
SCHOOL OF
PUBLIC HEALTH AND COMMUNITY MEDICINE - UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON AUTUMN,
2001
| Science
& Public Policy |
|
Shedding their lab coats or hard hats, researchers at the Department
of Environmental Health have been bringing their scientific knowledge
to the policy table, assisting in the development of informed environmental
and occupational health policy decisions.
In
this issue you will read how our Department was involved in conducting
and reviewing the science behind the proposed standard for arsenic
in drinking water as part of a National Academy of Sciences committee.
Many other faculty members participate on national and international
committees, covering topics that range from methylmercury to preparing
for public health emergencies.
The
Department has also developed courses with a policy focus, including
a new joint master's degree program to train scientists in public
policy and public affairs students in environmental health. By participating
in such efforts, faculty help assure that science plays a role in
shaping public policy and that their research is relevant to the
needs of policy makers.
|
|
|
| Arsenic
in Drinking Water |
|
 |
| A
new standard will lower the amount of arsenic allowed in drinking
water |
Scientists,
policy makers, and lay people all might agree that the public should
be protected from arsenic and other toxicants in drinking water. However,
moving beyond common sense to an enforceable, protective standard
involves a complex interplay of science, politics, and cost-benefit
analysis.
Professor
Dave
Eaton and Toxicology program alumna Michelle Catlin were involved
this past year in reviewing the science behind the recommended arsenic
standard, and communicating the risks in briefings before the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), the White House and Congress. Eaton is
a member of the National Academy of Sciences' committee that wrote
the Arsenic in Drinking Water report published recently by the National
Research Council. Catlin, a 1999 graduate of the Toxicology PhD
program who works at The National Academies, is the study director
for the report.
Some
of the scientific evidence for arsenic risks came from Department
Chair Dave Kalman's research collaborators, particularly in looking
at markers of effect, dose-response issues, susceptibility factors,
and other aspects of arsenic health effect. Kalman was a peer reviewer
on a National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council report.
The
arsenic standard is an example of the interaction of science and
public policy. After years of scientific review, the Clinton administration
decided to phase in an arsenic standard of 10 parts per billion
(ppb), to be lowered from 50, which has been the standard since
World War II. When the Bush administration took office, it suspended
the Clinton standard and requested the National Academies' report,
asking for further evaluation of recent scientific evidence. The
new report was intended as an update to an initial National Research
Council (NRC) report on Arsenic in Drinking Water, issued in 1999,
that served as the basis for the Clinton Administration's proposed
lowering of the standard. Although the update looked only at new
data published since the 1999 report, nearly 1,000 new scientific
papers on the toxicology and epidemiology of arsenic were included
in the review. The update, issued in September, reinforced the conclusions
of the original report that cancer risks exceed generally acceptable
levels of risk at the current standard of 50 ppb arsenic in tap
water.
The
administration could have set the standard anywhere between 3 and
20 ppb. In setting the 10 ppb standard in October, the EPA balanced
toxicology, risk assessment, and public health against the cost
to rural water systems that will need to install expensive filtration
equipment.
Eaton
stated that "it is important for the public to understand that the
NRC report evaluated only the scientific information relating to
potential risks of arsenic in drinking water at 3, 5, 10 and 20
ppb. The NRC report focused only on the "risk" side of the "risk-benefit"
equation-it is imperative that the EPA thoroughly consider actual
exposures in the US, as well as the economic costs to communities,
in making regulatory decisions that are in the best interests of
society."
|
|
|
| Graduate
Training |
Risk analysis
is an academic emphasis in the Department of Environmental Health.
Graduate students can earn a Risk Emphasis in conjunction with an
MS or PhD in Toxicology, Industrial Hygiene, or Environmental Health
Technology.
Setting
effective public policy requires cross-disciplinary training and
understanding beyond "exact sciences," said Professor Elaine Faustman,
who directs the Institute for Risk Analysis and Risk Communication
(IRARC). One of IRARC's research programs is the Center for the
Study and Improvement of Regulation, funded by Carnegie Mellon University.
