Fires and Burns

Interventions to Prevent Scald Burns

Background

Toddlers, particularly children under 2 years of age are most at risk for scald burns. Scald burns are usually caused by hot liquids; tap water in the bath or spilling of hot drinks or liquids from large containers on the stove. The data from the Harstad Injury Prevention Study33  indicate that 64.3% of hospitalized burn injuries resulted from scalds, 31.4% were contact burns and 4.3% due to open flames. Two-thirds of the patients were under 2 years of age and 66% were male. The United States Consumer Product Safety Commission in 1978 reported 2,600 scald burns, 25% of these were serious enough to require hospitalization.34  The studies reviewed here have used educational, legislative regulations and environmental interventions to reduce scald burns.


Review of scald burn interventions:

Author

Ytterstad, 1995

Study design and target population

Non-equivalent control group design.

Children under age 5.

Intervention community: Harstad, Norway

Control community: Trondheim, Norway

Intervention

Burn prevention component of Harstad Injury Prevention Study, a multi-faceted community campaign with active and passive interventions including promotion of stove cooker guards and setting of 55¡ C tap water temperature.

Outcomes

Hospital and ED treated injuries

Short-term hospitalization costs

Results

52.9% decrease in injuries (52.4 to 24.7 per 10,000 person years, p<0.05).

Non-significant increase in injuries in control city (RR=0.43, 0.23-0.82).

Reduction in hospitalization from 103.4 per 10,000 person years to 48.6 (rate ratio=0.47).

Scalds predominant injury; hot coffee and hot water most common cause (2/3 of all injured under 2 years old).

Study quality and conclusions

Multi-faceted community campaign based on known risk factors a success. Public participation and feedback of local burn data considered important in achieving success.

Use of multi-disciplinary approaches, active and passive interventions important.

Complete databases in intervention & control communities; minimal effect of registration loss.



Author

Waller, 1993

Study design and target population

Nonequivalent control group design.

Random sample of households with children under 3 in Dunedin, NZ, July-November 1990.

Intervention group: n=54

Control group: n=56.

Excluded households with baseline water temperature under 60¡ C (n=33, 23%)

Intervention

Half-hour educational home visit included measuring water temperature, discussing how to lower temperature and offering free plumber’s advice.

National media campaign ("Hot water burns like fire") conducted by Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC) at same time.

Outcomes

Recognition of ACC campaign.

Mean water temperature.

Proportion of homes with temperature under 60¡ C

Results

Identification of ACC campaign 73% vs. 16% at baseline.

Significant decrease in mean hot water temperature 61.2¡ C vs. 64.2¡ at baseline, p=0.001.

Proportion of homes with water temperature under 60¡ C increased to 41.9% from 9.3% (intervention group) and 30% vs. 10% (control group). OR=1.6, 0.34-7.6.

Majority of households still had temperatures above 55¡ C.

Study quality and conclusions

Educational campaign too time intensive and not effective.

Media campaign, particularly TV messages, most successful way to reach public.

Water heated by electric water heater and/or "wetback" heating system. Latter is an ancillary water heating device that can heat water to 100¡ C and override the electric heater thermostat. Present thermostats are ineffective.

Small study with 50% response rate.



Author

Erdman, 1991

Study design and target population

Non-equivalent control group design

Home visit and measurement of temperature for a random sample of Seattle, WA, households with post-law heaters (cases: n=50) and pre-law heaters (controls: n=50).

Intervention

Statewide legislation requiring preset temperature of 49¡ C (120F) for all new water heaters, 1983.

Law requires all utility customers to receive an annual warning of hazards of hot water and energy savings of lower temperatures; concomitant educational campaign.

Outcomes

Proportion of homes with tap water temperature less than 54¡ C

Mean tap water temperature change

Hospital admission rate for scald burns

Results

77% homes (84% of home with post-law and 70% of homes with pre-law water heaters) had tap water temperatures less than 54¡ C vs. 80% of homes with temperatures above 54¡ C in 1977. No statistically significant difference in safe temperature between case and control groups. OR for safe temperature was 2.25, 0.78-6.63.

