Volume VIa: Southeast United States -- Phase 2
ABSTRACT

Ottmar, Roger D.; Vihnanek, Robert E.; Mathey, Jared W. 2003. Stereo photo series for quantifying natural fuels. Volume VIa: sand hill, sand pine scrub, and hardwoods with white pine types in the Southeast United States with supplemental sites for volume VI. PMS 838. Boise, ID: National Wildfire Coordinating Group, National Interagency Fire Center. 78 p.

A series of single and stereo photographs display a range of natural conditions and fuel loadings in sand hill, sand pine scrub, and hardwoods ecosystems in the southeastern United States. Each group of photos includes inventory information summarizing vegetation composition, structure and loading, woody material loading and density by size class, forest floor depth and loading, and various site characteristics. The natural fuels photo series is designed to help land managers appraise fuel and vegetation conditions in natural settings.

Keywords: Woody material, biomass, fuel loading, natural fuels, sand hill, sand pine scrub, hardwoods, longleaf pine, Pinus palustris, sand pine, Pinus clausa, Eastern white pine, Pinus strobus.

COOPERATORS
This publication was developed by the USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Fire and Environmental Research Applications Team with funding provided, in part, by the Joint Fire Science Program and the Department of Defense, Eglin Airforce Base, Natural Resources Branch.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Special recognition is due Mike Kuypers, State of Florida, Division of Forestry; Bob Panko and Nate Benson, USDI, Everglades National Park; James Thorsen and George Custer, USDA Forest Service, Ocala National Forest; Keith Wooster, USDA Forest Service, Chattahoochee National Forest; Marty Bentley, USDA Forest Service, Cherokee National Forest; Kevin Hiers, James Furman, Kevin Mock, Al Sutsko, Billy Price, Pete Jerkins, and Trisha Dahl, Eglin Air Force Base Natural Resource Branch. Andrew Bluhm, Corey Bolen, Mathew Cerney, Timothy Davis, Jennifer McCormick, Jorge Morfin, Andres Najera, Diana Olson, Crystal Raymond, Sonya Schaller, Clint Wright, and David Wright, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station preformed the field work and helped with the analysis.

AUTHORS
Roger D. Ottmar is a research forester, Robert E. Vihnanek is a supervisory forester, and Jared W. Mathey is a forester, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Pacific Wildland Fire Sciences Laboratory, 400 North 34th Street, Suite 201, Seattle, Washington 98103.

PHOTOGRAPH AND INFORMATION ARRANGEMENT The photographs and accompanying data summaries are presented as single sites organized into three series. Each site contains the wide-angle (50 mm) photograph, general site, stand, and understory information, and summaries of overstory structure and composition, understory vegetation structure and composition, or forest floor depth loading and constancy, and dead and down woody material loading and density by size class.

Figure 1--Photo series sample area layout. Forty random azimuth line transects (one at each point on the 30- and 150-foot arcs, and two at each point on the 60-, 90-, and 120-foot arcs) and 10-15 clipped vegetation plots (two to three per arc) were located within the sample area. Trees, shrubs and seedlings were inventoried on 12 systematically located sample plots.
Figure 1--Photo series sample area layout. Forty random azimuth line transects (one at each point on the 30- and 150-foot arcs, and two at each point on the 60-, 90-, and 120-foot arcs) and 10-15 clipped vegetation plots (two to three per arc) were located within the sample area. Trees, shrubs and seedlings were inventoried on 12 systematically located sample plots.

SITE INFORMATION
The camera point of each site was located with a global positioning system (GPS) receiver using the WGS-84 datum. Aspect and slope were measured with a compass and clinometer, respectively. Community types were designated in the sand hill and sand pine scrub series based on vegetation structure and composition, and successional status (Kindell et al. 1997); "rough" includes understory vegetation and forest floor material, and the age indicates the number of years since the last fire occurred at the site. Society of American Foresters (SAF) cover type was assigned for each site based on descriptions in Eyre (1980). Society of American Foresters cover type is defined by current vegetation composition and locality or environmental factors.