"Historically,
scientists have not been very good at knowing what policy makers
need, and have not provided it in a form that is useful to inform
policy," Faustman said.
Toxicological
risks may be particularly hard to communicate, she said, because
harm may be long-term, such as cancers related to arsenic in drinking
water. "Delayed risks are harder to monitor - our metrics monitor
health impacts that are 20 to 30 years after initial exposure,"
Faustman said. "It's not like falling off a ladder, where the risk
is immediate." A broad public health approach would look at overall
vulnerabilities in the population, with a goal of preventing adverse
effects.
In
science, pure and esoteric research is sometimes valued over the
applied or practical. Scientists are accustomed to publishing for
their peers, Faustman said, but they may not have a "translational
approach" that allows them to answer policy makers' questions. "We
need people trained to go across that divide."
"Universities
play a unique role," Faustman said. In addition to teaching Risk
Analysis and directing IRARC, Faustman has been instrumental in
establishing a joint master's degree program with the Evans School
of Public Affairs (see story below).
In
addition to the Risk Analysis courses that Professor Faustman teaches,
several other graduate courses cover policy issues. These include
a course on Pesticides and Public Health, taught every other year
by Professors Rich Fenske and Matt Keifer, which examines health
risks and benefits associated with pesticide use in the United States
and internationally.
Professor
Fenske also teaches a course on Environmental Risk and Society that
examines scientific determinations of environmental risks and explores
how affected communities and society evaluate such determinations.
In
a course entitled Occupational Health and Safety: Policy and Politics,
Senior Lecturers Janice Camp and Sharon Morris provide students
with a better understanding of the historical, political, and policy
issues in occupational health and safety.
|
|
|
| Training
Scientists in Policy ... and Vice Versa |
|
The Department of Environmental Health and the Daniel J. Evans School
of Public Affairs have announced a concurrent master's degree program
that will train scientists in public policy and policy professionals
in environmental health. The first class will be accepted for autumn
2002.
The
concurrent degrees will allow students to expand their knowledge
in each of the areas of study while they develop a specialty. Students
will be able to complete a Master of Public Affairs (MPA) and a
Master of Science (MS) or Master of Public Health (MPH) in three
years, rather than the four that would be necessary if the degrees
were earned separately.
The
program is designed to train professionals who can understand both
the science and policy sides of debate, said Professor Elaine Faustman.
It is designed to appeal to staff in regulatory agencies, along
with Environmental Health majors who will be entering the regulatory
arena. Graduates will be able to synthesize the complexities of
the worlds of science, management, and policy.
The
Environmental Health concurrent degrees (MS or MPH) are structured
for students who are interested in environmental health and its
use in public health policy and management. Students will be exposed
to economic theory, health services, behavioral sciences, and statistical
methods. Faculty will be actively involved in curriculum decisions,
student advising, and directing research projects.
MS
students will be able to choose from three areas of concentration:
technology, toxicology, and industrial hygiene. The MPH is a Department-wide
degree in general environmental health.
Students
interested in pursuing a concurrent degree must apply to the Evans
School and Department of Environmental Health separately.
|
|
For
Further reading
Admission
procedures for the Evans School MPA program can be found at
http://www.gspa.
washington.edu/mpa/
and for the Department of Environmental Health at
http://depts.washington.edu/
envhlth/acad_programs/acad_programs.html
|
|
|
| Emergency
Preparedness |
|
On the morning of September 11, Senior Lecturer Chuck Treser was
in Georgia, beginning what he thought would be a three-day public
health preparedness workshop. The meeting adjourned immediately
after it started, when jets slammed into the World Trade Center
and Pentagon, and public health professionals from around the country
scrambled to meet the new challenges of terrorism.
Treser
is one of several School of Public Health and Community Medicine
faculty working with the Public Health Practice Program Office of
the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention through the Northwest
Center for Public Health Preparedness. The preparedness center is
part of the School's Northwest Center for Public Health Practice.
