|
by
Paul Landis
Nineteen-sixty
to 1969 was one of the most tumultuous decades in American history.
Thanks to television, virtually all Americans could watch the entire
decade unfold right before their eyes.
From the Bay of Pigs and the Beatles to free love and Vietnam,
the 1960s were quite distinct from most eras in American history.
Having survived the McCarthy era and the Red Scare, not unscathed
but still intact, the Communist Party (CP) began to find itself again
during the decade. However,
the early Sixties were a rough time for the
Party, which had
been in something of a lull after the 1950s due both to Khrushchev’s
revelations about Stalin and to the relentless pursuit and expulsion of
Communists from areas of government and society by HUAC and other
government organizations. The Party
found ways to stay organized and in touch with events, and, as the
decade progressed, became a more open entity.
Nevertheless, it was still a persecuted group whose members were
often fearful of declaring their Party affiliation.
Even so, in Washington State, Party members
were active if cautious.
Finding
a Voice
One
of the ways that the Washington State Communist Party began to organize
openly was around its newspaper, The
People’s World. The
paper, in existence since the 1930s, was published in San Francisco, and
represented the Communist Party on the West Coast. Washington State
Party members—Lonnie Nelson, for one—helped distribute the
paper and write for it, as well.[i]
The paper was an important vehicle for the WSCP to get its
message out. Each year the
Party organized picnics to raise money to keep the People’s World in circulation; these gatherings were held in
public parks where members and friends of the Communist Party were
encouraged to discuss current events and raise money for the paper.[ii]
The annual draw to the picnics was anywhere between 75 to 150
people and was considered the big Communist Party event of the year.[iii]
Both paper and picnics provided a bonding experience, as well as
avenues for recruitment.
This
period also marked a new openness for the Communist Party as part of its
strategy to break out of isolation.
Though still hounded and haunted by anti-communist sentiment, the
Party was trying to re-surface to regain a political presence.
Nevertheless, very few people put their own names to the articles
that they wrote in the PW, and even fewer seemed to admit being
Party members. It still was not safe to be an “open”
Communist, even in the “free loving” Sixties.
As
the 1960s saw a resurgence of political activity, especially on the
Civil Rights front, the CP began lending support to groups like CORE and
NAACP, both of which had made their way to Seattle and Washington State
to help solve the problems of segregation and racism.[iv]
The PW publicized the
movements that the CP supported, but these were one-way relationships.
Groups like SDS (Students for a Democratic Society) saw the CP as
the old guard—the “Old Left.” [v]
Furthermore, many activist organizations—especially the
anti-war movement—were under intense scrutiny by the FBI and did not
want to be labeled “Communist” for fear of being discredited.
However, many activist groups in the Sixties were more than
willing to allow Communists to work with them as long as they stayed
quiet about their Party affiliation.[vi]
Regardless, there was a political price to be paid for
associating with Communists, and a legal one, too, as many states and
the federal government targeted Communists and Communist-linked
organizations for surveillance and persecution.
The
Early Sixties
A
politically- and numerically-diminished organization, the Washington
State Communist Party was not a popular group, and the paranoia
surrounding the organization still persisted.
In February of 1962 two professors from the University of
Washington were fired for not signing a loyalty oath as required of all
state employees. Designed to keep the Communists out of the University and
other government jobs, the loyalty oath required signers to pledge that
they were not Communists.[vii]
The University did not stop there; Gus Hall – one of the
Communist Party’s national leaders at the time – was not permitted
to speak on the UW campus precisely because he was a Communist.[viii]
The
state’s Subversive Activities Control Board (SACB) continued to hunt
down old Communist fronts. Even
the Washington Pension Union (WPU), which was practically moribund,
remained under investigation. Under
the McCarren Act, any organization that was essentially Communist had to
register with the federal government as such, labeled a “communist
front.” The WPU had
actually been dissolved in 1961; thus, the SACB’s investigation serves
to point to the state government’s paranoiac fear of Communism.[ix]
In 1963 the Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C., finally ruled
that the WPU had in fact been dissolved and that its members could to
longer be harassed.
Another
witch hunt in 1963 led to Eugene Robel’s arrest and removal from his job at a
shipyard in Seattle after he was accused of being a “communist”
working near important defense projects.[x]
In some ways, the Red Scare of the Fifties carried over to the Sixties, and
continued to make life difficult for the Party. Even as late as June of 1964 the SACB was investigating yet
another “communist front,” the Washington Committee for the
Protection of the Foreign Born. The WCFPFB had been active in defending
Mr. Robel from losing his job at the shipyard, and had worked to keep
many accused Communists from deportation. The WCFPFB’s executive
secretary at the time was Marion Kinney, a leader of the Washington
State Communist Party.
Breaking
Out
Nineteen
sixty-four was a year of great change throughout the country and
Washington State, as the Civil Rights movement—and other activist
groups—turned up the heat on the status
quo. As if to define the battles that would come, Governor
George Wallace of Alabama came to the University of Washington campus to
speak at the beginning of this pivotal year.[xi]
Although considered by many to be a racist, Wallace as allowed to
speak on campus, while the Communist Party was still denied appearance
at the UW. In January,
anticipating Wallace’s visit, to protest political discrimination, UW
students in January 1964 demonstrated against President Odegaard’s ban
of Communists from the campus.[xii]
