<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A look at chatty vs chunky RESTful web services</title>
	<atom:link href="http://depts.washington.edu/ontheroa/?feed=rss2&#038;p=343" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://depts.washington.edu/ontheroa/?p=343</link>
	<description>The UW blog for all things Resource Oriented Architecture &#38; web services - email appdev@u.washington.edu</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:23:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn Medero</title>
		<link>http://depts.washington.edu/ontheroa/?p=343&#038;cpage=1#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Medero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 18:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://depts.washington.edu/ontheroa/?p=343#comment-163</guid>
		<description>Thanks for taking the time to write up how you&#039;ve internally approached designing your services.

One consideration when consider the chatty or chunky service design patterns is caching side-effects. In the past when I&#039;ve designed chunkier responses I&#039;ve gotten push back that clients want to be able to cache certain parts of the response more aggressively than others. Not suggesting it is an either/or problem, you can always offer both forms for different audiences. Just a cautionary warning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for taking the time to write up how you&#8217;ve internally approached designing your services.</p>
<p>One consideration when consider the chatty or chunky service design patterns is caching side-effects. In the past when I&#8217;ve designed chunkier responses I&#8217;ve gotten push back that clients want to be able to cache certain parts of the response more aggressively than others. Not suggesting it is an either/or problem, you can always offer both forms for different audiences. Just a cautionary warning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
