drinking at a younger age (9 years old)
report more days of binge drinking and more drinking in the month
preceding incarceration than adolescents who began drinking at
a later age (Morris, 1995). Adolescents with severe substance
use problems tend to be older, and have used drugs for a longer
time than those without substance use problems and this is especially
true for males (King, 1996). Somewhat surprising is the finding
that younger adolescents (12-14 years old) report more LSD and
PCP use compared to older adolescents (15-17). Younger adolescents
have also been found to be more likely to receive a DSM-III-R
(an earlier version of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of
Mental Disorders) polydrug abuse or dependence diagnosis compared
to older counterparts (Westermeyer, 1994). Certainly young adolescents
with substance use problems are at very high risk for exacerbation
of drug use and its concomitant problems.
It has been well documented that alcohol is the drug most frequently
involved in violent offenses such as assault and murder (U.S.
Department of Justice, 1996). As many as 50% of adolescent and
young adult murderers report that they were involved with alcohol
at the time of their crime and that alcohol use had effected their
impulse control (Fendrich, 1995). Recently a connection between
marijuana use and delinquency has been reported. A study of juvenile
detainees found that individuals whose urine drug screens were
positive for marijuana at the time of arrest had twice as many
prior non-drug felony arrests compared to juveniles whose drug
screens were negative for marijuana. The authors of this study
suggest that for adolescents entering the juvenile justice system,
heavy marijuana/hashish use may be a marker for serious future
delinquency and deepening drug use (Dembo, 1991).
One consistent finding in research on adolescents is that although
females typically begin drinking at a later age than males, drinking
patterns of males and females do not differ significantly (Morris,
1995; Opland, 1995; Mezzich, 1994). It has also been found in
an evaluation of 40 females and 42 males with substance abuse
or dependence and conduct disorder diagnoses, recruited from drug
treatment and juvenile detention centers, that there were no gender
differences in rates of substance use disorder diagnoses or patterns
of marijuana use. Results also indicated that generally the first
drug used by females is tobacco, while for males it is alcohol
(Mezzich, 1994). Gender differences in the use of drugs other
than alcohol and marijuana have been reported in the literature.
A study of 1,574 male and 219 female incarcerated adolescents
(mean age 15) found that females reported more use of cocaine
(42% vs. 30%), crack (9.6% vs. 3.3%), LSD and sedatives (25.6%
vs. 13.1% ) compared to males. Females also reported beginning
use of these drugs at an earlier age than the males (Morris, 1995).
For 820 females and 1,461 males with a diagnosis of substance
abuse, however, males reported more use of LSD, other psychedelics,
and marijuana compared to females (Opland, 1995). Males in this
study also reported using marijuana at a significantly earlier
age compared to females. Females reported using drugs for emotional
escape more than males. Generally, fewer gender differences in
substance use patterns are found in adolescents in chemical dependency
treatment than those found in high school populations.
A recent study in Washington State of adolescents treated in residential
treatment facilities found that the two most commonly used drugs
were marijuana (92%) and alcohol (78%), followed by hallucinogens
(20%), methamphetamine (11%), and cocaine/crack (11%) (Peterson,
1997). A significantly larger proportion of females than males
reported using methamphetamine (22% vs. 5%). Significant gender
differences also existed for the primary drug of choice with males
more likely to report marijuana as their primary drug of choice
(79% vs. 48%) and females more likely to report that alcohol was
their primary drug of choice (31% vs. 12%).
A contradiction, appears to exist in the literature concerning
adolescent substance use problems. Although African Americans
are described as suffering most from substance use problems, they
appear to have lower rates of substance use relative to other
racial groups (Morris, 1995; Van Hasselt, 1993). Generally, the
highest rates of substance use problems are reported by Caucasians
and Native Americans, and the lowest by African Americans (Morris,
1995; Van Hasselt, 1993). Yet in a study of 1,801 adolescents,
relative to Caucasians, African American adolescents were more
likely to have been arrested for drunkenness, be victims of alcohol
related homicide, and have been incarcerated for alcohol and drug
related crimes (Morris, 1995). Adolescent drug use is perhaps
the issue of most concern to African Americans (Van Hasselt, 1993).
