This page uses Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) to present the content in the best possible manner. If you can see this message, then CSS (or JavaScript) is not enabled in your browser or your browser is out-of-date and does not support CSS, and the page will not appear as the designer intended. Please update your browser and/or enable CSS (and Javascript).

Home
Getting Started
Common Teaching Situations
Presenting Information
Leading Discussions
Conducting Labs
Office Hours
Teaching Foreign Languages
Leading Quiz Sections
Tutoring
Critiquing Student Projects
Teaching Problem Solving
Student Writing
Evaluating Student Learning
Assessing and Improving Your Teaching
Essential Links
Important Policies and Procedures


COMMON TEACHING SITUATIONS:

Critiquing Student Projects

Working with student projects in a studio, going over the planning stages of a research project, or working with students putting together a business presentation are all examples of situations in which you may need to critique student projects. Critiquing provides an opportunity to share with students what you know, to enable them to see various options, or to identify flaws in their reasoning or design.

Be sure students understand the requirements of the project.

As students start a project, you must be sure they understand the goals, requirements and criteria for the project. Confirm that they understand by initiating discussion, asking questions, or brainstorming. Encourage students to express their understanding with statements such as: "Explain your understanding of the purpose of this assignment" or "Review with me the important criteria that you feel your project has to fulfill to be successful."

After projects are underway, having students work in pairs or small groups to provide feedback to each other helps keep students on track. However, it's also important that you provide feedback at key stages in the project as well.

Break the problem into manageable parts.

As students begin to think about their projects, focusing on all parts of a project simultaneously can be overwhelming. For example, in Landscape Architecture there may be as many as 25 variables (everything from soil quality to desired aesthetic effect) to consider in a project. Therefore, it can be useful, to walk students through a project slowly, encouraging them to consider distinct aspects of the project before deciding on a final approach.

As students work through projects in manageable parts, you can ask questions to see if they have familiarized themselves with the information relevant to the parts (e.g. colors and tones, soil types; discipline-specific conventions of the journal articles they are synthesizing; ways to construct a balance sheet).

Help the students move toward conceptualization.

Once students feel comfortable with the requirements of the project and with specific parts of it, they are ready to conceptualize an overall design. As they begin to combine elements for their overall conceptualization:

Help students move from conceptualization to design.

It is not uncommon for students to resist the move from conceptualizing to designing, from modeling to actual data gathering, or from brainstorming their approach to working out its sequence and emphases. Therefore, it is useful to:

Help students move from design to production.

Since some students may spend too much time perfecting their approach and leave too little time for realizing the project, you may have to push students towards completion once the other major steps have been completed. One TA tells her students that neither the design nor the product will be evaluated as a lasting entity, so they should not place undue emphasis on perfection.

As you help student move through major stages of project development, the following additional ideas for constructive feedback may be useful.

UW Home | The Graduate School | CIDR Home
TA Handbook | Office of Educational Assessment
Center for Teaching Learning and Technology

http://depts.washington.edu/cidrweb/TAHandbook/
©2003 The Graduate School and
Center for Instructional Development and Research
University of Washington