 |
Drowning Interventions
Boating Safety Training Programs
Background
According to the 1989 Red Cross survey 26
of boaters 16 and older, less than five percent of all boat operators (and less
than four percent of all boaters) had taken a boating safety course in 1987.
Only 31% of all boat operators (and 24% of all boaters) had ever taken a boating
safety course in their lifetime. Exposure to a boating safety course does not
necessarily translate to safe boating. Unfortunately, no studies have been done
that examine the direct relationship between those persons having taken boating
safety courses and those persons involved in boating accidents.
We found two studies relating to boating safety training, one
for the general public and the other designed to reduce drowning among Alaskan
fisherman. We have included the Alaskan occupational injury study for 2 reasons:
it includes some teens and young adults, and it illustrates use of a cohort
study design to evaluate boating safety training.
Review of boating safety training programs:
Author | Perkins,
1995 |
Study design and target population | Retrospective cohort study.
Alaska commercial fishing vessels involved in a drowning
or required rescue, 1991-1994.
Exposure: AMSEA safety course.
|
Intervention | 18-24 hour course for commercial
fisherman.
Course covers emergency preparedness, emergency response, and survival
training.
Includes practicing emergency drills.
|
Outcomes | Drowning and hypothermia deaths.
Victims & survivors identified from US Coast Guard database,
NIOSH investigations, & newspaper accounts.
|
Results | 159 vessel incidents reported
by US Coast Guard; 114 documented deaths, 227 (66%) of survivors identified
by name.
8 of 86"at least one survivor vessels" and none of 64"at
least one death vessels" had an AMSEA trained person on board (p=.021).
|
Study quality and conclusions | Boating safety course and accidents
linked by person.
Number trained small (1,218 is 3% of registered fisherman); course is
voluntary; no information on "prevented incidents".
Additional evaluation needed.
|
Author | Bernard
et al., 1994 |
Study design and target population | Ecological study
Registered recreational boaters in Louisiana, 1992-1993
|
Intervention | Education program (NASBLA-approved
safety course) and enforcement of boating regulations |
Outcomes | Reported boating accidents as
a proxy for drownings and near-drownings.
Citations used as a proxy for law enforcement presence.
|
Results | Mild inverse relationship between
number of safety course graduates per parish and number of annual reported
boating accidents in that parish.
Law enforcement has a much weaker effect on preventing
accidents than did safety course. Slightly positively correlated with
accident site, suggesting correct disbursement of funds.
|
Study quality and conclusions | Accidents not linked to persons.
Number of accidents probably underestimated.
Parish (i.e., county) of accident not necessarily parish
where boating safety course taken. Out-of-state boaters taken into account?
|
Summary of boating safety course studies
There is some evidence that a boating safety course sanctioned
by the National Association of Boating Law Administrators (NASBLA) may prevent
some boating accidents, but the evidence of a true association cannot be ascertained
with the current study designs. The cohort study of Alaskan commercial fishing
vessels is a stronger design which links individuals who completed the AMSEA
course to boating incidents. Although the evaluation indicated the AMSEA training
was effective, the number of commerical fisherman trained was too small to make
conclusions about effectiveness.
Recommendations on effectiveness of boating
safety training programs and enforcement of regulations
For the moment, there is no reason to suspect that a boating
safety programs might increase the number of incidents and submersions except
that more incidents may actually be reported. Time and cost commitments are
probably the most important determinants in deciding to enroll in a boating
safety course.
The AMSEA course is longer than the NASBLA course because it involves practicing
emergency drills. This type of training could easily be adapted to recreational
boating, small boats, and kayaks. At this time, we do not have sufficient data
to recommend these courses.
Recommendations for future research
There exist no published studies of boating safety courses
that go beyond simple descriptive epidemiology of boating courses and boating
accidents. Much stronger causal inferences could be made if evaluations linked
persons taking boat safety courses to persons involved in boating accidents
as was done in the AMSEA evaluation. This would transform a strictly ecological
study into a cohort design, with the exposure being the boating safety course
and the outcome the boating accident. A case-control study design might also
be used to examine the association between boating safety courses and drownings.
Given that boating incidents might serve as a useful proxy
for drowning, the possible association of alcohol and boating accidents should
also be examined, as well as the effectiveness of any regulations against alcohol
and boating. One example of a good case-control study examined the effect of
alcohol and drowning, showing that alcohol does indeed increase the risk of
drowning.28
^ Back to Top
|  |