|
CHAPTER V The MSE faculty members are all highly qualified individuals who are well respected by their peers and colleagues. The professional expertise and research interests of the faculty represent the breadth of our field. Further details of their expertise can be found in the abbreviated CVs and a summary of their research and teaching presented in Appendix G. The faculty has active research programs and contributes to both undergraduate and graduate programs. Their research programs and expertise are nationally and internationally recognized. The high quality research programs have a direct positive impact on the quality of teaching. The faculty brings both a sound understanding of the fundamentals and deep knowledge of their expertise area to the classroom. In addition to this, the students get a chance to personally interact with academic leaders in their field and to participate in the exciting research programs. 5.1 Current Faculty and Changes in the Last Ten Years The department faculty is a reflection of three realities: small faculty size, broad-based interdisciplinary nature of the field, and the commitment to have both a strong undergraduate program and a strong research focus. As a result, we have ten-tenure track and four research faculty members that have expertise in different classes of materials (ceramics, metals, semiconductors, polymers, and composites). In 1998, as a part of strategic planning for the department, we agreed that we should categorize expertise in Materials Science and Engineering not just by material class but also in other ways (research area, core expertise and application focus of the material). Our faculty is well represented in most of these categories. However, a few notable gaps remain. These are discussed later in Chapter 7, section 7.5, Challenges and Planning for Excellence. The small size of the Department has led us to design our faculty in a mode where there are no sub groups in specific areas. One notable result of the broad based faculty expertise and the interdisciplinary nature of the field is that our faculty has extensive collaborations with faculty members from other departments and outside the University. These collaborations are highly valued and are a critical component of the department’s mission. Seven colleagues from other departments are adjunct faculty members of the department, and five faculty members from the department have joint and adjunct appointments in other departments (Jen joint appointment in Chemistry, Cao adjunct in Mechanical Engineering, Krishnan and Ohuchi adjunct in Physics and Sarikaya adjunct in Chemical Engineering). The interdisciplinary aspects are further elaborated later in this Chapter. We believe that on the whole this character of the faculty provides strength to our department. The complementary strengths within the department and collaborations with colleagues makes it possible for us to both provide a broad-based research and educational program for our students while maintaining critical size and strength in specific topics. One positive result of this has been strategic recruiting of faculty in the last four years, who have developed strong collaborative research programs. These new research programs have also broadened the research portfolio of faculty who had been in the department for some time. There are a few significant challenges due to this character of our faculty. One is the lack of faculty members in a few areas which are very important from an educational perspective but do not have a strong base outside the department for collaborations. One example of this is metallic materials. Another challenge is our ability to appreciate the expertise and contributions of our colleagues. The final challenge is in being able to integrate the needs and expertise of all the faculty members in the educational programs of the department. The last two challenges are particularly true for organic and biological materials since our department’s traditional strength has been in inorganic materials. These challenges are present in most small to medium-sized research-focused MSE departments. We believe that in spite of these challenges, it is critical for us to develop a broad-based materials department with expertise in inorganic and organic (including biological) materials. This is due to the reasons that were outlined in our strategic plan (specifically to foster interdisciplinary collaboration, strong research funding and broad-based education for the students). The full integration of organic (including biological) materials in our curriculum (both graduate and undergraduate) is the major challenge for the future. We also believe that this integration will enhance our ability to appreciate the expertise and contributions of all the faculty members. The complete history of faculty hiring and retirements/resignation for both tenure track and research faculty members since 1991 is shown in Table 13. Eight tenure-track faculty members resigned or retired and six tenure track faculty members have been hired. The Department currently is recruiting two more faculty members. All ten tenure-track faculty and three research faculty offices are located on the third floor of Roberts Hall. One research faculty office is on the fourth floor of Roberts Hall. Emeritus faculty offices are also on the fourth floor of Roberts Hall.
The Department has recently experienced rapid expansion into new research areas. These include polymers, hybrids, biomaterials, nanomaterials, and photonic and magnetic materials. Potential applications of nanomaterials, biomaterials, and photonic materials exist in modern industry and cutting-edge technologies. These research areas complement existing strength in ceramics, metals, electronic materials and composites. Table 14 below lists the areas of faculty research within the department. Many faculty members have interactions with industry, either through research programs or consulting. Some industrial research programs (with in-state industries) are assisted by the Washington Technology Center. At least 7 of our faculty members have been involved with industrial research during the past 5 years.
