Getting Started
|
Year One Progress Report (July 1999) |
|||||||||||||||||
| Telepartners
in Early Diagnosis and Intervention for Children with Disabilities in Remote Communities Stephen Sulzbacher, Ph.D. Rural families must travel long distances to find specialty care for diagnosis and treatment of children with disabilities. Financial and sociocultural barriers often prevent them from seeking care. Even if the children are lucky enough to find the right specialists, written reports to the Local Education Agency (LEA) recommending educational interventions are frequently unclear or unworkable in the local community where services and specialty training are lacking. The expense of travel is a barrier as it reduces access to follow-up service. Additionally, time-stressed local service providers and primary care health practitioners have little opportunity for interactive consultation with appropriate distant experts about low-incidence disorders affecting educational programming and often don’t have the time or the readily-available e-mail technology to consult with each other across town. The overriding problem then remains one of bringing together all the relevant agencies to produce a coordinated individualized education plan (IEP). We are applying a proven model of outreach from the University of Washington to seven remote rural communities in Washington, Wyoming, Alaska, Montana, and Idaho (WWAMI) to provide needed services for children with disabilities. We are using the existing WWAMI Rural Telemedicine Network for early identification and ongoing consultation via interactive video teleconferencing (IVTC). The project is expanding the availability of specialty consultation for children birth to 21 years, with emphasis on those aged 3-12 for whom the LEA needs advice about medical conditions affecting educational progress. The use of IVTC will enable more school and community representatives to consult directly with distant specialists rather than requiring the child (and family) to travel to a distant center for diagnosis and intervention recommendations. Objective #1: Technical Consultation and Development Initial IVTC meetings with each participating
site We are also working with many school districts in Washington state who are just now getting T-1 lines as part of the K-20 Internet access system mandated by Governor Locke. That mandate, however, left unfunded the need for technical assistance to use these phone lines for videoconferencing purposes. We have been pleased school districts see us as a resource in this regard. Objective #2: Direct Student Consultations Consultations and consultant training Objective #3: Inservice Continuing Education via IVTC IVTC distance learning planning session All site IVTC presentation Objective #4: Dissemination Regional and national meetings Web site development |
||||||||||||||||||
|
Introduction | Types of Videoconferencing | Technical Background | Getting Started | Examples | Resources | Home
|
||||||||||||||||||
| © 2001 University of Washington. All Rights Reserved. | ||||||||||||||||||