|
|
ECASE #7
March 18-22
Kathy J. Hurlburt, MD
Case: A 36 yo female presents to your office with complaint of pain
and stiffness in her right wrist, MCP's and PIP's, now starting in her
left wrist as well. The pain and stiffness last 1-2 hours in the morning
and have been progressively worse over the past few weeks. She denies
fever, chills, weight loss, rashes, myalgias, GI symptoms.
On exam she has soft tissue swelling and tenderness in the above stated
joints. Her past medical history is unremarkable and she denies taking
any medications, prescription, OTC, or herbals. Labs show her rheumatoid
factor is negative, ESR is elevated to 36, CBC, Chem 7, Hep B & C,
and ANA/reflexive panel are negative. Bilateral AP/Ball Catcher views
of the hands show no erosions or bony decalcifications.
Questions
- Does this pt meet the criteria for rheumatoid
arthritis?
- What is the utility of radiographs in evaluating
RA? ESR?
- What form of initial treatment would you choose?
What additional baseline evaluation is necessary?
-
The criteria for the classification of RA from the American College
of Rheumatology requires 4 of the 7 following:
-
Morning stiffness in and around the joints lasting at least 1 hr
before maximal improvement
-
Arthritis of 3 or more jt areas simultaneously including: R or L
PIP, MCP, wrist, elbow, knee, ankle and MTP jts
-
Arthritis of hand jts
-
Rheumatoid nodules
-
Serum Rheumatoid Factor - 85% will be RF+, studies show RF titers
tend to correlate w/severe and unremitting disease, nodules, and extra-articular
lesions. In the individual pt, however, the RF titer is of little
prognostic value and serial titers are of no value in following the
disease process. A very small % of RF- pt's will seroconvert w/disease
progression.
-
Symmetric Arthritis
-
Radiographic changes: erosions or unequivocal bony decalcification
This pt has morning stiffness, arthritis of 3+ joints, symmetrical
(both wrists), and hand arthritis, and therefore meets the criteria.
-
X-Rays: Radiographs are important to obtain once the disease has
been diagnosed. Progression as evidenced by x-rays is helpful in
tailoring the patient's therapy, including a step-up to one of the
biologic agents (Etanercept or Infliximab).
ESR: Typically the ESR correlates w/the degree of synovial inflammation,
but this correlation varies greatly from patient to patient, and,
rarely, a patient w/active inflammatory RA may have a normal ESR.
The ESR is a useful tool, however, for following the course of inflammatory
activity in an individual. C-reactive protein may also be used to
monitor the level of activity.
-
Drug therapy for RA is yided roughly into two groups: those used
primarily for the control of joint pain and swelling, and those intended
to limit joint damage and improve long-term outcome. NSAIDS are effective
in treating pain, swelling, and stiffness, but have no effect on the
disease course or risk of joint damage. DMARDS (disease-modifying
antirheumatic drugs), on the other hand, can often times accomplish
both. Recommended dosages and side effects of most RA DMARDS are:
| DRUG |
ROUTE |
USUAL DOSAGES |
SIDE EFFECTS |
| Methotrexate |
PO, SQ, IM |
Initial: 7.5-10 mg/wk |
Fatigue, flu-like sx's, nausea, stomatitis, BM suppression,
pneumonitis, hepatic fibrosis. |
| Maintenance: 7.5-25 mg/wk |
| Plaquenil |
PO |
400 mg/d |
Nausea, abd pain, headache, rash, blurred vision, retinal toxicity. |
| Sulfasalazine |
PO |
Initial: 500 mg bid |
Nausea, diarrhea, rash, bm suppression, severe allergic
rxn, hepatitis. |
| maint.:1-1.5 g bid |
| Leflunamide |
PO |
Loading: 100mg/d x 3d |
N/V/D, abd pain, alopecia, rash, stomatitis allergic
rxns, hepatitis. |
| Maint.: 10-20mg/d |
| Azathiaprine |
PO |
2-2.5 mg/kg/d |
N/V/D, BM suppression, hepatitis. |
| Cyclosporin |
PO |
2-2.5mg/kg/d |
Htn, renal toxicity, hirsutism, tremor, gingival hyperplasia. |
| Gold Na Malate |
IM |
Initial: 10,25,50mg/wk x 15-20wks |
Rash, stomatitis, BM suppression, hematuria proteinuria. |
| Maint.: 50mg/wk + 50 mg q4 wks |
| Etanercept |
SQ |
25mg 2x weekly |
Injection-site rxn, infections, SLE-like rxns. |
| Infliximab |
IV |
Induction: 3mg/kg wk 0,2,6 |
Infusion rxn, infections, SLE-like rxns. |
| Maint.: 3 mg/kg q 8 wks |
For Mild Dz (few jts involved, ESR<30): Plaquenil (hydroxychloroquine)
or sulfasalazine +/- NSAIDS (naproxen and Ibup most commonly used)
ie - Hydroxychloroquine 400 mg/d +/- NSAID, and predn 3-5mg/d over
a 1-3 month period. Or, sulfasalazine up to 3 gm/d, although pt is
not likely to respond to >2gm.
For new-onset RA w/marked sx's (fatigue, low-grade fevers, wt loss,
polyarticular dz), or pt's w/established dz: Mtx
ie; MTX + NSAID + Predn 5-15/d, tapering predn over a 3-4 month period,
consider adding plaquenil or sulfasalazine if only a partial to Mtx.
For failure of combination regimens: Etanercept or Infliximab
-both are very expensive ($1000+/month), difficult to justify to insurance
co's, and pt may be on a waiting list.
This pt probably fits into the milder disease category as she has no
radiographic abnormalities and no constitutional symptoms, although most
rheumatologists would not disagree with starting this pt on Mtx given
her polyarticular disease and borderline ESR (to the cut off of 30).
Recommended baseline evaluations before starting a pt on
a DMARD includes:
-
Plaquenil - Eye exam (retinopathy occurs rarely when appriate dosages
used)
-
Sulfasalazine - CBC 2 wks x 3 months, then q 3 months
-
MTX - CBC, ALT/AST, serum Alb q 8 wks
-
Azathioprine - CBC q1-2 wks 1st month or w/dose change, then q1-3
months
-
Leflunomide - CBC, AST/ALT q 8 wks
-
Gold - CBC and UA q 1-2 wks for 1st 20 wks then at each injection
-
Cyclosporin - Creat & BP q 2 wks for 1st 3 months, then q month
-
Etanercept - none
-
Infliximab - none
References
-
Fries JF, Williams CA, Morfeld D. Reduction in long-term disability
in patients with rheumatoid arthritis by disease-modifying antirheumatic
drug-based treatment strategies. Arthritis Rheum 1996;39:616-622.
-
Masi AT. Articular patterns in the early course of rheumatoid arthritis.
Am J Med 1983;75:16-26.
-
Primer on the Rheumatic Diseases. Edition 12. 2001;208-31.
|