Riparian Restoration
Chambers and
Miller, Ch. 9
Restoration
success depends on understanding:
1) the processes that structure the ecosystem
2) the appropriate temporal and spatial scales
3) the effects of historical and ongoing land use.
Livestock
grazing is implicated in most disturbances
Livestock
influence riparian ecosystems by:
1) removing
herbage (allowing soil temp to rise and evaporation to increase)
2) damaging
plants by grazing, trampling
3) altering
nutrient cycling by depositing N and removing foliage
4) compacting
soil, which increases runoff and decreases water availability to plants.
Other
disturbances: roads, recreation
There
have also been long-term climate effects (drier, warmer).
Combined
climatic and anthropogenic effects:
1) many
streams have become isolated from their floodplains
2) surface
water/ground water interactions have been altered
3) declines
in water tables have resulted in changes in plant species composition
Spatial
Scales
Watersheds:
drainage basins.
Riparian
Corridors: integrated networks of stream channels and adjacent floodplains and
terraces.
Valley
Segments: have semi-uniform slopes, widths and geological materials.
Stream
Reaches: have relatively uniform channel
morphology, bed materials, bank conditions and woody debris.
Successful
strategies for restoration are at watershed/riparian corridor scale.
Projects
are at the valley segment/stream reach scale.
The
most sensitive basins have the quickest and most negative response to
disturbance and high-volume runoff.
Basin
types:
Flood
dominated high sensitivity
Deeply
incised low to moderate
sensitivity
Fan
dominated low to moderate
sensitivity
Pseudo-stable moderate to high sensitivity
Briggs, Riparian
Ecosystem Recovery, 1996
Impacts:
livestock
recreation
invasives
wildlife
Livestock
Grazing
may be less the problem than overgrazing.
One
heavy grazing on sensitive land can be bad
steep slopes
shallow soils
low
vegetation cover
Effects:
alters plant
competition
decreases
soil infiltration
increases
soil erosion
stream
characteristics modified:
loss
of bank undercuts
increased
turbidity
Livestock
Management to decrease riparian impacts
decrease
grazing intensity
rest/rotation
fencing
develop
upland water sources
Re-vegetating
livestock-damaged areas
You must first analyze: 1) channel stability
2)
water availability
Understand the potential for autogenic
re-vegetation
Livestock and re-vegetation are not
compatible
Plants palatable to livestock
must be protected for the first two growing seasons.
Non-palatable species should
be protected from trampling.
Recreation
Hiking,
camping, off-road vehicles
Changes:
compaction
loss of
vegetation
lowered
organic matter
increased
erosion
loss of
macroporosity
ORV’s cause the same changes, only quicker.
Managing
recreation
adjust use
levels
keep trails
and campsites away from sensitive areas (easily disturbed sites, new
restorations)
confine
camping to a few sites
install
interpretive signage
Do not
install a restoration project without controlling use
live stakes
may be used as firewood
seedlings may
be run over by vehicles
irrigation
systems may be torn up.
Invasives
Southwestern
invasives include salt cedar (Tamarix),
Russian olive (Eleagnus) and Bermuda
grass (Cynodon).
Usually
they come to dominate after hydrology has been modified (salt cedar does well
in artificial flow regimes).
Invasives
negatively impact restoration efforts.
Salt
cedar control
bulldozer
(where there are no natives)
herbicides
Typical
control regime
Cut trees down in fall (cut 5 cm above
ground)
Paint cut cambium with Garlon or
Tordon within minutes of cutting
Re-cut and herbicide sprouts within a
year.
Wildlife
Some
wildlife impact restorations
Some eat vegetation:
elk
white-tailed
deer
beaver
Some will gnaw irrigation lines:
rice rats
wood rats
pocket
gophers
Protecting
restoration from wildife:
Provide beaver with alternate food
sources
Build beaver cages out of chicken wire
or hardware cloth
Water Availability
Revegetating riparian sites
characterized by groundwater decline
Low
water availability occurs where groundwater levels are 3m or more below the
surface.
Planting riparian plants there is
difficult.
Survival rates are low.
Sources
of decline:
ground water
pumping
impoundment
agricultural
irrigation
non-native
phreatophytes
Plant
material must be matched to site
Planting riparian species may no
longer be practical
Flood plain spp. may be more
appropriate:
mesquite,
palo verde, hackberry
Riparian spp. may not have enough
water:
willows,
poplars, walnut, ash
Planting Techniques
Seedlings
may be especially vulnerable to low water availability.
Available
moisture from spring flooding dries up quickly with onset of summer.
Roots of seedlings must keep up with
the retreating zone of soil saturation.
Timing of planting is critical.
Some
techniques that work:
1)
Large poles (poplar trees)
P.
fremontii in this case.
Use where groundwater is more
than 3m deep
Holes must be dug or
“stinger” used.
Ground must support
equipment.
Drill must go through cobble
(not easy).
2) Drilling to groundwater
Drill 18 cm diameter hole.
Fill with alluvium.
Plant tree
in hole.
Irrigate from top.
3)
Irrigating
Expensive
Often will not wet soil
deeply enough to induce roots to grow to groundwater.
Must carry
on for one or two seasons.
Plant
more individuals in places likely to have extra available moisture:
secondary
channels
depressions
lower-elevation
sites
Problem:
trees planted in wetter sites may also be more flood-prone
Flood energy may disturb vegetation.
Prolonged inundation may kill trees
Even phreatophytes can be damaged
under prolonged flooding.
Fine-grained soils
more prone to anaerobiosis.
Channels
Channel
instability can degrade associated riparian ecosystems two ways.
1)
Destruction of vegetation through bank erosion.
2)
Dewatering of riparian zone.
Developing
restoration projects along unstable alluvial stream channels.
Time to implement recovery plans is
either 1) before obvious downcutting and erosion have occurred, or 2) after the site has undergone a major
erosional event and has begun to stabilize.
General
categories of strategies:
1) revegetation
2) installation
of streambank stabilizing structures.
Planting
Locations
Planting closest to
stream results in the greatest chance of loss due to flood disturbance.
Planting far away
from stream results in the greatest chance of vegetation failure due to lack of
soil water.
Best sites include:
1) just
downstream of concave stream reaches (accreting areas)
2) downstream
of large boulders or other obstructions (like logs).
Plant along an
elevational gradient so that there is an optimum elevation range along the planting
line.
Plant vegetation in the geomorphic
position it does best in.
Willows go in dynamic
landscapes near river channels.
Catclaw (Acacia gregii) is
drought-tolerant and does well on old stream terraces.
Revegetation
offers several advantages over instream structures.
It is self-maintaining.
Plants may resist a variety of
environmental conditions and flood forces.
Plants are cheaper.