|
E-Case #3C
David True, MD
January 7-18, 2002
A 46yr old type 1 diabetic patient presents to a colleague with midline
low abdominal pain of 3 days duration. He is afebrile and not experiencing
nausea, vomiting, or change in bowel habits. He notes that he is experiencing
anorexia. He denies dysuria or frequency. However, he is a hemodialysis
patient with end-stage diabetic renal disease. He also suffers from schizophrenia,
which has been only moderately controlled. A urinalysis is checked, which
is negative, and a CBC is requested.
The patient returns the next day and has now been experiencing nausea
and emesis X 2. He notes subjective fever and says; "I'm just not feeling
very well". Pain is still in the low midline but worse now in the RLQ.
Temp is 99.6. Exam of the abdomen demonstrates rebound pain on the L side
with guarding in the RLQ. Chest and cardiac exam are unremarkable. The
CBC from the previous day shows a leukocytosis with WBC count of 15K.
A left shift is present with elevated PMN's at 13K.
What is your differential diagnosis?
What additional studies would you order?
The patient demonstrates evidence of an acute abdomen with rebound tenderness,
fever, and leukocytosis. The differential is long but would include bowel
obstruction, appendicitis, diverticulitis, duodenal ulcer, pancreatitis,
cholelithiasis, renal colic secondary to nephrolithiasis, pyelonephritis,
or perinephric abscess, or a metabolic cause such as DKA.
Additional studies could include serum amylase, LFT's, chem-7 panel,
C-reactive protein and imaging studies such as abdominal series, ultrasound,
or spiral CT with oral contrast.
A spiral CT with oral contrast was ordered which demonstrated appendiceal
edema of greater than 6mm and the presence of an appendicolith. The patient
was admitted to surgery with open appendectomy performed demonstrating
an acute appendicitis.
Acute Appendicitis: Discussion
Appendicitis is the most common surgical condition of the abdomen. Peak
incidence is between the ages 10-30 years with a lifetime occurrence of
7 percent. Despite newer technologies, diagnosis is still based primarily
on the history and physical. Perforation with resultant peritonitis is
the primary risk. Mortality for non-perforated cases is 1 percent but
can rise to 5 percent in young or elderly patients. Prompt diagnosis and
surgical referral is essential.
Classically the symptom sequence proceeds within 24-36 hours from a vague
periumbilical pain to anorexia, nausea and non-sustained vomiting. Pain
then migrates to the RLQ and is accompanied by low-grade fever. Such a
presentation is present in only 50% of cases. Abdominal pain and anorexia
are present almost universally.
Exam findings can include RLQ tenderness, rebound tenderness, elevated
temp (< 38o), psoas/obturator sign, & tenderness on
rectal exam. The location of the appendix can vary and can lead to varying
exam findings. A retrocecal appendix can produce flank pain with a positive
psoas sign. A pelvic appendix may result in rectal tenderness and a positive
obturator sign.
Laboratory/ radiologic studies are helpful with leukocytosis present
in 80% and neutrophilia present in 95% of cases. Unfortunately, these
are non-specific findings in abdominal pain. Ultrasound demonstrates a
sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 92%. It is helpful during pregnancy
and is the best study for children. Spiral CT (combined with enema contrast)
has a sensitivity of 90-100% and specificity of 95-97%.
Ultrasound or spiral CT studies are not essential for the diagnosis of
appendicitis and are most helpful in equivocal or high-risk cases including
the young, elderly, and immuno-compromised patients.
References:
Hardin, Mike D.; Acute Appendicitis: Review and Update; Am
Fam Physician 1999; 60:2027-34
Nipper, M.L., & Jacobson, L.K.; Expanded applications of CT, Postgrad
Med 2001; 109(6):68-77
|