Acknowledge the unique demands of a rural practice including:
number of hours worked per week in patient care.
- number of patients seen per week.
- the difficult patient population.
- physician isolation.
- limited resources to access for back-up.
- home visits.
- nursing home care.
- on-call demands.
- “24 hr” accessibility.
the demands on yourself and family.
Acknowledge some of the critical issues that rural physicians in practice face with regards to the delivery of health care in a remote community which include:
shortage of health care professionals, especially the lack of available consultants in other specialty fields.
- reimbursement differential for services.
- financial pressures that can threaten small hospital closure, which in turn affect your mode of practice and your referral pattern.
- geographical distance to referral center which in turn alters your mode of practice.
- staffing shortages that alters your mode of practice.
- facility limitations that affects your pattern of referral.
administrative and leadership expectations (e.g. medical director of local nursing home, hospital committee membership, school board, etc.).
Understand the important role that time management plays in the rural physician’s ability to balance practice and a normal lifestyle.
Understand the importance of establishing good working relationships with other medical colleagues in the same community and with those in outlying areas (referral centers).
Understand the benefits of utilizing other community resources in the delivery of health care to the rural population, e.g. public health agencies, home health care, hospice, etc.
Acknowledge the many roles that a rural physician inherently accepts in their respective community outside the realms of being a physician, e.g. community leader, hospital advocate, counselor, personal friend, school board member, etc.
Understand the importance of identifying their own personal and social needs as a physician living in a remote community.
Sat, 22 May 2004Goals
Objectives
Methods
Evaluation & Post-test
Additional Curricular ResourcesThe resident will access and become familiar with the contents of the following websites to facilitate further study or for patient education:
Mon, 17 May 2004
Purpose: The purpose of the Family Practice Service rotation is to assist residents to become more familiar with the role of functioning of a family physician, and to increase their knowledge regarding the management of common ambulatory problems. Structure: Focused Clinics are special clinics that exist in addition to the normal continuity clinics that the residents are required to attend. These clinics are “focused” in the sense that patients who are appointed for these clinics are pre-screened to have one of the top 10 presenting problems in ambulatory care (see below). Only 3 patients are appointed per clinic to allow the resident ample time to obtain precepting, read around a problem/presentation, and provide patient care. The intent is for the residents to become well versed in the diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment, and prognosis of a number of common ailments that will be presented to them as ambulatory practitioners. Precepting: The preceptor for the resident in the focused clinics will be the regularly assigned preceptor for the half day. Precepting for the focused clinics is NOT the same as for 1:1 precepting, which occurs outside of the rotation. Presenting Complaints To Be Appointed For Focused Clinics:First Year Residents
Second & Third Year Residents
Introduction: Somatization is very common in family practice. Patients with physical complaints with no readily identifiable/treatable cause can be very time consuming and frustrating to work with. These patients are often labeled as “problem patients.” It is important to develop an understanding of which patients may have characteristics of Somatoform Disorders and to have an approach to evaluation and appropriate management of those patients. There is a spectrum of somatization, with many patients having a “subsyndromal” form and not meeting the full criteria of a specific disorder. Definitions: Somatization: is the tendency to experience and report bodily symptoms that have no physiologic explanation, to misattribute symptoms to disease, and to seek medical attention for them. In many patients Somatization becomes a form of chronic illness behavior. In the most severe cases Somatization becomes the focus of the patient’s life, and the sick role becomes the patient’s predominant mode of relating to the world. The symptoms are not intentional, or for secondary gain Somatoform Disorders (DSM-IV-TR criteria) Somatization Disorder (300.81): History of many physical complaints beginning before age 30 years, that occur over a period of several years and result in treatment being sought or significant impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning. Each of the following criteria must have been met, with individual symptoms occurring at any time during the course of the disturbance: Four pain symptoms: a history of pain related to at least four different sites or functions (e.g. head, abdomen back, joints, extremities, chest, rectum, during menstruation, during sexual intercourse,or during urination). Two gastrointestinal symptoms: a history of a least two gastrointestinal symptoms other than pain (e.g. nausea, bloating, vomiting other than during pregnancy, diarrhea, or intolerance of several different foods. One sexual symptom. One pseudoneurological symptom: C. Either 1) or 2) After appropriate investigation, each of the symptoms in Criterion B cannot be fully explained by a know general medical condition or the direct effects of a substance, or…. When there is a related general medical condition, the physical complaints or resulting social or occupational impairment are in excess of what would be expected from the history, physical examination, or laboratory findings D. The symptoms are not intentionally produced or feigned (as in Factitious Disorder or Malingering) Undifferentiated Somatoform Disorder (300.82) One or more physical complaints (e.g. fatigue, loss of appetite, GI or GU complaints) Either 1 or 2 as above Symptoms cause clinically significant distress Duration at least 6 months Not intentionally produced Pain Disorder (307.80 and 307.89)Acute <6 months, Chronic > 6 months Pain in one or more anatomical sites is the predominant focus Pain causes clinically significant impairment Psychological factors play an important role in the onset and severity Hypochondriasis (300.7) 21-38% of patients also have somatization disorder) Preoccupation with fears of having a serious disease based on the person’s misinterpretation of bodily symptoms. Preoccupation persists despite appropriate medical evaluation and reassurance. The belief in A. is not of delusional intensity The preoccupation causes clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational or other important areas of functioning. The duration is at least 6 months Specify “with poor insights” if for most of the time during the current episode, the person does not recognize that the concern about having a serious illness is excessive or unreasonable. Related Disorders-but are intentional: Factitious Disorders(300.16 and 300.19): with predominantly Physical Signs and symptoms 300.19. With combined psychological and Physical signs and symptoms Intentional production or feigning of physical or psychological signs or symptoms Motivation for the behavior is to assume the sick role External incentives for the behavior (such as economic gain, avoiding legal responsibility, or improving physical well-being, as in malingering) are absent. Tends to occur in patients who have some medical knowledge. Malingering (V65.2) The essential feature of Malingering is the intentional production of false or grossly exaggerated physical or psychological symptoms, motivated by external incentives. Suspect if: Medicolegal context of presentation Marked discrepancy between the person’s claimed stress or disability and the objective findings Lack or cooperation during the diagnostic evaluation and in complying with the prescribed treatment regiment. The absence of Antisocial Personality Disorder Incidence: 38% of primary care patients complain of symptoms that have no serious medical basis. 