Ottmar, Roger D.; Vihnanek, Robert E.; Wright, Clinton S. 2007. Stereo photo series for quantifying natural fuels. Volume X: sagebrush with grass and ponderosa pine-juniper types in central Montana. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-719. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 59 p.
Two series of single and stereo photographs display a range of natural conditions and fuel loadings in sagebrush with grass and ponderosa pine-juniper types in central Montana. Each group of photos includes inventory information summarizing vegetation composition, structure, and loading; woody material loading and density by size class; forest floor depth and loading; and various site characteristics. The natural fuels photo series is designed to help land managers appraise fuel and vegetation conditions in natural settings.
Keywords: Woody material, biomass, fuel loading, natural fuels, Missouri Breaks, mixed-conifer, ponderosa pine, Pinus ponderosa, creeping juniper, Juniperus horizontalis, Rocky Mountain juniper, Juniperus scopulorum, Douglas-fir, Pseudotsuga menziesii, mountain big sagebrush, Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana, Wyoming big sagebrush, Artemisia tridentata ssp. wyomingensis.
COOPERATORS
This publication was developed by the USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Fire and Environmental
Research Applications team in cooperation with the Bureau of Land Management, Central Montana Zone Fire Management,
with funding provided, in part, by the Joint Fire Science Program.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Special recognition is due Vinita Shea, Jennifer Walker, Karly Krausz, Gary Kirpach (Zone FMO), and Mitch Maycox,
Bureau of Land Management, Lewistown Field Office; Brad Gillespie, Bureau of Land Management, Dillon Field Office;
John Thompson, Bureau of Land Management, Butte Field Office; and Shannon Downey, Montana Department of Environmental
Quality. David Wright, Nicole Troyer, Geoffrey Seymour, Brian Maier, Ann McCauley, Frank Archuleta, Steve Duex,
Jennifer Prince, Jennifer Byington, Erin Kenney, and Christine Pachecco, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest
Research Station, Pacific Wildland Fire Sciences Laboratory worked on this project in the field and in the laboratory.
AUTHORS
Roger D. Ottmar and Clinton S. Wright are research foresters, and
Robert E. Vihnanek is a supervisory forester, Pacific Wildland Fire Sciences Laboratory,
400 North 34th Street, Suite 201, Seattle, WA 98103.
PHOTOGRAPH AND INFORMATION ARRANGEMENT The photographs and accompanying data summaries are presented as single sites organized into two series. Each site contains a wide-angle (50mm) photograph and general site and stand information. The ponderosa pine-juniper series include information on understory vegetation, dead and down woody material loading and density by size class, and summaries of the overstory tree, sapling, and shrub structure and composition. The sagebrush with grass series also includes vegetation, litter, and woody material loading by size class. The ponderosa pine-juniper series also includes forest floor information along with juniper biomass and structure information.
SITE AND STAND INFORMATION
The camera point of each site was located with a global positioning system receiver using the WGS-84 datum.
Aspect and slope were measured with a compass and clinometer, respectively. Ecological community classification
(to the association level; NatureServe 2006), an indicator of current vegetation composition, was assigned for all
sites. In addition, Society of American Foresters (SAF; Eyre 1980) and Society for Range Management (SRM; Shiflet 1994)
cover type, indicators of current vegetation composition were assigned for all ponderosa pine-juniper and sagebrush with
grass sites, respectively. Shrub, forb, and graminoid species coverage along with mineral soil exposure, was estimated
by using line intercept transects (Canfield 1941). The listing of understory species was not meant to be a complete
vegetation inventory and may represent only a portion of the actual species richness of the sampled areas.
For the ponderosa pine-juniper series, tree and seedling species present at a site are listed in order of abundance. Crown closure was measured with a forest densitometer (95 systematically located points). Tree and seedling composition and density were determined either by a total inventory of the sample area, or estimated by using twelve 0.005-acre circular plots; all trees less than 4.5 feet tall were considered seedlings.
Figure 1--Photo series sample area layout. Forty random azimuth
line transects (one at each point on the 30- and 150-foot arcs, and two at each point on
the 60-, 90-, and 120-foot arcs) and 12 clipped vegetation plots (two to three per arc)
were located within the sample area. Trees, shrubs and seedlings were inventoried within the entire sample area
or on 12 systematically located sample plots.
UNDERSTORY VEGETATION
Graminoid and forb heights were measured at 25 points located systematically throughout the sample area; shrub
height was calculated as an average of all shrubs measured in 12 systematically located 0.005-acre circular plots.