STAND INFORMATION
Tree and understory species (shrub, forb, and graminoid species) present at a site are listed in order of abundance.1 Understory species coverage was estimated using line intercept transects (Canfield 1941); the listing of understory species was not meant to be a complete vegetation inventory and may represent only a portion of the actual species richness of the sampled areas. The percentage of dead standing trees was determined by sampling within the site (fig. 1). Crown closure was measured either with a forest densitometer at 95 systematically located points in the sample area or, for forests with low tree cover or small stature, was estimated by using line intercept transects (Canfield 1941). Live seedling composition, density, and coverage were estimated by using twelve 0.005-acre circular plots representing 43 percent of the sample area; all trees less than 4.5 feet tall were considered seedlings.

1See below for a list of scientific and common species names used in this volume.

FOREST FLOOR INFORMATION
Surface material and duff depth were calculated as the average of measurements taken every five feet between the 30- and 150-foot arcs of the three center transects for a total of 75 measurements (fig. 1). The depth of the different forest floor components was calculated as an average of the depth only where that component was encountered during sampling. Therefore, the depths reported for the different forest floor components are not unit-wide averages and do not necessarily sum to total depth. Loading was calculated from bulk density values derived from field measurements or through collection of material in twelve 10.76 square foot plots.2 Constancy is an indicator of how consistently the various forest floor components occur in the sample area and is expressed as a percentage of the total number of measurements. The amount of exposed mineral soil at each site can be estimated by subtracting the constancy of the total forest floor from 100 percent.

2Forest floor bulk density values used for each material type are listed in the "Notes to User." for each series.

SAPLINGS AND TREES
Overstory trees and saplings (i.e., trees >4.5 feet tall) were sampled in twelve 0.005-acre circular plots located systematically throughout the sample area or within the entire sample area for sites with low tree density (fig. 1). Tree measurement data were summarized by diameter at breast height (d.b.h.) size class and by tree status (all, live, or dead).3 Height to crown base was defined as the height of the lowest, continuous live or dead branch material of the tree canopy, and height to live crown was defined as the height of the lowest continuous live branches of the tree canopy. Live crown mass values, where reported, (i.e., live branches and foliage) were calculated from species and size-specific allometric equations (Clark et al. 1985, Edwards and McNab 1979, Taras and Phillips 1978).

3D.b.h. is measured 4.5 feet above the ground.

UNDERSTORY VEGETATION
Understory species coverage was estimated by using line intercept transects (Canfield 1941). Where species-specific coverage is not reported, understory vegetation coverage was estimated by lifeform category (shrub, forb, or graminoid) by using the line intercept transects. Understory vegetation heights were measured at 25 points located systematically throughout the sample area. Typically, understory vegetation biomass was determined by sampling twelve square, clipped vegetation plots (10.76 square feet each) also located systematically throughout the sample area (fig. 1). For the sand pine scrub and supplemental longleaf pine series, understory vegetation biomass was clipped and collected in six to eight plots (43.03 square feet each) and separated by lifeform (seedling, sapling, or shrub), species, and size class. All live and dead understory vegetation (regardless of size) within each square plot was clipped at ground level, separated, and returned to the laboratory for oven drying. Understory vegetation and other collected material were ovendried at a minimum of 158 °F for at least 48 hours before weighing and determination of area loading.

WOODY MATERIAL
Measurement techniques used for inventorying dead and down woody material were patterned after the planar intersect method outlined by Brown (1974) and described by Maxwell and Ward (1980). Forty transects of random azimuth starting at 25 systematically located points within the sample area were used to determine woody material loading and density (fig. 1). Woody material data are reported by size classes that correspond to timelag fuel classes used in fire behavior modeling (see, for example, Burgan and Rothermel 1984).4 Woody material in 10-hour, and 100-hour and larger size classes was tallied on transects that were 10 feet and 30 feet long, respectively. Woody material loading in the 1-hour size class (and the 10-hour and 100-hour size classes for several of the sites) was determined by collecting, oven drying, and weighing all pieces in twelve 10.76-square-foot sample plots. The decay class and the actual diameter at the point of intersection was measured for all pieces >3 inches in diameter. All woody material <3 inches in diameter was considered sound. Woody material loading and woody material density were calculated from relationships that use number of pieces intersected and transect length (and wood specific gravity for loading), respectively, developed by Brown (1974) and Safranyik and Linton (1987).

