{"id":669,"date":"2020-09-02T10:59:48","date_gmt":"2020-09-02T17:59:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/?p=669"},"modified":"2020-09-08T12:45:32","modified_gmt":"2020-09-08T19:45:32","slug":"covid-19-literature-situation-report-sept-2-2020","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/2020\/09\/02\/covid-19-literature-situation-report-sept-2-2020\/","title":{"rendered":"COVID-19 Literature Situation Report Sept. 2, 2020"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The scientific literature on COVID-19 is rapidly evolving and these articles were selected for review based on their relevance to Washington State decision making around COVID-19 response efforts. Included in these Lit Reps are some manuscripts that have been made available online as pre-prints but have not yet undergone peer review. Please be aware of this when reviewing articles included in the Lit Reps.<\/p>\n<p>Today\u2019s summary is based on a review of 552 articles (510 published, 42 in preprint).<\/p>\n<h2>Key Takeaways<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>A meta-analysis of 7 randomized trials (12 countries, 1,703 critically ill patients with COVID-19) found that patients receiving corticosteroids had lower 28-day all-cause mortality (OR=0.7, 95%CI 0.5-0.8) compared with usual care or placebo. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2020.17023\">More<\/a><\/li>\n<li>COVID-19 has had negative effects on undergraduates\u2019 current and expected outcomes, including delayed graduation (13%) and losing a job or job offer (40%). <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jpubeco.2020.104271\">More<\/a><\/li>\n<li>Using the term \u201cimmunity\u201d rather than \u201cantibody\u201d to describe antibody test results increased the proportion of people who believed that a positive antibody test result meant they had no future risk of coronavirus infection and prompted an intention to wash their hands less frequently. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2020-040448\">More<\/a><\/li>\n<li>A modeling study indicates that common strategies to reopen US colleges and universities are estimated to reduce student SARS-CoV-2 infections by 24%-26%. Perfect testing and immediate quarantining of all students on arrival to campus could further reduce infections by a considerable degree. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1101\/2020.08.29.20184366\">More<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<div id=\"uw-accordion-shortcode\">\n<h3>Article Summaries<\/h3>\n<div class=\"js-accordion\" data-accordion-prefix-classes=\"uw-accordion-shortcode\">\n<div class=\"js-accordion__panel\" >\n<h2 class=\"js-accordion__header\">Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions<\/h2>\n<div class=\"su-posts su-posts-default-loop\">\n<div id=\"su-post-673\" class=\"su-post\">\n<h5 class=\"su-post-title\">What Protective Health Measures Are Americans Taking in Response to COVID-19? Results from the COVID Impact Survey<\/h5>\n<p>\t\t\t\t<!-- \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"su-post-meta\">\n\t\t\t\t\t: \t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n --><\/p>\n<div class=\"su-post-excerpt\">\n<ul>\n<li>A survey of Americans in ten states and eight metropolitan areas (n=25,269) found that knowing someone who had COVID-19 and\/or died from it was strongly associated with taking protective health measures like washing hands, avoiding public places, and canceling social engagements.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Qeadan et al. (Aug 29, 2020). What Protective Health Measures Are Americans Taking in Response to COVID-19? Results from the COVID Impact Survey. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/ijerph17176295\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/ijerph17176295<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<!-- <a href=\"\" class=\"su-post-comments-link\"><\/a> --><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"js-accordion__panel\" >\n<h2 class=\"js-accordion__header\">Testing and Treatment<\/h2>\n<div class=\"su-posts su-posts-default-loop\">\n<div id=\"su-post-677\" class=\"su-post\">\n<h5 class=\"su-post-title\">Serological Identification of SARS-CoV-2 Infections among Children Visiting a Hospital during the Initial Seattle Outbreak<\/h5>\n<p>\t\t\t\t<!-- \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"su-post-meta\">\n\t\t\t\t\t: \t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n --><\/p>\n<div class=\"su-post-excerpt\">\n<ul>\n<li>Six of eight children who had SARS-CoV-2 antibodies detected in leftover clinical samples had not been suspected of having COVID-19. Dingens et al. screened 1,775 leftover serum samples from children seeking medical care at Seattle Children&#8217;s Hospital during the early Seattle outbreak period and found one child was seropositive with SARS-CoV-2 in March and seven were seropositive in April, for a seroprevalence of 1% during this period among this population of children seeking care. Only two of the children with positive antibodies had tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR. <em>[EDITORIAL NOTE: A summary of a pre-print version of this manuscript appeared in the Lit Rep on May 28]<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Dingens et al. (Sept 1, 2020). Serological Identification of SARS-CoV-2 Infections among Children Visiting a Hospital during the Initial Seattle Outbreak. Nature Communications. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41467-020-18178-1\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41467-020-18178-1<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<!-- <a href=\"\" class=\"su-post-comments-link\"><\/a> --><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"su-post-675\" class=\"su-post\">\n<h5 class=\"su-post-title\">Association Between Administration of Systemic Corticosteroids and Mortality Among Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19 A Meta-Analysis<\/h5>\n<p>\t\t\t\t<!-- \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"su-post-meta\">\n\t\t\t\t\t: \t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n --><\/p>\n<div class=\"su-post-excerpt\">\n<ul>\n<li>A meta-analysis of 7 randomized trials conducted in 12 countries and\u00a0including 1,703 critically ill patients with COVID-19 found that administration of systemic corticosteroids, compared with usual care or placebo, was associated with lower 28-day all-cause mortality (OR=0.7, 95%CI 0.5-0.8). Serious adverse events occurred in 64\/354 (18%) patients who were randomized to corticosteroids and 80 events occurred among 342 patient randomized to usual care or placebo in the six trials that reported serious adverse events.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>The WHO Rapid Evidence Appraisal for COVID-19 Therapies (REACT) Working Group. (Sept 2, 2020). Association Between Administration of Systemic Corticosteroids and Mortality Among Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19 A Meta-Analysis. JAMA. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2020.17023\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2020.17023<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<!-- <a href=\"\" class=\"su-post-comments-link\"><\/a> --><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"js-accordion__panel\" >\n<h2 class=\"js-accordion__header\">Clinical Characteristics and Health Care Setting <\/h2>\n<div class=\"su-posts su-posts-default-loop\">\n<div id=\"su-post-683\" class=\"su-post\">\n<h5 class=\"su-post-title\">Cross-Sectional Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Among Skilled Nursing Facility Employees and Residents Across Facilities in Seattle<\/h5>\n<p>\t\t\t\t<!-- \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"su-post-meta\">\n\t\t\t\t\t: \t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n --><\/p>\n<div class=\"su-post-excerpt\">\n<ul>\n<li>Between March 29 and May 13, 2020, 16 skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) in the Seattle area (1,583 employees and 1,208 residents) were tested for SARS-CoV-2 by PCR, of which 11 (69%) SNFs had one or more employees or residents positive. Overall prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 was 3% among employees and 9% among residents. Despite facility policies that employees with new respiratory symptoms should not come to work, 42 (3%) employees reported respiratory symptoms (22 with cough, 39 with sore throat, 7 with fever) during the on-site testing. Out of 13 who tested positive and had symptom information available, 9 (69%) were asymptomatic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Weil et al. (Sept 1, 2020). Cross-Sectional Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Among Skilled Nursing Facility Employees and Residents Across Facilities in Seattle. Journal of General Internal Medicine. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11606-020-06165-7\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11606-020-06165-7<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<!-- <a href=\"\" class=\"su-post-comments-link\"><\/a> --><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"su-post-681\" class=\"su-post\">\n<h5 class=\"su-post-title\">Does Incubation Period of COVID-19 Vary with Age? A Study of Epidemiologically Linked Cases in Singapore<\/h5>\n<p>\t\t\t\t<!-- \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"su-post-meta\">\n\t\t\t\t\t: \t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n --><\/p>\n<div class=\"su-post-excerpt\">\n<ul>\n<li>A study among people with confirmed, locally transmitted SARS-CoV-2 in Singapore (n=164) reported that patients older than 70 years had significantly longer incubation periods for COVID-19 than those younger than 70 years (median 8 days vs. 5 days, p=0.04). Researchers concluded that elderly people may benefit from earlier and proactive testing, especially after exposure to a positive case.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Tan et al. (Sept 2, 2020). Does Incubation Period of COVID-19 Vary with Age? A Study of Epidemiologically Linked Cases in Singapore. Epidemiology and Infection. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S0950268820001995\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S0950268820001995<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<!