{"id":340,"date":"2018-05-19T19:42:50","date_gmt":"2018-05-19T19:42:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/globallawpol\/wordpress\/?p=340"},"modified":"2018-05-19T19:42:50","modified_gmt":"2018-05-19T19:42:50","slug":"18-0008-survey-study-of-43-supreme-court-common-law-judges-on-the-use-of-foreign-law-in-constitutional-rights-cases","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/globallawpol\/2018\/05\/19\/18-0008-survey-study-of-43-supreme-court-common-law-judges-on-the-use-of-foreign-law-in-constitutional-rights-cases\/","title":{"rendered":"18-0008 &#8211; Survey Study of 43 Supreme Court Common Law Judges on the Use of Foreign Law in Constitutional Rights Cases"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Authors: Brian Flanagan and Sinead Ahern<br \/>\nTime period: 2005-2006<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.icpsr.umich.edu\/icpsrweb\/ICPSR\/studies\/29121\/version\/1\" target=\"_blank\">Access ICPSR here.<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Authors: Brian Flanagan and Sinead Ahern Time period: 2005-2006 Access ICPSR here.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[47,23,58,50,60,48,53,25,22],"tags":[44,61,45,26],"class_list":["post-340","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-australia","category-canada","category-global","category-india","category-israel","category-new-zealand","category-south-africa","category-united-kingdom","category-united-states","tag-constitutional-issues","tag-foreign-law","tag-judges","tag-survey"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/globallawpol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/340","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/globallawpol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/globallawpol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/globallawpol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/globallawpol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=340"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/globallawpol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/340\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/globallawpol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=340"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/globallawpol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=340"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/globallawpol\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=340"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}