46% of new symptoms contain some element of Somatization. 6% of Primary Care patients have Somatization Disorder (similar to DM or UTI). Course of Illness: Unknown etiology 83-100% of patients have comorbid conditions, often psychiatric disorders. General: Physical symptoms may offer a language to express distress when patients do not easily express emotions in words (alexithymia), i.e. the “sick role” gives relief. These are generally chronic, relapsing conditions, not curable but readily manageable. Symptoms may offer benefits of social support, disability payments, escape from obligations and or a compromise for internal conflicts. Initial Approach: Early recognition and structured management will help improve patient care, decrease physician frustration, and improve overall practice function. Inform the patient up front that this will be your “get acquainted” visit to collect information to be able to do a competent evaluation, and that you may not have “all the answers” at the end of the visit. History: Chief Complaint: Very specifically note onset, duration, previous and current functional status, rate pain on 0-10/10 scale. Employment status: Working prior to onset of symptom? On the job injury? Did the patient like their job? Any outstanding lawsuits, disability claims? Social History: Screen for depression(60%), anxiety (86% of Hypochondriasis patients disorder, 60% have OCD and Panic Disorder)), PTSD Personal History of Mental Illness? Family of origin history: History of impairment or dysfunction caused by physical ailments among family members whom the patient witnessed during childhood Childhood Abuse Sexual Abuse Habits: Tobacco, Etoh, prescription drug abuse, illicit drug use current or remote Previous Medical Evaluation for this or related issues: Specific names and dates, obtain release of records for these reports. Physical: Perform a thorough focused exam of the related area. Labs/Imaging: Do conservative diagnostic workups: investigate objective findings, not subjective complaints. Beware of false (+). Do not repeat lab/images done elsewhere. Therapy: “The gold standard in the treatment of patients with multiple, unexplained physical symptoms is a long-term empathetic relationship with a primary care physician.” The goals of treatment are: Care for the patient, not necessarily “cure” the somatization Rule out concurrent physical disorders. Maintain or improve the patient’s overall functioning. Do not treat what the patient does not have. Obtain old medical records. Actively identify and address psychosocial factors, mental illness, and substance abuse. Encourage patients to develop problem-solving skills. Several studies have found that cost-effective treatment requires: The Family Physician is the patient’s primary, and if possible, only physician. Scheduling regular outpatient visits every 4-6 weeks. May need to be q 2 weeks initially if severely decompensated. Making these frequent visits brief enough (e.g. 15 minutes) to fit into a busy clinic’s schedule. Conducting a partial physical exam of the organ system that is the object of the patient’s complaints during each visit. Follow-Up Appointments: History: Interval changes in symptoms Specifically functional status Adherence to recommended treatments Review of old records and consultations when available Physical Exam: Focused on areas of concern at each visit Lab/Imaging Studies: Review results available Assessment: Working diagnosis for medical problem Carefully identify comorbidities E.g. Mental Illness, substance abuse, secondary gain Plan: Continue to acknowledge the patient’s suffering and disability. Provide the patient a name for the illness. Recommend/negotiate an approach to improve functional status, e.g. aerobic activity, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. Specifically address treatment of comorbidities. Don’t forget to address age/gender appropriate Health Maintenance needs. Agree to schedule of frequency of regularly scheduled follow-up appointments to address needs (e.g. q 4-6 weeks), not prn. References: American Family Physician review article February 15 and March 1, 2000 http://www.aafp.org/afp/20000215/1073.html http://www.aafp.org/afp/20000301/1423.html DSM-IV-TR, American Psychiatric Association, 2000 Initial Evaluation (or new patient to you/practice) Chronic Heart Failure Epic Smart Text I. History .name is a .age male/female presenting today for: Establishing care for known CHF / Follow up of known CHF / Possible signs and symptoms of CHF / * (If previous known dx, details of eval, hospitalization and treatment): * Current relevant ROS: (class 1 rec by ACC/AHA) General: fatigue, decreased concentration or memory, insomnia Cardiopul: chest pain, SOB, DOE, orthopnea, PND, edema GU: oliguria, nocturia GI: Abdominal distension, N/V PMH: Risk factors for underlying causes: Htn, CAD/angina, MI, DM, congenital/valvular dz Other CV risk factors: lipids, CVA, PVD Risk factors for precipitating causes: Anemia, thyroid dz, renal dz, COPD, Renal dz. PSH: cardiac surgeries, catheterization, angioplasty FH: CV dz, sudden death, early death CV event Medications (including all otc, herbals, etc) Habits: tobacco, etoh, illicit drugs Lifestyle: diet - sodium, fats, salt Level usual activity, exercise II. Physical Exam General: .vs. Neck: presence of JVD, abdominojugular reflex, thryomegaly, carotid bruits Cor: gallops, murmurs, rubs Lungs: presence of rales, wheezes, rubs Abd: hepatomegaly, ascites Ext: pedal edema, pulses, warm/cool to touch III. Lab / Imaging Class 1 recommendations per AHA / ACC - should have baseline: Cbc, UA, chem. 18 (lytes, BUN/Scr, LFT’s), TSH (if unexplained, ferritin, ANA) ECG CXR Echo (if unexplained - consider stress echo, stress imaging, if hx angina, cath vs stress imaging) IV. Assessment Type: diastolic vs systolic AHA class: (A,B,C,D) NYHA fx class (1,2,3,4) Compensated vs uncompensated V. Management
Digoxin (class 1 rec for stage C symptomatic HF pts) Nitrates -(class IIb rec- if pulmonary venous congestion/already on ACE,BB,dig,diuretic) Spironolactone - (class IIa for NYHA class IV pts, already on ACE,BB,dig,diuretic) Hydralazine/Nit combo - same as spironolactone for pts not tolerant of ACEI or ARB Diastolic dysfx Diuretics (class 1 rec ACC/AHA - tx pul/peripheral edema) After that: BB, CCB, ACE to minimize sx’s and tx Htn
.me Follow up Evaluation of Chronic Heart Failure Epic Smart Text I. History .name is a .age male/female presenting today for: Follow up of known CHF Updates on evaluations, hospitalization or treatment since last visit: none/* Current relevant ROS: (class 1 rec by ACC/AHA) General: fatigue, decreased concentration or memory, insomnia Cardiopul: chest pain, SOB, DOE, orthopnea, PND, edema GU: oliguria, nocturia GI: Abdominal distension, N/V Medications: update list, including all otc, herbals, etc Compliance with prescribed regimen: good / < ideal * Habits: tobacco, etoh, illicit drugs Lifestyle: diet - sodium, fats, salt Level usual activity, exercise II. Physical Exam General: .vs. Neck: presence of JVD, abdominojugular reflex, thryomegaly, carotid bruits Cor: gallops, murmurs, rubs Lungs: presence of rales, wheezes, rubs Abd: hepatomegaly, ascites Ext: pedal edema, pulses, warm/cool to touch III. Lab if on diuretics/ ACE - q 6 month chem. 7 if on digoxin, q 6 - 12 mo dig level IV. Assessment Type: diastolic vs systolic AHA class: (A,B,C,D) NYHA fx class (1,2,3,4) Compensated vs uncompensated V. Management