The size of the department facilitates communication among faculty. The MSE department is run democratically with faculty participation in all levels of administration. Our Undergraduate Committee has the primary responsibility for the undergraduate program. Similarly, the Graduate committee has the primary responsibility for the graduate program. The responsibilities of these committees include overseeing, administering and suggesting modifications to the respective programs. All major decisions are made by the entire faculty in regularly scheduled (nominally twice a month) faculty meetings. In addition, we have an annual retreat (late September) in which important long-term issues are discussed together with update on the status of the department and the key areas of focus for the coming year. The Research Faculty members are also an integral part of this decision making process. They have always provided advice to the department and have been involved in committees (including the Undergraduate Committee). A few year ago, the University Senate passed a resolution that gives research faculty a vote in most matters of the Department and the University. All the tenure-track faculty members contribute both to classroom and individual instructions at the graduate and undergraduate levels. Table 15 shows the workload for the past year. This is fairly typical for the department. Some of our classes are taught by research and temporary faculty members. This is due to need in specific topical areas, lack of sufficient number of faculty members (note we have two open positions) and buyout and sabbatical leaves. We also use the University’s 40 % rehire policy of recently retired faculty members. Every year, the Chair has a meeting, in the spring quarter, with individual faculty members in which they request the courses that they would like to teach in the coming year. The Chair also discusses course offerings with the graduate and the undergraduate committees for the coming year and in consultation with the Chairs of these committees, allocates teaching responsibilities for the following academic year. All new permanent courses are first proposed to the appropriate program committees who then bring them to the faculty meeting with specific recommendations. The faculty considers these courses and votes on them. In most cases, new courses are first offered on a trial basis (with a number of 499 or 599) for a few times before being considered for approval. Most graduate elective courses are based on individual faculty’s expertise area and are almost always taught by the same instructor. Table 15: Faculty Research Areas
5.3 Measures of Professional Excellence There are several measures of professional excellence for faculty members. The Department faculty is engaged in classroom instruction and the individual training and mentoring of students and post docs as discussed above. In addition, it contributes to scholarly research and discovery, and participates in professional service. In this section, we present some examples of the faculty’s many contributions to the mission of the University. The number of degrees awarded at all levels is indicative of the productivity of the department faculty. At the undergraduate level, it is a measure of the ability to recruit, retain and educate students, and at the graduate level it is a measure of recruitment effort, and the time and commitment by faculty members to individual instruction and education. From autumn 2002 to summer 2003, the Department awarded 37 undergraduate, 10 Master’s and 8 PhD degrees. The Department was first in the number of BS/faculty, sixth in MS/faculty and fifth in PhD/faculty among a group of 35 peer institutions. Additional details are presented in Chapter VI. Research and scholarly publications are one important way in which the faculty excellence is measured. These publications are testimonials to the creation of new knowledge and its preservation and sharing. Individual faculty members’ significant and/or recent publications are listed in their CV (Appendix G). The faculty publishes extensively in high-quality, high-impact journals. As an example, from March 2002 to March 2003, the ten tenure-track faculty members in the Department published 63 refereed papers. Research Funding and Research Expenses Another measure of the faculty’s excellence is the level of research funding. Research awards are an indication of the faculty’s ability to identify and target funding opportunities, write competitive proposals (which are peer reviewed in many cases) and innovatively seek partnerships and collaborations. In addition, research funding is critical to maintain a vigorous research program, including graduate and post-doctoral education and training. The trend in research expenditures in the past 8 years is shown in Figure 10. There has been a dramatic increase in the expenditures in the last three years. Based on last year’s results, the department is 12th among peer institutions in terms of research expenditure/faculty. Figure 10: Research Expenditures in MSE from 7/95 through 6/03
The excellence of the Department faculty has been recognized by our peers as indicated by the awards and honors that our faculty members have received. Details of these are provided in the individual faculty CVs (Appendix G). Here we summarize the most significant awards in Table 16.
