8-15 pages, with an average of 12.
Circulation area:
Greater Pacific Northwest area including Washington,
Oregon, Idaho, and British Columbia, Canada.
Editors:
Manley J. Wilson, Phil Frost, Richard Spohn
Collection:
University of Washington, Suzzallo Library A3977
Status:
Incomplete. Earlier films quality not as good as later ones but all are
readable.
The International Woodworker evolved out
of The Timber Worker in January 1942 as a union paper for the local
timber and logging industries of the Pacific Northwest. During the 1940’s the
paper was affiliated with the CIO, and later the AFL-CIO. Typically consisting
of 12-15 pages and published weekly, bi-weekly, and monthly, the newspaper was
sent to members of the IWA. It included news of other woodworker unions around
the country, along with national news stories that were relevant to working
class union members. This usually took up the first and second pages of the
paper. The bulk of the next four or five pages dealt with stories pertaining to
local issues. Here you find stories of what is going on at the local chapters of
the IWA or other local unions whose industry has some bearing on the timber
industry. The rest of the paper was used for advertisements, regular columns, a
women’s auxiliary page, cartoons, comics, and safety and healthcare
issues.
Union News
The Woodworker was a main source of labor news for union members.
It covered everything from international stories to small, local activities.
Internationally and nationally it focused on union issues and politics having
direct bearing on labor and the union. Stories came from as far away as Ottawa
and Toronto, from Tennessee and Oklahoma or other parts of the U.S. and Canada
where the union was part of the timber industry. Being a CIO affiliated paper
you might expect to find articles that showed the struggles between the AFL and
CIO and their differing ideologies, but for the most part articles written about
the AFL were sympathetic and reflected the hope that the union federations would
work together. However, there were on occasion articles hinting at the tensions
between the two. A 1945 article discusses the contest between IWA and the rival
AFL woodworkers union for representation of workers at the Booth-Kelly Lumber
Company, where the AFL had forced a decertification election. The IWA wins the
election and the International Woodworker criticizes the AFL for
"disruptive labor-splitting tactics" but otherwise doesn’t show the bitterness
of the battles between the AFL and CIO in the past. (4/18/45)
Articles showing the AFL and CIO coming together and unifying for organized
labor were more common, especially in the 1950s as the two federations moved
toward reunification. In elections celebrating CIO-endorsed candidates, the
praise went for all the candidates who supported labor, whether their background
was with the CIO or the AFL.(5/28/53) Another example is seen in an Idaho court
ruling. The article states "the decision upholds the contention of AFL and CIO
leaders in the state who took the case before the court."(8/25/54) Although the
Woodworker was a CIO affiliated newspaper, by the end of the forties and
into the early fifties their focus wasn’t on showing the rift between the two
labor union federations.
Keeping Wages Fair
The Woodworker also ran numerous stories having to do with wages,
minimum wage, and back-pay settlements due to union members from employers.
Minimum wage laws get a lot of coverage, both locally and nationally. In a 1945
issue the paper ran a story of a minimum wage increase at a veneer plant in
Portsmouth, Virginia. It details an agreement between the IWA Local 389 and the
Dixie Veneer Company, which established a minimum wage of fifty cents an
hour.(2/14/45) The increase brought the pay of women working at the plant from
40 cents/hr. to 50 cents/hr. This and other stories like it are evidence of the
fight by labor to get the working class a fair cut of the profits, reward the
women for keeping production up while many men went off to war, and to get
employers making huge profits from the war to spread the wealth to the workers.
Locally, the paper was also interested in fighting for better wages. In Oregon
in 1961 the paper reports on an amendment to a bill that would take away an
exemption which left logging crews of 12 or fewer exempted from the minimum wage
laws. The paper reports that this practice allowed owners to contract out for
help to cut company owned timber, keeping work size down and allowing the owners
to set the wage scale below the minimum wage level.(2/22/61)
Another issue the Woodworker focused on was back pay due to union
members. A 1946 front page had a story from Memphis, Tenn. in which the IWA-CIO
won $60,000 in back wages to be paid to employees. On the same page was a local
story of retroactive pay for workers at the Buol Logging Co., who received 71/2
cents an hour going back 3 months.(1/10/46) This trend of front-page coverage
indicates that the paper is making sure that union members know about the
victories, both local and national.