Digoxin (class 1 rec for stage C symptomatic HF pts) Nitrates -(class IIb rec- if pulmonary venous congestion/already on ACE,BB,dig,diuretic) Spironolactone - (class IIa for NYHA class IV pts, already on ACE,BB,dig,diuretic) Hydralazine/Nit combo - same as spironolactone for pts not tolerant of ACEI or ARB Diastolic dysfx Diuretics (class 1 rec ACC/AHA - tx pul/peripheral edema) After that: BB, CCB, ACE to minimize sx’s and tx Htn
.me
Welcome to the Obesity Study Module for the Obesity Focused Clinic. There are a number of excellent resources on the Internet on the subject of obesity. I would like to introduce you to an important one called “Clinical Guidelines on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults”. This was developed by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Obesity Education Initiative, and sponsored by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. An expert panel made up of 24 members, and 115 outside reviewers performed a systematic review of the literature using MEDLINE from January 1980 through September 1997, and chose 236 randomized controlled trials to develop the following guidelines. TASK ASSIGNMENTS: Go to Clinical Guidelines on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults home page and read the Executive Summary The complete text can also be viewed online — same home page as above — click on “Electronic Textbook” — it is worthwhile to bookmark this page for future reference. Take the Post-test and submit your answers. From the same home page as above — download the free PDA software program labeled “Obesity Guidelines for the Palm”. This is an excellent tool that you can use at the bedside. It not only includes a copy of the executive summary text, but also includes an interactive assessment tool that you can actively use with your patient right in the exam room — it allows you to calculate the patient’s BMI, and perform a risk assessment. This will then help you develop a management strategy for your patient and suggest to you what your patient may require, e.g. lifestyle change, diet, exercise, pharmacotherapy, etc. Obtain the free PDA software program called “Ideal Body Weight v.2.1” from David Acosta, MD — he can beam this to you for your Palm, or you can download it yourself at http://www.useabledata.com (click on “Medical Apps”, and select “Ideal Body Weight”) — it will allow you to calculate your patient’s ideal body weight, BMI, and classify obesity. Read Drug Therapy for Obesity, by Susan Rowe, R.Ph., 8/5/2003 EpicCare SmartText Find the SmartText labeled “TFMObesity_Initial Visit” to guide you through your initial visit and help you document pertinent information. For followup visits, find the SmartText labeled “TFMObesity_FUvisit” to use as a guide and help you document. ADDITIONAL RESOURCES: Organizations American Obesity Association Shape Up America! Algorithm for Weight Management Visualizing the sometimes circuitous process of weight management can be helpful in the therapeutic setting. Print out this physician’s aid for quick reference. Choosing a Safe and Successful Weight Loss Program (patient education) Diets Food Exchange List Sample Reduced-Calorie Menus(1200 through 1600 calorie diets, with sample diets for cultural diverse populations) Sample Diets (1200 through 2000 calorie diets, with sample diets for cultural diverse populations) Shopping For Food: What to Look For (patient education) Counseling Guide to Behavioral Change (patient education) Counseling Your Patients About Weight Loss Guide to Physical Activity (patient education) Diagnostic Codes for Treating Obesity & Co-Morbidities Introduction:Stroke is the third leading cause of death in the US and is associated with significant morbidity and healthcare costs. Every year approximately 500,000 individuals suffer a first stroke and more then 200,000 suffer a subsequent stroke. The frequency of stroke doubles every 10 years after age 55 (1). Risk factors for stroke, as outlined in a concensus statement from the National Stroke Association, include six medical conditions: hypertension, myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis, and four lifestyle risks: smoking, alcohol use, physical inactivity and high fat diet. The National Stroke Association recommends vigorous identification, evaluation and alteration of an individual’s risk factors for stroke (2). Module Objectives:
b. Crossed straight leg raising test (Fajersztajn test). c. Patrick’s Test d. Sacroiliac provocation test
b. Presence of heel drop c. Absence of the Achilles reflex d. Weakness of the extensor digitorum longus and extensor hallucis longus.
Follow-up visit History Symptoms of target organ disease, uncontrolled HTN Log or BP measurements Lifestyle review, 24 hour diet recall Review of medications, side effects and compliance Physical Exam focused cardiovascular Labs followup of impact of meds on electrolyte and renal function Assessment JNC 7 categories, controlled or not, compliant or not JNC 7 compelling indications Reversible cardiac risks that need attention Other Co morbidities Plan: Diagnostic tests, any further f/u lab or lab for secondary causes indicated Lifestyle counsel especially diet and exercise and habit Medication adjustments EpicCare SmartTexts Click SmartText button, hit T, scroll to TFM HTN F/U Goals
Objectives
a. Gather pertinent history information relevant to risk factors, precipitating causes and common symptoms of CHF b. Perform directed physical exam, demonstrating knowledge of pertinent positive and negative exam findings correlative with CHF. c. Order appropriate lab and imaging studies to evaluate and clarify the diagnosis. d. Demonstrate knowledge of differential diagnosis of underlying causes and precipitating causes of CHF. e. Using the above information, accurately diagnose and assess the severity of CHF, then formulate a management plan in accordance with current national guidelines, including appropriate specialty consultation when indicated. f. Provide appropriate patient education about their illness.
Methods
A. Chronic Heart Failure. American Board of Family Practice Reference Guide, 8th edition. http://www.familypractice.com/references/guidesframe.htm B. ACC / AHA guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Heart Failure in the Adult: 2001 Report of the ACC / AHA Task Force. Executive summary (from circulation): http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/full/104/24/2996 Or selected sections of the full text report via Adobe Acrobat http://www.americanheart.org/downloadable/heart/1013201138293HFGuidelineFinal.pdf Overview HF &def’n pg 4-5, Stages/classification pg 6, Eval and Hx/PE pg 7-11, General tx recs pg 12-14, pharmacotherapy pg 14-25, Diastolic dysfx pg 36-38, End stage pg 28-30 Or Pocket guideline http://www.acc.org/clinical/pocket_guidelines.htm Or Pocket guide download site for PDA http://www.acc.org/clinical/palm_download.htm
When seeing patients in the module clinic with possible or known CHF, the resident will use the TFM epic smart text on Initial Evaluation or Follow up Evaluation of Chronic Heart Failure. These smart texts have distilled the current national guidelines for history, physical and lab/imaging documentation into a template for a visit note, helping to both review these concepts and provide one example for charting that fulfills expectations for appropriate documentation Evaluation
