|
IPEM (IGERT Program on Evolutionary Modeling) fellows are pursuing doctoral degrees in one of three units at two universities: Anthropology or School of Biological Sciences at Washington State University, Pullman (WSU), or Anthropology at University of Washington, Seattle (UW). As part of the program, they spend at least one term at their non-home institution, and take a variety of classes outside their home discipline, as well as participating in multidisciplinary research teams.
Adam Boyette (Evolutionary Anthropology, WSU; BA in Psychobiology, UC
Santa Cruz, 2002; MA in Anthropology, WSU, 2006)
Focus: In order to succeed, both biologically through enhanced fitness
and/or culturally through local concepts of acquired status, human children
must go through an evolved period of intense learning. I want to understand
the social-aspects of that period of learning. For example, human cultures
vary in the ways in which their members cooperate with one another, the
perceived fitness benefits of cooperating dependent upon both biological and
cultural factors. How much of this variation is attributable to learning
from our parents versus other members of our group? How does our rearing
environment affect whom we target as cultural models? How does the
differential attention allocated to specific models influence culture
change? I want to build on current theory and methods to answer these and
related questions. My hypotheses, derived from theoretical models of
adaptive cultural transmission, will be tested using data I collect from
Central African foragers.
[ email ]
|
 |
Chad Brock (Biology, WSU; BS in Biological Sciences, U of Nebraska, 2006)
Focus: The application of phylogenetic comparative methods and computer-based modeling approaches to the evolution
of complex behavioral and/or cultural traits. Possible research topics: 1) The evolution and maintenance of mutualistic
interactions between cleaner wrasses and their “client” fish, especially the possible role of sensory exploitation
on the part of the wrasses in guiding this process. 2) The transmission of cultural traits (such as knowledge of
feeding areas) in schooling fish. 3) The application and evaluation (through computer simulation) of various statistical
phylogenetic approaches, especially likelihood-based methods, to study the evolution of cultural traits. 4) Application
of ancestral-state reconstruction methods and ecological niche modeling to study the effect of certain factors (e.g.,
varying predation pressures) on the evolution of plasticity in behavioral syndromes within a given clade. 5) Using
comparative phylogenetic analyses to study the impact of cultural evolution on behavioral, molecular, and/or
physiological evolution in humans.
[ email ]
|
 |
Megan Carney (Biocultural Anthropology, UW; BS in Anthropology and Zoology, U of Michigan, 2001)
Focus: Darwinian processes in cultural and biological systems; using computational methods to integrate evolutionary
ecological and cultural transmission approaches to cultural change. Possible research topics: 1) Adoption as an example
of cooperation in social systems. An apparently altruistic behavior, the care of others’ offspring (henceforth referred
to as “adoption” or “adoptive behavior’) has long been of interest to behavioral ecologists. Researchers currently debate
the adaptiveness of adoption in modern environments. For example, some suggest that it is a non-adaptive response, resulting
from proximate mechanisms eliciting interest in and care of offspring (Silk 1990). Yet, it is possible that adoption is
maintained through a process resembling reciprocal altruism in some cases, and increased inclusive fitness in others. 2)
Cross-species analysis of adoption and other forms of offspring care; for example, adoption has been recorded in over 270
species of social birds and mammals. 3) Using mathematical and computational models to examine if and when adoption can be
sustained by mechanisms of social transmission.
[ email ]
|
 |
Devin Drown (Biology, WSU; BA in Biology, Grinnell College, 1996)
Focus: My research interests are in coevolutionary interactions, particularly
host-parasite interactions. I am interested in the effect of dispersal (or
migration) on coevolutionary interactions. I am also interested in how the
local patterns of interaction between host and parasite (e.g. local
adaptation) can scale up and lead to patterns of host specificity. My
thesis research is divided into two main areas: empirical work and theory
work. For my empirical work, I am investigating the interaction of
Potamopyrgus antipodarum (New Zealand Mud Snails) and a commonly
infecting trematode worm (Microphallus sp.). I have begun by
collecting molecular data to look for patterns across the interaction.
Next, I will design local adaptation experiments to test the scale of
interactions. I am using this system to explore how local patterns of
adaptation may scale up from populations to species. For my theory work, I
have focused on host-parasite interactions and am interested in how this
type of interaction can shape the migration rate of one player in the
interaction. I have been using a using a variety of techniques (numerical
simulations, analytical solutions and QLE approximations) to understand the
evolution of migration in an antagonistic interaction.