4>1-, 10-, 100- and 1000-hour timelag fuels are defined as woody material 0.25 inch, 0.26-1.0 inch, 1.1-3.0 inches, and >3.0 inches in diameter, respectively.

SPECIES LIST
Scientific and common species names are from NRCS (2002); Pinus clausa (sand pine) taxonomy is from Ward (1963).

SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME
 
TREES
Acer rubrum L.
Amelanchier arborea
     (Michx. f.) Fern.
Aralia spinosa L.
Betula papyrifera Marsh.
Carpinus caroliniana Walt.
Carya alba
     (L.) Nutt. ex Ell.
Carya glabra (P. Mill.)
Cercis canadensis L.
Cornus florida L.
Diospyros virginiana L.
Fagus grandifolia Ehrh.
Halesia carolina L.
Ilex opaca Ait.
Liquidambar styraciflua L.
Liriodendron tulipifera L.
Magnolia spp.
Magnolia grandiflora L.
Magnolia virginiana L.
Nyssa sylvatica Marsh.
Oxydendrum arboreum
     (L.) DC.
Persea spp.
Persea borbonia
     (L.) Spreng.
Persea humilis Nash
Pinus clausa
     (Chapman ex Engelm.)
     Vasey ex Sarg.
     var. clausa
Pinus clausa
     (Chapman ex Engelm.)
     Vasey ex Sarg.
     var. immuginata Ward
Pinus echinata P. Mill.
Pinus elliottii Engelm.
Pinus palustris P. Mill.
Pinus strobus L.
Pinus virginiana P. Mill.
Prunus serotina Ehrh.
Quercus spp.
Quercus alba L.
Quercus chapmanii Sarg.
Quercus coccinea
     Muenchh.
Quercus geminata Small
Quercus hemisphaerica
     Bartr. Ex Willd.
Quercus incana Bartr.
Quercus laevis Walt.
Quercus margarettiae
     Ashe ex Small
Quercus myrtifolia Willd.
Quercus prinus L.
Quercus rubra L.
Quercus stellata Wangenh.
Quercus velutina Lam.
Rhus copallinum
     L. (Jacq.) DC.
Robinia pseudoacacia L.
Sassafras albidum
     (Nutt.) Nees
Tsuga canadensis (L.) Carr.
Viburnum prunifolium L.
 
SHRUBS
Asimina spp.
Calycanthus floridus L.
Ceratiola ericoides Michx.
Chimaphila maculata
     (L.) Pursh
Chimaphila umbellata
     (L.) W. Bart.
Chrysoma pauciflosculosa
     (Michx.) Greene
 
 
Red maple
Common serviceberry
 
Devil's walkingstick
Paper birch
American hornbeam
Mockernut hickory
 
Sweet Pignut hickory
Eastern redbud
Flowering dogwood
Common persimmon
American beech
Carolina silverbell
American holly
Sweetgum
Tuliptree
Magnolia
Southern magnolia
Sweetbay
Blackgum
Sourwood
 
Bay
Redbay
 
Silk bay
Ocala sand pine
 
 
 
Choctawhatchee sand pine
 
 
 
Shortleaf pine
Slash pine
Longleaf pine
Eastern white pine
Virginia pine
Black cherry
Oak
White oak
Chapman oak
Scarlet oak
 
Sand live oak
Darlington or laurel oak
 
Bluejack oak
Turkey oak
Runner or sand post oak
 
Myrtle oak
Chestnut oak
Northern red oak
Post oak
Black oak
Winged sumac
 
Black locust
Sassafras
 
Eastern hemlock
Blackhaw
 
 
Paw paw
Eastern sweetshrub
Sand heath
Striped prince's pine
 
Pipsissewa
 
Woody goldenrod
 
SHRUBS (CONTINUED)
Crataegus spp.
Euonymus spp.
Garberia heterophylla
     (Bartr.) Merr. & F. Harper
Hydrangea arborescens L.
Ilex coriacea
     (Pursh) Chapman
Ilex vomitoria Ait.
Kalmia latifolia L.
Leucothoe spp.
Licania michauxii Prance
Lyonia spp.
Opuntia spp.
Rhododendron spp.
Rhododendron canescens
     (Michx.)
Rhus glabra L.
Rubus spp.
Sabal etonia
     Swingle ex Nash
Serenoa repens
     (Bartr.) Small
Smilax spp.
Smilax glauca Walt.
Smilax rotundifolia L.
Toxicodendron radicans
     (L.) Kuntze
Vaccinium spp.
Vaccinium arboreum Marsh.
Vaccinium myrsinites Lam.
Vaccinium pallidum Ait.
Vaccinium stamineum L.
Vitex spp.
Vitis spp.
Vitis rotundifolia Michx.
Yucca spp.
 