The finding that African American youth have lower rates of substance
use is most likely due to the fact that most surveys of adolescent
substance use are done in middle class high schools. African
Americans are not well represented in these samples due to their
higher school dropout rates and lower economic resources (Van
Hasselt, 1993). African Americans who are in school are likely
to be better functioning and less drug involved than those who
have dropped out of school.
The aforementioned studies point to the importance of a detailed
assessment of substance use in adolescents. The number of substances
used, the frequency (e.g., number of days), and the intensity
(amount of a substance used per episode of use) should all be
assessed in the CDDA youth at entry to treatment and at each follow-up
evaluation. Other indicators of substance use problems that should
be measured are the number of convictions for drug related crimes
and the number of additional admissions to a substance abuse treatment
program following treatment. The proportion of positive urinalysis
results for an adolescent can also be used as a measure of substance
use severity.
a. Substance Use Relapse
There has been limited evaluation of the cyclical nature of relapse
in teenagers (Brown, 1990; Myers, 1993). Although the
goal of drug treatment is abstinence the majority of adolescents
will have some continued use of alcohol or drugs before obtaining
total abstinence. A recent study of 139 adolescents who completed
an inpatient substance abuse treatment program found that 86%
of the youth experienced at least one relapse during the year
following treatment (Myers, 1996). Given that most adolescents
in the CDDA program will not be entering treatment of their own
free will, it is important to realize that not all adolescents
will have total abstinence as a treatment goal.
The cognitive-behavioral model of relapse is based on social learning
theory. This model states that certain stressful situations in
which an individual has inadequate resources to cope will increase
the probability of relapse. Additionally, an individual's response
to an episode of occasional use or a lapse will influence subsequent
relapse. The model proposes that attributing a lapse to personal
failure or a lack of control leads to the expectation of unsuccessful
coping in the future, making further use more likely. An emotional
reaction of guilt or self-blame also promotes continued use following
a lapse. A larger repertoire of problem-and-emotion focused coping
skills should, therefore, enable an individual to cope more effectively
with stressful situations and avoid relapses (Myers, 1993). It
is important to measure more than simply whether or not a youth
has remained abstinent. Relapse to any drug or alcohol use is
not necessarily the same as a return to problematic use. As described
below some studies have made distinctions regarding gradations
of relapse.
A study of factors related to relapse was done with 25 females
and 32 males 6 months after they had completed an alcohol treatment
program. In this study a lapse was considered to be any substance
use as long as it did not occur for four or more consecutive days
and amounted to less than a total of 30 days over a 6 month follow-up.
A relapse was defined as at least 4 consecutive days of use with
a brief relapse consisting of 14 or fewer days of consecutive
use, and a severe relapse defined as 30 days of consecutive use.
Extended abstinence was defined as 30 days of non-use. Social
support was the biggest influence on the initial length of abstinence
obtained. Abstainers had the fewest peers who continued to use
drugs or alcohol, while the relapsers had the highest rates (Brown,
1993). Contradicting the idea that relapsers are exposed to more
stressful situations, results found that adolescents who abstained
from substance use for 6 months following treatment actually reported
more stressful life events compared to those who had major relapses
(Brown, 1993). There was a significant relationship between type
of coping and total days of alcohol or other drug use, but the
type of coping used did not predict categories of use such as
minor relapser, major relapser. Use of wishful thinking (e.g.,
Wish I were a stronger person, Wish I could change what happened)
was associated with more total days of use during the 6 month
follow-up. Self blame was not found to be an important factor
in relapses (Brown, 1993).
3. Academic and vocational functioning
Truancy and school dropout are associated with delinquency and
substance use problems (Dembo, 1996; Hawkins, 1995; Ingersoll,
1997; Eggert, 1994). Youths who experience academic success are
less likely to be involved in substance use and delinquent behaviors
than those with poor academic performance. A study of 2,104
adolescents, average age 15, entering the Juvenile Assessment
Center (JAC) in Tampa, Florida (Dembo, 1996) found that although
72% of the sample were still attending school, only 14% were at
the age appropriate grade. It is estimated that the rate of substance
abuse and corresponding need for treatment is 50% higher in school
dropouts than among high school students (Joanning, 1992). A
study of 1,000 high school students revealed that risk factors
for truancy include low levels of self esteem and personal satisfaction,
parental strain such as divorce or separation, and strong bonds
with deviant peers (Eggert, 1994). Additionally, academic and
behavioral problems at the end of elementary school, but not in
grades 1-3, have been found to predict academic and behavioral
problems such as substance abuse and delinquency in adolescence.
