Established in 1974, the Journal of Japanese Studies features original, analytically rigorous articles from across the humanities and social sciences, including comparative and transnational scholarship in which Japan plays a major part

Mueller 41:1

ABSTRACT

 

SIMONE MÜLLER
The “Debate on the Literature of Action” and Its Legacy:
Ideological Struggles in 1930s Japan and the “Rebirth” of the Intellectual

 
In the mid-1930s, a group of Japanese writers initiated a “literature of action” and, by appropriating the newly popular term chishikijin (intellectual), they pleaded for a renaissance of intellectuals. Their claims triggered a debate between liberal-humanists and orthodox Marxists on the sociopolitical mission of writers and the role of intellectuals. This debate was important in the shifting meaning of the term “intellectual” which reflected the cultural and political background of the time. It also laid the groundwork for the postwar debate on the social responsibility of the writer as intellectual, demonstrating the continuity in intellectual discourse between prewar and postwar Japan.

Volume 41, Number 1 (Winter 2015)
© 2015 Society for Japanese Studies