Treser
and his colleagues have been working with public health practitioners
and academics in a six-state region to increase the capacity of
local and state public health professionals to respond to a variety
of public health problems, including bioterrorism. The region includes
Alaska, Idaho, Montana, Oregon, Washington, and Wyoming. The team
includes Dr. Mark Oberle, Associate Dean for Public Health Practice;
Jack Thompson, director of the School's Northwest Center for Public
Health Practice; and Epidemiology Professor James Gale, principal
investigator on the Preparedness Center grant.
The
Centers for Public Health Preparedness are designed to mobilize
the national public health workforce-an estimated 500,000 physicians,
nurses, environmental health scientists, health educators, laboratory
staff, managers and others practicing on the front lines of public
health. The system was put in place in response to a 1997 report,
Public Health Workforce: An Agenda for the 21st Century. The goal
is to ensure front-line public health workers have the skills and
competencies required to effectively respond to current and emerging
health threats.
The
network has three tiers: academic centers in schools of public health;
specialty centers, generally university based, with specific expertise;
and local exemplar centers that develop advanced applications at
the community level. The focus is on three key areas of preparedness
for bioterrorism and other urgent health threats:
The
network has three tiers: academic centers in schools of public health;
specialty centers, generally university based, with specific expertise;
and local exemplar centers that develop advanced applications at
the community level. The focus is on three key areas of preparedness
for bioterrorism and other urgent health threats:
integrated communications and information systems across
multiple sectors
advanced operational readiness assessment
comprehensive training and evaluation.
In
addition to UW, the academic centers are at the University of Illinois
at Chicago, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Columbia
University, University of Iowa, University of South Florida, and
Saint Louis University.
|
|
For
more information
CDC
bioterrorism site,
http://www.bt.cdc.gov/
(English and Spanish)
Northwest Center for Public Health Practice,
http://healthlinks.washington.edu/nwcphp/
Public Health-Seattle & King County Web site on bioterrorism,
http://www.metrokc.gov/health/bioterrorism/
Public Health Workforce: An Agenda for the 21st Century (a 69-page
pdf file),
http://www.health.gov/phfunctions/pubhlth.pdf
University of Washington School of Public Health and Community Medicine
Bioterrorism Concerns FAQ,
http://sphcm.washington.edu/news/bioterrorism.html
|
|
|
| Helping
Make Public Policy |
|
Departmental
faculty members have served as members of federal panels and as
expert advisors to state, federal, and international agencies that
set policy for environmental and occupational exposures.
Thomas
Burbacher: National Academy of Sciences committee that last
year reaffirmed the Environmental Protection Agency's standards
for methylmercury exposure
Harvey
Checkoway: working group of the International Agency for Research
on Cancer (IARC), which concluded that crystalline silica from occupational
exposures is carcinogenic to humans
Lucio
Costa: Institute of Medicine/ National Academy of Sciences Committee
on Gulf War Syndrome
Bill
Daniell: Ergonomics Rulemaking Advisory Committee, Washington
state Department of Labor & Industries; Institute of Medicine committee
and expert panel on Gulf War and Health: Review of the Literature
on Pesticides and Solvents
Dave
Eaton: National Research Council panel that reviewed the scientific
basis for EPA's proposal to lower the drinking water standard for
arsenic
Elaine
Faustman: chair, National Academy of Sciences Developmental
Toxicology Committee; phthalates expert panel, National Toxicology
Program's Center for the Evaluation of Risks to Human Reproduction;
National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council subcommittee
on spacecraft water exposure guidelines; National Academy of Sciences/Institute
of Medicine subcommittee on upper reference levels of nutrients;
External Advisory Committee, Model Toxics Control Act, Washington
state Department of Ecology; birth defects advisory committee, Washington
state Department of Health; Washington state Right to Know Advisory
Council, governor's appointee representing academic and research
communities
Richard
Fenske: pesticides and children's health, Washington state Governor's
Pesticide Advisory Board; advisory committee of the Agricultural
Health Study, National Cancer Institute
Dave
Kalman: peer reviewer, National Academy of Sciences Committee