Another measure of the faculty’s excellence is their leadership roles in professional societies and associations. Details of these are also provided in Appendix G, (individual faculty members CVs). A selection of the most significant contributions are presented below in Table 17: Table 17: Faculty Leadership in Professional Organizations
Leadership from the Department Members of the Department faculty have been leaders in several University-wide and national programs. These include the ECSEL Program, UW Worldwide, Photonics Initiative, Nanotech Education, Research on Magnetic Materials and Spintronics, and Molecular Biomimetics. Leadership in Engineering Education: ECSEL (Profs. Bordia & Kalonji) This was a 10-year multi-institute (seven schools) program, funded by NSF, which had the twin goals of increasing the design component in engineering education and increasing the diversity of the student body. Department faculty members have been part of the leadership team and active participants in the ECSEL Coalition. Prof. Gretchen Kalonji was the Co-Director for the entire coalition from 1990 to 2001. Prof. Rajendra Bordia was the Institutional Co-PI from 1995 to 1996 and 1997-1998; and the PI from 1998 to 2001. Prof. Brian Flinn was the UW focal point for the K-14 interactions from 1997 to 2001. In addition to the leadership roles, with support from ECSEL, six departmental courses were modified to enhance the design component in them. The UW’s final report for this program which highlights the main activities and accomplishments of ECSEL is presented in Appendix H. Leadership in Photonics: (Prof. Jen) Since Professor Jen joined the University of Washington in 1999, he has focused on establishing an internationally respected group for performing research on synthesis and characterization of well-defined, highly functionalized materials for photonics, organic and molecular electronics, and biosensing. His group has grown within this period of time to 24 people (14 postdocs and 10 Ph. D. students). Because his research is highly interdisciplinary, the group members are coming from very diversified background, such as chemistry, chemical engineering, materials science, physics, and electrical engineering. In addition to the excellent team that he has assembled, he has also established a self-sustaining, state-of-the-art facility for performing chemical synthesis, optical and electrical characterization, processing, nano-manipulation and imaging, and device fabrication all within the same place. He has also played a major role in establishing several high-profile Research Centers and raised more than $50 millions dollars for the University of Washington. Through the collaboration with Professor Larry Dalton (Chemistry), an AFOSR-funded MURI Center (Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative) on "Polymeric Smart Skins", a NSF-funded NIRT program "Nanoscale Interdisciplinary Research Team" on "Nanoscale Tailoring of Electro-Optic Materials for Devices", a DARPA-funded Center on "Molecular Photonics", and a NSF-STC (Science and Technology Center) on "Materials and Devices for Information Technology Research" have been established. The STC has more than 30 faculty participants from seven universities including UW (leading institution), UC-Berkeley, CalTech, U. of Arizona, Georgia Tech, UCSB, and USC. He is currently serving as Thrust Leader, Executive Committee Member, and Director of the Shared Instrumentation Facility in this Center. The research activities of the STC are integrated across the participating institutions and across four research thrusts. Most research objectives within the Center will require close interaction between researchers with expertise in: (i) theory and modeling; (ii) new material synthesis; (iii) characterization of the optical and electrical properties in bulk, thin films, and nanostructured forms of the new materials; and (iv) device fabrication, performance testing, and optimization of processing techniques. These multidisciplinary interactions across the fields of chemistry, physics, optics, electrical engineering, and materials science provide unique opportunities for the education of a new generation of students. Through the regular exchange of students and postdoctoral fellows from different institutions, the research within each thrust will be integrated. Cross-fertilization among thrust areas will be facilitated through regular video-conference group meetings that focus on specific research projects that overlap with the four research thrust areas. Participants in the research thrusts will be actively involved in the educational mission of the Center through the development of teaching modules related to the central research themes of each thrust. In addition to these developments, Professor Jen is also serving as Director of the ATI (Advanced Technology Initiative) program that he had initiated and was recently funded by the State of Washington to hire several new faculty (MSE, EE, and Chemistry) in the Photonics areas for UW. He is also a co-PI in the ARO-funded DURINT Center (Defense University Research Initiative in Nanotechnology) on "Genetically-Engineered Proteins for Functional Inorganics" Leadership in Internationalization of Research and Education: (Prof. Kalonji) One of our faculty members, Prof. Gretchen Kalonji, has played key leadership