logo link to homepage

Fire and Burn Injury Interventions

 

Best Practices Overview

Overview
Staff & Funding
Study Designs
Outcome Criteria
Cochrane Collaboration
Related Links

Intervention Strategy

Education
Legislation
Product & Environment

Topic

Adolescent suicide
Bicycles
Child abuse
Child pedestrians
Choking, aspiration,
and suffocation
Drowning
Falls
Firearms
Fires and burns
Rehabilitation
Motor Vehicle
Poisoning
Recreational injuries
Youth violence
 

Interventions to Prevent Contact Burns

Background

Toddlers, particularly children under 2 years of age are most at risk for contact burns. Contact burns are usually due to hot stoves (electric, wood, coal burning), heaters and irons. The data from the Harstad Injury Prevention Study33  indicate that 64.3% of hospitalized burn injuries resulted from scalds, 31.4% were contact burns and 4.3% due to open flames. Two-thirds of the patients were under 2 years of age and 66% were male. This is the only study which has attempted to reduce this class of burns in a systematic fashion (See section on multi-focal burn intervention programs for more information).


Review of contact burn interventions:

Author

Ytterstad, 1995

Study design and target population

Non-equivalent control group design.

Children under age 5.

Intervention community: Harstad, Norway

Control community: Trondheim, Norway

Intervention

Burn prevention component of Harstad Injury Prevention Study, a multi-faceted community campaign with active and passive interventions including promoting sale of stove cooker guards.

Outcomes

Hospital and ED treated injuries

Short term hospitalization costs

Contact burns due to:

electrical irons, electrical cooking stove, electrical heating stoves, wood- or coal-burning heating stoves

Results

Contact and scald burns NOT separated.

52.9% decrease in injuries (52.4 to 24.7 per 10,000 person years), p<0.05.

Non-significant increase in injuries in control city. RR=0.43, 0.23-0.82.

Reduction in hospitalization from 103.4 per 10,000 person years to 48.6 (rate ratio=0.47).

Scalds predominant injury; hot coffee and hot water most common cause (2/3 of all injured under 2 years old).

Study quality and conclusions

Multi-faceted community campaign based on known risk factors a success.

Public participation and feedback of local burn data considered important in achieving success.

Use of multi-disciplinary approaches, active and passive interventions important.

Complete databases in intervention and control communities; minimal effect of registration loss.

Summary of contact burn interventions

Product modification, that is, environmental interventions offer the most effective methods for reducing both contact burns. Stove guards (protective rails) around kitchen stoves and screens around heaters keep young children away from hazards.33  Burn injury rates are presented for contact and scald burns combined. Separate data on contact burns is not available. A study by Elberg in 1987 also reported reduction in scald and contact burn injuries as a result of a 17-year campaign in Denmark.40  Data on types of burn injuries were not separated.

Recommendations on contact burn interventions

Product modifications which prevent children from coming into contact with hot stoves, irons and heaters would seem to be the most reasonable approach to reducing these types of burns. Multi-disciplinary educational approaches involving the media, lay organization and public authorities appeared to work in the Harstad Project in Norway.33  It is not clear whether the same success could be achieved in larger and more heterogeneous populations like the United States.

Recommendations for future research

Engineering approaches should be employed to design safer products.


^ Back to Top


          |    University of Washington    |    Harborview Medical Center
Contact HIPRC   |   Site by Publications Services