on Arsenic in Drinking Water Report, National Research Council
Matthew
Keifer: National Academy of Sciences/National Research Committee,
subcommittee on methyl bromide; National Panel on Pesticides and
National Strategies for Health Care Providers
Jane
Koenig: consultant to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Clean Air Science Advisory Committee, Air Quality Criteria for Particulate
Matter
Sally
Liu: studying the susceptibility of sensitive populations to
fine parti-culates in air pollution as part of the EPA's review
of its standards for fine particulate matter (PM2.5); public health
representative, Agriculture Burning Task Force, Washington state
Department of Ecology
Michael
Morgan: National Research Council committee on air quality in
passenger cabins of commercial aircraft
Sharon
Morris: Innovations Task Force, state Department of Labor &
Industries; NIOSH Board of Scientific Counselors that provides guidance
on the Institute's research programs; Washington Governor's Industrial
Safety and Health Advisory Committee
Tim
Takaro: president's advisory board on radiation and workers'
health; Department of Energy/Department of Labor's physicians' panel
for reviewing workers compensation
Chuck
Treser: ad hoc committee developing Washington state response
plan for viruses transmitted by mosquitoes and ticks
Gerald
van Belle: Peripheral and Central Nervous System Drugs Advisory
Committee of the US Food and Drug Administration.
|
|
|
| Alice
Hamilton: A Policy Pioneer |
|
When
Alice Hamilton graduated from medical school in 1893, there was
no specialty of occupational medicine. There were no standards for
safety at work, and employers routinely fired sick workers and replaced
them with new ones looking for jobs.
In
a career that spanned 50 years, Hamilton pioneered occupational
epidemiology and industrial hygiene. Her findings led to sweeping
reforms, both voluntary and regulatory.
She
began her academic career in 1893 at the Women's Medical College
of Northwestern University in Chicago, and also moved into Jane
Addams' Hull House, center of the social reform movement in the
US. Through Hull House's well-baby clinic she became acquainted
with immigrant families, and learned about parents' unsafe working
conditions.
Her
first public policy role came during the typhoid fever epidemic
in Chicago in 1902. She made a connection between improper sewage
disposal and the role of flies in transmitting the disease. Her
findings led to reorganization of the Chicago Health Department.
She
was asked to direct the governor of Illinois' Occupational Disease
Commission in 1910, the first such commission in the world. As a
result of its findings, several workers' compensation laws were
passed in Illinois. She was asked by the US commissioner of labor
to replicate her research on a national level, where she looked
at the hazards posed by exposure to lead, arsenic, mercury, organic
solvents, and radium, which was used in manufacture of watch dials.
In
1919, Hamilton was appointed assistant professor in a new industrial
hygiene program at Harvard, the first woman on Harvard's faculty.
She
served on the League of Nations Health Committee in the 1920s, investigating
industrial health conditions worldwide, and published the first
American textbook on industrial toxins, Industrial Poisons in the
United States.
After
retiring from Harvard in 1935, she became a consultant for the Division
of Labor Standards of the US Labor Department. Her survey of the
rayon industry led to passage of Pennsylvania's first workers' compensation
law. While serving as president of the National Consumers League,
she published her autobiography, Exploring the Dangerous Trades.
In
1995, when a postage stamp was unveiled in her honor, Harvard Dean
of Public Health Harvey Fineberg said Hamilton "was the first physician
to use the scientific approach to study threats to health in the
workplace."
|
|
|
| Toxicogenomics
Consortium: New tools to solve genetic puzzles |
|
|
|
Dave
Eaton Professor & Director, Center for Ecogenetics and Enviornmental
Health |
The University
of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center are part
of a new, federally funded, $37 million research consortium to study
how genetic makeup affects an individual's response to various environmental
agents. Such research will help answer puzzling questions such as
why some people who have never smoked a cigarette develop lung cancer,
while others who have smoked heavily for years never show signs of
the disease.
The
Hutchinson Center/UW Toxicogenomics Consortium, part of a research
collective involving academic institutions nationwide, will receive
more than $7 million in funding over five years from the National
Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS).