roles in internationalizing education and research in recent years. In Fall 1998, she was asked by ex-President Richard McCormick to chair a campus-wide body called the International Faculty Council (IFC). The IFC was charged with investigating new models for the more effective internationalization of research, education and service. Through the IFC, which existed from 1998 – 2000, more than 70 faculty members and staff were mobilized to work on a variety of projects, including working with the Seattle School District on the internationalization of K-12 curriculum, working with the Association of Pacific Rim Universities (APRU) on programs for the career development of junior faculty and graduate students, and creating new models for integrating international research into undergraduate curriculum. A new initiative, called UW Worldwide, was catalyzed through this work and funded initially through a grant from UW’s Tools for Transformation Fund. Since Summer 2000, Prof. Kalonji has been working as the Director of UW Worldwide, which has launched a variety of experiments in multinational project-based education across the disciplines, and which has been successful in garnering significant levels of external support and recognition. The primary strategy of UW Worldwide is to work with selected partner universities to transform education through collaboration in faculty-student teams on concrete multi-disciplinary research challenges. These collaborations can take place within a single jointly taught course, as is the case with the highly successful UW-Tohoku University Joint Program on Engineering Design, or they can span a full four-year, jointly offered curriculum, as is the case with the UW-Sichuan University Joint Program on Challenges to the Environment in the US Pacific Northwest and southwest China. A wide variety of project-based collaborations have been launched through UW Worldwide, primarily focusing on undergraduate education. More recently, the program has expanded its efforts to develop new models for internationalizing graduate education, and is in the final stages of discussion with the NSF on the budget for a new IGERT which will provide support for the graduate extension of UW Worldwide’s focus. The title of the IGERT is "Multinational Collaborations on Challenges to the Environment". Through the various UW Worldwide efforts we have brought together faculty from a wide variety of colleges and departments, including Engineering, Arts and Sciences, Education, Law, Social Work, Ocean and Fisheries Sciences and Forest Resources. Because of the heavy research focus of our model we have been successful in garnering about 6 grants to support our work, as well as in receiving support through the Fund for the Improvement of Post-Secondary Education (FIPSE) of the US Department of Education and from the Hewlett Foundation, through the Global Classrooms Project. The current focus of UW Worldwide is on developing mechanisms through which we can scale up our basic multinational project-based approaches and offer these experiences to a greater number of students in a wider variety of disciplines. Our ultimate goal is that all students in all majors have the opportunity at least once in their undergraduate career to engage in a deep, multi-disciplinary project with colleagues in another part of the world. Leadership in Spinelectronics and Magnetism at Nanoscale: (Prof. Krishnan) The broad scope of this research is the systematic exploration and design of fundamental magnetic properties/phenomena and spin-dependent transport of materials as a function of size and dimensionality. New materials structures, the correlation of materials behavior with the microstructure (as a function of processing) and their applications in emerging technologies are emphasized. All the projects are vertically integrated from the underlying science to their engineering applications. Collaborative research is being pursued in the following areas: Spin Electronics Materials And Spin-Dependent Transport: Our goal is to develop a comprehensive program to synthesize new dilute magnetic semiconducting materials for spin electronics, develop fundamental understanding of their magnetic behavior and electronic structure and to explore various synthesis strategies for integrating them with existing silicon device technology. Principal Funding: "Varied synthetic approaches to the development of a room temperature ferromagnetic & semiconducting oxide nanostructures for silicon based spintronics", NSF/ECS, September 15, 2002 – September 14, 2005, $450,000; PI: Kannan Krishnan; Co-PIs: Prof. D. Gamelin (Chemistry/UW), Prof. M. Olmstead (Physics/UW) and Dr. S. Chambers (PNNL). A Senior Scientist (Dr. A. Pakhomov) and five graduate students (Ms. K. Griffin (MSE), Mr. B. Roberts (MSE), Mr. J. Kamencik (MSE), Mr. D. Schmidt (Physics), Mr. D. Schwartz (Chemistry)) are working on this project. Characterization And Manipulation At The Nanometer Length Scale: We are developing instrumentation and methods to characterize materials by imaging, scattering/diffraction and spectroscopy at the nanometer length scale. A number of avenues are being developed to acquire the required instrumentation through federal grants as well as donations from various companies. In addition, the students/research members take advantage of various