Mean water temperature 50¡ C in 1988 vs. 60¡ C in 1977.

56% reduction in hospital admission rate, from 5.5 children per year to 2.4 per year. Rate ratio=0.44. Severity of burns reduced.

Study quality and conclusions

Classic study

Educational programs aimed at reducing temperature settings of water heaters were effective.

Legislation increased number of homes with tap water lower than 54¡ C.

Excellent consumer acceptance.



Author

Katcher et al., 1989

Study design and target population

Randomized control trial, single-blinded

Patients at pediatric ambulatory clinic, University of Wisconsin at Madison

(n=697 ).

Intervention

Cases: Received liquid crystal thermometer and counseling (hot tap water safety pamphlet)

Controls: counseling only.

Safe water temperature 54.4¡ C (130F)

Outcomes

Baseline and post intervention questionnaire to measure changes in knowledge, hot water temperature, and thermostat lowering.

Validated a subsample with home visits at 1 year. (Response rate: 76.5% cases, 70.2% controls).

Results

Group that received thermometer and read pamphlet more likely to test water temperature need OR

No difference between groups for non-readers of pamphlet.

Study quality and conclusions

Home visit to validated, self-reported water temperatures done on small subsample (n=40).

Data not given for intervention and control groups separately. These groups demographically similar.

Knowledge of safe water temperature associated with testing.

Anticipatory guidance more successful when thermometer provided.



Author

Webne, 1989

Study design and target population

Randomized controlled trial, single blinded

Referred by community-based pediatricians Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Restricted to families with 1 child under 3 and 1 over 3 years with high baseline tap water temperatures.

Intervention

Educational pamphlet and liquid crystal thermometer.

Intervention introduced to each participant at different points in time in random order.

4 home visits:

baseline, intervention, follow-up plus telephone report of measured temperatures, 1 month follow-up.

Outcomes

Measured tap water temperatures for 3 time periods:

mean baseline to post intervention, post intervention to follow-up, and mean baseline to follow up.

Analyzed using 50 C and 54 C as safe temperature cut-off.

Results

No effect of intervention.

No statistically significant decrease in hot water temperature; proportion of heaters with safe temperature not statistically different pre- and post- intervention.

Study quality and conclusions

Very small study (n=12), and time-intensive.

Conclude that compliance is a significant problem even after education and personal demonstration.

Recommend legislation to require pre-set water heater temperature.



Author

Williams, 1988

Study design and target population

Randomized controlled trial, single blinded

Parents enrolled in pre-natal classes at Urban hospital, Kansas City, Kansas (n=75).

Intervention

Education plus "accident prevention" information vs. usual prenatal curriculum

Outcomes

Tap water temperature, use of smoke detectors and car seats evaluated during home visit.

Results

58% of experimental group had tap water temperature below 130F (n=23) vs. 31% of controls (n=11).

No significant differences between groups for car seat or smoke detector use.

Study quality and conclusions

Higher proportion of households with safe water temperature in intervention group.

Study weaknesses: post-test evaluation only; no adjustment for confounding; experimental group had more highly-educated parents and higher proportion of owner-occupied homes.



Author

Elberg, 1987

Study design and target population

Interrupted time series

Patients admitted to Burns Unit, Odense University Hospital, Denmark (1968-77 vs. 1978-84), n=1391.

46% of study sample under 16 years.

Intervention

10-year intensive information campaign: press, radio, TV.

Household product modification

Outcomes

Deaths and hospitalization in burn unit; mean annual incidence of burn injuries

Burns not separated by type.

Results

Scalds accounted for 80% of all burns (366/457) in children under 6.

Greatest success in reducing scald and contact burns in children under 6 years, with 50% reduction in all burn injuries, p<0.05.

Study quality and conclusions

Complete case ascertainment.

Campaign effective for younger children.

Small number of burn injuries: 1391 over 17-year period; 33% of burns in children under 6; 13% to 6-15 year olds.