-- <a href=\"\" class=\"su-post-comments-link\"><\/a> --><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"su-post-679\" class=\"su-post\">\n<h5 class=\"su-post-title\">Nasopharyngeal Viral Load Predicts Hypoxemia and Disease Outcome in Admitted COVID-19 Patients. Critical Care<\/h5>\n<p>\t\t\t\t<!-- \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"su-post-meta\">\n\t\t\t\t\t: \t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n --><\/p>\n<div class=\"su-post-excerpt\">\n<ul>\n<li>Initial SARS-CoV-2 viral load in nasopharyngeal samples was significantly higher among hospitalized patients who required mechanical ventilation and\/or subsequently died (n=21) compared to non-mechanically ventilated patients who survived (n=149). Initial SARS-CoV-2 viral load has negatively associated with the lowest level of blood oxygen saturation recorded during hospitalization, but was not associated with other clinical parameters in this study that took place March-July, 2020.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Shlomai et al. (Sept 1, 2020). Nasopharyngeal Viral Load Predicts Hypoxemia and Disease Outcome in Admitted COVID-19 Patients. Critical Care. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13054-020-03244-3\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13054-020-03244-3<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<!-- <a href=\"\" class=\"su-post-comments-link\"><\/a> --><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"js-accordion__panel\" >\n<h2 class=\"js-accordion__header\">Mental Health and Personal Impact<\/h2>\n<div class=\"su-posts su-posts-default-loop\">\n<div id=\"su-post-685\" class=\"su-post\">\n<h5 class=\"su-post-title\">The Impact of COVID-19 on Student Experiences and Expectations: Evidence from a Survey. Journal of Public Economics<\/h5>\n<p>\t\t\t\t<!-- \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"su-post-meta\">\n\t\t\t\t\t: \t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n --><\/p>\n<div class=\"su-post-excerpt\">\n<ul>\n<li>Among 1,500 undergraduates at Arizona State University, COVID-19 has led to negative effects on students\u2019 current and expected outcomes: 13% have delayed graduation, 40% have lost a job, internship, or job offer, and 29% expect to earn less at age 35. These effects have been highly heterogeneous and followed existing socioeconomic divides. Lower-income students were 55% more likely than their higher-income peers to have delayed graduation due to COVID-19.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Aucejo et al. (Aug 27, 2020). The Impact of COVID-19 on Student Experiences and Expectations: Evidence from a Survey. Journal of Public Economics. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jpubeco.2020.104271\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jpubeco.2020.104271<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<!-- <a href=\"\" class=\"su-post-comments-link\"><\/a> --><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"su-post-679\" class=\"su-post\">\n<h5 class=\"su-post-title\">Nasopharyngeal Viral Load Predicts Hypoxemia and Disease Outcome in Admitted COVID-19 Patients. Critical Care<\/h5>\n<p>\t\t\t\t<!-- \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"su-post-meta\">\n\t\t\t\t\t: \t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n --><\/p>\n<div class=\"su-post-excerpt\">\n<ul>\n<li>Initial SARS-CoV-2 viral load in nasopharyngeal samples was significantly higher among hospitalized patients who required mechanical ventilation and\/or subsequently died (n=21) compared to non-mechanically ventilated patients who survived (n=149). Initial SARS-CoV-2 viral load has negatively associated with the lowest level of blood oxygen saturation recorded during hospitalization, but was not associated with other clinical parameters in this study that took place March-July, 2020.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Shlomai et al. (Sept 1, 2020). Nasopharyngeal Viral Load Predicts Hypoxemia and Disease Outcome in Admitted COVID-19 Patients. Critical Care. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13054-020-03244-3\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13054-020-03244-3<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<!-- <a href=\"\" class=\"su-post-comments-link\"><\/a> --><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"js-accordion__panel\" >\n<h2 class=\"js-accordion__header\">Modeling and Prediction<\/h2>\n<div class=\"su-posts su-posts-default-loop\">\n<div id=\"su-post-695\" class=\"su-post\">\n<h5 class=\"su-post-title\">Analyzing Inherent Biases in SARS-CoV-2 PCR and Serological Epidemiologic Metrics<\/h5>\n<p>\t\t\t\t<!-- \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"su-post-meta\">\n\t\t\t\t\t: \t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n --><\/p>\n<div class=\"su-post-excerpt\">\n<ul>\n<li>[Preprint, not peer reviewed] A modeling study found that the observed peak in PCR-detected SARS-CoV-2 infections can follow the peak of true infection incidence due to prolonged shedding of SARS-CoV-2 by approximately ten days in a scenario with an R0 of 1.6 versus 5 days when R0 is 3. Half of those who tested positive by PCR prior to the observed epidemic peak were actually in the prolonged PCR positivity stage. Additionally, the observed seroprevalence substantially underestimated true prevalence of ever having infection, with the underestimation most pronounced around the time of epidemic peak.