They pointed out that most colleges and universities, including
nine in Oregon, no longer banned Communists from their campuses.
Finally, near the end of the year, a Communist was allowed to
speak on the campus; he was Henry Winston, an African-American party
leader who had served time in federal prison for contempt under the
Smith Act. [xiii]
A
bold move for the WSCP occurred when Party member Milford A. Sutherland
decided in 1964 to run for governor of Washington State.
While not open about his Communist Party affiliation,
Sutherland’s platform included the full range of Party positions, and The
People’s World vigorously supported him.
The newspaper touted his opposition to the loyalty oath and his
challenge to repeal the McCarran Act.
Sutherland called for the defeat of the “ultra-right,” for
more jobs, for an end to the war in Vietnam, for free elections in the
states of Mississippi and Washington, and, finally, for separation of
the state from the military, monopolistic and economic domination of the
Boeing Company.[xiv]
Still, the fact that the WSCP and Sutherland did not come out and
run his candidacy as a “Communist” ticket was significant.
Members remained
unsure about being open because of national and state laws that were
still on the books.[xv]
The
War, Civil Rights and Help from the Left
In 1965 Marines landed in Da Nang and the Vietnam War went into
overdrive. Billions of dollars would be spent and a million lives would
be lost in a fight to contain Communism.
Back in Washington State, the CP and its members were already
beginning to work within several movements that would come to define the
activism of the Sixties. The
war in Vietnam and Civil Rights, prime concerns of the WSCP, were
specifically addressed at a meeting on October 30, 1965, when the Party
simultaneously decided to pay “special attention to the Central
District” of Seattle and concluded that the “peace movement must
take on McCarranism … if [they] want to move forward.”[xvi]
The
WSCP Civil Rights focus was on the mostly-black neighborhood of the
Central District, with a presence and commitment that dated back to the
1930s. In the 1960s some of
the Party’s work stressed jobs for Blacks and revitalization of the
Central neighborhood. [xvii]
Lonnie Nelson moved with her family to the Central District so
she could work on these issues within the neighborhood, itself (see
Lonnie Nelson interview). In addition, the WSCP and its members supported and were active
in the Central District school boycotts that were protests against the
segregation in schools and the poorer quality of education for Blacks.
Several members from the WSCP also traveled south in support of the
Civil Rights movement.[xviii]
The WSCP was very active in Civil Rights, especially because Seattle was
far from an equitable place for minorities to live in the Sixties.
Even though a good deal of effort was expended by some to
discredit the Civil Rights movement as “communist,“ the movement,
itself, embraced and accepted the Party’s members as supporters of its
work for equality.
However,
the WSCP still met resistance as a result of suspicions about its
activities. Milford
Sutherland responded in March of 1966 with regard to a Seattle
Times article that accused the
WSCP of “infiltration” of mass groups.
Sutherland argued that the Times
was only trying to smear the peace, Civil Rights, and Labor movements.
[xix]
This was often the response of
most people opposed to mass movements, nervous about maintenance
of the status quo.
In fact, the U.S. Attorney General at this time, Nicholas
Katzenbach, accused SDS of harboring Communists as members.[xx]
It is no wonder, then, that so many organizations did not want to
openly have Communists participating with them in their activities.
The
WSCP began working with another civil rights movement when it expressed
concern for Native Americans in Washington State.
Party meeting notes taken in 1966 state that, with regard to
Native Americans, “nearly all are being left behind in the march of
the Johnson administration’s ‘Great Society’,” and show the WSCP
vowing to “fight for the rights of the Indian people.”[xxi]
In addition, the Peoples World reported in February of 1966 on the rights of Indians
to treaties that had been broken by federal and state governments.[xxii]
The WSCP took an active interest in rectifying what had been done
to Indians in Washington State; specifically, Nisqually and Puyallup
Indian fishing rights became a hard-fought battle that raged for quite
some time. Members of the
WSCP, like Lonnie Nelson, were directly involved in organizing protests
and other efforts to get these tribes their fishing rights.
The WSCP was one of the few groups aiding Native Americans at
this time.[xxiii]
Nineteen
sixty-eight saw an expansion of the CP politically at both national and state levels. Nationally,
the CP—for the first time in twenty-eight years—decided to run
candidates for President and Vice President of the United States. Charlene Mitchell, a Black woman, was nominated for
President, but was entered on the “Free Ballot Party,”
not the Communist Party.[xxiv]
Politically, “communist” was still a dirty word; nonetheless,
the Party seemed to be coming out of its shell.
In Washington State, Milford Sutherland went on the offensive,
again attacking the loyalty
oaths still required for state office.
More importantly, the ACLU decided to join the fight as well,[xxv]
indicating that leftist organizations began to perceive that the CP was
under attack over its First Amendment rights.
This new political weight behind the CP’s defense was different
from the early Sixties when leftist groups were unwilling to allow CP
members to be open about their politics out of fear of legal reprisals
for associating with known Communists.
The
Black Panther Party was another group that the WSCP supported in the
late Sixties. Nationally, the Black Panthers were harassed by
police, which often led to violence against its members; in Seattle they
suffered a similar fate. In
December of 1968 the PW
published an interview given to the paper by members of the Panther
Party who voiced concerns about the treatment that they received from
the police. The Panthers were often in close contact with the CP.
After all, members of the WSCP were living in the Central
District and helping the Black community directly.