Additional Resources Mnemonic for DDX of Acute Treatable / Precipitating Causes of CHF Decompensation “PAID HEART” PE/ Pericardial dz Htn urgency / Hypoxia Arrthymia Endo (like thyroid, Calcium disorder) Infarct / Infection Anemia Drug / Diet (new bad drugs: NSAID, or non compliance Rheumatic (valve problem) / Renal failure w/ CHF meds, or diet, increase Na+) Tamponade Additional Articles for Further Learning Jessup, Mariell. Brozena, Susan.. Medical Progress: Heart Failure. New England Journal of Medicine. 348(20):2007-2018, May 15, 2003. http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/348/20/2007 Gomberg-Maitland, Mardi MD. Baran, David A. MD. Fuster, Valentin MD, PhD. Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure: Guidelines for the Primary Care Physician and the Heart Failure Specialist. Archives of Internal Medicine. 161(3):342-352, February 12, 2001. Abraham, William T. MD. Scarpinato, Len DO, MS. Higher Expectations for Management of Heart Failure: Current Recommendations. Journal of the American Board of Family Practice. 15(1):39-49, January/February 2002. http://www.jabfp.org/cgi/reprint/15/1/39 Farrell, Michael H. MD. Foody, JoAnne Micale MD. Krumholz, Harlan M. MD. [beta]-Blockers in Heart Failure: Clinical Applications. JAMA. 287(7):890-897, February 20, 2002. http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/287/7/883 http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/287/7/890 Patient Education Sites American Heart Association link for general explanation of heart failure, tips on healthy eating, medication use, etc. http://www.americanheart.org/presenter.jhtml?identifier=1486 Mayo Clinic link for good patient information on Heart Failure: http://www.mayoclinic.com/invoke.cfm?id=DS00061 National Institutes for Health link for even more information on Heart Failure: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/public/heart/other/hrtfail.htm Welcome to the Low Back Pain Study Module for the Low Back Pain Focused Clinic. There are a number of excellent resources on the Internet on the subject of low back pain. I would like to introduce you to an important one published by the American Academy of Family Practice, that is one of the reference guides that is used when you recertify for your Boards. This is the same publication that is used in checking the quality of documentation in your medical charts in the office. It is now in its 7th edition. TASK ASSIGNMENTS: To find the monograph, go to FamilyPractice.com, the ABFP Guides home page. Click on “Reference Guides”; and on the left side panel, click on “Low Back Pain”. Read the monograph. The complete text can also be downloaded as a PDF file if you prefer. Take the Post-test and submit your answers. OTHER RESOURCES: Deyo RA, Weinstein JN. Low Back Pain. NEJM 2001; Feb 1; 344:(5):363-70 Same article in pdf format http://content.nejm.org/cgi/reprint/344/5/363.pdf (username: hslic password: winter) Click here for summary of same article “LBP Pearls for the Palm”, by David Acosta MD, 7/2003 - clicking on “Palm” will download the document to your computer, and then will allow you to hot sync it to your Palm. You can find it under Teal Doc, or iSilo. EpicCare Find the SmartText labeled “TFM LBP_InitialVisit” to guide you through your visit and document pertinent information. For followup visits, find the SmartText labeled “TFM LPB_FUvisit” to use as a guide and help you document.
Monographs, websites and sources JNC Express, The 7th Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure, May 2003, NIH and NHLBI, website: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/hypertension/jncintro.htm Hypertension, reference guide 4, 9th edition, American Board of Family Practice, 2001, website: http://www.familypractice.com/references/referencesframe.htm?main=/references/ABFPGuides/Hypertension/hypertension.htm Hypertension: Common Conditions, PrimeAnswers University of Washington website: http://www.primeanswers.org/primeanswers/fpin/ebptutorial/ Evidence-based management of low back pain by Rick Deyo, M.D. Recently, Dr. Deyo gave a highly rated, evidence-based talk on the management of low back pain at the University of Washington based on his recent review article published in the New England Journal of Medicine, 2001*. Some of the important points he shared included: Evidence suggests: 25-80% of causes of LBP are impossible to determine 90+% of patients with LBP get better in 6-8 weeks no matter what treatment is provided LBP is a common, chronic disorder with intermittent exacerbation and long periods of remission When seeing a patient with LBP, Dr. Deyo suggested you ask yourself three questions: Could a systemic disease cause this? (cancer, rheumatic disease, infection, referred pain) Red flags indicating concern: age > 50 history of previous cancer fever / immunocompromised injection drug use / skin infection / UTI Could this be a neurologic problem? (neuropathy, nerve root impingement) Red flags indicating concern: L-5: weak foot, weak toe dorsiflexion, sensory loss in L-5 dermatome S-1: decreased ankle reflex Symptoms of spinal stenosis (usually >50yo, simian stance, OK uphill, pain downhill) Are there significant social/psychological factors? (disability issues, secondary gain, opioid seeking) Red flags indicating concern: whole leg pain consistent pain for “years” Imaging Studies Unless you are considering a systemic illness or neurologic problem, imaging studies are unlikely to be helpful and are often confusing. In controlled studies, many patients with highly abnormal MRI’s of the spine are totally asymptomatic. Plain spine films are useful 1/1250 times in unselected patients with LBP Treatment Encourage patient to be as active and exercise as much as possible (bedrest delays recovery and increases morbidity). Transition back to work as soon as possible NSAIDs modest symptomatic relief during acute flare Opioids symptomatic relief during acute flare only. Should be time limited. Chronic LBP and long term opioids are controversial and patient should be referred to pain clinic or specialist first Massage, chiropractic and physical therapy all help some during acute flare Acupuncture and other complimentary therapies have no good evidence of benefit.
IntroductionHypertension is the number one principal diagnosis billed for an office visit in outpatient Family Practice in 2000. Individuals who are normotensive at age 55 have a 90% chance of developing hypertension in their lifetime. Lifestyle modifications (diet, exercise and alcohol moderation) aimed at both controlling HTN and preventing atherosclerotic disease are needed in every patient. Of those requiring medicines, about 25% will be controlled with monotherapy, but most patients will require two or more medications to reach the goal BP of <140/90, (<130/80 in DM and Renal disease). In patients with HTN and additional cardiac risk factors, with stage 1 HTN (140-159/90-99) achieving a sustained 12mm reduction in systolic BP for 10 years will prevent 1 death for every 11 treated. With established CVD or target organ damage, the same reduction and length will prevent 1 death for every 9 treated. Initial workup visit: The content of the initial workup is more extensive and contains: History: Special age or ethnic group Diagnosis and duration of HTN and prior HTN workup Present symptoms ROS review for hints of secondary causes of HTN, about 10% of HTN, or symptoms of active target organ damage, i.e. angina, TIA Medications, supplements, and herbals causing HTN Lifestyle habits diet, exercise, alcohol, drugs, and tobacco Past Medical History of target organ damage conditions Past Medical History of causes of secondary HTN Family History of HTN, CAD, CVA Social History for stress, ability to afford medicines, motivational stage to adopt lifestyle changes