Laws v. South Dakota Dept. of Social Services
598 N.W. 2d 554 (S.D. 1999)
Eli was adopted by Ms. Laws (and her then husband) in 1998. The
DSS determined that Eli was a special needs child, and DSS agreed with the
parents to pay a monthly subsidy of $157. In 1990 the parents learned
that Eli's problems were worse than had been known earlier, and negotiated
an increase in the subsidy to $187.55, and later to $370.45.
The initial determination that Eli was a special needs child was
based on several factors, including "prenatal exposure to alcohol." N. 2.
He was later "diagnosed with fetal alcohol exposure." N. 6.
After the level of the monthly subsidy had been raised, Ms. Law
sued to obtain retroactive reimbursement at the new, higher rate. The
court held that state law did not authorize such retroactive payments.
(**9).