In fact, they had helped block Seattle police from raiding the
Panthers’ office. To some
Party members, the harassment of the Black Panthers had obvious
similarities to the harassment that the CP had faced over the years.[xxvi]
Nineteen
sixty-nine was the fiftieth anniversary of the CP in the United States.
Nationally, congratulations came in from all over the world – the
Soviet Union, Cuba and North Korea.[xxvii] In the same year,
Angela Davis—later one of the Party’s most notable members—was
fired from her job as a professor at UCLA for being a Communist.
Davis, not at all shy about her membership in the Party, openly
fought the school for reinstatement.[xxviii]
Her actions demonstrated that the CP was willing to draw national
attention by non-capitulation to opposition.
As more groups came to the Party’s aid (like the ACLU), the CP
finally found itself able to confront some of the governmental
harassment issues that had plagued it since the Fifties.
A lot of support was focused on the Party’s First Amendment
rights, a universal concern for many organizations.
By 1969 the WSCP was putting even more effort into the anti-war
movement. The CP had been speaking out against the war since the early
Sixties, and Washington State Party members consistently participated in
anti-war demonstrations. [xxix]
However, the CP did have to face something of a split with the
labor unions over their anti-war stance because most unions at this time
were not against the war per se
and very few ever really came out against the war.[xxx]
It was a difficult decision because the CP had always been a
worker’s party. In October of 1969 several members of the WSCP took a
bus to San Francisco to participate in one of the largest anti-war
demonstrations of the Sixties, a nation- wide moratorium on the war. The
WSCP would remain active in the anti-war movement throughout the
Seventies, all the way to the war’s end.[xxxi]
Conclusion
By the Sixties the CP had become a much-diminished organization.
The Fifties and McCarthyism had taken their toll both on Party
members’ morale and on membership levels, while international events
had similar effects. Regardless,
individual Party members pressed on at the national and the state level.
In Washington State, the Party seemed to reenergize itself, especially
by the end of the decade. In
spite of their relatively small number, WSCP members enthusiastically
participated in Civil Rights, the anti-war movement, the campaign for
Indian rights, and even defended the Black Panthers.
However, the Party still had its enemies—namely, the
government, and, concurrently, the many people in the United States who
felt that the war in Vietnam was all about arresting the spread of
Communism. It is surely one
of the ironiy positive things happened for the CP in
the Sixties. The Party
finally found its break with McCarthyism, and many of the laws that had
discriminated against it were slowly removed from the books, or at least
seriously stripped of power.[xxxii]
At the beginning of the Sixties the CP was down but not out, and
by the end of the decade the Party seemed to have found its legs again.
©
Copyright Paul Landis 2002
Next:
Closing the Century Notes:
[i]Lonnie
Nelson Interview by Brian Grijalva, 26 February 2001, Special
Collections, University of Washington, Seattle.
[ii]B.J.
Mangaoang, Seattle CP member, wrote an article in the April, 1961,
issue of the People’s
World discussing this subject.
[iii]Marc
Brodine Interview by Paul Landis, 25 February 2001. Video of the
interview can be found in Special Collections at the University of
Washington, Seattle.
[iv]“Fight
against Seattle job bias inspired by Carolina example,” People’s World, 2 September 1961, 3.
[v]Walt
Crowley, Rites of Passage: a
Memoir of the Sixties in Seattle (Seattle: University of
Washington Press, 1995), 21.
[vi]Marc
Brodine Interview.
[vii]“’Loyalty’
issue simmers despite court turndown,” People’s
World, 3 February 1962, 3.
[viii]”Gag
on Gus Hall stirs up protest,” People’s
World, 10 February 1962, 3.
[ix]“SACB
sleuths shadow Pension Union’s ghost,” People’s
World, 17 March 1962, 3.
[x]“Ruling
due Nov. 25 in Eugene Robel case,” People’s
World, 26 October 1963, 3.
[xi]“A
cold shoulder for Gov. Wallace,” People’s
World, 25 January 1964, 3.
[xii]“University
sticks by its speaker ban; report assailed as cub on free speech,”
People’s World, 18 January 1964, 3.
[xiii]“Campus
issue sparks debate,” People’s
World, 24 October 1964, 3.
[xiv]Marion
Kinney Collection, Special Collections, University of Washington,
Box 1.
[xv]Marc
Brodine Interview. Brodine
discusses how McCarthyism really arrested the party and in the
Sixties still kept members from being too open about their politics.
[xvi]Marion
Kinney Collection, Box 1. This
contains minutes of various Party meetings from 1965 on.
[xvii]“New
plan for Seattle ghetto,” People’s
World, 7 October 1967, 3.
[xix]“Press
tries to make CP plan ‘secret’,” People’s
World, 19 March 1966, 3.
[xx]James
Miller, Democracy Is in the
Streets: from Port Huron to the Siege of Chicago
(New York: Simon & Schuster, 1987), 250.
[xxi]Marion
Kinney Collection, Box #1.
[xxii]“’Grass
Roots’ forum to hear Indian fishing rights dispute,” People’s
World, 5 February 1966, 3.
[xxiii]Lonnie
Nelson Iinterview. The
interview explores more of this topic.
In fact, Nelson, herself,
was quite active with helping AIM and various other Indian
organizations, especially in Washington State.
[xxiv]“Communists
name black-youth ticket,” People’s
World, 13 July 1968, 1.
[xxv]“Drive
captures interest,” People’s
World, 19 October 1968, 3.
[xxvi]Lonnie
Nelson Interview. She
discusses this incident in more detail.
[xxvii]“U.S.
Communist anniversary feted,” People’s
World, 13 September 1969, 5.
[xxviii]“Black
prof fired; storm brewing,” People’s
World, 27 September 1969, 1.
[xxix]“Seattle
students applaud Winston,” People’s
World, 24 October 1964, 3.
Henry Winston, a CP national leader, came to the UW and one
of the things that he spoke out against was the war in Vietnam.
[xxx]Marc
Brodine Interview.
In 1962, a group of 64
faculty, staff, and students of the University of Washington filed suit
to stop enforcement of the university's mandatory loyalty oath,
first imposed in 1931. Two years later the Supreme Court ruled with the
plaintiffs, setting a precedent for ending loyalty oaths in other
states. (Peoples World February 3, 1962)