It is believed by some that adolescents turn to crime and selling
drugs as a means of employment not enjoyment (Bradley, 1996).
For students with academic under-performance school-to-work programs,
which provide academic and job training or career academy programs
have demonstrated some success in reducing delinquency and substance
use problems. These programs allow the youth to focus efforts
on getting a job in a particular area such as nursing or emergency
service rather than going to college. Successful school-to-work
programs also supply mentoring, intensive counseling, and a curriculum
based on real life learning (Ingersoll, 1997). Unemployment and/or
a lack of self sufficiency reduces an individual's self esteem.
Therefore, new drug treatment programs need to address occupational
issues whether using mentoring, tutoring, or some other program
to enhance the employability of youth (Bradley, 1996).
While impairment in school performance has been found to differentiate
substance abusing females from non-substance abusing females,
this is not true for males (King, 1996). With regard to racial
differences in academic performance, over a third of African Americans
18-19 years old have dropped out of school. African American's
lower perceived benefit of education may be, in part, responsible
for poor academic performance (Van Hasselt, 1993).
Clearly there is a strong association between academic performance
and substance use. An important outcome of CDDA treatment programs
should, therefore, be improved academic performance. Important
variables to evaluate include changes in treated adolescents'
truancy rates (including skipping classes and the general patterns
of school attendance), the number of disciplinary problems incurred,
as well as grades. If an adolescent is employed it is expected
that effective treatment should also improve vocational functioning.
Measures of vocational functioning which should be evaluated
include fewer absences (including arriving late or leaving early)
from work related to substance use, fewer disciplinary actions,
and a more positive relationship with co-workers.
4. Sexual/Physical/Emotional Abuse
Higher rates of substance abuse are reported by teenagers who
were abused compared to non-abused teenagers. Roughly a third
of female and 17% of male adolescents in substance abuse treatment
report some form of sexual or physical abuse (Moran, 1994). Females
are more likely to respond to abuse with depression or somatization
while males respond with hostility and acting out behaviors.
In other words females turn negative feelings inward while males
are more likely to externalize their negative feelings (Moran,
1994). These differences are probably a factor of socialization
differences that intensify during puberty. Abused female adolescents
are also more likely to run away, spend time in detention, and
be heavy drug users compared to non-maltreated females. Males
who report sexual abuse have significantly higher levels of hostility,
interpersonal sensitivity, behavioral problems, and obsessive
compulsiveness, but not more drug use, compared to college aged
peers with no history of abuse (Moran, 1994).
5. Interpersonal relationships
A 15 year study of youth in San Francisco reported that frequent
substance users were more interpersonally alienated, emotionally
withdrawn, and manifestly unhappy compared to non-drug users (Moran,
1994). It has also been found that interpersonal alienation at
an early age predicts frequent use of marijuana at age 18 (Shedler,
1990). For females, earlier involvement with males can also be
a risk factor for development of substance abuse and delinquency
(King, 1996). Females with substance use problems are found to
be more involved with opposite sex partners compared to non-substance
using females, but this is not the case for male adolescents.
It has been proposed that females who mature earlier (earlier
age of menarche and development of secondary sexual characteristics)
are more likely to be assimilated into older opposite sex peer
groups. Since these older age peers are more likely to be involved
with substance use this association places the adolescent female
at greater risk for early substance use (Moffitt, 1993). A study
of 28 females, average age 16, recruited from inpatient and outpatient
drug clinics, however, found no significant relationship between
the age of menarche with age of onset of drug use, frequency of
alcohol use, or severity of substance use (Mezzich, 1992).
Studies have also demonstrated that those adolescents who are
able to maintain abstinence after treatment tend to have the least
exposure to peers who continue to use drugs or alcohol, while
those that relapsed had the highest number of peers who continued
to use drugs (Brown, 1990;1993).
Studies to date have not addressed racial differences in regard
to the significance of interpersonal relationships in the development
of substance use problems and/or delinquency.
