|
| |
TA strikes --Lessons from
California
(5/23/01)
The blueprint for what is going on between the administration and GSEAC-UAW
is to be found in the University of California system, where another UAW
teaching assistant union negotiated a contract last year. Both GSEAC and
President McCormick understand the blueprint but most of the faculty do not.
Here is what they both know.
- The idea that the University cannot negotiate a contract because of our
state laws is a smoke screen. California laws are different but that was
exactly the position that UC administration took for seven years until after
four different strikes and endless disruption they realized that the TA
union was not going to go away and that common sense required a settlement.
- The idea that arbitration is an unacceptable system in a university is
completely bogus. That is precisely what the University of California agreed
to and it is part of most union contracts. The UAW agreement with UC creates
a firewall between curriculum issues and employment issues. Only the later
are subject to arbitration. Both administration and GSEAC know about the
precedents. Sooner or later they will work this out.
- The big lesson from California is that TA unions do not go away. They can
lose the first strike, lose the second strike, lose the third strike, but
sooner or later they will win. The reasons for that are clear to any student
of labor studies: TAs cannot be effectively penalized or replaced (who will
take their place?). And because they form a natural community with a good
lines of communication, every defeat and every attempt at intimidation just
increases the solidarity and levels of anger. The fact that GSEAC is backed
by a wealthy international union that has organized many campuses and knows
how to win, just adds to the certainty of outcome.
So the question before our campus is not whether but when. We can follow the
path of California and spend the next seven years enduring strikes or we can
work it out now. I am an historian, a labor historian to be exact, and thus more
interested in learning from the past than repeating it. President McCormick is
an historian too.
Jim Gregory
|