The idea of working shorter hours was also a common theme in the paper. In
the same way the union kept members unified and informed with stories of
settlements and back-pay awards, they ran quite a few stories promoting the idea
of shorter working days. A 1953 article calling for the 6-hour workday, draws
parallels back to early strikes of the shingle weavers and Wobblies demanding an
8-hour day.(2/11/53) Twenty-five years later, in 1977, the IWA’s position still
held its course. There were stories quoting recent studies showing the decrease
in working hours over time for the last century in America. The paper said that
the 40-hour workweek could soon be down to a 35-hour workweek.(10/19/77)
Support for the War
During World War II the paper dealt with the strain it put on the working
class while presenting a positive, patriotic attitude. Whether it was stories
run on the front page giving praise and recognition to local chapters supporting
the "Buy a Bomber" campaign(1/28/42), or running half page recruitment ads on
why experienced seamen should re-enlist and help "finish the job"(1/3/45), the
union’s support for the war effort was fairly obvious. In light of losing
manpower out of the working class to go overseas and fight, the IWA worked to
keep union members unified and focused to meet the high production demands put
on industry nationwide. The editorial page provided "pep talks" on the
importance of keeping production up and remembering that American lives still
depended on the output of American industry. The paper also ran stories praising
record production levels, trying to keep members morale up in times of rationing
and a wavering economy.
Although the IWA showed strong support for the war, they didn’t always agree
with government proposals or decisions that directly affected the union and its
members. A major issue of contention between labor and the government was over
plans to draft manpower. In a 1945 front page, the union boldly opposed FDR’s
plan for national service legislation, with its work-or-fight conscription. The
union viewed these stipulations as providing union busting
possibilities.(1/24/45)
Taft-Hartley Hatred
There was no doubt about the IWA’s position on the Taft-Hartley Act of 1947.
News about the new law made the front page, along with editorial cartoons
showing the "execution" of labor. The union believed that this Act would
increase labor disputes rather than settle them, that the government would have
too much say in matters of collective bargaining, and that the purpose of the
Act was to make strikes more difficult rather than more unnecessary. This
opposition to what the union saw as the government aiding big business lead the
union to urge members to vote, while educating them of the shift of power away
from the President and into the Congress. Truman’s presidency after 1948 was the
example the union used to show that Congress wielded more power than the
President. The newspaper often featured articles explaining that voting mattered
and was the key to stopping further anti-labor legislation.(5/28/52)
Focus on Safety
Throughout the history of the Woodworker, the most common issue
addressed is that of safety and creating a safer work environment in the most
"dangerous industry in the nation."(9/10/52) Attempts to make members more
safety conscious came in numerous forms. An illustrated scene of a logging
accident, diagramed and detailed with descriptions of what went wrong and why,
was always presented under the heading of "A Woodworker Died Here".(11/26/52)
Small articles providing statistics on accident rates and such things as the
cost of workmen’s compensation benefits for the year were even more
common.(1/26/72) Once in a while a page was dedicated to a special feature on
safety. It would briefly outline the importance of safety and awareness, along
with clearly showing the importance of the timber industry and its effects in
everyday life. Photos of different logging or sawmill scenes would be followed
by safety tips and learning how to prevent accidents.(1/10/45) Almost weekly a
section was dedicated to "News of the Sick and Injured", in which were listed
names of the newly injured along with identifying information including their
employer, their union local and the hospital where they were
treated.(1/3/45)
Along with the weekly or monthly features, regular news articles on safety
were in virtually every issue. These stories highlighted safety programs and
attempts for better government regulations promoting safety in the workplace. In
1970 organized labor helped pass the Occupational Safety and Health Act, OSHA.