Decreased feelings of interpersonal alienation should be considered
a goal of chemical dependency programs for CDDA youth, since individuals
who are less interpersonally alienated appear to be less likely
to be substance users. It will also be important to evaluate
the relative amount of time that an adolescent spends with substance
abusing peers, as this increases the likelihood of relapse. Establishing
relationships with prosocial non-substance peers could also be
considered a result of an effective treatment program.
6. Sexual activity
Most youth in a juvenile justice setting are sexually active,
have had multiple partners, and have engaged in unprotected sex.
In 1990 the Juvenile Court Health Services in Los Angeles County
surveyed 1,754 newly admitted juvenile detainees, 14.3% female,
and found that 97% of males and 94% of females were sexually active
and reported an average of 15 different prior sexual partners
(Morris, 1992). Two-thirds of these youths reported never having
used condoms. A 1991 survey studied AIDS awareness and knowledge
among 219 females and 1,574 males (average age 15) incarcerated
in either a short term (less than 3 months, n=451) or a long term
facility (n=1,350). Knowledge of AIDS was poor; 15% reported
that you could get AIDS from a mosquito, 21.3% were unsure if
that was true, and 8.3% believed that you could get AIDS from
a drinking glass (Morris, 1995). This was despite the fact that
86.4% of the facilities surveyed provided comprehensive AIDS education.
In a 1995 study of 171 juveniles entering a detention center
in Virginia, rates of sexually transmitted diseases were significantly
higher in females compared to males (65-75% of females tested
positive for a sexually transmitted disease compared to 9% of
males). Since there was no significant difference in the rates
of sexual activity between males and females (76% and 60% respectively),
it was hypothesized that differences were due to the fact that
females tended to have older age sex partners. These differences
may also be because females appear to have greater physiological
susceptibility to sexually transmitted diseases compared to males.
Female gang members are an especially high risk group as they
report high rates of sexual activity and little use of protection
in sexual intercourse (Bjerregaard, 1993). Detained youths appear
to begin involvement in risky behaviors early on and require early
prevention programs regarding the risks for contracting sexually
transmitted diseases.
Health care issues, in general, are more prominent for female
juvenile delinquents than for males. Female juvenile delinquents
use the health care system more than males and used more 'sick
calls' compared to males. This is most probably a result of higher
rates of somatization in the females while males have higher rates
of acting out behaviors (Juvenile Justice Programs and Trends,
1996).
A goal of chemical dependency programs for CDDA youth should be
to reduce the frequency of unprotected sexual activity in treated
adolescents. Given the serious, and potentially life threatening,
risks associated with unprotected sexual behavior, discouraging
unprotected sexual activity could not only save the adolescent's
life, but also could substantially reduce future health care costs.
7. Psychopathology
In the general adolescent population a strong correlation between
substance use and other psychiatric problems is found. Substance
use problems in 'normal' adolescents have been associated with
high rates of antisocial behavior, depressive disorders, attention
deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), risk taking and sensation
seeking behavior, borderline personality disorder, and suicide
(Hawkins, 1995; Grilo, 1995; Neighbors, 1992). A 1997 evaluation
of 192 youth served by residential chemical treatment facilities
in Washington State found that 65% had received mental health
services prior to treatment and that 45% were on some type of
prescription medicine for mental health problems (Peterson, 1997).
Treatment outcome studies of adolescents in chemical dependence
treatment have found that problems such as mood disorders, conduct
disorder, paranoid ideation, and hostility are related to treatment
outcome. Results are inconsistent; however, some studies report
that adolescents with moderate to high levels of psychiatric severity
have more positive treatment outcomes compared to those with low
levels of psychiatric problems (Friedman, 1987), while other studies
find that more psychiatric problems are related to poorer treatment
outcome (Friedman, 1996).
Two pathways in the development of substance use problems have
been proposed. The first, 'negative affect alcoholism/substance
abuse' proposes that psychiatric symptoms, such as depression,
precede substance use. Substance use may occur as a means of
relieving or 'medicating' those symptoms. Substance use, however,
usually exacerbates these symptoms and ultimately results in greater
emotional distress and more overall problems. It has been suggested
that this may be the more common pathway for female adolescents
(Mezzich, 1992).
The second theory, 'antisocial substance abuse' or 'general deviance
syndrome' proposes that substance use is just one of multiple
deviant behaviors that are manifest in childhood and adolescence.