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Makhoul et al. (Sept 2, 2020). Analyzing Inherent Biases in SARS-CoV-2 PCR and Serological Epidemiologic Metrics. Preprint downloaded Sep 2 from <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1101\/2020.08.30.20184705\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1101\/2020.08.30.20184705<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<!-- <a href=\"\" class=\"su-post-comments-link\"><\/a> --><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"su-post-693\" class=\"su-post\">\n<h5 class=\"su-post-title\">Potential Community and Campus Covid-19 Outcomes Under University and College Reopening Scenarios<\/h5>\n<p>\t\t\t\t<!-- \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"su-post-meta\">\n\t\t\t\t\t: \t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n --><\/p>\n<div class=\"su-post-excerpt\">\n<ul>\n<li>[Preprint, not peer reviewed] A modeling study of various US college and university reopening plans (various fully open, hybrid, and fully virtual approaches) shows common reopening strategies could reduce student SARS-CoV-2 infections by 24%-26% and deaths by 36%-50%. Perfect testing and immediate quarantining of all students on arrival to campus at the start of term could further reduce infections by 58%-95% and deaths by 95%-100%. All scenarios were simulated assuming best\/worst case ranges for disease prevalence among community residents and arriving students, precaution compliance, contact frequency, virus attack rates, and tracing and isolation effectiveness.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Benneyan et al. (Sept 2, 2020). Potential Community and Campus Covid-19 Outcomes Under University and College Reopening Scenarios. Preprint downloaded Sep 2 from <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1101\/2020.08.29.20184366\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1101\/2020.08.29.20184366<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<!-- <a href=\"\" class=\"su-post-comments-link\"><\/a> --><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"su-post-691\" class=\"su-post\">\n<h5 class=\"su-post-title\">Modeling the Combined Effect of Digital Exposure Notification and Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions on the COVID-19 Epidemic in Washington State<\/h5>\n<p>\t\t\t\t<!-- \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"su-post-meta\">\n\t\t\t\t\t: \t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n --><\/p>\n<div class=\"su-post-excerpt\">\n<ul>\n<li>[Preprint, not peer reviewed] A modeling study based on three counties in Washington state predicts that if 15% of the population participates a in digital exposure notification system, it could reduce SARS-CoV-2 infections by 8% and COVID-19 related deaths by 6%. The authors conclude that this approach could complement traditional contact tracing.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Abueg et al. (Sept 2, 2020). Modeling the Combined Effect of Digital Exposure Notification and Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions on the COVID-19 Epidemic in Washington State. Preprint downloaded Sep 2 from <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1101\/2020.08.29.20184135\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1101\/2020.08.29.20184135<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<!-- <a href=\"\" class=\"su-post-comments-link\"><\/a> --><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"js-accordion__panel\" >\n<h2 class=\"js-accordion__header\">Public Health Policy and Practice<\/h2>\n<div class=\"su-posts su-posts-default-loop\">\n<div id=\"su-post-697\" class=\"su-post\">\n<h5 class=\"su-post-title\">\u201cImmunity Passports\u201d for SARS-CoV-2: An Online Experimental Study of the Impact of Antibody Test Terminology on Perceived Risk and Behaviour<\/h5>\n<p>\t\t\t\t<!-- \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"su-post-meta\">\n\t\t\t\t\t: \t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n --><\/p>\n<div class=\"su-post-excerpt\">\n<ul>\n<li>In an online survey among 1,204 adults from a UK research panel, Waller et al. reported that by using the term \u201cimmunity\u201d (vs \u201cantibody\u201d) to describe antibody tests for SARS-CoV-2, participants were more likely to perceive no risk of catching coronavirus given an positive antibody test result (OR 2.9). Perceiving no risk of infection was associated with an intention to wash hands less frequently (aOR=2.3)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Waller et al. (Sept 2, 2020). \u201cImmunity Passports\u201d for SARS-CoV-2: An Online Experimental Study of the Impact of Antibody Test Terminology on Perceived Risk and Behaviour. BMJ Open. