{"id":6965,"date":"2021-03-18T15:21:06","date_gmt":"2021-03-18T22:21:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/?p=6965"},"modified":"2021-03-19T15:41:18","modified_gmt":"2021-03-19T22:41:18","slug":"covid-19-literature-situation-report-march-18-2021","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/2021\/03\/18\/covid-19-literature-situation-report-march-18-2021\/","title":{"rendered":"COVID-19 Literature Situation Report March 18, 2021"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The scientific literature on COVID-19 is rapidly evolving and these articles were selected for review based on their relevance to Washington State decision making around COVID-19 response efforts. Included in these Lit Reps are some manuscripts that have been made available online as pre-prints but have not yet undergone peer review. Please be aware of this when reviewing articles included in the Lit Reps.<\/p>\n<p><em>Today&#8217;s summary is based on a review of 355 articles (336 published, 19 in preprint)<\/em><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/LitRep_20210318.pdf\">View the PDF version here.<\/a><\/p>\n<h2>Key Takeaways<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><b>US parents of children aged 5-12 years who received virtual or combined virtual\/in-person instruction were more likely to report both poor parent and child well-being compared to parents of children who received in-person instruction only. Findings are based on a nationwide survey of 1,290 parents, of whom 46% reported their child was receiving virtual instruction only. <\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15585\/mmwr.mm7011a1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">More<\/span><\/a><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><b>A New Jersey private boarding school with high adherence to COVID-19 mitigation protocols reported a SARS-COV-2 test positivity rate of 0.18% and 0.06% among staff and students, respectively, from August to November 2020. <\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15585\/mmwr.mm7011a2\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">More<\/span><\/a><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><b>51% of COVID-19 survivors reported at least 1 new-onset symptom at four months after hospitalization in a cohort study (n=478) in France. The most common symptoms were fatigue, cognitive symptoms, and shortness of breath.<\/b> <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2021.3331\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">More<\/span><\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<div id=\"uw-accordion-shortcode\">\n<h3>Article Summaries<\/h3>\n<div class=\"js-accordion\" data-accordion-prefix-classes=\"uw-accordion-shortcode\">\n<div class=\"js-accordion__panel\" >\n<h2 class=\"js-accordion__header\">Transmission<\/h2>\n<div class=\"su-posts su-posts-default-loop\">\n<div id=\"su-post-6972\" class=\"su-post\">\n<h5 class=\"su-post-title\">Minimal SARS-CoV-2 Transmission After Implementation of a Comprehensive Mitigation Strategy at a School \u2014 New Jersey, August 20\u2013November 27, 2020<\/h5>\n<p>\t\t\t\t<!-- \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"su-post-meta\">\n\t\t\t\t\t: \t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n --><\/p>\n<div class=\"su-post-excerpt\">\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">A New Jersey private boarding school with high adherence to COVID-19 mitigation protocols reported 17 positive PCR tests among faculty and staff (0.18% of total) and 8 positive tests among students (0.06% of total) during August to November 2020. Case investigations found likely off-campus sources for all but 2 of the positive cases (both students), suggesting that only 7% of cases were considered to represent on-campus transmission. Among persons receiving a positive test, all were asymptomatic at the time of testing.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Volpp et al.\u00a0(Mar 19, 2021). Minimal SARS-CoV-2 Transmission After Implementation of a Comprehensive Mitigation Strategy at a School \u2014 New Jersey, August 20\u2013November 27, 2020. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. <\/span><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15585\/mmwr.mm7011a2\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15585\/mmwr.mm7011a2<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<!-- <a href=\"\" class=\"su-post-comments-link\"><\/a> --><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"su-post-6970\" class=\"su-post\">\n<h5 class=\"su-post-title\">Notes from the Field: SARS-CoV-2 Transmission Associated with High School Football Team Members \u2014 Florida, September\u2013October 2020<\/h5>\n<p>\t\t\t\t<!-- \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"su-post-meta\">\n\t\t\t\t\t: \t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n --><\/p>\n<div class=\"su-post-excerpt\">\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">In an outbreak investigation by the Florida Department of Health, an index case of COVID-19 in a high school football player was linked to an additional 18 confirmed cases (12 players, 2 coaches, and 2 non-player classroom contacts). Because of potential close contact between infected team members and classmates, 267 students at the football team\u2019s school were quarantined, resulting in approximately 2,243 person-days of lost in-person learning. Factors that likely led to transmission included infrequent mask use in the weight room or during practice, inadequate physical distancing and ventilation on buses transporting players, infrequent disinfection of communal areas, and insufficient sanitization of shared hydration systems.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Siegel et al.