Researchers
will use the tools of genomics to obtain a fundamental understanding
of the mechanisms of environmentally induced disease processes.
The genome is broadly defined as all of an organism's genetic material.
The
long-range goal of the Hutchinson Center/UW partnership is to shed
light on genetic differences that make some people more sensitive
to various environmental exposures. The consortium's four laboratory-based
projects will focus on the effects of various toxic substances on
breast-cancer, how exposures to certain pesticides may affect behavior
in children, environmental factors that may harm the developing
nervous system, and development of laboratory tests that can replace
animal testing.
MICROARRAYS
The Seattle-based consortium will rely on the combined strengths
of the Hutchinson Center and UW in DNA microarray technology-the
use of so called "gene chips" to monitor the expression of thousands
of genes at once-and the UW's long-standing expertise in toxicology
and environmental health sciences.
The
principal investigator of the Seattle consortium, an expert in both
environmental sciences and DNA-array technology, is Dr. Helmut Zarbl
of the Hutchinson Center's Human Biology and Public Health Sciences
divisions. "The ultimate goal is to predict an individual's risk
of cancer based on their genetic profile and environmental exposures,"
said Zarbl, also an associate professor of pathology and an affiliate
associate professor in toxicology.
Co-principal
investigator of the consortium is Dr. David Eaton, professor in
the Department of Environmental Health and director of its NIEHS-funded
Center for Ecogenetics and Environmental Health.
"Many
chronic diseases-such as most cancers, Parkinson's disease and Alzheimer's
disease-are caused by complex interactions between genetics and
the exposures to factors in our environment," said Eaton, who is
also Associate Dean for Research in the UW School of Public Health
and Community Medicine.
Other
departmental researchers involved in the consortium are Terry Kavanagh,
principal investigator of the Toxicology Core, and Curt Omiecinski,
Elaine Faustman, and Lucio Costa, who have research projects funded
under the Center. Chris Hassett and Theo Bammler also play important
roles in this new Center.
Other
academic institutions participating in the consortium are the University
of North Carolina, Oregon Health and Science University, Duke University,
and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
"We
know we can stretch the research dollar by having scientists at
NIEHS and grantees at universities work in concert," said NIEHS
Director Kenneth Olden, "but perhaps more important, we know that
bringing ideas together in science increases the advances we achieve."
|
|
Back
to Top
|
| Research
and its Application to Ergonomics |
|
Assistant
Professor Peter Johnson recently demonstrated how he and Chris Jensen,
a senior researcher from Denmark's National Institute of Occupational
Health, measure muscle fatigue in the forearm resulting from low-force
work. With electrodes attached on Johnson's lower arm, they quantified
muscle activity and fatigue.
"In
this laboratory work, we are taking a snapshot of a work day and
looking at the resultant muscle fatigue and recovery," Johnson said.
"A muscle can do the same average amount of work in different ways,
and depending on how the work is structured, we believe it will
affect how much the muscle fatigues."
Together,
he and Jensen intend to use the data to identify how various work
patterns influence fatigue and recovery. These patterns are similar
to those found during actual work. Ultimately, their findings may
be useful in making workplace modifications.
The
two international collaborators specialize in measuring physiological
outcomes associated with low-force, but highly repetitive tasks,
such as using a computer mouse. Jensen's measurements of muscle
activity in the forearms have shown that people are typically working
their muscles at less than 10% of their maximal capacity during
computer mouse use. Johnson, with his force-sensing computer mouse,
has demonstrated that people squeeze the sides of the computer mouse
with very low forces, typically just about 0.4 Newtons (roughly
2 ounces of force). Despite these low forces, people are developing
problems. The patterns of the forces, the fact that they are often
relatively constant and continuous, may be part of the problem.
Policy implications
The
US Bureau of Labor Statistics has found that office work causes
more days of sick leave than manufacturing. Arm and neck ailments
are among the slowest to heal, resulting in an average of three
weeks sick time.