national resources for electron microscopy (NCEM), synchrotron radiation measurements (ALS/APS) and neutron scattering (IPNS). They have also been successfully nominated to participate in various national workshops at Argonne, Los Alamos etc. Principal Funding: "Acquisition of a scanning probe microscope systems for research and education in nano-magnetism and spinelectronics" NSF, Instruments for materials Research, September 1, 2003, $238,000; PI: Kannan Krishnan; Co-PIs : Prof. M. Olmstead (Physics) and Prof. D. Gamelin (Chemistry) Leadership in Curriculum Development for Nano-science and Technology: (Prof Ohuchi) Development of UW-PNNL Collaborative Curriculums in Nano-Science and Technology. NSF Total Amount Awarded : $370,718; Award Period, 07/01/02-06/30/05 F. S. Ohuchi (PI), T. G. Stoebe, S. Danhum, and C. Campbell
Summary of the Project The overall goal of this project is to develop a prototype for a new type of collaborative education that meets broad and expanding needs in the areas of nanoscience and nanotechnology. An objective is to speed undergraduate and graduate entry into the nanotechnology field and enhance education and research by developing a new series of interdisciplinary nanotechnology courses. We have developed four nano-courses in collaboration with Pacific Northwest National Laboratories in Richland, WA:
Nanoscience and Nanotechnology related to Nanostructured Materials Fabrication of Nano-Materials Characterization of Nano-Materials Theory of Nanoscale Materials Systems These courses are built on our activities in Nanoscience and Nanotechnology related research and education at the University of Washington (UW) and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). The courses are being offered as a part of the program under "UW-PNNL Joint Institute for Nanoscience" established in April-2001. The Environmental Molecular Science Laboratory (EMSL), a US Department of Energy user facility at PNNL, provides the state-of-the-art facilities associated with nanomaterials synthesis and characterization which allow students direct exposure to high quality research equipment. A User Housing Facility for EMSL is used for students to stay in PNNL during the course. Progress To Date The original proposal was primarily targeted to students from UW and local universities/colleges in the State of Washington. Soon after receiving this grant, and announcing the program in the State of Washington, we realized that the impact of this proposal was much larger than we anticipated. In collaboration with PNNL’s Fellowship Program Office, we looked into the impact of this program nationwide, and a letter requesting an indication of interest was sent to a variety of schools. We received very positive responses from approximately 25 schools nationwide. We have therefore formulated a Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Course Steering Committee, consisting of 6 universities (Colorado State of Mines, Creighton University, Florida A & M University, New Mexico State University, University of Alaska-Fairbanks, and Whitman College), to review the information and provide us with suggestions that might better meet the needs of these individual institutions. Based on the recommendation from the Steering Committee, we have worked out several specific issues related to credit, tuition, schedule, creating useful information, course content planning, and housing. We then created and printed a course brochure. A brochure mailing has gone out to some 27 colleges and universities that expressed interest in the courses. Course information was provided at a nanoscience symposium at the AAAS meeting Colorado in February, 2003. A website is up and operating. Engineering Professional Programs (EPP) of the University of Washington has agreed to be in charge of all administrative roles for registration, and participant contact. The first and second courses, "Nanoclusters, Nanomaterials, and Nanotechnology" and "Theory of Nanomaterials" were offered during May 19-30, 2003, at PNNL in Richland, and September 15-20, 2003, in UW-Seattle campus respectively. In the course offered in May, more than half of participants (total 20 students) were non-UW students, including students from Oregon, Idaho, Iowa, North Carolina, Florida and Alaska. Eight scientists from PNNL and one professor from WSU participated in teaching. In the September course, students from Oregon, Idaho, Lousiana, and Florida, joined this course. Three instructors (1-UW, 1-PNNL and 1-Stanford) taught this course. We are planning to offer a course on Nano-Characterization and Nano-Synthesis in PNNL in January 2004. Leadership in Molecular Biomimetics: (Prof. Sarikaya) Research Theme and Brief Description: In biological hard tissues, proteins control inorganic materials assembly, morphogenesis and formation through molecular recognition and specific binding. Based on lessons from biology, MOLECULAR BIOMIMETICS offers a novel approach in which engineered polypeptides are selected through display protocols and modified utilizing molecular biology techniques and used as molecular building blocks in controlled assembly and formation of functional inorganic and hybrid materials and systems in nano-and nanobio-technology. These polypeptides are usually 7-15 amino acid long, and obtained via combinatorial biology using, for example, cell