Substance use, in this theory, is viewed as preceding the onset
of psychiatric symptoms. Psychiatric symptoms develop as a result
of substance use and other deviant behaviors. This may be the
more common pathway to substance use problems and delinquency
for males (Mezzich, 1992; Thomas, 1996).
It should be noted that females in the general population have
rates of depressive disorders 2-3 times higher than those found
in males, but males' rates of delinquency are 5-6 times those
found in females. In the general population and in treatment
settings, African Americans are less likely to meet criteria for
psychiatric diagnoses compared to other racial groups. It appears
that although African Americans are faced with greater stress
and more risk factors for the development of substance abuse and
delinquency (e.g. lower economic resources, more violence and
drug use in community), they appear to be more resilient to the
cumulative effects of those stressors compared to other racial
groups (Vega, 1993).
a. Mood disorders
In chemical dependency treatment programs rates of major depression
range from 25-50% (Dembo, 1994b; Mezzich, 1995). It has also
been found that among adolescents being treated for severe emotional
disturbance the rates of co-existing substance use problems are
as high as 48% (Dembo, 1996; King, 1996). The more severe the
alcohol and substance use, especially poly-drug use, the higher
the rates of depression (Dembo, 1996; Neighbors, 1992). The more
severe the depression, the higher the risk for suicide (Dembo,
1996; Eggert, 1994; Neighbors, 1992; King, 1996).
As with adult females, female adolescents are more likely than
males to be diagnosed with a mood disorder (Vega, 1993; Thomas,
1996). In female, but not male, adolescents substance use has
been linked to prolonged depressive episodes (King, 1996). Females
with substance use problems also exhibit higher rates of suicidal
thoughts, plans, and attempts compared to males (Thomas, 1996).
Compared to African Americans, Caucasians are reported to have
higher rates of depression, suicidal thoughts and actions (Thomas,
1996). In a sample of adolescents at a juvenile assessment center
in Florida, African Americans and Caucasians reported similar
degrees of emotional distress and substance use, but twice as
many Caucasians compared to African Americans had received prior
mental health treatment and three times as many Caucasians had
received prior drug treatment (Dembo, 1995). These results suggest
that African American adolescents' emotional distress and drug
use may not be as problematic for them, but it is also possible
that they may in fact require mental health and drug treatment
services as much as Caucasians. For African Americans, access
to mental health or drug treatment services may be limited by
their financial resources or by a lack of availability of such
services in their communities. It is also possible that seeking
formal mental health services is even less socially acceptable
to African Americans than Caucasians, especially given that the
majority of service providers tend to be middle class Caucasians
(Vargas, 1991).
Depression and suicide are major areas of concern for American
Indians and Alaskan Native youth (Dinges, 1993). Results of a
study of 124 American Indians and Alaskan Native youth (average
age 16) with a diagnosis of depressive disorder found that 76%
of the sample received another psychiatric diagnosis. Results
also indicate that in these populations, depression precedes substance
use problems. Family/parent conflicts and loss of cultural supports
were strongly associated with the development of depression, suicidal
ideation and suicide attempts in these populations (Dinges, 1993).
Individuals in this study were not in a residential hospital
setting, but rather in a boarding school that was not well equipped
to deal with the adolescents' mental health needs. It will be
of utmost importance to assess American Indians and Alaskan Native
youth in the CDDA project for depression and suicide risk. Additionally,
the family bonds and tribal views on mental health treatment should
be taken into consideration when determining treatment placements.
b. Conduct disorder
Conduct disorder (CD) is defined by a pattern of violating the
rights of others or violating societal norms and rules. Research
demonstrates that CD frequently co-occurs with substance use problems
(King, 1996). In a study of 76 male and 62 female adolescents,
average age 15, it was found that CD was diagnosed more frequently
in patients with substance abuse diagnoses compared to those without
substance abuse diagnoses (75.4% vs. 34.8%; Grilo, 1995). It
has also been found that the greater the number of CD symptoms
the more severe the substance use problem will be (Grilo, 1995;
Neighbors, 1992). Results suggest that in many adolescents CD
precedes substance use (Riggs, 1995). Individuals that have CD
preceding substance use problems may also be the individuals at
highest risk for ongoing delinquency and drug use in adulthood.