Low
arm and neck problems are common in computer work. People usually
don't go to the doctor with this type of complaint, Jensen said,
but "continue working the way they always did, and some of them
may get into some really serious trouble." In Denmark, educational
campaigns in the workplace, news media, and union publications have
created a high level of awareness of computer-related disorders,
Jensen said. Employers bring physical therapists and other consultants
into the workplace to help fit the work to the workers (fitting
the work to the workers is the essence of ergonomics). Adjustable
desks and chairs are required at workstations there.
Such
awareness is growing in Washington, where a state ergonomics rule
was enacted in May 2000. The state Department of Labor and Industries
calculated that musculoskeletal injuries cost more than $411 million
a year in medical treatment and lost wages, and represent a high
toll of pain, suffering, and lost productivity for both employers
and workers.
The
Washington state rule applies to workers who perform intensive keying
more than four hours per day. Mouse use is not covered yet, Johnson
said, but the scientific body of evidence is developing about the
cumulative effects of the small motions that control mouse work.
Jensen
has returned to Denmark, where he continues his research into diseases
associated with visual display unit work. He is conducting an epidemiological
study among employees at technology companies and evaluating the
effect of interventions. Another project looks at variables such
as time spent with computer work, type of work, input devices, and
environmental factors such as indoor climate and workstation design.
Johnson
is developing the new safety and ergonomics lab for future studies,
and continues to work on computer-related exposure assessment projects
with the School of Public Health at Harvard and the Department of
Occupational and Environmental Medicine at Gūteborg University in
Sweden.
|
|
For
further reading:
Chris
Jensen's Department of Research in Visual Display Unit Work,
http://www.ami.dk/english/afdelinger/24.html
Chris Jensen's Behavior in Information Technology (BIT) study,
http://www.ami.dk/english/projekter/35.html
Peter Johnson's faculty page,
http://depts.washington.edu/envhlth/about/facultypage/john_page.html
|
|
|
| Ergonomics
Policy Evaluation |
|
What
do workers and employers know about ergonomics now that the new
Washington state ergonomics rule is begin-ning to take effect? This
summer and fall, the Department's Policy Analysis and Program
Evaluation team visited 61 large and small workplaces throughout
the state and talked to as many as five managers and five workers
at each site to try to answer that question.
"Washington
is one of only two states that currently has an ergonomics rule,"
said Senior Lecturer Sharon Morris, director of the project. "We
want to know whether having an ergonomics rule increases ergonomics
awareness and prevention activities in the workplace. We're
collecting baseline data now and will go back in two years to see
whether knowledge and prevention activities have changed."
This
study is funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
and conducted in conjunction with the SHARP research program at
the Department of Labor and Industries. SHARP mailed an ergonomics
survey to more than 10,000 Washington businesses in 1998 and again
this year. The work sites for the UW interviews were selected from
a sample of the businesses that returned the SHARP questionnaire.
"I
believe this is the largest study ever conducted that observes the
effects of implementing a major new workplace rule," said Morris.
"The results will be helpful to employers, workers and regulators
in developing future occupational safety and health policies."
|
|
|
| People
& Places |
|
Nilo
Arnaiz
was awarded the Chest Foundation Clinical Research Trainee Award,
one of two awarded nationally this year. The award is based on work
he will conduct on lung inflammation in aluminum smelter workers,
collaborating with Joel Kaufman
and Noah Seixas. Arnaiz has been
a joint Occupational and Environmental Medicine Fellow and Pulmonary
and Critical Care Medicine Fellow. He is also now a postdoctoral
fellow on Harvey Checkoway's
Environmental and Molecular Epidemiology Training Grant.
Drew
Brodkin was appointed to the American Thoracic Society
committee to update the 1986 ATS statement on "The diagnosis
of nonmalignant diseases related to asbestos."
Lucio
Costa was an invited participant for the Neurotoxicity
Task Force, European Commission, Institute for Health and Consumer
Protection, Joint Research Center in Ispra, Italy, in October, and
an invited expert at a workshop on developmental neurotoxicity of
pyrethroid insecticides for the European Commission, Directorate
General for Health and Consumer Protection in Brussels in November
.
