Stienstra-R. Jonker-T-A. Bourdrez-P. Kuijpers-J-C. van-
Kleef-J-W. Lundberg-U.
Ropivacaine 0.25% versus bupivacaine 0.25% for
continuous epidural analgesia in labor: a double-blind
comparison.
Anesth-Analg. 1995 Feb. 80(2). P 285-9.
We compared the effects of continuous epidural infusion
of
ropivacaine 0.25% with bupivacaine 0.25% on pain relief
and motor block during labor, and on the neonate. Seventy-six
full-term parturients in active labor requiring epidural
analgesia were randomly allocated to receive either bupivacaine
0.25% or ropivacaine 0.25%. Fifteen minutes after a
loading dose of 10 mL of the study drug, an epidural infusion
with the same drug was started at 6-12 mL/h to maintain an
adequate block. Top-up doses of 6-10 mL were given as required.
At full cervical dilation, the epidural infusion was
discontinued. The onset of pain relief (verbal scale),
contraction pain (visual analog scale), intensity of motor
block (modified Bromage scale), and duration of motor block
were not statistically different between the groups. Apgar
scores at 1 and 5 min after delivery were comparable. There was
a higher proportion of the neonates in the ropivacaine
group (26/31 = 84%) who had a neurologic and adaptive capacity
score (NACS) > or = 35 2 h after delivery than in the
bupivacaine group (18/29 = 62%). We conclude that
ropivacaine 0.25% and bupivacaine 0.25% are equally
effective for epidural pain relief during labor.
Ropivacaine may have an advantage over bupivacaine
regarding neonatal neurobehavioral performance during the first
few hours after delivery, although further studies will be
required to substantiate this.