Julia Herschensohn


Julia Herschensohn

Professor
PhD. 1976, University of Washington

Personal statement

Research
A major enterprise of generative linguistics is the determination of how language acquisition is accomplished, how a young child achieves phonological and syntactic mastery of a language to which she has imperfect input, the less than complete corpus to which she is exposed. The current generative model holds that the grammar of a particular language is learnable because it has a core, Universal Grammar (UG), comprising principles that are invariant across languages, and parameters whose differing values permit an explanation of variation from language to language. In my work I examine second language (L2) acquisition, arguing that it is not simply learning through communicative experience, but rather the resetting of parameters and transfer of already acquired grammatical principles within the lexicon of the new language.

Curriculum Vitae

Most significant recent contributions

 

Books:

To appear. Language Development and Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

2001. (equally co-edited with Enrique Mallen and Karen Zagona) Features and Interfaces in Romance: Essays in honor of Heles Contreras. Philadelphia / Amsterdam: Benjamins [302 pp.].

2000. The Second Time Around: Minimalism and L2 acquisition. Philadelphia / Amsterdam: John Benjamins [287 pp.].

1996. Case Suspension and Binary Complement Structure in French. Philadelphia / Amsterdam: John Benjamins [200 pp.].

Articles in Refereed Journals:

2006. Français langue seconde: From functional categories to functionalist variation. Second Language Research.

2005. (Main author with Jeff Stevenson and Jeremy Waltmunson). Children's acquisition of L2 Spanish morphosyntax in an immersion setting. International Review of Applied Linguistics 43: 193-217.

2004. Inflection, thematic roles and abstract Case. Bilingualism: Language and cognition 7, 1. (invited response to keynote article).

2003. Verbs and rules: Two profiles of French morphology acquisition. Journal of French Language Studies 13: 23-45.

2003. (equally co-authored with Deborah Arteaga and Randall Gess). Focusing on phonology to teach morphological form in French. Modern Language Journal 87:58-70.

2001. Missing inflection in L2 French: Accidental infinitives and other verbal deficits. Second Language Research 17: 273-305.

I have chosen these publications because they reflect my current research interests and contributions, and they also display the range of my work in the areas of generative syntax, second language acquisition theory, and applied linguistics. My main areas of specialization are theoretical syntax and nonnative language learning, linked in my current research dealing with L2 acquisition. My most recent book, Language Development and Age (Cambridge UP) examines the question of whether there is a critical period for language acquisition, demonstrating that first language (L1) is largely susceptible to age constraints, whereas second language is indirectly so affected. L1 is not thoroughly acquired if age of onset passes seven years and shows major deficits past age twelve. L2 acquisition also shows age effects, but with a range of individual differences. The competence of expert adult learners, the unequal achievements of child L2 learners, and the lack of consistent empirical evidence for a maturational cutoff, all cast doubt on a critical period for L2A. Furthermore, the reasons for the deterioration of acquisition potential are only partly maturational, since experience with the native tongue shapes the neural networks of the brain dedicated to language.

In 2001 my colleagues Enrique Mallen, Karen Zagona and I edited a volume on Romance dealing with morpho-syntactic and phonological features and the interfaces of syntax, semantics, morphology and phonology, Features and Interfaces (J. Benjamins). My 2000 book, The Second Time Around: Minimalism and L2 Acquisition, published by J. Benjamins in the Language Acquisition & Language Disorders Series relates recent advances in theoretical syntax with empirical research in language development, I claim that second language acquisition is not totally distinct from first language acquisition, but rather is a relearning of language, accomplished through the mastery of morphological features and their syntactic connection to functional categories. My 1996 book Case Suspension and Binary Complement Structure in French, a study in theoretical syntax, argues that the dual nature of objective case in French correlates with a parallel limit on argument (complement) projection, using non-thematic subject constructions as the main area of investigation.

Recent articles explore the role of Universal Grammar and the nature of morphology learning in second language acquisition, through an examination of adult L2 French interlanguage and Spanish child learners. These articles expand ideas presented in several chapters of my 2000 book, in which I argue that second language acquisition may draw on aspects of UG, and that L2A is accomplished through the progressive mastery of morpho-lexical constructions and with the use of a coalition of resources (e.g. UG constraints, cognitive learning strategies). Cheryl Frenck-Mestre (CNRS, Aix-en-Provence) and I have collaborated on a study of French gender acquisition by learners with and without gender in their native language and presented our results at EUROSLA 2005.

My ongoing research with colleague Deborah Arteaga (UNLV) is examining longitudinal data of three advanced French L2 learners to ascertain development of L2 competence. We are looking at their acquisition of verbal and nominal inflection, verb raising, object clitics and sociolinguistic competence. We have presented our work at several conferences (GALA, SLRF 2005, 2006, BUCLD 2005, LSRL 2006, GASLA 2006, PACSLRF 2006).


If you have any further questions or comments please contact us at phoneme@u.washington.edu

Last modified 6/19/06 by Joyce Parvi