CV Risk factor review Physical: Repeat BP with proper size cuff, and both limbs and one leg BMI, neck and waist circumference for sleep apnea and metabolic syndrome Fundi exam for changes Neck exam for thyroid and carotid bruits, and JVD Lung, heart, peripheral CV exam for cardiopulmonary Abd exam for renal or aortic bruits Baseline Lab: Electrolytes, BUN, Creatinine, glucose, calcium (Chem 7); Urinalysis, microalbumin Lipid profile after a 9-12 hour fast ECG Assessment: JNC 7 categories of optimal, <120/80, prehypertension, 120-139/80-89, Stage 1 HTN, 140-159/90-99, and Stage 2 HTN ³ 160/100 JNC 7 compelling indications for medications, CHF, post MI, high risk for CAD, Diabetes, Chronic Kidney disease, CVA Evidence of possible secondary cause of HTN needing workup Reversible cardiac risks that need attention Co morbidities Plan/Patient education: Lifestyle counsel of weight reduction, adopting the DASH eating plan, dietary sodium reduction, increased physical activity, and moderation of alcohol consumption Medications and their possible side effects Addressing other active cardiac risk factors Need for lifelong treatment Epicare Smarttexts Click SmartText button, hit T, scroll to TFM HTN Initial A 58 year old female comes to your office to establish care. She states that she was diagnosd with atrial fibrillation. She has been taking in aspirin (325 mg) a day. 1) All of the following would place her in a high risk category for stroke secondary to atrial fibrillation except:A) Hypertension B) Prior embolic event C) Congestive heart failure D) Mitral valve stenosis E) Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 2) The patient then tells you that she had an echocardiogram done six months ago, which showed an enlarged left ventricle and evidenc of congestive heart failure. What do you recommend to her in regards to pharmacologic stroke prevention?A) No therapy B) Aspirin 325 mg once a day C) Low dose warfarin plus aspirin 325 mg a day D) Warfarin to attain an INR of 2-3 E) Warfarin to attain an INR of 4-5 3) Appropriate follow up of the INR in a patient that has started warfarin would be: A) Weekly until stable, then monthly B) Every 2 weeks C) Weekly until stable, then every 3 months D) Weekly until stable, then only if the patient complains of bleeding E) Every 6 months A 60 year old male patient with permanent lone atrial fibrillation asks you about the most appropriate preventive medication for stroke. He has no other medical problems. 4) Which of the following medication regimens would you recommend?A) Aspirin 75 mg once a day B) Aspirin 325 mg once a day C) Warfarin to attain an INR of 2-3 D) Warfarin to attain an INR of 3-4 E) Low dose warfarin and aspirin 5) If he had a history of a previous embolic stroke but no residual deficits, which pharmacologic regimen would you recommend?A) Aspirin 325 mg once a day B) Warfarin to attain an INR of 1.6 - 2.5 C) Warfarin to attain an INR of 2.5 - 3.5 D) Warfarin to attain an INR of 4 - 5 E) No medication at this time A 55 year old male patient of yours was recently diagnosed with atrial fibrillation, which has been present for at least 72 hours. You consult the cardiologist and make a decision to try cardioversion. 6) What do you counsel him in regards to treatment prior to cardioversion?A) He will need to take warfarin for 3-4 days before and after the procedure B) He will need to take 325 mg of aspirin for 2 weeks before and after the procedure C) He will need to take warfarin for 3-4 weeks before and after the procedure D) He will need to take aspirin for 3-4 weeks before and after the procedure E) He can undergo cardioversion immediately as he has not had atrial fibrillation long enough to increase his risk of cardioembolism 7) All of the following are risk factors for stroke except:A) Hypertension B) Atrial fibrillation C) Asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis D) Female sex E) Hyperlipidemia 8) Permanent atrial fibrillation is defined as:A) Atrial fibrillation episodes last < 7 days B) Atrial fibrillation episodes last more than one year and cardioversion has not been attempted or fails C) Atrial fibrillation in individuals without structural heart disease D) None of the above
BONUS QUESTION (optional) How many salesmen does it take to change a light bulb? Who cares? I hate this joke. One Two Three Only one. But today, and today only. What You Should Know About Generalized Anxiety Disorder What is generalized anxiety disorder? Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) causes people to be worried or tense most of the time. Sometimes, they think something terrible will happen even though there’s no reason to think that it will. They may also worry about health, money, family or work. They may feel tense without knowing why. GAD usually starts when people are in their early 20s. About 10 million adults in the United States have this disorder. Women are more likely to have it than men. How do I know if I have GAD? Most people worry and these occasional worries are normal. This doesn’t mean that you have GAD. You may have GAD if you can’t stop worrying and relax. As a rule, if you have GAD, you worry so much that it interferes with your day-to-day life, and it happens more days than not. Here are other signs of GAD: Trouble falling or staying asleep Muscle tension Irritability Trouble concentrating, or your mind goes blank Getting tired easily Restlessness, or feeling “keyed up” or on edge If you feel tense most of the time and have some of these symptoms, talk to your doctor. Your doctor will probably examine you and ask some questions to make sure that something else isn’t causing your symptoms. Sometimes certain kinds of medicine may cause GAD. Your thyroid gland could be too active or you may be depressed. If your doctor doesn’t find any other reason for your symptoms, you may need to be treated for GAD. How is GAD treated? If you have GAD, you must learn ways to cope with your anxiety and worry. You’ll probably need some counseling to help you figure out what’s making you so tense. Also, you may need to take some medicine to help you feel less anxious. Your doctor will be able to recommend the treatment that will be best for you. Patients with GAD can get better. If you take medicine for generalized anxiety disorder, you may be able to s taking it in the future. To learn more about GAD, you can visit the Web site of the Anxiety Disorders Education Program at http://www.nimh.nih.gov/anxiety. This handout provides a general overview on this topic and may not apply to everyone. To find out if this handout applies to you and to get more information on this subject, talk to your family doctor. Visit familydoctor.org for information on this and many other health-related topics. Copyright © 2000 by the American Academy of Family Physicians. Permission is granted to print and photocopy this material for nonprofit educational uses. Written permission is required for all other uses, including electronic uses. INITIAL VISIT CONTENT TREATMENT GOALS ROUTINE VISIT CONTENT MEDICATION /TREATMENT ALGORITHMS ADA & USPSTF GRADING SYSTEMS WEB LINKS Latest version: 7/15/2003 DIAGNOSIS and SCREENING Diagnostic Criteria Normal IFG or IGT* Diabetes FPG < 110 mg/dl FPG > 110 and < 126 mg/dl FPG > 126 mg/dl 2 hr PG < 140 mg/dl 2 hr PG > 140 and < 200 mg/dl 2 hr PG > 200 mg/dl or random plasma glucose > 200 mg/dl and symptoms *IGT = impaired glucose intolerance IFG = impaired fasting glucose Fasting = no intake except water for > 8 hours 2 hr PG = 2 hours post 75 gm glucose load ADA Risk Factors for Type 2 Diabetes Age > 45 years Overweight (BMI > 25) Family history of diabetes Habitual physical inactivity Race/ethnicity (African-American, Hispanic-American, Native American, Asian, Pacific