Understory vegetation biomass was determined by sampling 12 square, clipped vegetation plots (10.76 square feet each)
located systematically throughout the sample area (fig. 1). All live and dead understory vegetation
(except Juniperus spp.) within each square plot were clipped at ground level, separated, and returned to
the laboratory for oven drying. Understory vegetation and other collected material was oven dried at a minimum of
158 °F for at least 48 hours before weighing and determination of area loading. Where present, Prunus virginiana was
considered a shrub and measured in twelve 0.005-acre circular plots; biomass was calculated from a growth-form-based
allometric equation (tall shrubs; Brown 1976).
FOREST FLOOR INFORMATION
For the ponderosa pine-juniper series, litter and duff depth were calculated as the average of measurements taken every
5 feet between the 30- and 150-foot arcs of the three center transects for a total of 75 measurements (fig. 1).
The depth of the litter and duff was calculated as an average of the depth only where litter or duff was encountered
during sampling (null values, or points where litter or duff were absent, are not included in the average).
Therefore, the depths reported for litter and duff are not unit-wide averages, and do not necessarily sum to total depth.
Loading was calculated from depth and bulk density values derived from field measurements or through collection of
material in twelve 10.76-square-foot plots.1 Constancy, an indicator of how consistently the various forest floor
components occur in the sample area, is expressed as a percentage of the total number of measurements.
The amount of exposed mineral soil at each site for the ponderosa pine-juniper series can be estimated by subtracting
the constancy of the total forest floor from 100 percent. For the sagebrush with grass series, litter loading was
determined through collection of material in twelve 10.76-square-foot plots.
1Forest floor bulk density values used for each material type appear under "Notes to Users" for each series. |
SELECTED SHRUB SPECIES
For the sagebrush with grass series, individual plants of selected shrub and tree species were measured in circular plots or,
if shrub density was low, in the entire sample area. Selected tree and shrub species included Pseudotsuga menziesii,
Juniperus scopulorum, Artemisia tridentata, and Sarcobatus vermiculatus. The density and percentage
of all stems that were
dead is based on the number of plants rooted in circular plots ranging from 0.0001-acre to 0.005-acre each (or in the
entire sample area if shrub density was low). Crown area was calculated from crown breadth (i.e., the average of the
maximum crown diameter, and the widest point perpendicular to the maximum crown diameter). Basal diameter was measured
above the root collar. Height is given as the average and maximum height of all sampled individuals of a given species.
Cover was estimated by using line intercept transects (Canfield 1941). Pseudotsuga menziesii biomass was estimated by
using species-specific allometric equations (Brown 1978) and includes the mass of foliage and branches less than 3
inches diameter. Shrub biomass was determined by sampling 12 square clipped vegetation plots located systematically
throughout the sample area.
WOODY MATERIAL
Measurement techniques used for inventorying dead and down woody material were patterned after the planar intersect
method outlined by Brown (1974) and described by Maxwell and Ward (1980). Forty transects of random azimuth starting
at 25 systematically located points within the sample area were used to determine woody material loading and density (fig. 1).
Woody material data are reported by size classes that correspond to timelag fuel classes used in fire behavior modeling
(see, for example, Burgan and Rothermel 1984).2 Woody material in 10-hour, and 100-hour-and-larger size classes was tallied
on transects that were 10 feet and 30 feet long, respectively. The decay class and the actual diameter at the point of
intersection were measured for all pieces >3 inches in diameter. All woody material less than or equal to 3 inches in
diameter was considered sound. Woody material loading and woody material density were calculated from relationships that
use number of pieces intersected and transect length (and wood specific gravity for loading) developed by Brown (1974) and
Safranyik and Linton (1987), respectively. Woody material loading in the 1-hour size class (and the 10-hour and 100-hour
size classes for many of the sites) was determined by collecting, oven drying, and weighing all pieces in twelve
10.76-square-foot plots. When woody material >3 inches in diameter was scarce, a total inventory within the sample area
was conducted to determine loading and density estimates. Measurements were taken to determine log volume, and wood
specific gravities were applied to the volume to calculate loading.
2>1-, 10-, 100- and 1000-hour timelag fuels are defined as woody material <=0.25 inch, 0.26-1.0 inch, 1.1-3.0 inches, and >3.0 inches in diameter, respectively. |
SAPLINGS AND TREES
Overstory tree and sapling composition and density were determined either by a total inventory of the sample area,
or were estimated by using twelve 0.005-acre circular plots located systematically throughout the sample area (fig. 1).
