 |
UNDERGRADUATE
STUDY
GRADUATE STUDY
    MA Degree
    PhD Degree
    Apply
to the                     Program
    Areas of Study
      By Division
      By Faculty
        Bailkin, J.
        Behlmer, G.
        Campbell, E.
        Dhavan, P.
        Dong, M.
        Ebrey, P.
        Felak, J.
        Findlay, J.
        Gamboa, E.
        Giebel, C.
        Glenn, S.
        Gowing, A.
        Gregory, J.
        Guy, R. K.
        Harmon, A.
        Hevly, B.
        Johnson, R.
        Jonas, R.
        Joshel, S.
        Jung, M.
        Leiren, T.
        Lopez, S.
        McKenzie, R. T.
        Nam, H.
        Nash, L.
        Noegel, S.
        Nomura, G.
        O'Mara, M.
        O'Neil, M.
        Poiger, U.
        Pyle, K.
        Rafael, V.
        Rodriguez-Silva,I
        Rorabaugh, W.
        Salas, E.
        Schmidt, B.
        Schwarz, F.
        Sears, L.
        Singh, N.
        Smallwood, S.
        Spafford, D.
        Stacey, Robert
        Stacey, Robin
        Taylor, Q.
        Thomas, C.
        Thomas, L.
        Thurtle, P.
        Toews, J.
        Walker, J.
        Warren, A.
        Werrett, S.
        Williams, M.
        Yang, A.
        Young, G.
    Funding
    Career Preparation
    Placement Record
    On-Leave Policies
    Coursework
    Graduation                       Ceremonies
    Grievances
    Student    
                        Organizations
    FAQs
TEACHING
NON-MATRICULATING
POST-BACCALAUREATE
DISTANCE LEARNING
ACCESS PROGRAM
|
 |
 |

Simon
Werrett: Areas of Graduate Study
History of Science
A general field, designed to begin preparation of graduate students aiming
to teach undergraduate courses or pursue research in history of science
during their careers, and to introduce the general historiographical framework
and development of the field. The field can be modified to meet the student's
particular interests. This would normally be the second field for students
interested in becoming historians of science.
Science and Technology Studies
"STS" engages in the variety of new approaches to understanding
the sciences which have emerged in the wake of Thomas Kuhn's Structure
of Scientific Revolutions (1962). Drawing from diverse academic disciplines,
such as philosophy, sociology, and anthropology, scholars in the 1970s
and 80s developed powerful and controversial new methods of analyzing
science as a social construction or network, and critiqued the role of
gender and race in scientific practice, theory, and organization. More
recently, cultural and anthropological studies of science have presented
new means to interpret science alongside alternative systems of human
(and even 'non-human'!) action and belief. Postcolonial studies of science
and technology have traced science's interactions with empire, development,
and indigenous knowledges. Students taking this field will engage with
these diverse approaches of recent STS through reading, writing, and discussions.
A knowledge of the tools and concepts of STS has been indispensable for
recent history of science, and the field will deepen and broaden participants'
perspectives on science.
Early Modern Sciences, 1500-1800
This field takes in a period in the history of science which witnessed
dramatic change with the emergence of a new, experimental science in the
seventeenth century. European and American figures such as Galileo, Isaac
Newton, Benjamin Franklin, and Antoine Lavoisier overturned long-held
traditions of natural knowledge to offer exciting new ideas about the
natural world. Or did they? The so-called 'Scientific Revolution' remains
a theme hotly disputed in the history of science. Was modern science really
new, or a continuation of earlier developments in the fifteenth century,
which included practices like natural magic, alchemy, the collecting of
wonders and curiosities, and astrology? Or was modern science a product
of the period around 1800, later than we normally think, when professionalization
created the first research laboratories, university departments, peer-review
journals and other familiar scientific institutions? Given that the 'revolution'
only happened in the West, should we see its results as 'universal' or
as a peculiar and local form of knowledge? Study in the field explores
these and other issues surrounding the history of science in the early
modern period, taking in new insights and approaches from many disciplines
including history, sociology, anthropology, and philosophy. The UW has
a fine tradition in teaching this field, and students will have access
not only to many works in the Suzallo Library but in addition a valuable
collection of early modern scientific instruments. Students may take courses
in conjunction with others in the History of Science, and Early Modern
European History.
Science in Russia and the Soviet Union
Russian science encompasses many of the achievements of science, including
Lobachevskii's Non-Euclidean Geometry, Mendeleev's Periodic Table, and
advances in Nuclear and Space Science. Studying Russia also grapples with
issues of the relations between science and politics, science and revolution,
Marxism and science, and other centrally important issues in current studies
of the sciences. The University of Washington is one of the few educational
institutions in the USA where it is possible to undertake specialized
study in the history of the sciences in Russia and the Soviet Union. Since
the early 1990s this field has blossomed with many exciting and novel
approaches being applied to the field, which has been greatly enriched
by access to many new materials and archives in Russia. Prof. Simon Werrett
offers courses in Imperial and Soviet Russian Science which may be taken
in conjunction with fields in the history of science and the History of
Russia and East Europe. Students will be encouraged to travel to Russia
and advised on how to study in Russian archives. The University has a
flourishing Department
of Slavic Language and Literature in which students may develop their
language skills. The Russian,
East European, and Central Asian Studies (REECAS) program also organizes
numerous events and activities on Russian history and politics.
Science and the Arts
Is there a fundamental division between the arts and sciences as C. P.
Snow proclaimed inhis essay on the 'Two Cultures'? Or do the arts and
sciences share visions, methods, techniques, ideas in their histories?
This field explores relations between the arts and sciences from the renaissance
to the present and embraces topics such as the changing definitions of
arts and sciences, science and theaticality, visual imagery in the sciences,
science in literature and drama, science on film, and the history of objectivity
and mechanism in science and art. Prof. Werrett takes a particular interest
in the role of the spectacular in the history of science.
|
 |