 |
Recreational Injury Interventions
Recreational Injury Effectiveness
of Bracing or Taping in Prevention of Sports Injuries
Background
In the US, 25% of girls and 50% of boys aged 8-16 participate in sports. More than
one-third of all injuries to children and adolescents occur during sports, with
about one-third of these being lower extremity injuries.
One method to avoid injury, or to avoid re-injury, which has been proposed is bracing
and/or taping of knees or ankles. Many athletes use these methods and a large amount
of money is spent on them. We review the evidence for their effectiveness. In this
review, we include data on both children and adults, since relatively few studies
have been done on children alone.
Ankle Injuries
The most common mechanism of ankle injury is inversion of the plantar flexed foot.
Injury occurs to the anterior talo-fibular ligament, followed to a varying degree
by the calcaneofibular ligament. Injury to the ankle is associated with a five fold
increased risk of subsequent injury, McKay GD, Goldie PA, Payne WR, Oakes BW. Ankle
injuries in basketball: injury rate and risk factors. British Journal of Sports
Medicine 2001;35(2):103-8.).
Review of ankle bracing & taping
studies:
Author | Handoll, et al., 2001 |
Study design and target population | Meta analysis of interventions to prevent ankle injuries.
Population: all physically active individuals from
adolescence to middle age. |
Intervention | Ankle brace or orthosis compared to control. |
Outcomes | Ankle ligament injuries. |
Results | Summary RR for 5 studies: 53 (95%
CI 40 to 69). |
Study quality and conclusions | Very strong meta-analysis. |
Author | Handoll, et al., 2001 |
Study design and target population | Meta analysis of interventions to prevent ankle ligament
injuries.
Data analyzed by prior history of ankle sparin. |
Intervention | Ankle brace of orthosis compared to control. |
Outcomes | Ankle ligament injuries. |
Results | History of prior sprain, effect
of bracing: RR=33 95% CI .20 to .53. No prior history
of sprain, effect of bracing: RR=.73, (.52, 1.03). |
Study quality and conclusions | 4 studies looked at this effect
by prior history. |
Author | Handoll, et al., 2001 |
Study design and target population | Meta analysis of interventions to
prevent ankle ligament injuries. |
Intervention | Taping vs. cloth wrap.
One study of 148 people. |
Outcomes | Ankle ligament injuries. |
Results | RR= 1.03 (.27, 3.95). |
Study quality and conclusions | No effect of taping. |
Author | Sharpe, et al., 1997 |
Study design and target population | Retrospective cohort study.
Population: 38 collegiate soccer players:. |
Intervention | Taping and/or bracing. |
Outcomes | Prevention of re-injury Ankle sprains.
|
Results | No injuries in the braced group,
25% in the taped group, 25% in group which sued both and 35% in group which
used neither. |
Study quality and conclusions | Poorly done study. Historical
control. |
Summary of ankle bracing &
taping interventions
There appears to be good evidence that ankle bracing/orthosis is effective in prevent
ing ankle ligament injuries, although the effect appeared to be confined to those
with prior injury. Although a smaller benefit is likely for those who have no prior
history of ankle injury, this remains to be proven.
It is instructive to use the data in the studies to calculate a Number Needed to
Treat (NNT). To prevent one ankle sprain, the device would need to be worn for 280
athletic exposures (one practice or at least one half of a basketball game), 3000
hours of soccer playing (practice or game), or 300 parachute jumps. There are no
good data on how acceptable these devices are for athletes, particularly those playing
at a high level in their sport.
Bot and van Mechelen (1999) recently reviewed the
effect of ankle bracing on performance. They concluded that ankle bracing has little
or no effect on performance in vertical jump height, running speed, broad jump and
agility in persons with stable ankles. The effect of ankle bracing on performance
after a prolonged time of use is unknown. It has the potential to have an effect
on ankle musculature and ligament function.
Recommendations on ankle
bracing & taping programs
There is good evidence that external ankle supports can reduce the risk of ankle
ligament injury in high risk sports such as basketball and soccer, particularly
am ong those with a prior injury to the ankle. These can be recommended although
their use must be balanced against acceptability, possible effects on performance,
and effects from long term use.
Review of shoe and ankle injury
studies:
Author | Barrett, et al., 2001 |
Study design and target population | RCT. Population: 622 college aged intramural male basketball
players. |
Intervention | High top vs. low top shoes. |
Outcomes | Ankle sprains. |
Results | Rate in high top shoes was 4.06/10,000
player minutes compared to 4.8 in low top shoes, not significantly different.
|
Study quality and conclusions | No effect of high top shoes in basketball. |
Summary of shoe and ankle injury
interventions
The one available study appeared to show no protective effect of high top shoes
in preventing ankle sprains in basketball.
Recommendations on shoe
and ankle injury programs
High top shoes cannot be recommended as a method to prevent ankle sprains.
Knee injuries
Knee injuries are relatively common and often result in significant long term impairment.
One study form Switzerland (de Loes) found that the sports with the greatest
risk of knee injuries for both males and females were: ice hockey, handball, soccer,
basketball, alpine skiing. Knee injuries accounted for 10% of all injuries in males
and 13% in females, but they accounted for 27% and 33% of the medical costs per
hour of particip ation.
Unfortunately, we could find no randomized studies that have examined the effect
of braces on primary prevention of knee injuries.
|