FORBS
Asarum spp.
Aster spp.
Erigeron spp.
Galax urceolata (Poir.)
Hepatica nobilis Schreb.
     var. obtusa
     (Pursh) Steyermark
Hieracium spp.
Hypericum spp.
Mentha spp.
Mitchella repens L.
Pityopsis spp.
Polystichum acrostichoides
     (Michx.)Schott
Potentilla spp.
Pteridium aquilinum
     (L.) Kuhn
Viola spp.
 
GRAMINOIDS
Andropogon virginicus L
Aristida stricta Michx.
Carex spp.
Cladium spp.
Juncus spp.
Panicum spp.
Schizachyrium scoparium
     (Michx.) Nash
Spartina spp.
 
 
Hawthorn
Spindletree
Garberia
 
Wild hydrangea
Large gallberry
 
Yaupon
Mountain laurel
Doghobble
Gopher apple
Staggerbush
Prickly pear
Rhododendron or azalea
Sweet Mountain azalea
 
Smooth sumac
Blackberry
Scrub palmetto
 
Saw Palmetto
 
Greenbrier
Cat greenbrier
Roundleaf greenbrier
Eastern poison ivy
 
Blueberry
Farkleberry
Shiny blueberry
Blue Ridge blueberry
Deerberry
Chastetree
Grape
Muscadine (grape)
Yucca
 
 
Ginger
Aster
Fleabane
Brummitt beetleweed
Roundlobe hepatica
 
 
Hawkweed
St. Johnswort
Mint
Partridgeberry
Silkgrass
Christmas fern
 
Cinquefoil
Western brackenfern
 
Violet
 
 
Broomsedge bluestem
Pineland threeawn
Sedge
Sawgrass
Rush
Panicgrass
Little bluestem
 
Cordgrass

LITERATURE CITED

Brown, J.K. 1974. Handbook for inventorying downed woody material. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-16. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 24 p.

Burgan, R.E.; Rothermel, R.C. 1984. BEHAVE: fire behavior prediction and fuel modeling system--FUEL subsystem. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-167. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 126 p.

Canfield, R.H. 1941. Application of the line interception method in sampling range vegetation. Journal of Forestry. 39: 388-394.

Clark, A., III; Phillips, D.R.; Frederick, D.J. 1985. Weight, volume, and physical properties of major hardwood species in the Piedmont. Res. Pap. SE-255. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station. 78 p.

Edwards, B.M.; McNab, H.W. 1979. Biomass prediction for young southern pines. Journal of Forestry. 77: 291-292.

Eyre, F.H., ed. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Washington, DC: Society of American Foresters. 148 p. [plus map].

Kindell, C.E.; Herring, B.J.; Nordman, C.; Jensen, J.; Schotz, A.R.; Chafin, L.G. 1997. Natural community survey of Eglin Air Force Base, 1993-1996: final report. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Natural Areas Inventory.

Maxwell, W.G.; Ward, F.R. 1980. Guidelines for developing or supplementing natural photo series. Res. Note PNW-358. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 16 p.

Natural Resources Conservation Service [NRCS]. 2002. The PLANTS database. Version 3.5. https://plants.usda.gov. (3 March 2003).

Safranyik, L.; Linton, D.A. 1987. Line intersect sampling for the density and bark area of logging residue susceptible to the spruce beetle, Dendroctonus rufipennis (Kirby). Inf. Rep. BC-X-295. Victoria, BC: Canadian Forestry Service, Pacific Forestry Centre. 10 p.

Taras, M.A.; Phillips, D.R. 1978. Aboveground biomass of slash pine in a natural sawtimber stand in southern Alabama. Res. Pap. SE-188. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station. 31 p.

Ward, D.B. 1963. Contributions to the flora of Florida-2, Pinus (Pinaceae). Castanea. 28: 1-10.