• C-CONT constructional content (the semantic contribution of the phrase or lex rule)

• LIGHT a feature useful for handling phenomena that distinguish words (or word-like small phrases) from phrases (see Abeille and Godard 2003).

• for lexical entries

• for lexical entries [gcs 10 Mar 2009 : this one has an error, the path to LKEYS is SYNSEM.LKEYS, not SYNSEM.LOCAL.LKEYS]

1. It's not the same for every sign (consider the features inside COMPS on transitive versus intransitive verbs).
2. It's not static: Anyone using the Matrix is adding features. Furthermore, depending on how you configured the Matrix (if you're using the modules and the configuration script), you might have slightly different feature sets (e.g., with or without AUX).

• --OCOMPKEY pointer to the oblique complements's KEY predsort

• for phrases
• for lexical entries

Examples

Here are a couple of pdf files meant to be used as "cheat sheets" for reading of the path names of features you want to constrain in your grammars. They are not complete, but aim to present the most commonly used features in a readable format.

• for phrases
• for lexical entries

• HEAD-DTR the sign that is the head-daughter, linked (by basic-head-only, basic-head-final, or head-initial) to the appropriate element of the ARGS list.

Binary headed-phrases have an analogous feature

• NON-HEAD-DTR the sign that is the non-head daughter.

Synsem Features

Most of the action happens within SYNSEM (either the SYNSEM of the sign itself, or the SYNSEM of its ARGS). Inside SYNSEM, one finds:

• LOCAL syntactic and semantic information, excluding that dealing with non-local dependencies.
• NON-LOCAL information about non-local dependencies
• OPT for marking certain arguments as optional or obligatory (note that this feature is usually used by selecting heads inside their valence features)
• DEF-OPT a feature allowing lexical heads to specify how their arguments are to be interpreted (as definite or indefinite) when they are left unxpressed. This may be superseded by a Sem-I based solution. Like OPT, signs don't specify their own DEF-OPT value, but rather the DEF-OPT value of their dependents.
• LIGHT a feature useful for handling phenomena that distinguish words (or word-like small phrases) from phrases (see Abeille and Godard 2003).
• MODIFIED a feature used in the analysis of modification to control spurious ambiguity in the case of left and right modifiers.
• LKEYS pointers into the semantics of lexical items, useful for syntax-semantic linking in defining lexical types.

Local features

Inside LOCAL, one finds the following:

• CAT category (head, valence)
• CONT content (semantics)
• CTXT context (pragmatic information; not well developed as of 4/2006)
• AGR (syntactic) agreement
• COORD a feature which distinguishes phrases that are inside of coordinate structures from those that are not.
• COORD-REL a feature which mediates semantic composition in the case of coordination
• COORD-STRAT a feature for distinguishing coordination strategies in languages which have more than one.

Non-local featues

Inside NON-LOCAL, one finds the following features, which all take difference lists as their values:

• SLASH long-distance dependencies (topicalization, wh-questions, relativization, easy-adjectives)
• QUE marks the presence of wh- question words within a consituent; used in the analysis of wh-questions
• REL marks the presence of relative pronouns within a constituent; used in the analysis of pied piping in relative clauses

Category features

Inside CAT, one finds the following:

• HEAD Part of speech information. NB: as of 4/2006, the Matrix provides a hierarchy of types which serve as the value of HEAD, but no features for those types, beyond MOD and KEYS.
• VAL Valence requirements (specifier, subject, complements)
• MC distinguishes main from subordinate clauses, in case of phenomena sensitive to this distinction
• HC-LIGHT determines the LIGHT value of a head-complement phrase with the current item as its head.
• POSTHEAD controls order of modifiers with respect to heads

Head and Valence features

Inside HEAD, one finds the following:

• MOD list valued; either a list containing a single synsem that matches the kind of constituent the sign can modify, or empty.
• KEYS fine-grained subclassification of part of speech types (e.g., temporal v. non-temporal nouns, specific adpositions)

Inside VAL, one finds the follwing, which all take lists of synsems as their values.

• SUBJ subject of verbs, other predicates
• SPR specifier of nouns, adjectives; as a basic rule of thumb, specifiers are semantic heads, subjects are not
• COMPS complements of any kind of head
• SPEC feature used by specifiers to select their heads (and therefore gain access to information for semantic composition)
• --KEYCOMP pointer to 'key complement' on COMPS list.

Content features

Inside CONT as well as C-CONT, one finds the following:

• HOOK information available for further semantic composition
• RELS list of elementary predications (difference list to facilitate append)
• HCONS list of handle constraints (diffrence list to facilitate append)
• MSG pointer to message on RELS list.

The value of RELS is a list of elementary predications, which typically have the following features:

• LBL the handle which labels the ep.
• WLINK a list used (by the underlying machinery) for linking an ep to the lexical item that contributed it; useful in some applications
• PRED the predicate name of the relation
• some list of ARGn features, each taking an index or a handle as their value.

The value of HCONS is a list of qeqs, which have the following features:

• HARG the handle with higher scope
• LARG the handle with lower scope

Inside HOOK, one finds the following:

• LTOP local top handle
• INDEX index (individual or event) of the local sign
• XARG distinguished argument of the local sign, available for control by outside predicates

Lexkeys

• KEYREL pointer to main relation in RELS
• ALTKEYREL pointer to an alternate relation in RELS
• --COMPKEY pointer to the first complement's KEY predsort
• ---OCOMPKEY pointer to the oblique complements's KEY predsort

Grammar Engineering Frequently Asked Questions

What is the feature geometry assigned in the Matrix? (Or: How do I figure out what paths I need to use?)

It's not possible to exhaustively describe the feature geometry for at least two reasons:

1. It's not the same for every sign (consider the features inside COMPS on transitive versus intransitive verbs).
2. It's not static: Anyone using the Matrix is adding features. Furthermore, depending on how you configured the Matrix (if you're using the modules and the configuration script), you might have slightly different feature sets (e.g., with or without AUX).

Nonetheless, it can be useful to have a quick reference guide to the basic feature geometry, especially if you're having a hard time getting path names right. This FAQ attempts to provide that basic guide.

Outermost features

The top level features on all signs are as follows:

• STEM the orthography
• SYNSEM syntactic and semantic constraints
• KEY-ARG is this the daughter that should be instantiated first? (NB: This feature is typically set not in the definition of the sign itself but in the definition of a rule describing which of its daughters should be instantiated first.)
• ARGS daughters (for lexical entries, this is just ignored; for phrase structure rules, it is the daughters, for lexical rules, it is (logically) the input)
• INFLECTED a binary feature which tracks whether a lexical item is completely inflected.

In addition, phrases and lex-rules also have the following:

• C-CONT constructional content (the semantic contribution of the phrase or lex rule)
• RULE-NAME a string giving the rule a name for LKB display purposes

And lexical entries (lex-item) and lexical rules also have the following:

• ALTS a place for features tracking which lexical rules an item can undergo (not well-developed within the Matrix as of 4/2006)
• ARG-ST the argument structure of the lexical item (only on words, but NB we don't do binding theory; ARG-ST is used to assist in cross-linguistic statements of linking facts, or the mapping of syntactic and semantic arugments)

Back to FAQs page

Back to main course page

-- EmilyBender - 09 Apr 2006