APEC Emerging Infections Network Logo

ev71

The Impact of Enterovirus 71 Epidemic in Taiwan

What is enterovirus?
Enteroviruses are a group of RNA viruses that includes more the 60 types of viruses, including polio virus (3 types), coxsackievirus A (23 types), coxsackievirus B (6 types), echo virus (30 types), and enterovirus type 68 to 71. Unlike most respiratory viruses that can only infect the respiratory tract, enteroviruses can also infect the gastrointestinal tract. Therefore, they are named as enteroviruses. Herpangina (vesicles and ulcers over the posterior part of the mouth) and hand–foot–and–mouth disease (HFMD; oral ulcers, vesiculopapules of hands, foot, and buttock) are two distinct clinical diseases caused by enteroviruses.

Routs of transmission
Enterovirus can be transmitted by respiratory droplet, by fecal–oral route (virus excreted into the stool and then ingested by someone else), or by person–to–person contact (important for enterovirus 70 and coxsackievirus A24 that may cause acute hemorrhagic conjunctivitis).

Epidemiology
In previous days, epidemics of enterovirus infection occurred almost every year in Taiwan during warmer months. Because there are more than 60 serotypes of enterovirus, a person may get similar diseases repeatedly with different serotypes of the virus. The predominant serotype of enterovirus in each epidemic usually differs from year to year.

Clinical Outcome
The enterovirus usually causes a mild disease that can be recovered completely. For children with oral ulcers, the most frequent complication is dehydration due to a poor oral intake. The infection is occasionally complicated by meningitis, encephalitis, paralytic syndrome, and myocarditis. The mortality rate is very low. In the past, the enterovirus may endanger human life on two occasions: an invasion of the heart causing myocarditis and heart failure, and a disseminated infection in infants less than 3ע months with septic pictures.

Enterovirus 71
Enterovirus 71 (EV71) is one distinct member of the enterovirus family. Several reports on this virus indicated that it is associated with a high rate of neurological complications, including meningoencephalitis and nerve paralysis. In the literatures, there have been three epidemics of EV71 infection with excess mortality. The first epidemic was described in Bulgaria and caused 44 deaths in 1975. A mixed epidemic of EV71 and a tick–borne encephalitis virus occurred in Hungary in 1978 and resulted in 45 deaths. Another epidemic of EV71 took place in Malaysia in 1997 and 29 deaths were reported.

Epidemic of Enterovirus 71 in Taiwan
An epidemic of enterovirus infection occurred in Taiwan in 1998. Beginning in late March, the number of cases of HFMD and herpangina reported by sentinel physicians increased gradually. A total of 98,004 cases were reported between March 29 and July 25, during the first wave of the epidemic. The second wave was largely limited to the southern region, lasted from September 6 to December 12, and included 24,166 cases. It peaked at 3177 cases during the week of October 4. The total number of cases reported during the two waves from March 29 through the end of the year was 129,106, which probably represents less than 10 percent of the estimated total number of cases.(Fig. 1.)
Average number of hand–foot–mouth disease and herpangina cases reported from sentinel sites in Taiwan, by week, May 1998 to Nov. 1999

There were 405 patients with severe disease, most of whom were five years old or younger. (Fig.2)
Number of cases and outcome of severe Hand–Foot–Mouth Disease and Herpangina in Taiwan from the Week of Feb. 15, 1998 through the week of Dec. 20, 1998

Complications included encephalitis, aseptic meningitis, pulmonary edema or hemorrhage, acute flaccid paralysis, and myocarditis. Seventy–eight patients died, 71 of whom (91 percent) were five years of age or younger. Among patients from whom a virus was isolated, EV71 was present in 48.7 percent of outpatients with uncomplicated HFMD or herpangina, 75 percent of hospitalized patients who survived, and 92 percent of patients who died.

Among fatal and near fatal cases of enterovirus infection, almost all isolates were EV71. Investigations on severe cases had identified only a few significant risk factors, including a young age (89% of fatal cases were less than 3 years of age), male sex (male: female = 6:4), location of residence (severe cases clustered in Tao–Yuan, Tai–Chung and Chan–Hua area), and a history of allergic disease.