surface or phage display libraries. Once selected, the inorganic binding polypeptides could be further engineered by genetic engineering (e.g., using site directed mutagenesis) to tailor their properties for specific applications. The potential of using engineered polypeptides is enormous due to the premise offered by molecular biology, namely due proteins’ chemical and physical molecular recognition characteristics of inorganics, their self-and co-assembly in higher order and predictable structures, and the ability to manipulate their molecular composition and structure and, therefore, properties by genetic engineering protocols (DNA-based technologies). Over the last several years, we adapted protocols for selection of inorganic-binding polypeptides using both cell-surface and phage display technologies, developed rules of binding characteristics to inorganics (metals, oxides, and semiconductors), achieved through spectroscopic (e.g., surface plasmon resonance), imaging (e.g., atomic force microscopy) and molecular dynamic studies, made great leaps in their conjugation and hybridization with designer proteins, DNA, and functional molecules (for molecular electronics and photonics), their long-range ordered assembly and, finally, their utility as molecular substrates for nanoengineering applications in bio- and nanotechnology. Key Participants: Based on the realization early on that any real progress in the new field of molecular biomimetics can only be accomplished at the cutting edge of materials and biological sciences, we formed a polydisciplinary collaboration of researchers from diverse field, as exemplified in research team listed below. University of Washington: Mehmet Sarikaya (PI) - MSE : Molecular biomimetics and nanotechnology; Alex Jen – MSE/Chemistry: Design, synthesis and assembly of functional (electronic, photonic) molecules Daniel Schwartz - Chem. Eng.: Electrochemical processes of nanostructures; Francois Baneyx - Chem. Eng.: Bacterial genetics & cell surface display; Beth Traxler – Microbiology: Permissive site analysis in DNA-binding proteins; Fumio Ohuchi – MSE/Physic: Small particles, semiconducting surfaces, quantum properties; Samuel Jenekhe – Chem. Eng. & Chemistry: Functional nanostructured molecular films; Other Universities and Overseas Team Members: Candan Tamerler –Molecular Biology & Genetics, Istanbul Technical University, Turkey: Phage display and genetic engineering protocols in protein design; Malcolm Snead – Craniofacial Molecular Biology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles: Enamel proteins and dental genetics; Stanley Brown, Molecular Cell Biology, University of Copenhagen, Denmark: Cell surface display and protein engineering; John Evans, Chemistry, New York University, NY: Protein structure and NMR; Klaus Schulten, Biophysics, Beckman Center, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL: Molecular dynamics of protein structure and interactions; John Smit, Molecular Biology, University of British Colombia, Vancouver, Canada: Genetics and bacterial S-layers Funding Sources: PI in Army Research Office – Defense University Research Initiative in Nanotechnology (ARO-DURINT) program, Molecular Biomimetics, $5,000,000; 01-06; Co-PI, on Bioinspired Technologies, Air Force Office of Scientific Research (w/Jen), $450,000+ $400,000; 01-06. Co-PI with K. Katti (North Dakota State Univ.) Predictive Models for Mechanical properties of Nanostructured Hard Tissues, $240,000, 01-04. Co-PI with M. Snead (University of Southern California), Enamel Biomimetics, $1,500,000, 99-05. Several Equipment and Facility projects in developing molecular biology, Imaging and Analysis (including scanning probe microscopy and molecular spectroscopy), NSF, ARO, Murdock, ‘95-‘04, $1,000,000. Size of the Program and Investigators In addition to the 12 co-principal investigators and collaborators listed above, in the DURINT and Enamel Biomimetics programs, there are 12 graduate students, 8 UG research students, 7 post-doctoral researchers, plus 5 visiting graduate students, and three visiting scientists at the University of Washington working in the area of biomimetics in multidisciplinary facilities from genetics to material synthesis that span on 20 different laboratories covering 20,000 sqft floor space. Collaborations With Other Units In The University Of Washington Materials Science and Engineering, by its nature, is interdisciplinary. We collaborate with both basic science and with engineering and applied sciences program. Currently, we have active collaborations in research and/or education with Chemistry, Physics, Applied Mathematics, and Bio, Civil, Chemical, Electrical, and Mechanical Engineering Departments. Increasingly, our faculty are developing robust collaborations with various departments in Biological Sciences and the School of Medicine. We enjoy good relations with these departments and have a number of adjunct faculty members from some of them. We also teach joint and co-listed courses with Electrical and Mechanical Engineering. Our students take a variety of courses in these departments. In addition, our students and faculty interact frequently with students and faculty from other departments and programs as they participate in interdisciplinary research programs. We believe that these interdisciplinary collaborations enhance the educational