Practices related to Grading - both as an assessment of student performance and as a mechanism through which students receive feedback on their work - vary widely across disciplines, course levels, departments, institutions, and instructors. However, there are several strategies that most instructors agree contribute to successful grading: creating clear grading criteria, communicating these criteria to students, giving constructive feedback, and employing time management strategies when grading large amounts of student work.
CIDR Resources
|
Consult with CIDR CIDR consultants are available to meet with you as you consider your approaches to grading student work and giving students constructive feedback. See our Consulting pages on exploring teaching issues, designing courses and assignments, and collecting student feedback for more information. To schedule a consultation, call 206-543-6588, or contact us by email to arrange an appointment. |
UW Resources
|
Faculty resource on grading (FROG) University of Washington Grading system Office of Educational Assessment - Grades (pdf) |
Additional Resources
|
Brookhart, S. M. (1999). The art and science of classroom assessment: the missing part of pedagogy. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports, 27(1). Davis, B. G. (1993). Grading Practices. In Tools for Teaching (chap. 32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Speck, B. W. (2000). Grading students' classroom writing: issues and strategies. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports, 27(3). Ohio State University, Office of Faculty and TA Development. (2001). Testing and Grading: Assessing Student Performance (pdf). In Teaching at the Ohio State University: A Handbook (pp. 75-99). Maznevski, M. L. (1996, Spring). Grading Class Participation. Teaching concerns: A newsletter for faculty and teaching assistants (University of Virginia, Teaching Resource Center). Stanford University, Center for Teaching and Learning. (1992). The Agony and the equity: Testing and grading (pdf). Speaking of Teaching (Stanford University Newsletter on Teaching), 4(2). University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Center for Teaching and Learning. (2001, January). Evaluation Issues. Teaching at Carolina. University of North Texas, Technology Applications Center for Educator Development. (2001). Rubrics. University of Oregon, Teaching Effectiveness Program. (2005, November). Effective Assessment. |
Available in the CIDR Reading Room
|
Davis, B. G. (1993). Tools for teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. McKeachie, W. J., & Svinicki, M. (2006). The ABC's of assigning grades. In W. J. McKeachie & M. Svinicki (Eds.), McKeachie's teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers (12th ed., pp. 123-138). Boston: Houghton Mifflin. |







