State v. Murphy
91 Ohio St. 3d 516, 747 N.E. 2d 765 (2001)
Murphy was convicted of murder and sentenced to death. On appeal
he argued that his attorney had failed to fully investigate possible
mitigating factors. He specifically objected that the attorney should
have called an expert witness on FAS and should have obtained a
neuropsychological assessment to investigate possible organic brain
damage. 747 N.E. 2d at 797.
The appellate court rejected this argument because "the record
does not show that defense counsel failed to investigate these
possibilities." 747 N.E. 2d at 797. That sort of showing would
ordinarily be easy to make in a post-conviction proceeding.