Tree measurement data were summarized by diameter at breast height (d.b.h.)3 size class and by tree status
(live, dead, or all trees). The two most abundant tree species for each size class are listed with their relative density.
Height to crown base (reported as ladder fuel height in previous photo series volumes) was defined as the height of the lowest,
continuous live or dead branch material of the tree canopy, and height to live crown was defined as the height of the lowest
continuous live branches of the tree canopy. Live crown mass (branchwood and foliage) was calculated from species- and
size-specific allometric equations (Brown 1978, Jenkins et al. 2003). Juniperus scopulorum with a single-stemmed
form was considered a tree.
3D.b.h. is measured 4.5 feet above the ground. |
JUNIPER BIOMASS
Juniperus scopulorum and J. horizontalis in the Missouri Breaks region of central Montana have a diverse
morphology, from prostrate shrub to tree form, and are reported to hybridize (Fassett 1944, 1945), making them difficult
to identify to the species level. Therefore, all juniper with a multi-stemmed form were combined, regardless of species,
and characterized by height class to distinguish between the low stature juniper form (= 3 feet tall) and the more upright
form (> 3 feet tall). Biomass was collected in six systematically located 10.76-square-foot plots for each height class
represented at each site. All juniper vegetation that occupied the space defined by a vertical projection of the plot
edges was clipped, separated into live and dead components, and weighed. A subsample of plots was further separated
into size classes including foliage and live and dead fine twigs less than or equal to 0.25 inch, 0.26- to 1.0-inch twigs,
and greater than 1.0 inch diameter stem and branch material. Biomass for each height class was calculated by multiplying
the square footage occupied by each size/status class and the average loading per square foot for that size/status class
for each site.
SPECIES LIST
Scientific and common species names are from NRCS (2006).
SCIENTIFIC NAME | COMMON NAME | SCIENTIFIC NAME | COMMON NAME |
TREES Juniperus scopulorum Sarg. Pinus ponderosa P. & C. Lawson var. scopulorum Englem. Prunus virginiana L. Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco var. glauca (Beissn.) Franco SHRUBS Artemisia tridentata Nutt. ssp. vaseyana (Rydb.) Artemisia tridentata Nutt. ssp. wyomingensis Beetle & Young Chrysothamnus spp. Nutt. Juniperus spp. Juniperus horizontalis Moench Potentilla spp. Rhus trilobata Nutt. Ribes spp. Rosa woodsii Lindl. Sarcobatus vermiculatus (Hook.) Torr. Symphoricarpos albus (L.) Blake GRAMINOIDS Bouteloua gracilis (Willd. ex Kunth) Lag. ex Griffith Bromus japonicus Thunb. ex Murr. Carex spp. Elymus lanceolatus (Scribn. & J.G. Sm.) Gould Festuca idahoensis Elmer Koeleria macrantha (Ledeb.) J.A. Schultes Muhlenbergia spp. Nassella viridula (Trin.) Barkworth Pascopyrum smithii (Rydb.) A Love Poa secunda J. Presl Pseudoroegneria spicata (Pursh) A. Love |
Rocky Mountain juniper Interior ponderosa pine Chokecherry Rocky Mountain Douglas-fir Beetle Mountain big sagebrush Wyoming big sagebrush Rabbitbrush Juniper Creeping juniper Cinquefoil Skunkbush sumac Currant Wood's rose Greasewood Common snowberry Blue grama Japanese brome Sedge Thickspike wheatgrass Idaho fescue Prairie junegrass Muhly Green needlegrass Western wheatgrass Sandberg bluegrass Bluebunch wheatgrass |
FORBS Achillea millefolium L. Allium spp. Antennaria spp. Arabis spp. Artemisia ludoviciana Nutt. Aster spp. Chenopodium spp. Cirsium spp. Collomia linearis Nutt. Comandra umbellata (L.) Nutt. Fragaria spp. Fragaria vesca L. Geum triflorum (Pursh) Halogeton glomeratus (Bieb.) C.A. Mey. Helianthus L. Lactuca L. Lepidium spp. Lupinus spp. Medicago sativa L. Melilotus officinalis (L.) Lam Opuntia polycantha Haw. Psoralea spp. Ratibida columnifera (Nutt.) Woot. & Standl. Sisymbrium spp. Solidago spp. Solidago velutina DC. Sphaeralcea coccinea (Nutt.) Rydb. Taraxacum officinale G.H.Weber ex Wiggers Thermopsis montana Nutt. Thlaspi arvense L. Tragopogon dubius Scop. Trifolium spp. Vicia americana Muhl. ex Willd. |
Common yarrow Onion Pussytoes Rockcress White sagebrush Aster Goosefoot Thistle Tiny trumpet Bastard toadflax Strawberry Woodland strawberry Old man's whiskers or prairie smoke Saltlover Sunflower Lettuce Pepperweed Lupine Alfalfa Yellow sweetclover Plains pricklypear Scurfpea Upright prairie coneflower Hedgemustard Goldenrod Threenerve goldenrod Scarlet globemallow Common dandelion Mountain goldenbanner Field pennycress Yellow salsify Clover American vetch |
LITERATURE CITED
Albini, F.A. 1976. Estimating wildfire behavior and effects. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-30. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 92 p.