\u00a0(Mar 19, 2021). Notes from the Field: SARS-CoV-2 Transmission Associated with High School Football Team Members \u2014 Florida, September\u2013October 2020. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. <\/span><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15585\/mmwr.mm7011a3\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15585\/mmwr.mm7011a3<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<!-- <a href=\"\" class=\"su-post-comments-link\"><\/a> --><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"su-post-6968\" class=\"su-post\">\n<h5 class=\"su-post-title\">Estimating the Increased Transmissibility of the B.1.1.7 Strain over Previously Circulating Strains in England Using Fractions of GISAID Sequences and the Distribution of Serial Intervals.<\/h5>\n<p>\t\t\t\t<!-- \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"su-post-meta\">\n\t\t\t\t\t: \t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n --><\/p>\n<div class=\"su-post-excerpt\">\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Pre-print, not peer-reviewed]<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> The SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 strain is suggested to be 40% more transmissible than previously circulating strains, according to a model-based analysis using the time course of the proportion of SARS-CoV-2 infections with the B.1.1.7 variant applied to SARS-CoV-2 genome sequence data and the distribution of serial intervals in England. For mitigation, the authors suggest that contact rates between individuals would need to fall by 29% compared to rates allowable for previously circulating strains.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Piantham and Ito. (Mar 17, 2021). Estimating the Increased Transmissibility of the B.1.1.7 Strain over Previously Circulating Strains in England Using Fractions of GISAID Sequences and the Distribution of Serial Intervals. Pre-print downloaded Mar 18 from <\/span><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1101\/2021.03.17.21253775\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1101\/2021.03.17.21253775<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<!-- <a href=\"\" class=\"su-post-comments-link\"><\/a> --><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"su-post-6966\" class=\"su-post\">\n<h5 class=\"su-post-title\">Transmission Dynamics and Timing of Key Events for SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Healthcare Workers<\/h5>\n<p>\t\t\t\t<!-- \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"su-post-meta\">\n\t\t\t\t\t: \t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n --><\/p>\n<div class=\"su-post-excerpt\">\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">In a retrospective study of healthcare workers (HCWs) in Turkey with SARS-CoV-2 infection (n=149), 98% of symptomatic HCWs had developed symptoms within 14 days of their index case developing symptoms. Among 39 HCW infector-infectee pairs, the median serial interval (time between symptom onset in the pair) was 4 days (IQR: 2-6). The authors suggest that rigorous contact tracing and isolation in this population could explain the shorter serial intervals than are typically observed in the general population (median 5-7 days).<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Emecen et al.\u00a0(Mar 17, 2021). Transmission Dynamics and Timing of Key Events for SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Healthcare Workers. Infectious Diseases. <\/span><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/23744235.2021.1900599\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/23744235.2021.1900599<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<!-- <a href=\"\" class=\"su-post-comments-link\"><\/a> --><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"js-accordion__panel\" >\n<h2 class=\"js-accordion__header\">Testing and Treatment<\/h2>\n<div class=\"su-posts su-posts-default-loop\">\n<div id=\"su-post-6974\" class=\"su-post\">\n<h5 class=\"su-post-title\">Mavrilimumab in Patients with Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia and Systemic Hyperinflammation (MASH-COVID): An Investigator Initiated, Multicentre, Double-Blind, Randomised, Placebo-Controlled Trial<\/h5>\n<p>\t\t\t\t<!-- \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"su-post-meta\">\n\t\t\t\t\t: \t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n --><\/p>\n<div class=\"su-post-excerpt\">\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The monoclonal antibody treatment mavrilimumab did not significantly lower the proportion of patients with severe COVID-19 who were alive and off oxygen therapy at day 14 compared to placebo (52% vs 47%, OR = 1.48, 95% CI: 0.43-5.16) in a multicenter, double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial (n=40). Patients were included in the study if they were hospitalized, had COVID-19 pneumonia, low blood oxygen levels, and a C-reactive protein concentration &gt;5 mg\/dL. Patients who were mechanically ventilated were excluded.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Cremer et al.\u00a0(Mar 18, 2021). Mavrilimumab in Patients with Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia and Systemic Hyperinflammation (MASH-COVID): An Investigator Initiated, Multicentre, Double-Blind, Randomised, Placebo-Controlled Trial. The Lancet Rheumatology. <\/span><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thelancet.com\/journals\/lanrhe\/article\/PIIS2665-9913(21)00070-9\/fulltext\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">https:\/\/www.thelancet.com\/journals\/lanrhe\/article\/PIIS2665-9913(21)00070-9\/fulltext<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<!