|If you are a professional
and have not previously answered our Standardized
Test Use questionnaire, please
of Pragmatic Language (TOPL)
Diana Phelps-Terasaki and Trisha Phelps-Gunn (Authors)
The Psychological Corporation (Publisher)
555 Academic Court
San Antonio, TX 78204
Or order online from Super Duper, Inc: http://www.superduperinc.com/TUV_Pages/tm47.htm
(as of 06/2001)
Complete Kit: includes examiner's manual, 25 profile/record forms,
storage box = $149.00 (doesn't mention picture book, but should
Order from Super Duper, Inc:
Complete Kit: includes examiner's manual, picture book, 25 profile/record
forms, storage box = $143.00
||Use to evaluate social
language skills; designed to be used with a complete battery of tests
(they don't specify what) 44 items, each establishes a social context.
Show a picture to the child and offer a verbal stimulus to elicit
a response to the dilemma presented.
|Content: What it Tests
||Measures students ability to effectively use pragmatic
language (language used socially to achieve goals, involving not only
what is said, but why and for what purpose): 6 core sub-components:
physical setting, audience, topic, purpose (speech acts), visual-gestural
cues, and abstraction.
||Percentile ranks, quotient, age equivalent.
Strong Reliability Scores:
Internal consistency: > .80 for all ages (except age 6 = .74)
(coefficient alpha means)
Interscorer: .99 (correlation coefficients)
Standard Error of measurement: 5.0 - 6.7 (depending on age level);
average = 6.3
(the lower the SEM the better)
Content validity: using "point biserial correlation technique":
.22-.49 for discrimination (depending on age) and .57-.92 for difficulty
(depending on age) (point-biserial correlations of .20 or greater
are viewed as strong).
Concurrent validity: .82 (correlation coefficients)
Construct validity: for age: .55
For spoken language: .7
For school achievement: .32 (math), .39 (writing), .55 (reading)
For mental ability: .68
For differentiation of language disability vs. average performer:
no coefficient, but those with known language disabilities average
score was 87.
For item validity: .22-.49 for item discrimination (depending on
are a professional
and have not previously answered our
Standardized Test Use questionnaire,
please click here.
Home | Standardized
University of Washington,
Dept. of Speech & Hearing Sciences, Tele-Collaboration Project. ©
1999-2001, UW-SPHSC, including all photographs and images unless otherwise
noted. Comments: firstname.lastname@example.org