|
|
|
|
|
Brett E. Shelton |
|
College of Education, University of Washington |
|
May 4, 2001 |
|
bshelton@u.washington.edu |
|
|
|
|
|
© 2001 Brett E. Shelton |
|
|
|
|
|
Learning to teach with technology |
|
Practical and increasingly common |
|
Facilitate technology into educational practice |
|
Convenient and meaningful transition |
|
The Goal:
to examine the factors that affect the adoption of a technological
tool into existing teaching practice |
|
The educators: Helpline Volunteers |
|
The technological tool: the Arthritis Source website |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Callers |
|
From various geographical locations |
|
Want information regarding arthritis issues |
|
Surgery |
|
Pain management |
|
Doctor-patient relationships |
|
Disease prognosis |
|
Medications |
|
|
|
|
|
Volunteers |
|
Field questions from callers about
arthritis-related issues, often anticipating their needs |
|
Mail information in the form of brochures and
articles |
|
Stay abreast of new diagnoses and treatments |
|
Offer emotional support and personal histories |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not an event, destination, or threshold |
|
|
|
Based on the introduction of something
presumably helpful |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology adoption studies |
|
Involve product design and usability testing
(e.g. Nielsen, 2000; Norman, 1988) |
|
|
|
Are often driven by software and hardware
development |
|
|
|
Grounded studies involving |
|
People and their use of technological artifacts (e.g.
Bannon & Bodker, 1991; Blomberg, Suchman, & Trigg, 1997; Kling,
1999) |
|
Workplace environment and social interaction (e.g.
Engstrom, 1990; Gasser, 1986; Norman, 1991) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In an historical context, technology has |
|
Received eras of strong support for classroom
integration since the 1920s (Cuban, 1986) |
|
Not reformed education simply due to its
existence (Noble, 1999) |
|
|
|
|
|
Followed computer delivery and introduction |
|
Gathered data through |
|
Participant observations in the Helpline offices |
|
Semi-structured audiotaped interviews |
|
Presumed that the Arthritis Source can help by |
|
Educating the volunteers |
|
Providing them with an additional resource |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Question:
What factors may affect a particular group of educators adopt a
potentially valuable Internet tool into an existing instructional
environment? |
|
Data summaries and transcripts |
|
Coding within Atlas |
|
Followed with summaries around |
|
Means |
|
Motive |
|
Opportunity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marge |
|
Used Arthritis Source on many occasions |
|
Highly motivated to learn about new arthritis
issues |
|
Openly encourages other volunteers to use the
tool |
|
Nelson |
|
Infrequent but periodic uses of the Arthritis
Source |
|
No records of him recommending the tool to
callers |
|
High levels of computer and Internet experience |
|
Ralph |
|
Little Arthritis Source use (began e-mail) |
|
No records of him recommending the tool to
callers |
|
Comfortable with his existing practice |
|
Apprehensive about Internet technology |
|
|
|
|
|
All subjects experienced |
|
Different physical, environmental, and cognitive
means |
|
Varying levels of motive in learning and
satisfaction |
|
Varying amounts of opportunity prompts |
|
Difficulty in recognizing opportunities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novices may feel intimidated by |
|
Unfamiliarity of new elements |
|
Making irrevocable mistakes |
|
Lack of training and/or references can strongly
influence even the most motivated individuals |
|
Providing direct examples for the benefits of
using a new tool is beneficial along with patience for “full integration”
to happen |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
“Member check” follow-up (Lincoln & Guba,
1985) |
|
Phone Interviews with Marge, Nelson, and Ralph |
|
Focus group with all volunteers |
|
Provide an opportunity for the volunteers to
reflect on my data and claims |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finding the way to overcome obstacles that lead
to effective technology integration |
|
Focus on patterns to create parameters for
adoption on an individual basis |
|
Benefits teaching/working environments utilizing
technology in its most effective form |
|