Sharon
Elliott was elected as chair-elect of the Administrator's
Association of the NIEHS Centers Programs at the 59th Environmental
Health Sciences Center Director's/Administrators meeting in
Austin, Texas, in October.
Elaine
Faustman's
Center for Child Environmental Health Risks Research received a
supplement from EPA/NIEHS and her Institute for Risk Analysis and
Risk Communication had a new initiative funded by the University
of Arizona/NIEHS.
Sally
Liu organized a workshop on Air Quality Monitoring Technology
for the US EPA and Taiwan Environmental Protection Administration:
(http://depts.washington.edu/~tepa/). Liu presented three talks
during the workshop and presented to the Department of Atmospheric
Science and the Institute of Occupational Medicine and Industrial
Hygiene at the National Taiwan University after the workshop.
Curt
Omiecinski was a guest speaker at a drug metabolism workshop
for Africa, hosted by the Department of Pharmacology, University
of the Free State, in South Africa in March. His introduced the
cytochrome P450 (CYP450) enzyme family and discussed the scientific
basis for ethnic variations in drug response and toxicity.
Omiecinski
and Sid Nelson (Dean, School
of Pharmacy) will work with colleagues at the University of Arizona
NIEHS Center. This is part of a new supplemental grant the Center
for Ecogenetics and Environmental Health received to develop capabilities
to study the way proteins work inside cells, and how they interact
with each other.
Scott
MacKay,
continuing education director, recently met with Secretary of Labor
Elaine Chao. There was interest in the online course that the department's
OSHA Training Institute has developed in the past year. Department
Chair Dave Kalman noted that
the OSHA center has emerged as a leader
in this area.
The
Department was well represented at the Northwest Occupational Health
Conference in Seaside, Oregon, in October, with presentations by
the following faculty, staff, and students: Janice
Camp, Lee Monteith, Richard Neitzel, Kate Stewart, Matt Keifer,
Rick Gleason, Robert Leo, Carolyn Reeb Whitaker, Marie Martin,
and Gerry Croteau. Also, nine
graduates of the Department presented papers.
Departmental
faculty, affiliate faculty, and staff taught several workshops at
the annual state-of-the-art conference of the College of Occupational
and Environmental Medicine, held in Seattle in late October and
early November. Tim Takaro was
on the conference planning committee. Presenters included Takaro,
Matt Keifer, Janice Camp, Rick Gleason, and Rick
Neitzel on hazards of Northwest agriculture, commercial
fishing, and forestry; Mike Morgan
and Kate Stewart on airplane
manufacturing and office ergonomics; Keifer
on international health; Harvey Checkoway
and Gary Franklin on evaluating
causation in occupational disease; Takaro
on screening for occupational lung disease; Drew
Brodkin on liver toxins; and Dave
Eaton on the genomics revolution.
|
|
|
|
Continuing Education
|
|
To confirm this schedule or find more information about these courses,
call (206) 543-1069 or visit the Continuing Education Web site at
http://depts.washington.edu/ehce. Courses are in Seattle unless
noted.
