TO
THE TEACHER
OBJECTIVES
OF THE UNIT: To introduce students to archaeological finds as
an historical source. To
encourage students to think about the connections between burial
practices, forms of social organization, and beliefs about the
afterlife. To present students with visual evidence of the great changes
in China between 2000 and 100 BCE.
TEACHING
STRATEGIES: It might be
best to start with an individual tomb and ask the students to look
at the objects in it. What
do they reveal about the aesthetics and technology of the period?
To encourage students to speculate about possible functions
of the objects or the meaning of decoration added to them, the
teacher can tell them that even specialists frequently propose very
different theories. To encourage students to think about
change over time, they can be asked to compare the five tombs.
To make
this material more challenging, the teacher could introduce issues
relating to twentieth century archaeology, ranging from Chinese concerns to
show that China developed independently of the rest of Eurasia, to
the political favor archaeology has enjoyed because it fits well
with Marxist materialist theories of history.
Students could discuss whether archaeologists should devote
their time to the most splendid tombs, showing the finest art and
technology, to more representative tombs, or to sites of cities,
kilns, and other evidence of economic life.
WHEN TO TEACH:
This unit is designed for a chronologically-organized course. For courses that devote a week or more to the ancient period,
using all five tombs offers a good way to reinforce recognition of
the enormous changes that occurred in China during those centuries.
When less time is available, it might make more sense to
select one tomb to use in class.
The tomb of Fu Hao, for instance, could be used to supplement
discussion of the Shang dynasty without using the other tombs.