Brown v. State
659 N.E. 2d 671 (Ind. Ct. App. 1996)
Brown was convicted of two murders, and sentenced to 50 years in
prison on each. On appeal he argued that the trial judge had failed to
consider his FAS as a mitigating factor. 659 N.E. 2d at 674.
The sentencing judge did expressly consider eleven mitigating
factors. The appellate court described one of those as being the fact
that "Brown had a significant history of psychiatric referrals and
diagnoses due to his behavioral problems." (659 N.E. 2d at 675). It is
unclear whether this was a general mitigating factor that would have
included FAS, or whether the sentencing judge did not expressly consider
the FAS issue. If the latter, then it is unclear whether the appellate
court did not recognize that that issue had been ignored, or merely felt
that the judge's decision was otherwise so thorough that it should not be
reversed merely because the opinion did not expressly mention a twelfth
mitigating factor.