Eugene Robel was arrested in 1963 charged
with violating the McCarran Act that made it illegal for a Communist to work in a
defense industry. Robel at the time worked for Todd Shipyard. In 1967
the Supreme Court voided that part of the Internal Security Act. (Peoples
World May 11, 1968)

Overcoming the legal obstacles that had
been imposed in the McCarthy era would remain a major Party project all
through the 1960s. Peoples World July 17, 1965

People's World December 12, 1964

In 1962, a faculty group at Central
Washington University and a student group at UW, invited Party
chair Gus Hall to the two campuses for a speaking
engagement. These invitations directly challenged the State's
prohibition against Communists speaking on college campuses and
both administrations enforced the ban and Gus Hall
was forced to speak off-campus. ( Peoples World February 10,
1962).

When the universities finally relaxed
the ban on Communist speakers in 1965, James Jackson,
editor of The Worker which was the Party's New York newspaper, spoke at
WSU and UW. (Peoples World May 29, 1965)

All through the 1960s the CP
concentrated energy and attention on Seattle's African American
community. It supported civil rights initiatives early in the
decade and later worked with the Black Panther Party. People's World October 7, 1967

After 50 black students occupied the
Administration Building, UW President Charles Odegaard agreed to
increase the recruiting of African American students and faculty and to
expand Black Studies programs. The People's World applauded June
1, 1968

Communists also supported the fishing rights
struggles of Northwest native peoples . (Peoples World February 5, 1966)

A People's World article celebrates
1968 "Fish-ins" to reclaim the treaty rights. (October 19,
1968).

More than any other development of the
decade, the growing anti-war movement helped change the political
climate. After nearly two decades of persecution and secrecy, the
Communist Party was beginning to operate openly.

People's World August 26, 1967 (reprinted from the London Morning
Star)

A CP contingent joins Seattle's 1968 May Day march. (Peoples
World May 4, 1968)

Peoples World September 7, 1968

The Party chose Charlotte Mitchell as its
Presidential candidate in 1968. (People's World July 13, 1968)
|
|