Islander) Impaired fasting glucose or glucose tolerance History of gestational diabetes or delivery of infant > 9 lbs Hypertension HDL cholesterol < 35 mg/dl and/or triglycerides > 250 mg/dl Polycystic ovarian syndrome History of vascular disease Screening No Randomized clinical trials demonstrating reduced morbidity and mortality from screening. Preferred screen is the fasting plasma glucose. Repeat required for diagnosis confirmation. HbA1c is not used for screening or diagnosis ADA recommendations (expert opinion) Consider q 3 years starting age 45, particularly with BMI > 25 Consider at younger age and higher frequency if additional risks present Children and adolescents q 2 years starting age 10 for overweight + 2 risk factors Overweight = BMI > 85%ile for age and sex, or weight for height > 85%ile, or weight > 120% of ideal (50%ile) for height. Risks are type diabetes in 1st or 2nd degree relative, high risk race/ethnicity (as above), signs of insulin resistance (HTN, hyperlipidemia, PCOS, acanthosis nigricans) USPSTF recommendations: http://www.ahcpr.gov/clinic/uspstf/uspsdiab.htm INITIAL VISIT CONTENT ADA recommendations http://care.diabetesjournals.org/cgi/content-nw/full/26/suppl_1/s33/T5 TREATMENT GOALS ADA Treatment Goals: HbA1c < 7.0% (Grade A for tight control and reduced complications, grade B for specific goal) Preprandial plasma glucose 90-130 mg/dl Peak postprandial glucose < 180 mg/dl No data concerning effects in elderly 65 or over, children < 13, and patients with advanced complications. Less stringent goals may be appropriate. Blood pressure < 130/80 (Grade A for reduced complications, grade B for specific goal) Lipids LDL < 100 mg/dl (Grade A for reduced cardiovascular events, B for goal) Triglycerides < 150 mg/dl HDL > 40 mg/dl ATP-III guideline secondary goal: non-HDL cholesterol (total minus HDL) < 130 American Association of Clinical Endocrinlogists has issued more stringent guidelines with goals of HbA1c < 6.5, Fasting glucose < 110, and postprandial peak < 140 http://www.aace.com/clin/guidelines/diabetes_2002.pdf ROUTINE VISIT CONTENT (All evidence grades are per ADA system) Frequency q 1-2 weeks while establishing control of above parameters, then q 3-6 months History Patient concerns Diet, exercise, and medication adherence Symptoms of hypo or hyperglycemia Review home blood glucose records Intercurrent illness ROS Symptoms of complications: chest pain or anginal equivalents, paresthesias or foot ulceration, claudication, urinary symptoms, visual symptoms. Physical Weight (assess gain/loss) Blood pressure Targeted exam based on history and ROS Foot exam for high risk (loss of protective sensation, deformity, prior ulcer, ASPVD, smoker) Interventions Address acute issues and patient concerns Prn review of self-care: diet/exercise therapy, foot care, glucose monitoring, ect. Regimen modification to meet therapeutic targets as above (BP, lipids, glucose) Indicated periodic screenings for complications Indicated referrals Periodic Monitoring and Screening for Complications (add diabetic modifier in HM in EPIC) HbA1c q 3-6 months (grade E) Home glucose monitoring: GDM and type 1 > 3/day, type 2 adequate to reach goals Annual spot urine for microalbuminuria (grade E, no trials showing less nephropathy) Annual foot exam and monofilament testing for protective sensation (grade B) Foot exam q visit if high risk (grade E) Lipids annually and as needed to optimize therapy (grade E) Baseline EKG Baseline BUN/creatinine and as indicated Prevention Annual flu vaccine (grade C) Pneumovax, repeat at age 65 if > 5 years since first dose (grade C) Smoking cessation advice (grade A) Cessation counseling/treatments (grade B) Aspirin 75-325 mg/ day All adults with macrovascular disease (grade A) Consider for adults with one or more additional CV risk factors Age > 40 (grade A) Between age 30 and 40 (grade B) Do not use under age 21 (Reyes syndrome risk) (grade A) Family planning/preconception counseling for reproductive age women Referrals Foot ulcer + high risk foot for multidisciplinary management (grade A) Diabetic education, self-monitoring instruction at diagnosis and as needed (grade B) Annual dilated eye exam starting at diagnosis for type 2, 3-5 years post dx for type 1 (B) GFR < 60 or difficulties with hyperkalemia (Grade B for less cost, delayed dialysis) Vascular evaluation for claudication (grade C) Specialty preventive care for high risk feet (grade C) BP not controlled with 3 drugs (grade E) MEDICATION AND TREATMENT ALGORITHMS General Aspirin as above ACE for type 1 with/without HTN, micro or macro albuminuria (grade A) ACE or ARB for type 2 with HTN and microalbuminuria (grade A) ARB for type 2 with macroalbuminuria, HTN and Cr > 1.5 mg/dl (grade A) B blocker for history of MI (grade A for reduced mortality) B blocker, diuretic, or ACE for initial tx of HTN (grade A) Statins to lower LDL (grade A) Fibrates to raise HDL, lower LDL (grade B) Antidiabetic Agents Medication potency for lowering HbA1c: Metformin and sulfonylureas ~ 1-1.5% Metiglinides ~ 1% Thiazolidinediones and alpha glucosidase inhibitors ~ 0.5-1% Given these potencies, HbA1c elevations at 9-11% often warrant initial combination therapy, and severe elevations > 11% may warrant initial insulin therapy as control is unlikely with oral meds and absolute insulin insufficiency is highly likely. Use ABFP monograph for detailed discussion of medications and a suggested treatment algorithm. Link goes to monograph listing, open diabetes pdf file. http://www.familypractice.com/references/guidesframe.htm GRADING SYSTEMS ADA evidence grading system http://care.diabetesjournals.org/cgi/content-nw/full/26/suppl_1/s33/T1 A. Clear evidence from well-conducted, generalizable randomized controlled trial that are adequately powered or supportive evidence from well-conducted randomized controlled trials that are adequately powered. B. Supportive evidence from well-conducted cohort studies or case-control studies. C. Supportive evidence from poorly controlled or uncontrolled studies, or weight of conflicting evidence supporting the recommendation. E. Expert consensus or clinical experience.USPSTF evidence grading system http://www.ahcpr.gov/clinic/ajpmsuppl/harris3.htm A. Strongly recommend. Good evidence the service improves important health outcomes and that benefits substantially outweigh harms. B. Recommend. At least fair evidence that the service improves important health outcomes and that benefits outweigh harms. C. No recommendation for or against. At least fair evidence that the service can improve health outcomes, but the balance of benefits and harms is too close to justify a general recommendation. D. Recommend against. At least fair evidence that the service is ineffective or that harms outweigh benefits. I. Insufficient evidence to recommend for or against. Evidence is lacking, conflicting, or poor quality. WEB LINKSADA Guides (updates yearly) http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/vol26/suppl_1/ ABFP Guides (updates q 2 years) http://www.familypractice.com/references/guidesframe.htm USPSTF (2003 screening) http://www.ahcpr.gov/clinic/uspstf/uspsdiab.htm After completing this aspect of the rotation, the resident will be able to:
Classification of Atrial Fibrillation per ACC/AHA/ESC*1) Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: atrial fibrillation episodes last < 7 days, usually < 24 hours 2) Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: lasts > 7 days, may be paroxysmal if it recurs after reversion, recurrent when a patient experiences 2 or more episodes 3) Permanent Atrial Fibrillation: lasts more then one year and cardioversion has not been attempted or fails 4) Lone Atrial Fibrillation: describes paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent atrial fibrillation in individuals without structural heart disease The incidence of thromboembolism depends in part on the type of atrial fibrillation. The majority of clinical trials have been conducted in patients with persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation. However, embolic events have been shown to occur in patients with atrial fibrillation for as little as 72 hours (3). Therefore, patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation should be anticoagulated if present for a substantial portion of time. *ACC=American College of Cardiology, AHA=American Heart Association, ESC=European Society of Cardiology Epidemiology: Atrial fibrillation is the most common clinically significant arrhythmia seen in primary care. It affects 0.4% of the population in general, increasing with age to affect 6-10% of the population over age 75 (4). Atrial fibrillation increases the risk of stroke 6 fold when compared to patients with normal sinus rhythm and 20-30% of acute ischemic strokes are cardioembolic in origin (5). The risk of stroke in patients with untreated atrial fibrillation is approximately 6% per year (1). Pathophysiology of Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation: Blood stasis in the left atrium and left atrial appendage along with activation of the hemostatic system leads to intra-atrial clot formation. The clot can then pass through the left ventricle, aorta, carotid arteries and subsequently obstruct the cerebral vasculature. Prevention Modalities: Multiple studies have been done to evaluate both aspirin and warfarin therapy in primary prevention of stroke. Conflicting results have been obtained with regard to aspirin. However, a meta-analysis of 6 trials comparing aspirin to placebo found that aspirin decreased the incidence of stroke 22% (6). It also appears that aspirin is more helpful when used in low risk patients which will be defined later. Adjusted dose warfarin, on the other hand, has been shown to consistently work well for stroke prevention and to be superior to aspirin in this regard. Warfarin decreases the risk of stroke by 62-68% with an absolute annual reduction of 2.7-3.1% (7). Therefore, treating 100 patients with warfarin will decrease 3 strokes per year. When compared to aspirin, warfarin decreases the risk of stroke by 2-3 times, but increases the risk of major bleeding 1.5 times (8). Combined low dose warfarin and aspirin have been studied for use in primary stroke prevention and have been shown to cause a higher morbidity and mortality when compared to adjusted dose warfarin and should therefore not be used in this setting (9). Risk Stratification: The choice of treatment modality in stroke prevention must take into account the benefits of stroke prevention versus the risk of bleeding. Therefore, several studies have been done to determine risk stratification in regards to treatment choice. Based on the information obtained a number of risk models have been developed. These include: The Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation (SPAF) investigators The sixth American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) Consensus Conference Guidelines from the ACC/AHA/ESC The pooled analysis from the five randomized, primary stroke prevention trials in patients with atrial fibrillation: BAATAF, SPINAF, AFASAK, CAFA, SPAF (10-14). All the models agreed on the following high risk features: prior embolic event LV dysfunction or heart failure valvular heart disease hypertension older age The ACCP and ACC/AHA/ESC also included as risk factors: DM CAD thyrotoxicosis The different models varied on the age at which risk was increased independent of other risk factors: women >75 years in SPAF
Additional guidelines from the ACC/AHA/ESC include: 1) For primary prevention of embolism in patients over age 75 years, target a lower INR of 2 (range 1.6-2.5) 2) INR should be determined at least weekly during the initiation of oral anticoagulation therapy and monthly when the patient is stable. 3) Anticoagulate patients with atrial fibrillation lasting more than 48 hours or of unknown duration for at least 3-4 weeks before and after cardioversion (INR 2-3). Clinical Evaluation and Assessment of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Obtain a complete history and physical and update this in the chart at each visit. This should include any additional risk factors for stroke that would place the patient in a high risk category as listed above. Also include additional modifiable stroke risks such as smoking, high fat diet, alcohol use, etc. Assess the type of atrial fibrillation, duration and any pharmacologic agents the patient is taking. Also, be sure to assess the patient’s risks for potential bleed if started on anticoagulants such as history of GI bleed or intracranial bleed, is the patient at risk for frequent falls, etc. An EKG should be present on the chart to confirm the rhythm and evaluate for any other abnormalities: previous MI, other arrhythmias, LVH. The patient should also have a CXR done at some point to assess cardiac silhouette, vasculature, lung parenchyma. A cardiac echo should be done to evaluate for valvular disease, ejection fraction, and evidence of thrombus. Laboratory studies should be done to assess TSH, lipid profile, and electrolytes and repeated as indicated. Additional tests to consider if indicated include exercise testing, holter monitor, transesophageal echocardiogram and electrophysiological studies. If the patient is started on adjusted dose warfarin therapy there needs to be clear documentation of management with appropriate follow up as listed previously. Summary: Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia seen by primary care physicians. It increases with age and is associated with an increased risk of stroke due to thromboembolism. Oral anticoagulants have been shown to decrease the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. While there is conflicting literature in regards to the efficacy of aspirin in this setting it does seem to decrease the risk of stroke in low risk patients and is associated with less risk of bleeding then warfarin. Warfarin on the other hand has been consistently shown to decrease the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. The risk of bleeding versus the reduction in stroke incidence must be weighed out in each patient individually. There have been multiple studies to help risk stratify those at highest risk of thromboembolism and stoke. These high risk patients are appropriate candidates for warfarin therapy. However, lifestyle, drug interactions, compliance, risk of falls, and other associated risks should be discussed prior to the initiation of adjusted dose warfarin therapy. Finally, close follow up of patients on warfarin to insure appropriate INR level should be emphasized. Additional Reading and Resources: American College of Cardiology American Heart Association American Stroke Association American Academy of Family Physicians: Stroke Monograph 256, 2000 (not available online) Bibliography:
A. Glucose B. Uric acid C. Blood pressure D. B and C E. A and C
B) Restriction of Ventricular Filling C) Rhythm Disturbance D) Volume Overload E) Pressure Overload
A) Prednisone F) Imipramine B) Advil G) Verapamil C) Alkaseltzer H) Chlorpropamide D) Prozac I) Amlodopine E) Tums
A) ACEI E) Diuretic B) Metoprolol F) Digoxin C) Hydralazine G) Nitrates D) Spironolactone H) Combined hydralazine / nitrates
A) ACEI E) Thiazide B) Metroprolol F) Digoxin C) Hydralazine G) Nitrates D) Spironocactone H) Combin hydralazine / nitrates