[ email ]
|
 |
Erik Gjesfjeld (Archaeology, UW; BA in Archaeology, U of Wisconsin-La Crosse, 2002; MA in Archaeological
Theory and in Archaeological Field Techniques, U College London, 2004)
Focus: The use of Darwinian processes and the explanation of variation in biological and cultural systems. An
interdisciplinary approach to understanding Darwinian processes is critical to archaeology, as the theoretical and
methodological foundations for understanding cultural evolution rely on strategies developed in biology, anthropology and
other disciplines. Thus, my research agenda will emphasize an interdisciplinary understanding of the positive and negative
analogies between processes of cultural and biological systems. Possible research topics: 1) Using statistical phylogenetic
methods to model cultural change and identify coevolutionary traits, as well as to identify the prevalence of vertical and
horizontal variation in the archaeological record. 2) Study of coevolutionary dynamics in cultural evolution and in
culture-environment interactions. 3) The integration of evolutionary ecology and cultural transmission; the explanatory
mechanisms of an evolutionary ecology framework are necessary in order to integrate cultural transmission processes and
explanations of cultural change.
[ email ]
|
 |
Benjamin Hanowell (Biocultural Anthropology, UW; BA in
Anthropology, California State U - Sacramento, 2007)
Focus: International aid and development organizations would benefit from a
clearer understanding of the social problems they purport to mitigate, such
as the prevalence and increase of marked social inequality and its
associated ills (i.e. starvation, disease, social unrest, violence).
Identifying how culture and ecology intersect with individual motives to
produce large-scale inequity has and will continue to help build this
understanding. Computational agent-based modeling experiments based on
inequality research and theory could help identify, quantify, and test our
assumptions about how these systems emerge, evolve, and relate to similar
situations in nature before risking possibly ineffectual and dangerous
intervention on the ground. Simple, general models of inequality could also
assist researchers in the comparative analysis of colonial and postcolonial
political economics across space and time. These complex problems deserve
the same scientific rigor afforded to other academic subjects.
[ email ]
|
 |
Meredith Schulte (Evolutionary Anthropology, WSU; BS in Anthropology and Biology,
U of Southern California, 2006)
Focus: Using evolutionary modeling to understand the origins and development
of culture, the phylogenetics/phylogeography of neotropical primates, health
implications of human-primate interactions, and conservation issues. I am
currently focusing on the effects of tourism and development on the
behavior, health and evolution of capuchin monkeys, Cebus capucinus,
in Central Pacific Costa Rica. I have completed pilot research on behavioral
differences in capuchins living in tourist regions as part of the IPEM team
project. I am in the process of doing microsatellite genetic analyses of
capuchin phylogeography in Costa Rica as a part of the IPEM team project. I
will be returning to UCIMED in Costa Rica during Fall 2007 to analyze fecal
parasites of white-faced capuchins in the Manuel Antonio area, comparing a
group living in an agricultural region with one living in a highly touristed
national park. I will be beginning a second field season at this site in
January 2008, continuing genetic and parasite analyses and focusing on a
behavioral analysis of the sex/age class differences in ecologically based
aggression.
[ email ]
|
 |
Megan van Wolkenten (Evolutionary Anthropology, WSU; BA in
Anthropology and Psychology, College of William and Mary, 2003; MA in
Psychology, Emory U, 2005)
Focus: The application of agent based modeling and game theory to understand
the evolution of sexual behavior. Possible research topics: 1) The evolution
of non-conceptive sexual behaviors and possible adaptive functions of such
behaviors. For example, in many western societies, homosexuality is often
considered maladaptive since an exclusive attraction to same-sex sex
partners is likely to preclude reproduction. However, if we broaden the
definition of homosexuality to include any same sex sexual interactions
rather than an exclusive attraction to members of the same sex, homosexual
behavior no longer precludes the possibility of reproductive sexual
encounters, and may, in fact, serve an adaptive function. Consider bonobos,
where female-female sexual interactions lead to an increase in social
bonding between females. Stronger bonds, particularly among unrelated
females, facilitate female cooperation against males, allowing females to
maintain priority access to food patches. 2) Intragroup variation in mating
strategies, the factors that influence these strategies, and the effect of
alternative strategies on an individual’s reproductive success..
[ email ]
|
 |
|