The cause of excess mortality in the epidemic EV71 is a unique enterovirus in that its infection is associated with a higher rate of neurological complications than other types of enterovirus. This is true for all parts of the world, including U.S.A., Australia, France, Japan, Sweden and so on. However, an excess mortality of EV71 epidemic has been observed in only a few countries, including Bulgaria (1975, 44 deaths), Hungary (1978, 45 deaths), and Malaysia (1997, 31 deaths). The cause of different mortality rates in different areas remains obscure. It is speculated that the neurovirulent potential of EV71 strains among these epidemics may be different. Analysis of fatal cases in Taiwan indicated that EV71 can invade the brain stem and cause neurogenic pulmonary edema that may lead to death within hours to days. Some authors suggested that a viral sepsis syndrome may also contribute to the death.

Panic in the EV71 epidemic
The epidemic of EV71 infection resulted in a panic in Taiwan. The news media reported new occurrences of severe cases almost every day. Some parents took their children to other countries because of an intense fear. Following the panic, there comes a chaos. The government was blamed for the inability to control the epidemic. Physicians were blamed for the inability to treat the disease. Some herbal drugs and various measures were claimed to be effective for prevention or for treatment. Many people believed that EV71 is a mutant of other pathogens, including avian influenza in Hong Kong and foot–and–mouth disease in pigs. Patients were viewed as very dangerous and no one would like to go near them. Some children did not go to school. Some children were not vaccinated on schedule because their parents thought the clinic was dangerous. The government closed swimming pools and other activities for children, which action resulted in some economic loss.

Reasons of the panic
Several factors made EV71 epidemic hard to be controlled and resulted in a panic:

  1. A rapidly fatal disease in previously healthy children: Most of the fatal cases were below 3ס years of age and they were healthy in the past. Some types of enterovirus infection may also be fatal in infants below 3ע months. However, most fatal cases of EV71 were between 6 months and 3 years. Among fatal cases, the duration between the onset of symptom and the admission to a hospital ranged between 1.5 to 7 days (median 3 days), and 79% of fatal cases expired within 24 hours after reaching a hospital. At the onset of infection, there was not a clinical parameter that may predict a grave outcome. Such a fulminant course of infection in a previously healthy child was alarming and created an intense anxiety in the population.
  2. No effective treatment: There is no effective therapy against EV71 at present. Although an experimental antiviral agent, Pleconaril, can suppress the growth of some enteroviruses, it has no effect on EV71 by in vitro test. Intravenous immunoglobulin was given to some severe cases in the epidemic with an aim to neutralize the disseminated virus in the body. However, there was no apparent therapeutic effect. Many children still expired with such a treatment.
  3. No effective means of prevention: Enterovirus infection is difficult to prevent. Hand–washing and other means may lower the disease incidence but not to the level of zero. Closing schools during an epidemic may also be effective, but is not practical. Enterovirus may persist in respiratory secretions of patients for up to 3נ weeks, and in stool of patients for up to 6פ weeks. Closing schools means stopping the education of all students for several months. The government could only recommend that infected children should not attend a school for one week, in which period the transmission potential is the greatest. A vaccine may provide an effective way of prevention. However, the development of a vaccine needs several months and this strategy is not practical for a sudden outbreak of EV71.

Lessons from the epidemic
According to some seroepidemiological studies, about 50% of school–aged children had been infected by EV71 during the epidemic. Seropositive rate for EV71 ranged between 10% and 40% in younger children. Similar epidemic is not likely to occur in Taiwan in the next few years. However, similar epidemic is likely to occur in other places and in Taiwan in the future. The EV71 epidemic is a unique experience in medicine, not only for Taiwan but also for the whole world. Our experiences suggest that a conjoined effort of different countries is needed to combat EV71 infections. Surveillance of EV71 in Southeast Asia may provide an early alarm system to monitor the occurrence the epidemic. Conjoined efforts to study the virus in detail will clarify the virulence potential of EV71, and the way to deal with the infection. Development of a vaccine is also needed for us to be well prepared before another epidemic occurs in the future.

Author: Ping–Ing Lee, MD, PhD
Department of Pediatrics
National Taiwan University Hospital

Contact: Data Center of Enterovirus Epidemic
Center for Disease Control in Taiwan
http://www.cdc.gov.tw
clark@cdc.gov.tw


This project is a joint effort involving resources of the University of Washington School of Public Health and Community Medicine and the United States Centers for Disease Control. It is an approved APEC project.

Revised:
May 2000

Contact us at apecein@u.washington.edu