CD has been found to be more common among adolescent males compared
to females (Neighbors, 1992, Dembo, 1995). Interestingly, the
presence of CD differentiates between substance and non-substance
abusing female adolescents, but not between substance and non-substance
abusing male adolescents (King, 1996). CD and alcohol and other
drug abuse appear more tightly linked in females than male adolescents
(King, 1996). In many delinquent males CD has been found to precede
the development of depression and substance abuse (Riggs, 1995).
To our knowledge, there is no research indicating racial differences
in the rates of CD.
c. Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
Many adult addicts have reported having difficulties with hyperactivity
as children (Meyer, 1992). This finding has resulted in increased
study of the relationship of ADHD to substance abuse and CD in
children and adolescents. The inability to concentrate and focus
can lead to academic difficulties which in turn relates to a higher
risk for development of substance use problems. It has also been
suggested that for many adolescents ADHD may be associated with
earlier onset of CD, depression and substance use (Riggs, 1995).
It is currently believed that the combination of ADHD and CD
together places a child at greater risk for substance abuse than
the presence of either CD or ADHD alone (Bukstein, 1995). Studies
of ADHD in adolescents with substance use problems are currently
limited to examining co-morbidity of ADHD and substance use. A
study of 1,613 normal youth aged 9-12 found that attention problems
were second only to delinquency in predicting the development
of problems such as substance use, police contacts, school performance
problems, and use of mental health services by youth recruited
over a 6 year period (Achenbach, 1995). As with CD, rates of
ADHD are five times greater in males than in females. No studies
have, to our knowledge, evaluated the impact of ADHD on chemical
dependency treatment outcomes. No research to date has examined
racial differences in rates of ADHD.
d. Aggression and Alienation
Unlike other predictors previously discussed, most research on
aggressiveness does describe gender differences. Research has
found that childhood aggressive behavior may be an indicator of
adolescent problems. In a sample of 250 African American first
graders there was a strong positive correlation between male aggressiveness
and level of substance use 10 years later (Hawkins, 1995). Young
males appear to be at greatest risk for assaultive violence as
they feel the need to prove their manhood (Thomas, 1996).
Research demonstrates that the more severe the drug use the more
likely an adolescent is to be involved in fighting (10-20% higher
than non drug users; Thomas, 1996). A study of 412 males and
384 females followed from grades 9-12 which assessed beliefs about
alcohol use, the age of onset of alcohol, tobacco, and other drug
use, and frequency of adverse consequences resulting from substance
use, found that aggressiveness and alienation were related to
the age of onset of substance use and the frequency of adverse
consequences experienced from substance use. Gender differences
regarding the impact of alienation with the degree of use, age
of onset, and problems associated with substance use were found.
Males with low levels of alienation were less likely to use drugs
and alcohol compared to males with high levels of alienation.
Alienation appeared to be a protective factor for females with
regard to onset, degree of use and to a lesser degree, the consequences
of use, but had little effect in males on any of these variables.
A direct effect between pro-use beliefs regarding drug and alcohol
use with the age of onset for drug and alcohol use was found for
males, but not for females (Thomas, 1996).
Gang members account for a disproportionate amount of adolescent
aggressive and criminal behavior (Juvenile Justice Programs and
Trends, 1996). In the Rochester Youth Development study 262 female
and 707 male adolescents (67.6% African American) were surveyed
at age 13-15 and then 6 months after an intervention. Results
indicated that gang members were more likely than non-gang members
to have been involved in substance use and delinquency. Risk
factors associated with gang membership included low self esteem,
poverty, and feeling alienated from family and peers. A study
by Elliott (1985) also found that feeling alienated from family
and school predicted association with deviant peers (Bjerraard,
1993). The association with deviant peers in turn related to
higher rates of substance use and criminal activity as well as
gang membership. The possibility of increased sexual activity
and membership in a strong peer group were two main reasons reported
for choosing to belong to a gang. One gender difference found
for gang members was that male gang members had much lower expectations
of doing well in school compared to females (Bjerraard, 1993).