and research opportunities and experiences for our students and strongly encourage them. Recruiting faculty members who enhance our interdisciplinary collaborations was one of the strategic directions in the recent faculty searches. We believe that we have been able to achieve this goal. Prof. Zhang has very close collaborations with the School of Medicine, the Department of BioE and the University of Washington Engineered Biomaterials Center. Prof. Jen has a joint appointment and extensive collaborations with Chemistry. Prof. Krishnan has an adjunct appointment and close interactions with Physics. The details of the research collaborations that have been active in the past ten years are presented in Appendix I for individual faculty members. It is clear from this that the department faculty is very collaborative and proactive in establishing meaningful collaborations with colleagues from other departments. Participation In The Center For Nanotechnology One very illustrative example of collaborations is the participation of the Department in the Center for Nanotechnology (CNT). The CNT is an interdisciplinary center which was created in 1997 with internal University funding (University Initiatives Fund). In 2000, it received a National Science Foundation Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship (NSF-IGERT). Currently, the Center supports graduate students, has a state-of-the-art user facility and supports a seminar series. The over-arching goal is the support of interdisciplinary research and education in nanotechnology. The Department of Materials Science and Engineering has been a significant part of the CNT since its planning and inception. Currently, eight of the ten tenure-track faculty members from the department are members of the Center. This includes all the faculty members who have joined the Department since 1990. Currently, the Center has participation from 10 departments. 14 % of the participating faculty in the Center are from MSE. The Center maintains a list of courses of relevance to Nanotechnology. Approximately 40 courses are offered every year on the campus. Of these seven are offered by MSE. One of the unique features of the CNT is the Dual PhD Program. Students in this program have to satisfy both the requirements of their home departments and the CNT. These students then receive a dual PhD degree (e.g. PhD in Materials Science and Engineering and Nanotechnology). 25 % of all students in this program are from MSE. Since 2001, the Center offers Early Bird Fellowships to recruit outstanding graduate students. 30% of all Early Bird Fellows have been from MSE. The Center has provided support to 62 graduate students on a competitive basis. Of these 14 have been MS&E students. Finally, in collaboration with PNNL, a new program called Joint Institute of Nanotechnology (JIN) has started. This program is targeted at enhancing collaboration between PNNL and UW in Nanotechnology. This Institute has provided 19 Graduate fellowships on a competitive basis. 7 of these Fellowships have been won by graduate students from MSE. The success of our students in receiving competitive fellowships and awards from this Center is a testament to the quality of our students, the interdisciplinary nature of the Department and the responsiveness of our faculty in aligning our research programs in significant and relevant research areas. Full details about the Center including our participation in it are available in a recent report from the Center. This is available at www.nano.washington.edu In addition to collaborations within the University of Washington, our faculty has extensive collaborations with colleagues from industry, national labs and other academic institutions. These include significant international collaborations. These collaborations provide our students with industrial perspective and access to world-class facilities and expertise. In exit interviews, the students who have participated in these collaborations have unanimously commented on the very positive impact of these on their education. In particular, the graduate students have identified the following specific positive aspects of these collaborations: Availability of complementary expertise and facilities Exposure to other scientific cultures (international collaborations) Chance to learn firsthand about career options in industry and national labs Networking with other professionals The specific details of these collaborations are also provided in Appendix I. In 1998, the Department developed and adopted a faculty merit review process. This process is used annually to assess faculty productivity and contributions. It is also used to determine merit-based salary raises. In addition, it outlines the departmental process for the promotion and tenure cases. Finally, it includes the specifics of the mentoring process for junior faculty. This document is presented in Appendix J. In 2000, the Department adopted the specific details of the evaluation process for teaching effectiveness. It includes specifics about student evaluations, peer evaluation and self evaluation. The document is presented in Appendix K. Since 1998, the Department has a specific mentoring program for junior faculty. When a new Assistant Professor joins the department the Chair, in consultation with the faculty member, assigns two mentors