The IWA viewed this as a very important issue for the union due to the hazards
of the industry, and urged workers to "remain active in searching out hazards to
members on the job and demand immediate correction. The lives and well-being of
the individual member and his family require the assurance of safe and healthful
employment."(1/12/72) Other stories cited the poor performance by Washington
State’s logging and enforcement programs on evaluations by OHSA in light of
increased numbers of fatalities over previous years.(10/19/77) The IWA ran
stories to keep worker awareness on the importance of safety, and to show
members the importance of allowing regulations like OSHA to work for the
employee and not let the employer cut corners, especially when it comes to
worker’s safety.
Advertisements, Ladies Auxiliary, and "About Open Spaces evolved out
of The Timber Worker in January 1942 as a union paper for the local
timber and logging industries of the Pacific Northwest. During the 1940’s the
paper was affiliated with the CIO, and later the AFL-CIO. Typically consisting
of 12-15 pages and published weekly, bi-weekly, and monthly, the newspaper was
sent to members of the IWA. It included news of other woodworker unions around
the country, along with national news stories that were relevant to working
class union members. This usually took up the first and second pages of the
paper. The bulk of the next four or five pages dealt with stories pertaining to
local issues. Here you find stories of what is going on at the local chapters of
the IWA or other local unions whose industry has some bearing on the timber
industry. The rest of the paper was used for advertisements, regular columns, a
women’s auxiliary page, cartoons, comics, and safety and healthcare
issues.
Union News
The Woodworker was a main source of labor news for union members.
It covered everything from international stories to small, local activities.
Internationally and nationally it focused on union issues and politics having
direct bearing on labor and the union. Stories came from as far away as Ottawa
and Toronto, from Tennessee and Oklahoma or other parts of the U.S. and Canada
where the union was part of the timber industry. Being a CIO affiliated paper
you might expect to find articles that showed the struggles between the AFL and
CIO and their differing ideologies, but for the most part articles written about
the AFL were sympathetic and reflected the hope that the union federations would
work together. However, there were on occasion articles hinting at the tensions
between the two. A 1945 article discusses the contest between IWA and the rival
AFL woodworkers union for representation of workers at the Booth-Kelly Lumber
Company, where the AFL had forced a decertification election. The IWA wins the
election and the International Woodworker criticizes the AFL for
"disruptive labor-splitting tactics" but otherwise doesn’t show the bitterness
of the battles between the AFL and CIO in the past. (4/18/45)
Articles showing the AFL and CIO coming together and unifying for organized
labor were more common, especially in the 1950s as the two federations moved
toward reunification. In elections celebrating CIO-endorsed candidates, the
praise went for all the candidates who supported labor, whether their background
was with the CIO or the AFL.(5/28/53) Another example is seen in an Idaho court
ruling. The article states "the decision upholds the contention of AFL and CIO
leaders in the state who took the case before the court."(8/25/54) Although the
Woodworker was a CIO affiliated newspaper, by the end of the forties and
into the early fifties their focus wasn’t on showing the rift between the two
labor union federations.
Keeping Wages Fair
The Woodworker also ran numerous stories having to do with wages,
minimum wage, and back-pay settlements due to union members from employers.
Minimum wage laws get a lot of coverage, both locally and nationally. In a 1945
issue the paper ran a story of a minimum wage increase at a veneer plant in
Portsmouth, Virginia. It details an agreement between the IWA Local 389 and the
Dixie Veneer Company, which established a minimum wage of fifty cents an
hour.(2/14/45) The increase brought the pay of women working at the plant from
40 cents/hr. to 50 cents/hr. This and other stories like it are evidence of the
fight by labor to get the working class a fair cut of the profits, reward the
women for keeping production up while many men went off to war, and to get
employers making huge profits from the war to spread the wealth to the workers.
