|
Soc Com Model
- Behaviors
- Cognitive
- Language
- Processing
If you are a professional
and have not previously answered our Prevalence
questionnaire, please
click here. |
If you are a caregiver
or professional and would like to create a Profile,
please
click here. |

|
|
Language
Abilities
Appropriate social communication requires that children have adequate
language to support their social interactions. In order for a school age
child to communicate appropriately and successfully, he/she needs to be
linguistically competent. Indeed, language is the primary means by which
school age children succeed in establishing and maintaining social relationships.
The pivotal role that language plays in teacher-related and peer-related
adjustment (Gresham, 1998) places
school age children with compromised language not only at a social communicative
risk, but also jeopardizes their ability to participate in social environments.
Children need basic and advanced abilities in semantics
or word knowledge, syntax or language structure, and pragmatics
or language use. Semantic skills for good social communication include
having the vocabulary to allow for sophisticated forms of information
exchange as needed in social exchanges. Lack of flexibility in word knowledge
can create misunderstandings in interpersonal communication and confusion
when deciphering linguistic information. For example, appropriately offering
help or resolving conflicts necessitates an adequate vocabulary and production
of word relations. Very often successful interpersonal relations among
school age children requires an ability to appreciate synonyms, analogies,
idioms and other forms of figurative language (e.g., "Are you going
back on your word?" "Don't let the cat out of the bag."
"Are you biting off more than you can chew?").
school age social communication also requires adequate syntax for formulating
complex sentences. Facility with comprehension and production of complex
constructions, especially embedded clauses,
is necessary for elaboration of abstract ideas that occur in social interactions.
Syntax used for such social behaviors as negotiating interactions is typically
rather sophisticated, including compound and complex sentence types (e.g.,
"I'd like to help, but I'm late for school." "If the movies
are over early, we can go bowling afterwards.").
Finally, a school age child must have advanced pragmatic knowledge for
adequate social communication. Arguably, this may be the most significant
component of language as it relates to social communication. Pragmatics
refers to how children use their semantics and syntax in interactions
with others. It reflects a child's knowledge of how communication should
vary in different contexts, allowing a child to know how to talk and behave
in different situations with different people. These are the abilities
that are necessary for determining how to appropriately behave in the
classroom as a child interacts with teachers and peers.
We have identified the following specific semantic, syntactic and pragmatic
behaviors as being important for social communication:

Semantics:
- Variety in vocabulary
- Recognizing different points of view and using evaluative
comments (taking on more than one perspective on events-using
verbs of mental states, e.g., thinking, believing, and knowing)
- Recognizing different emotions (using verbs of emotion,
e.g., angry, sad, frustrated)

Syntax:
- Propositions with complex structures
A proposition is defined as any clause
containing at least a noun/subject + verb (e.g., He was sleeping.).
However, the subject may be implied, as in infinitivals
(e.g., He wanted to go outside, in which the subject is the same
for wanted and to go, vs. He said to go outside,
where the subject of to go is someone other than the subject
of said.) The same is true of gerundives
(e.g., Leaning out the window, the dog fell, in which the subject
of leaning is the dog.) Alternately, the verb may be implied,
as in cases of verb ellipsis
(The boy searched in the tree, and the dog in the woods, where
searched is the implied verb for the dog). Thus, any instance
of subject + verb, whether these elements are overt or not, will be
counted as a proposition.
Syntactically complex propositions are defined as propositions that
are joined to other propositions by means other than or, and
or but. These include embedded clauses (clausal subjects, verb
complements, relative clauses, infinitival clauses, gerundive clauses),
subordinate clauses begun by conjunctions
other than and/but/or, and two propositions forming a conditional
utterance of any type.
- Pronouns with clear antecedents
Pronouns need to have clear, unambiguous referents. A clear reference
occurs whenever a pronoun is used to refer back to a noun or prepositional
phrase that was explicitly stated earlier in the sentence or in a previous
sentence (e.g., The boy wondered where his frog went. He started
to look for it in which he refers back to the boy
and it refers back to his frog.).
- Linking meaning across referents and events
(discourse cohesion in extended turns-e.g., conjunctions with temporal
and causal links). This refers to producing two propositions that are
linked by a conjunction, which specifies a conceptual relationship between
them. Of particular importance to social communication are conjunctions
that relate two propositions in a causative (because, so that)
or temporal (after, while) manner will be counted.
- Mapping questions and answers
(asking and answering the right questions for specific information,
e.g., double wh-questions-"Who
is wearing what"?).

Pragmatics (Damico, et al.,
1999)
- Clear statement of topics and reiteration of topics. Topics are clearly
stated, and when necessary for the listener, are repeated.
- Clear and polite communicative attempts. Verbal interactions between
two or more people that are clear and polite. Clear attempts
are informative as the situation requires. They do not deceive the listener/communicative
partner (i.e., sincere), talk about that for which speaker lacks adequate
information. They are neither obscure nor ambiguous, but rather, are
free from confusion, uncertainty, or doubt. Polite attempts
do not impose upon the listener/communicative partner, but, rather are
friendly, appropriate to the situation, courteous, civil.
Behaviors | Cognitive
| Language | Processing
Home | Soc Com Model | Assessment
Guidelines
|