{"id":1982,"date":"2020-11-04T12:16:53","date_gmt":"2020-11-04T20:16:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/?p=1982"},"modified":"2020-11-05T12:18:25","modified_gmt":"2020-11-05T20:18:25","slug":"association-of-covid-19-rt-qpcr-test-false-negative-rate-with-patient-age-sex-and-time-since-diagnosis","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/2020\/11\/04\/association-of-covid-19-rt-qpcr-test-false-negative-rate-with-patient-age-sex-and-time-since-diagnosis\/","title":{"rendered":"Association of COVID-19 RT-QPCR Test False-Negative Rate with Patient Age Sex and Time since Diagnosis"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><i>[Preprint, not peer-reviewed] <\/i>A study using electronic health records in Israel reported that the 11% of PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 were negative with 0-5 days of clinical diagnosis among patients who had at least one positive PCR test (n= 521,696). Patients who were female (vs. male: OR=1.7) and patients who were younger (10 vs. 40 years of age: OR=2.5) were more likely to have a false-negative result.<\/p>\n<p><i>Levine-Tiefenbrun et al. (Nov 3, 2020). Association of COVID-19 RT-QPCR Test False-Negative Rate with Patient Age Sex and Time since Diagnosis. Pre-print downloaded Nov 4 from <\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1101\/2020.10.30.20222935\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1101\/2020.10.30.20222935<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>[Preprint, not peer-reviewed] A study using electronic health records in Israel reported that the 11% of PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 were negative with 0-5 days of clinical diagnosis among patients who had at least one positive PCR test (n= 521,696). Patients who were female (vs. male: OR=1.7) and patients who were younger (10 vs. 40&#8230;<\/p>\n<div><a class=\"more\" href=\"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/2020\/11\/04\/association-of-covid-19-rt-qpcr-test-false-negative-rate-with-patient-age-sex-and-time-since-diagnosis\/\">Read more<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[25,75,76,27],"topic":[19],"class_list":["post-1982","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-article-summary","tag-candidate","tag-report","tag-summarize","tag-testing","topic-testing-and-treatment"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1982","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1982"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1982\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1983,"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1982\/revisions\/1983"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1982"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1982"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1982"},{"taxonomy":"topic","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topic?post=1982"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}