to the new faculty member. The mentors work closely with the Assistant Professor and provide him or her with advice and suggestions on all aspects of a faculty career. Typical issues include promotion and tenure, funding opportunities (including feedback on proposals), opportunities for collaborations, student interactions, running a research group, teaching (including peer review of teaching), resources available on campus and elsewhere, and time management including work and family balance. During the annual review with the faculty members, the Chair discusses the mentoring relationship with both the junior faculty member and the mentors. Changes in the mentoring committee are made at the request of either party. The mentoring committee assists the Chair and the faculty member in putting together the renewal and the promotion and tenure packages. This includes identification of external reviewers. The formal mentoring process is for Assistant Professors. For Associate Professors, the Chair in consultation with the faculty member, identifies two Professors who assist the faculty member and the Chair in preparing the promotion package. The process is described in Appendix J. Resources and Recognition for Teaching T he quality of teaching is very important to the Department. We assess the quality of instruction, identify resources for enhancing teaching effectiveness, encourage faculty to use them, and recognize effective teaching.The quality of teaching is assessed by the feedback from students, e.g. course evaluation and exit interviews with the Chair. A specific question in the exit interview concerns courses that are being taught very well and why students think they work well. In the individual meetings with faculty members, the Chair discusses the response of this question with individual faculty members as it relates to the courses that they have taught. They are encouraged to share their good practices with other faculty members. A related question is regarding courses that need improvement. If a trend exists (i.e. a significant number of students identify courses that need improvements) then the Chair discusses this with the faculty member who teaches the course, identifies strategies and resources for improvement and, if needed, discusses it with relevant program committees. This is done if the course content needs modification or if the instructor needs to be changed. A variety of resources are available to the faculty to enhance their teaching effectiveness. These include the various services of the Center for Instructional Development and Research (CIDR) (at website: depts.washington.edu/cidrweb/), and the Center for Engineering Learning and Teaching (CELT) (at website: depts.washington.edu/celtweb/). On an ongoing basis, primarily at the annual faculty retreat, we have focused discussions on teaching effectiveness and resources available to enhance it. Typically, these discussions are led by experts from these organizations. The faculty regularly uses these resources. These discussions and consultations are confidential and the faculty member decides if they will let anybody know about them. CELT experts have led discussions on active learning at faculty retreats and assisted individual faculty members in enhancing teaching by: Providing consultations with instructional consultants Faculty participation in CELT workshops and CELT sponsored talks Evaluation of course materials and teaching styles by CELT personnel In addition, CIDR also provides individual consultation to faculty members, observes and videotapes classroom teaching for review and consultation by experts and confidential feedback from students. The Department proactively recognizes and encourages effective teaching and teaching innovations. We nominate our faculty for various teaching awards. Prof. Gretchen Kalonji was awarded the NSF’s most prestigious director’s honor, the 2001 Distinguished Teaching Scholar Award. This award recognizes excellence and innovation in both research and education. Prof. Guozhong Cao received the University of Washington’s Outstanding Educator Award in 2000 (this is the only teaching award given by the University and the highest University-wide recognition of teaching). He also received the Outstanding Educator Award from the College of Engineering in 1999. Brian Flinn received the Outstanding Educator Award of the College of Engineering in 2000. In addition to these, our junior and senior classes each vote for Teacher of the Year. The winners in the last ten years have been: 2003 Y.K. Rao (juniors) ; Y.K. Rao & Lucien Brush (seniors) 2002 Fumio Ohuchi (juniors); Guozhong Cao (seniors) 2001 Fatih Dogan (chosen by both junior & senior classes) 2000 Guozhong Cao (juniors); Rajendra Bordia (seniors) 1999 Lucien N. Brush (juniors); Guozhong Cao & Robert G. Stang (seniors) 1998 Guozhong Cao (chosen by both junior & senior classes) 1997 Guozhong Cao (chosen by both junior & senior classes) 1996 Fumio S. Ohuchi (juniors); Rajendra K. Bordia (seniors) 1995 Rajendra K. Bordia 1994 Rajendra K. Bordia The winners of all these awards are recognized in the Department newsletter, at the Department graduation ceremony, by e-mail to the entire department, at the faculty and staff retreats, and by engraving on plaques displayed in Mueller Hall.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||