United States v. Murphy
50 M.J. 4 (U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 1998)
56 M.J. 642 (U.S. Army Court of Criminal Appeals)
Murphy was court martialed for three murders, and sentenced to
death. Following conviction he obtained diagnoses or affidavits from five
physicians, all of which raised questions about whether he was incapable
of forming the requisite intent to commit premeditated murder. One
psychiatrist noted that Murphy's limited intellectual functioning was
"consistent with organic brain damage, perhaps as a result of fetal
alcohol syndrome." A pediatrician concluded that the amount of alcohol
consumed by Murphy's mother was sufficient to cause organic brain damage,
and that further examination for FAS was warranted. None of the experts
made a diagnosis of FAS/FAE. (50 M.J. at 14.)
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces declined to affirm
the death sentence, relying on three factors, including the potential
mitigating effect of the post trial evidence regarding Murphy's mental
status (of which possible FAS was a part). Military law evidently
permitted consideration of such post trial evidence in a manner that would
not be possible in federal habeas corpus regarding a regular criminal
trial.
That court remanded the case to the U.S. Army Court of Criminal
Appeals to decide whether consideration of that new evidence might
reasonably have led to a different sentence. (50 M.J. at 16). On remand
the Army Court of Criminal Appeals decided that resolution of that issue
required an evidentiary hearing. (56 M.J. at 647). This disposition was
significant because in habeas corpus actions federal courts have almost
uniformly held that the jury would have imposed the same sentence even if
it knew that the defendant had FAS/FAE.
URL:
http://www.armfor.uscourts.gov/opinions/1999Term/64,926.htm