Author

Katcher, 1987

Study design and target population

Non-equivalent control group design

750,000 subscribers of Wisconsin Electric Power Company, Madison, WI.

Intervention

Multi-faceted community campaign; educational pamphlet sent with electric bill with offer of free liquid-crystal thermometer upon request.

Newspaper, TV and radio publicity, coupons in hospitals and doctor’s offices.

Outcomes

Self-reported knowledge, testing tap water temperature and lowering water heater thermostat. Three telephone surveys (n=337, 318, 325).

Results

140,000 thermometers requested. Pre-and post-program general population random surveys found increased awareness of the danger of hot tap water, from 72 % to 89%, but no increase in testing or lowering of water heater temperatures.

Random sample survey of thermometer requesters had a higher rate of testing (a difference of 58.1% (55.3% to 60.9%) than in general population.

43% of testers reported temperatures above 54.4¡ C and 52% of this group lowered their water heater thermostat.

Study quality and conclusions

Increasing awareness of hazard via education doesn’t necessarily result in behavior change.

Motivated consumers (those requesting thermometer) more likely to change.

Radio and TV messages found to be more effective than pamphlet.

Data is self-report and was not validated by actual temperature measurements.



Author

Barone, 1984

Study design and target population

Randomized controlled trial, single blinded

Enrollees in "Parenting the Toddler" classes; middle and upper-middle class parents, suburban Kansas city (n=79).

Intervention

Education plus specific burn prevention information and thermometer to measure water temperature

Outcomes

Tap water reduction

Results

Knowledge of safe tap water temperature 90% in experimental group vs. 32% in controls.

No difference in mean water temperature measured at post-intervention home visit (41.5% experimental group with safe temperatures vs. 39.5% of controls).

Study quality and conclusions

Educational intervention not effective in this population.

Post-test evaluation only; smoke detector use over 90% and car seat use 100%.



Author

Thomas, 1984

Study design and target population

Randomized controlled trial, single blinded.

Members of HMO in Kansas City, Kansas who selected 90 min. "well baby" classes.

Randomized to experimental or control group; children under 1 year.

Intervention

Module on burn prevention including coupon for reduced price smoke alarm added to usual well baby class curriculum.

Home visit after 4-6 weeks for both groups

Outcomes

Scores on Fire Safety Knowledge Test

Home tap water temperature

Smoke alarm installation

Results

Mean score on Knowledge test 20.3 (experimental group) vs. 18.9 (control group), p=0.0001.

76% of experimental group had safe water temperature vs. 23% of controls; 66% of experimental group lowered temperature setting vs. none of the controls, p=0.01.

No significant difference in smoke alarm installation.

Study quality and conclusions

Single education session effective.

However, the study was small and had the following weaknesses:

selection bias-volunteers for classes; population employed, married and in late 20’s; post-test measures only for water temperature and smoke detector installation.

Summary of scald burn interventions

Legislation requiring a safe pre-set temperature for all water heaters has proved a more effective method of reducing scald burns than education to encourage parents to turn down water heaters. Educational approaches are effective in some populations when they are accompanied by a tangible product such as a thermometer to measure tap water temperature. Legislation is necessary to insure safe temperatures in multi-family dwellings served by a central water heater. Safe temperatures can be maintained by building code inspection. Product modification, that is, environmental interventions offer the most effective methods for reducing scald burns from hot coffee and soups and other hot liquids on the stove. Wide based ("no spill") cups and rails around kitchen stoves are good examples of well designed safer products.33 

Recommendations on scald burn interventions

Tap water scalds can best be prevented by lowering the water temperature at the source. Legislation which outlines manufacturers specifications appears to be the most effective method. Temperatures should be checked as part of Building Code inspections of multi-family dwellings and apartments. Potential dangers of high tap water temperatures can be successfully addressed by providing educational material and a free liquid crystal thermometer to use in testing home tap water temperatures. Scald burns from hot liquids can be prevented by modifying coffee cups and kitchen stoves to prevent hot liquid spills.

Recommendations for future research

Engineering approaches should be employed to design safer products and prevent hot liquid spills.