With regard to racial differences, in a study of 1,801 detained
youth it was found that North American Indians and 'other' racial
groups were the most likely (87.1% and 77%) to have been involved
in at least one fight during the last year, while Asians were
the least likely to have been involved in fights (37.5%; Morris,
1996). North American Native Indians were, however, least likely
(35.4%) to be involved with a gang, while Asians were the most
likely (65.6%).
Summary
The severity of co-morbid psychopathology can have a profound
effect on an adolescent's chemical dependency treatment; therefore,
it is important that psychological functioning of CDDA youth be
assessed. However, since a thorough psychological evaluation
can be costly and time consuming, it may not be possible to perform
a full psychological evaluation on every CDDA adolescent to determine
the presence or absence of major depression, ADHD, and conduct
disorder. In the case of depression, an alternative assessment
strategy is to assess depressive symptomatology, such as the number
of days that an adolescent has felt depressed or had suicidal
thoughts and measure the change in these symptoms from treatment
entry to the follow-up evaluations. In the case of ADHD and conduct
disorder a similar strategy can be utilized. Adolescents can
be queried regarding their ability to focus and concentrate on
a task (an indication of the possible presence of ADHD) and school
functioning can also be used as an indication of problems in concentration.
The presence of behavioral problems associated with conduct disorder
(such as theft, violation of curfew) can be evaluated by a series
of questions given at entry to treatment and then re-assessed
at each follow-up point. The number of aggressive acts that the
adolescent engages in over the follow-up periods can be used as
an indicator of level of aggressiveness and hostility.
The degree of alienation felt by an adolescent can be ascertained
from questions regarding the number of friends that they currently
have, how they are getting along with their parents and siblings,
and in general by asking directly about the degree of alienation
that they experience in relation to their peers and friends (e.g.,
I feel that I am liked by my classmates). These procedures, as
well as considering the number of hospitalizations or treatments
for psychological problems, and use of psychiatric medications
can all be used to assess general psychological functioning.
1. Familial factors
In general, adolescents' overall adjustment is related to the
nature of their family environment (Brown, 1990). Negative family
functioning is the strongest predictor of substance use and other
problems (Friedman, 1991,1995; Rhodes, 1990).
Parenting styles have been linked to substance abuse and delinquency
(Stice, 1993; Brown, 1990; Tarter, 1993). Parenting ordinarily
consists of two elements, control and support. Disturbances in
either area can cause problems with regard to substance use problems
and delinquency (Stice, 1993; Brown, 1990). A study of 214 female
and 240 male adolescents, ages 10.5-15.5, found that adolescents
who were raised with either extreme parental control or extreme
parental support were at greater risk for developing problem behaviors
such as substance abuse (Stice, 1993). There is also some evidence
that poor parental supervision and inconsistent discipline practices
are predictive of substance use problems and delinquency (Dobkin,
1995; Hawkins, 1995; Dishion, 1988).
Conflict in families seems more salient than a broken home per
se in the development of substance use and delinquency (Hawkins,
1995). Divorce or separation in the last year, loss of employment
in last year, low level head of household occupation, and being
abused in the family are all familial stressors found to be related
to adolescent substance use (Hawkins, 1995; Stice, 1993; Brown,
1990).
Although there can be a genetic predisposition to developing an
addiction, exposure to problem behaviors in the family may be
a stronger predictor of an adolescent developing problem behaviors.
If an adolescent's parent(s) or siblings are involved in substance
use they are more likely to develop a substance use problem than
an adolescent whose family does not currently engage in substance
use. Furthermore, having a parent or sibling convicted of a crime,
or involved in delinquent behaviors is predictive of adolescent
criminal involvement (Hawkins, 1995; Dishion, 1988).
Few studies have addressed gender and racial differences in relation
to familial factors and development of substance use and delinquency.
Familial factors do appear to be more important in the development
of substance use in females than males (Friedman, 1991,1995; Hawkins,
1995). The extended family living arrangement, common among African
Americans, appears to provide augmented support and resources
for the family and is associated with reductions in deviant behaviors.
Involvement of the family is crucial in implementing behavioral
change in inner city African Americans who rely heavily on their
families for support (Van Hasselt, 1993).
There are limited investigations of the relationship between familial
variables and adolescent chemical dependency treatment outcomes.