SEROTONERGIC DRUGS MERIDIA COMBINATION DRUGS FAT BLOCKERS METFORMIN OTC, HERBS, VITAMINS CHROMIUM PICOLINATE It is estimated that 14% of adults are using prescription weight loss products and another 7% are using OTC weight loss medications. Criteria for efficacy: Use results in weight loss of at least 5% of initial body weight and maintenance of that loss. Reduction of comorbidities such as hyperglycemia, hypertension, dyslipidemias. Minimum of tolerable side effects. Noradrenergic drugs Suppress appetite by direct stimulation of the satiety center in the hypothalamic and limbic regions of the brain. Amphetamines have high abuse potential; there is no clinical need for these drugs in the treatments of obesity. Structurally similar drugs have appetite suppressing effects with lower risk for CNS stimulation and abuse. Generic Name Trade Name Dosage Form, Strength Dosage Regimen DEA Schedule Diethylpropion Tenuate Tepanil Tenuate Tablet: 25 mg Dospan: 75 mg Ten-Tab: 75 mg 25 mg 3 times daily, 1 hour before meals, and in mid-evening if needed. Sustained release 75mg once daily, mid-morning IV Phentermine Phentermine (various mfg.) Fastin Ionamin Tablet: 8 mg Capsule: 8 mg Sustained release capsule: 30 mg Sustained release capsule: 15, 30 mg 8 mg 3 times daily, ½ hour before meals, or 15 to 30 mg as a single daily dose before breakfast or 10-14 hours before bedtime IV Phenylpropanolamine Dexatrim Pre-Meal Prolamine Acutrim 16 Hour Capsule: 25 mg Capsule: 37.5 mg Tablet: 75 mg 25 mg 3 times daily, not to exceed 75 mg in 24 hours, or 75 mg once daily (as sustained release) Was OTC- pulled from market in 2000 due to increased incidence in hemorrhagic stroke Side effects: CNS stimulation, blood pressure elevation, false sense of well being, irritability, nervousness, restlessness, insomnia. After the effects have worn off, unusual fatigue or weakness, drowsiness, trembling, mental depression. Serotonergic drugs The increased serotonin is thought to be responsible for satiation, and thereby reduces food intake. Fluoxetine (Prozac) Dosing: Recommended daily dose for weight loss id 60 mg Side effects: Anxiety, nervousness, diarrhea, and drowsiness Efficacy: Weight loss slows after first few months of therapy and is minimal by months 6 to 10. Fenfluramine (Pondimin)- withdrawn from market 1997 Dexfenfluramine (Redux)- withdrawn from market 1997 Sibutrimine (Meridia) DEA schedule: class IV Action: Promotes appetite control by inhibiting the reuptake of norepinephrine, serotonin and dopamine. Dosing Comes in 5, 10 and 15 mg capsules. The recommended starting dose id 10 mg daily, and increase depending on patient tolerance to 15 mg daily. The 5 mg dose is reserved for patients not tolerating the 10 mg dose. Titration is dependent on blood pressure and heart rate. The safety and efficacy of use longer than 1 year has not been evaluated. Side effects: Most commonly dry mouth, constipation, and insomnia. Others include headache, increased sweating, increase in blood pressure (sometimes substantial- blood pressure must be monitored regularly), increase in heart rate. Primary pulmonary hypertension has been reported with other weight loss drugs in this class. Efficacy: Studies showed an average weight loss of 4.4 to 6.9 kg over 12 weeks. Approximate cost: $90 per month Combination “Fen-phen” combination was tested at doses of fenfluramine 60mg plus phentermine 15 mg (half the usual dose of each drug) in 121 men and women for 210 weeks. 48 of the patients were still participating in the study at its conclusion. The adverse effects noted were dry mouth, GI symptoms such as abdominal pain, nausea, metallic taste, diarrhea and constipation, and fatigue. These studies concluded that the drugs retained their effectiveness without serious adverse events. However, widespread use of the drug combination revealed an incidence of 18 million cases per million of primary pulmonary hypertension and the occurrence of valvular heart disease. Fat blocking drugs Orlistat (Xenical) Action: Inhibits the absorption of dietary fats. Dosing: 120 mg 3 times daily (or with each meal, may skip with non-fat meals) + multivitamin to supplement fat-soluble vitamins. Side effects: Most commonly oily spotting, flatus with discharge, fecal urgency, fatty/ oily stool, oily evacuation, increased defecation, and fecal incontinence. Side effect management: Psillium (Metamucil) 10-15 ml (12 grams) with water at bedtime, or 1 rounded teaspoonful (6 grams) with each dose, to adsorb the oily discharge, panty liners as patient adjusts to drug. Efficacy: Studies showed a weight loss of 5.6 to 6.1 kg at one year. Approximate cost: $105 per month (120 mg TID) Metformin (Glucophage) Action: Decreases insulin resistance. Dosing: 1500 mg/day, start with 500 mg daily-> BID-> TID Side effects: GI upset, diarrhea Efficacy: Studies show 9- 13 kg weight loss at one year when combined with low carbohydrate diet. Approximate cost: $66 per month OTC drugs, herbal, vitamin, trace elements Metabolife Contains: Vitamin E, Magnesium, Zinc, Chromium, Guarana Concentrate (40 mg naturally occurring caffeine), Ma Huang Concentrate (12 mg naturally occurring ephedrine), Bee Pollen, Ginseng, Ginger, Lecithin, Bovine Complex, Damiana, Sarsaparilla, Golden Seal, Nettles, Gotu, Kola, Spirulina Algae, Royal Jelly, L-Carnitine-L-Tartrate, Gymnema Sylvestre. Warnings: Donot use if pregnant, nursing, heart disease, thyroid disease, diabetes, high blood pressure, depression, or other psychiatric condition, glaucoma, difficulty urinating, prostate enlargement, seizure disorder, using an MAO inhibitor, or any other prescription drug containing ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, or phenylpropanolamine. Ephedra warning: The herb industry is largely unregulated compared to FDA standards. With the market withdrawal of phenylpropanolamine, many “herbal” weight loss drugs have been marketed. Many of these contain ephedra as a pharmacologic means to stimulate metabolism. Ephedra can be referred to as many different products: ephedra herba, desert herb, ma huang, joint fir, popotillo, sea grape, teamster’s tea, and yellow horse. What to warn your patients about: Physiologic effects: Amphetamine-like effect, stimulation of alpha-1, beta-1, and beta-2 receptors which increase heart rate, peripheral vascular resistance, and blood pressure. Many of the marketed products also contain caffeine. When used with other stimulants, ephedra use was associated with adverse effects such as heart palpitations, psychiatric effects, gastrointestinal effects, symptoms of autonomic hyperactivity, including tremor and insomnia. Dangerous drug interactions: with non-cardioselective beta blockers could result in an increased pressor effect from unopposed alpha receptor stimulation. With MAO inhibitors (isocarboxazid Ò Marplan, phenelzine ÒNardil, tranylcypromine Ò Parnate) severe hypertension can result. All patients undergoing anesthesia with halogenated general anesthetics need to stop all ephedra use prior to surgery to avoid drug interactions. Adverse effects: Hypertension, palpitation, tachycardia, stroke, and seizures. The American Association of Poison Control Centers reported 1178 adverse reactions related to ephedra in 2001. This is 64% of the adverse reactions reported secondary to commonly used herbs, but ephedra products are only 0.82% of the herbal products for sale. This translates to a 10 to 40 fold higher risk of an adverse reaction with ephedra use. Chromium picolinate Action enhances glucose metabolism Dosing: There is no RDA, but intake of 50 to 200 mcg daily has been deemed safe. Efficacy: Anecdotal Pricing information from Drugstore.com In Prime Answers, go to the bottom left hand part of the frame, and find “Find retail price at Drugstore.com” In the blank dialog box, type in the medication you are interested in and hit the “Enter” key |

Edit this Post
ambulatory