Locally, the paper was also interested in fighting for better wages. In Oregon
in 1961 the paper reports on an amendment to a bill that would take away an
exemption which left logging crews of 12 or fewer exempted from the minimum wage
laws. The paper reports that this practice allowed owners to contract out for
help to cut company owned timber, keeping work size down and allowing the owners
to set the wage scale below the minimum wage level.(2/22/61)
Another issue the Woodworker focused on was back pay due to union
members. A 1946 front page had a story from Memphis, Tenn. in which the IWA-CIO
won $60,000 in back wages to be paid to employees. On the same page was a local
story of retroactive pay for workers at the Buol Logging Co., who received 71/2
cents an hour going back 3 months.(1/10/46) This trend of front-page coverage
indicates that the paper is making sure that union members know about the
victories, both local and national.
The idea of working shorter hours was also a common theme in the paper. In
the same way the union kept members unified and informed with stories of
settlements and back-pay awards, they ran quite a few stories promoting the idea
of shorter working days. A 1953 article calling for the 6-hour workday, draws
parallels back to early strikes of the shingle weavers and Wobblies demanding an
8-hour day.(2/11/53) Twenty-five years later, in 1977, the IWA’s position still
held its course. There were stories quoting recent studies showing the decrease
in working hours over time for the last century in America. The paper said that
the 40-hour workweek could soon be down to a 35-hour workweek.(10/19/77)
Support for the War
During World War II the paper dealt with the strain it put on the working
class while presenting a positive, patriotic attitude. Whether it was stories
run on the front page giving praise and recognition to local chapters supporting
the "Buy a Bomber" campaign(1/28/42), or running half page recruitment ads on
why experienced seamen should re-enlist and help "finish the job"(1/3/45), the
union’s support for the war effort was fairly obvious. In light of losing
manpower out of the working class to go overseas and fight, the IWA worked to
keep union members unified and focused to meet the high production demands put
on industry nationwide. The editorial page provided "pep talks" on the
importance of keeping production up and remembering that American lives still
depended on the output of American industry. The paper also ran stories praising
record production levels, trying to keep members morale up in times of rationing
and a wavering economy.
Although the IWA showed strong support for the war, they didn’t always agree
with government proposals or decisions that directly affected the union and its
members. A major issue of contention between labor and the government was over
plans to draft manpower. In a 1945 front page, the union boldly opposed FDR’s
plan for national service legislation, with its work-or-fight conscription. The
union viewed these stipulations as providing union busting
possibilities.(1/24/45)
Taft-Hartley Hatred
There was no doubt about the IWA’s position on the Taft-Hartley Act of 1947.
News about the new law made the front page, along with editorial cartoons
showing the "execution" of labor. The union believed that this Act would
increase labor disputes rather than settle them, that the government would have
too much say in matters of collective bargaining, and that the purpose of the
Act was to make strikes more difficult rather than more unnecessary. This
opposition to what the union saw as the government aiding big business lead the
union to urge members to vote, while educating them of the shift of power away
from the President and into the Congress. Truman’s presidency after 1948 was the
example the union used to show that Congress wielded more power than the
President. The newspaper often featured articles explaining that voting mattered
and was the key to stopping further anti-labor legislation.(5/28/52)
Focus on Safety
Throughout the history of the Woodworker, the most common issue
addressed is that of safety and creating a safer work environment in the most
"dangerous industry in the nation."(9/10/52) Attempts to make members more
safety conscious came in numerous forms. An illustrated scene of a logging
accident, diagramed and detailed with descriptions of what went wrong and why,
was always presented under the heading of "A Woodworker Died Here".(11/26/52)
Small articles providing statistics on accident rates and such things as the
cost of workmen’s compensation benefits for the year were even more
common.(1/26/72) Once in a while a page was dedicated to a special feature on
safety. It would briefly outline the importance of safety and awareness, along
with clearly showing the importance of the timber industry and its effects in
everyday life. Photos of different logging or sawmill scenes would be followed
by safety tips and learning how to prevent accidents.(1/10/45) Almost weekly a
section was dedicated to "News of the Sick and Injured", in which were listed
names of the newly injured along with identifying information including their
employer, their union local and the hospital where they were
treated.(1/3/45)
Along with the weekly or monthly features, regular news articles on safety
were in virtually every issue. These stories highlighted safety programs and
attempts for better government regulations promoting safety in the workplace. In
1970 organized labor helped pass the Occupational Safety and Health Act, OSHA.