Studies have found that a positive description of one's family
is associated with better treatment outcome (Friedman, 1991; Stice,
1993). Research shows that family involvement during residential
or outpatient treatment is associated with more positive outcomes,
and the shorter the residential stay the less disruption to the
family bond and community support systems. This results in a
greater chance of the adolescent integrating positive gains made
in treatment into their community life (Juvenile Justice Programs
and Trends, 1996). Having a family environment that is supportive
of an adolescent obtaining independence was found in one study
to be the best single predictor of improvement in substance abuse
treatment (Friedman, 1991).
Genetic risk has not been directly associated with treatment outcome
for adolescents, but level of pretreatment exposure to substance
abuse has been linked to poorer treatment outcomes. In a 6 month
follow-up of adolescents treated for substance abuse, abstainers
reported the least exposure to familial alcohol and drug use while
major relapsers reported the greatest exposure (Brown, 1990).
Results of one study reported that African Americans and Hispanics
were more likely than other racial groups to report family substance
use (Vega, 1993).
A reduction in family conflicts that arise because of, or related
to, an adolescent's substance use problems should be reduced as
a result of an effective treatment intervention. A decreased
number of adolescent runaway episodes, and an improved rating
of parental satisfaction with their adolescent's behavior can
be viewed as indicators of reduced family conflict.
2. Poverty
Extreme social and economic deprivation are related to the development
of substance use and delinquency (Hawkins, 1995). Poverty places
children at risk for school dropout, serious delinquency and substance
use. Over one half of students from poor families do not graduate
from high school (O'Donnell, 1995). Poverty is associated with
fewer coping skills and more potential for family violence, child
abuse, and neglect (Van Hasselt, 1993). Living in neighborhoods
with high population density and high rates of criminal behavior
have also been identified as a predictor of criminal behavior
and to a lesser degree substance abuse (Hawkins, 1995). Length
of residence in a community is related to the degree of social
bonding in individuals and this in turn is predictive of delinquency
and related problems (O'Donnell, 1995).
African Americans are exposed to greater risk for substance abuse
with regard to living situations compared to Caucasians. Over
35% of African American families live at or below the poverty
level. Compared to Caucasians, a greater proportion of African
Americans have no working head of the household (33% vs. 14%).
While 62% of African American families are divorced, separated,
widowed, or never married this is true of only 33% for Caucasian
families. Additionally, more African American children are born
to unwed mothers (58%) or adolescent mothers (28%) than in Caucasians
(28% and 14% respectively; Van Hasselt, 1993). All of these factors
are associated with increased risk for substance use.
Summary
Substance use in adolescents is a complex issue. In order to
effectively treat substance use problems, multiple areas need
to be addressed. Improved functioning in areas such as school
performance, peer and family relationships, and psychopathology
serve to decrease risk factors associated with development of
protracted substance use while increasing protective factors that
decrease the likelihood of continued problematic substance use.
Based on the aforementioned research studies an effective substance
abuse treatment program should result in improvements in several
areas of functioning. Improvements in these areas of functioning
will be measured by the effectiveness standards listed below.
C. Effectiveness Standards: Changes in Adolescent
Behavior
1. Reductions in substance use will be assessed by:
2. Reductions in recidivism will be assessed by:
The number of arrests incurred over the follow-up periods will
not be used as a measure of criminal recidivism in evaluation
of the CDDA programs. Arrest data are difficult and costly to
reliably obtain because there is no statewide database for arrests.
Therefore, until there is a statewide database for arrests, arrests
will not be used in determining effectiveness of chemical dependency
treatment programs for CDDA youth.
3. Improvement in others areas of functioning such as:
Rutherford, M ; Banta-Green C. Effectiveness Standards for the
Treatment of Chemical Dependency in Juvenile Offenders: A Review of the
Literature. Seattle: University of Washington. Alcohol and Drug
Abuse Institute, January 1998. (ADAI Technical Report 98-01)
Top
Top
PREVIOUS
NEXT
Title Page |
| Table of Contents |
Acknowledgments |
Executive
Summary | Introduction | Background | Methodological
Issues | I. Treatment Issues | II. Predictors of Alcohol &
Drug
Use | III.
Screening and
Assessment | IV. Evaluation of CDDA Programs | Bibliography
Updated
7/2/99
http://depts.washington.edu/adai/pubs/tr/9801/chap2.htm