|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case Studies |
|
Olympia
Washington: Office Parking Lot (www.ecy.wa.gov.programs/wq/stormwater/index.html)
Study conducted by Center for Urban Water Resources Management, University
of Washington.
Adjacent parking stalls were constructed using four different approaches
to permeable paving. These systems consisted of a combination of grass
and gravel.
|
|
The different
approaches included:
1. Network of plastic cells filled with grass
2. Network of plastic cells filled with gravel
3. System of impervious blocks separated by
grass area (60% impervious)
4. System of impervious blocks separated by
gravel area (90% impervious)
|
|
An adjacent stall constructed
out of traditional asphalt was used as a control medium |
|
|
|
|
|
Permeable Paving Approaches in Olympia Parking
Lot
|
|
Results of the study show the following
relationships (Taken from: EPA-841-B-00-005B):
- The use of permeable pavement systems dramatically
reduced surface runoff volume and attenuated
the peak discharge.
- Although there were significant structural
differences between the systems, the hydrologic benefits
were consistent.
- Storm characteristics and weather conditions
influenced the hydrologic responses of the systems.
-- Permeable pavement system types vary widely
in cost and are more expensive than typical asphalt
pavements. Cost comparisons between permeable pavement installations
and conventional ponds or underground vaults
are limited. However, the elimination of conventional systems
and reduced life cycle and maintenance costs can result in significant
cost savings over the long term.
- A significant contribution of permeable
pavements is the ability to reduce effective impervious area,
which has a direct connection with downstream drainage systems. This
strategy of hydrologic and hydraulic disconnectivity
can be used to control runoff timing, reduce runoff volume,
and provide water quality benefits.
|
|
|
|