The IWA viewed this as a very important issue for the union due to the hazards
of the industry, and urged workers to "remain active in searching out hazards to
members on the job and demand immediate correction. The lives and well-being of
the individual member and his family require the assurance of safe and healthful
employment."(1/12/72) Other stories cited the poor performance by Washington
State’s logging and enforcement programs on evaluations by OHSA in light of
increased numbers of fatalities over previous years.(10/19/77) The IWA ran
stories to keep worker awareness on the importance of safety, and to show
members the importance of allowing regulations like OSHA to work for the
employee and not let the employer cut corners, especially when it comes to
worker’s safety.
Advertisements, Ladies Auxiliary, and "About Open Spaces"
The back pages of the Woodworker were filled with plenty of
advertisements, a ladies auxiliary page, and other weekly features like Fred
Goetz’s column "About Open Spaces", Kip Knothaid’s "Dry Rot", and "Chip’s and
Shavings" by George!. There were plenty of advertisements filling in spaces
throughout the paper, especially towards the back. Some 1945 ads proudly stated,
"100% Union Store", "Union Made", "Always ready to serve IWA-CIO members", or
other slogans showing support for the union. (10/31/45) The majority
of the ads had no such slogan or indication of being "for" unions. Most appear
to be small, family owned private businesses. These small business owners
understood their reliance on the timber industry and its impact on the local
economies. Whether they supported the idea of unions or not, the small business
owners more than likely supported the unions for economic factors if nothing
else. The ads came from all over the Pacific Northwest. They ranged from British
Columbia, throughout Washington, and much of Oregon. Most were from small, rural
communities with strong ties to the timber industry. Mixed in with the ads it
wasn’t uncommon to see banners saying "Buy Bonds" and notices to "Send in your
reports of sick and injured members". Evidence of union views both on safety and
the war were easy to find scattered throughout the paper.
Women were also given a voice in the union by way of a woman’s auxiliary
page. This page gave a voice to the women and wives of the union. In 1945 there
were news stories about women workers and how labor was working for them
throughout the country. (1/3/45) Other stories were inclined more towards issues
in the average woman’s everyday life. These included articles explaining the
food rationing during the war, the need for action over the rising cost and
decline in quality of clothes, especially for children,(1/17/45) and ceiling
prices on groceries in the local communities.(1/10/45)
There were also a couple of regular features in the paper. "Dry Rot" by Kip
Knothaid and "Chips and Shavings" by George! ran during the late 40’s and
throughout the 50’s. Both were editorial columns often using current events
stories to get a point across about the need to support or strengthen the union.
Both of these columns seem to have a looser, more radical feel to them, like
they’re rebelling a little against the norm to gain the interest of union
members. In the 1970s a regular feature was Fred Goetz’s "About Open Spaces".
This section was a chance for members to send in pictures of their fishing and
hunting trophies, as well as tell stories and tidbits of their adventures. Along
with submitted works, Mr. Goetz ads his own touches to the column, often stories
about fishing during the different seasons or just plain factual information on
the local region and its wildlife.(1/26/72)
Summary
For the most part The International Woodworker appears to be
similar to other mainstream local papers. The main difference is that while
other papers report on everyday news stories, the Woodworker is focused
on issues directly related to the IWA or to organized labor. There is no real
animosity or radical ideas being spread by the paper. Its goal or purpose seems
to be to provide a means of keeping members current on labor and union issues,
while educating them on important issues such as safety in the workplace.
Although the paper may have had a more alternative or radical start as the
Timber Worker in the mid 30’s, by the time of its evolution into the
Woodworker during the early 40’s it seems to have settled into its role
as an informative source of news for members of the IWA..