| Northwest
Center for Occupational Health & Safety |
| Jan
23-25 |
Annual
Hazardous Waste Refreshers
|
| Mar
7 |
Essentials
for Environmental Health Practice; Home, Community, and Workplace
|
| Mar
8 |
Pesticide Medicine
|
| Apr
3 |
Current
Issues in Construction Safety
|
| Mar
2 |
An
Aging Workforce: Issues for this Century
|
| OSHA
Training Institute Educational Center |
| Jan
7 |
OSHA
845: OSHA Recordkeeping Rule
|
| Jan
7-10 |
OSHA
309A: Electrical Standards (Portland)
|
| Jan
8 |
OSHA
845: OSHA Recordkeeping Rule (Olympia)
|
| Jan
14-17 |
OSHA
501: Trainer Course for General Industry
|
| Jan
15 |
OSHA
845: OSHA Recordkeeping Rule (Portland)
|
| Jan
16 |
OSHA
845: OSHA Recordkeeping Rule (Eugene)
|
| Jan
22 |
OSHA
845: OSHA Recordkeeping Rule (Richland)
|
| Jan
23 |
OSHA 845: OSHA Recordkeeping Rule (Spokane)
|
| Jan
24 |
OSHA
845: OSHA Recordkeeping Rule (Boise)
|
| Jan
28-31 |
OSHA
600: Collateral Duty for Other Federal Agencies
|
| Feb
4-7 |
OSHA
201A: Hazardous Materials
|
| Feb
11-14 |
OSHA
500: Trainer Course for Construction Industry
|
| Feb
25-28 |
OSHA
204A: Machinery & Machine Guarding Standards (Portland)
|
| Feb
25-28 |
OSHA
301: Evacuation, Trenching, & Soil Mechanics
|
| Mar
4-6 |
OSHA
503: General Industry Trainer Update
|
| Mar
8, 9, 15 |
OSHA
225A: Principles of Ergonomics (Spring Institute)*
|
| Mar
16, 22, 23 |
OSHA
222A: Respiratory Protection (Spring Institute)*
|
| Mar
18-20 |
OSHA 502: Construction Industry Trainer Update
|
| Mar
20-22 |
OSHA
510: OSHA Standards for Construction (Anchorage)
|
| Mar
29-30 |
OSHA
501: Trainer Course for General Industry (Spring Institute)*
|
| Apr
5-6 |
OSHA
501: Trainer Course for General Industry (Spring Institute)*
|
| Apr
12, 13, 19 |
OSHA 226: Permit-Required Confined Space Entry (Spring Institute)*
|
| Apr
19-20 |
OSHA
521: TOSHA Guide to Industrial Hygiene (Spring Institute)*
|
| Apr
26-27 |
OSHA
521: TOSHA Guide to Industrial Hygiene (Spring Institute)* |
|
|
|
| New
MPH Program |
|
The
Department of Environmental Health has created a new Master of Public
Health degree for students who want to address broader environmental
health issues. This two-year, 62-credit program will admit its first
class in autumn 2002.
Until
now, the department's only MPH option required a MD or PhD degree,
and appealed most to physicians who concurrently entered an Occupational
and Environmental Medicine residency program. The new MPH option
is open to applicants with relevant undergraduate degrees.
Rather
than being associated with one of the four Departmental programs
(Toxicology, Industrial Hygiene & Safety, Environmental Technology,
and Occupational & Environmental Medicine), it will be administered
by faculty from all four programs through a Department-wide MPH
coordination committee. The newly approved curriculum requires a
thesis; a non-thesis option is under review.
Students
can enroll in other degree pathways, such as Master of Science or
Doctor of Philosophy, at the same time.
For
more information, contact the graduate program office at ehgrad@u.washington.edu
or (206) 685-9331.
|
|
|
| THE
FINE PRINT |
|
Environmental
Health News
is published three times a year by the Dept. of Environmental Health
at the University of Washington. Inquiries should be addressed to
Environmental
Health News, Box 354695,
4225 Roosevelt Way NE, Suite 100, Seattle, WA 98105-4695; Phone:
(206) 543-1564;
E-mail: kjhall@u.washington.edu.
Find the department on the World Wide Web at http://depts.washington.edu/envhlth/.
Reprint
permission is granted provided that copyright notice as given below
is included. We would appreciate receiving a copy of your reprinted
material.
This
newsletter is also available online at http://depts.washington.edu/envhlth/info/publications.html
©
2001 ISSN number 0029-7925
Department
of Environmental Health
|
|
Managing
Editor - Sharon L. Morris
Senior
Writer & Editor - Kathy Hall
Designer
& Illustrator - Cathy Schwartz
Editorial
Assistant - Kipling West
Interim
Department Chair - David A. Kalman
|
|
|
|
Dept.
of Environmental Health Home UW
School of Public Health Home UW
Home Publications
Page
|