Brown, J.K. 1974. Handbook for inventorying downed woody material. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-16. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 24 p.
Brown, J.K. 1976. Estimating shrub biomass from basal stem diameters. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 6: 153-158.
Burgan, R.E. 1988. 1988 revisions to the 1978 national fire-danger rating system. Res. Pap. SE-273. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station. 39 p.
Burgan, R.E.; Rothermel, R.C. 1984. BEHAVE: fire behavior prediction and fuel modeling system--FUEL subsystem. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-167. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 126 p.
Canfield, R.H. 1941. Application of the line interception method in sampling range vegetation. Journal of Forestry. 39: 388-394.
Clary, W.P.; Tiedemann. A.R. 1986. Distribution of biomass within small tree and shrub form Quercus gambelii stands. Forest Science. 32(1): 234-242.
Deeming, J.E.; Burgan, R.E.; Cohen, J.D. 1977. The national fire-danger rating system--1978. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-39. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 63 p.
Elliott, K.J.; Clinton, B.D. 1993. Equations for estimating biomass of herbaceous and woody vegetation in early-successional southern Appalachian pine-hardwood forests. Res. Note SE-365. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station. 7 p.
Eyre, F.H., ed. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Washington, DC: Society of American Foresters. 148 p. [+ map].
Grier, C.C.; Elliott, K.J.; McCullough, D.J. 1992. Biomass distribution and productivity of Pinus edulis-Juniperus monosperma woodlands of north-central Arizona. Forest Ecology and Management. 50: 331-350.
Grigal, D.F.; Ohmann, L.F. 1977. Biomass estimation for some shrubs from northeastern Minnesota. Res. Note NC-226. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station. 3 p.
Jenkins, J.C.; Chojnacky, D.C.; Heath, L.S.; Birdsey, R.A. 2003. National-scale biomass estimators for United States tree species. Forest Science. 49(1): 12-35.
Maxwell, W.G.; Ward, F.R. 1980. Guidelines for developing or supplementing natural photo series. Res. Note PNW-358. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 16 p.
Natural Resources Conservation Service [NRCS]. 2006. The PLANTS Database. https://plants.usda.gov. [U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA.] (18 October 2006).
NatureServe. 2006. NatureServe Explorer: An online encyclopedia of life. Version 6.0. https://www.natureserve.org/explorer. [NatureServe, Arlington, VA.] (16 October 2006).
Ross, D.W.; Walstad, J.D. 1986. Estimating aboveground biomass of shrubs and young ponderosa and lodgepole pines in southcentral Oregon. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University, College of Forestry Research Bulletin 57. 12 p.
Sackett, S.S. 1980. Woody fuel particle size and specific gravity of southwestern tree species. Res. Note RM-389. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 4 p.
Safranyik, L.; Linton, D.A. 1987. Line intersect sampling for the density and bark area of logging residue susceptible to the spruce beetle, Dendroctonus rufipennis (Kirby). Inf. Rep. BC-X-295. Victoria, BC: Canadian Forestry Service, Pacific Forestry Centre. 10 p.
Scott, J.H.; Burgan, R.E. 2005. Standard fire behavior fuels model: a comprehensive set for use with Rothermel’s surface fire spread model. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-153. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 72 p.
Snell, J.A.K.; Little, S.N. 1983. Predicting crown weight and bole volume of five western hardwoods. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-151. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 37 p.