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2020-040448\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2020-040448<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<!-- <a href=\"\" class=\"su-post-comments-link\"><\/a> --><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h2>Other Resources and Commentaries<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/cid\/ciaa1314\">No One Likes a Stick up Their Nose: Making the Case for Saliva-Based Testing for COVID-19<\/a> \u2013 Clinical Infectious Diseases (Sept 2)<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2020.17101\">Regulatory Decision-Making on COVID-19 Vaccines During a Public Health Emergency<\/a> \u2013 JAMA<br \/>\n(Aug 31)<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5603\/ARM.2020.0133\">Ageing, Sex, Obesity, Smoking and COVID-19 &#8211; Truths, Myths and Speculations<\/a>. \u2013 Advances in Respiratory Medicine (Aug 31)<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijcha.2020.100627\">Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin-Receptor Blockers and the Risk of COVID-19 Infection or Severe Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis<\/a> \u2013 IJC Heart &amp; Vasculature (Aug 27)<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.2008281117\">A SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Candidate Would Likely Match All Currently Circulating Variants<\/a> \u2013 PNAS (Aug 31)<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.m3386\">Covid-19: White House Told CDC to Stop Recommending Tests for Asymptomatic Contacts<\/a> \u2013 BMJ (Sept 1)<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7326\/M20-0928\">Probable Evidence of Fecal Aerosol Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in a High-Rise Building<\/a> \u2013 Annals of Internal Medicine (Sept 1)<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamapediatrics.2020.3549\">Debates Around the Role of School Closures in the Coronavirus 2019 Pandemic<\/a> \u2013 JAMA Pediatrics (Aug 31)<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12035-020-02094-y\">Understanding the Immunologic Characteristics of Neurologic Manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 and Potential Immunological Mechanisms<\/a> \u2013 Molecular Neurobiology (Sept 1)<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/d41586-020-02495-y\">More Testing Alone Will Not Get Us out of This Pandemic<\/a> \u2013 Nature (Sept 3)<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cegh.2020.08.007\">Estimates of Serial Interval for COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis<\/a> \u2013 Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health (Aug 26)<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.hlpt.2020.08.011\">Rapid Response to Crisis: Health System Lessons from the Active Period of COVID-19<\/a> \u2013 Health Policy and Technology (Aug 27)<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.puhe.2020.07.015\">Complexities to Consider When Communicating Risk of COVID-19<\/a> \u2013 Public Health (July 23)<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2020.16253\">Emergency Use Authorizations During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Lessons From Hydroxychloroquine for Vaccine Authorization and Approval<\/a> \u2013 JAMA (Aug 31)<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.nmni.2020.100750\">Are Two Consecutive Negative RT-PCRs Enough to Rule out COVID-19?<\/a> \u2013 New Microbes and New Infections (Aug 27)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Report prepared by the UW MetaCenter for Pandemic Preparedness and Global Health Security and the START Center in collaboration with and on behalf of WA DOH COVID-19 Incident Management Team.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Key Takeaways: A meta-analysis of 7 randomized trials (12 countries, 1,703 critically ill patients with COVID-19) found that patients receiving corticosteroids had lower 28-day all-cause mortality (OR=0.7, 95%CI 0.5-0.8) compared with usual care or placebo.<\/p>\n<div><a class=\"more\" href=\"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/2020\/09\/02\/immunity-passports-for-sars-cov-2-an-online-experimental-study-of-the-impact-of-antibody-test-terminology-on-perceived-risk-and-behaviour\/\">Read more<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":671,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"topic":[],"class_list":["post-669","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-covid-19-literature-situation-report"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/669","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=669"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/669\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":705,"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/669\/revisions\/705"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/671"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=669"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=669"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=669"},{"taxonomy":"topic","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topic?post=669"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}