-- <a href=\"\" class=\"su-post-comments-link\"><\/a> --><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"js-accordion__panel\" >\n<h2 class=\"js-accordion__header\">Vaccines and Immunity<\/h2>\n<div class=\"su-posts su-posts-default-loop\">\n<div id=\"su-post-6976\" class=\"su-post\">\n<h5 class=\"su-post-title\">Assessment of Protection against Reinfection with SARS-CoV-2 among 4 Million PCR-Tested Individuals in Denmark in 2020: A Population-Level Observational Study<\/h5>\n<p>\t\t\t\t<!-- \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"su-post-meta\">\n\t\t\t\t\t: \t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n --><\/p>\n<div class=\"su-post-excerpt\">\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Individuals with a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test during the first surge in Denmark (prior to June 2020) were less likely to get a positive test during the second surge (September to December 2020) compared to individuals with a negative SARS-CoV-2 PCR test during the first surge. In this nationwide cohort study (n=525,339), 72 of 11,068 (0.65%) individuals who were initially positive retested positive again compared to 16,819 of 514,271 (3.27%) who were initially negative but retested positive, suggesting an estimated protection against a repeat infection of 80%. Among those aged 65 years and older, observed protection against a repeat infection was 47%. [<\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">EDITORIAL NOTE: Differences between those who do and do not retest for SARS-CoV-2 after an initial positive or negative test result could affect the observed test positivity. Conclusions based on these findings about the effectiveness of prior infection against re-infection should be made with caution.]<\/span><\/i><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Hansen et al.\u00a0(Mar 17, 2021). Assessment of Protection against Reinfection with SARS-CoV-2 among 4 Million PCR-Tested Individuals in Denmark in 2020: A Population-Level Observational Study. The Lancet. <\/span><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0140-6736(21)00575-4\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0140-6736(21)00575-4<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<!-- <a href=\"\" class=\"su-post-comments-link\"><\/a> --><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"js-accordion__panel\" >\n<h2 class=\"js-accordion__header\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Clinical Characteristics and Health Care Setting<\/span><\/h2>\n<div class=\"su-posts su-posts-default-loop\">\n<div id=\"su-post-6982\" class=\"su-post\">\n<h5 class=\"su-post-title\">Frailty as a Predictor of Mortality among Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis<\/h5>\n<p>\t\t\t\t<!-- \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"su-post-meta\">\n\t\t\t\t\t: \t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n --><\/p>\n<div class=\"su-post-excerpt\">\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">COVID-19 patients with frailty had a 2.5-fold higher risk of dying compared to those without frailty, according to a systematic review and meta-analysis of 15 studies including 23,944 COVID-19 patients. Subgroup analyses of studies with hospitalized patients (n=8 studies) and nursing home residents (n=2) showed that risk of dying among patients with frailty was 2.6-fold and 2.1-fold higher, respectively. Patients with frailty were at higher risk of mortality regardless of the frailty assessment tool used.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Zhang et al.\u00a0(Mar 17, 2021). Frailty as a Predictor of Mortality among Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. BMC Geriatrics. <\/span><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12877-021-02138-5\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12877-021-02138-5<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<!-- <a href=\"\" class=\"su-post-comments-link\"><\/a> --><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"su-post-6980\" class=\"su-post\">\n<h5 class=\"su-post-title\">Four-Month Clinical Status of a Cohort of Patients After Hospitalization for COVID-19<\/h5>\n<p>\t\t\t\t<!-- \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"su-post-meta\">\n\t\t\t\t\t: \t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n --><\/p>\n<div class=\"su-post-excerpt\">\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">51% of COVID-19 survivors reported at least 1 new-onset symptom at four months after hospitalization that was not previously present in a cohort study (n=478) in France. New-onset symptoms included fatigue (31%), cognitive symptoms (21%), and shortness of breath (16%). In a subset of patients with further evaluations (n=177, including 97 of 142 former ICU patients), the median score for mental fatigue was high, and lung-scan abnormalities were common.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Morin et al.\u00a0(Mar 17, 2021). Four-Month Clinical Status of a Cohort of Patients After Hospitalization for COVID-19. JAMA. <\/span><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2021.3331\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2021.3331<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<!-- <a href=\"\" class=\"su-post-comments-link\"><\/a> --><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"su-post-6978\" class=\"su-post\">\n<h5 class=\"su-post-title\">Hospital Policies During COVID-19<\/h5>\n<p>\t\t\t\t<!-- \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"su-post-meta\">\n\t\t\t\t\t: \t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n --><\/p>\n<div class=\"su-post-excerpt\">\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Visitor restriction policies varied significantly among the 70 largest US hospitals during the first 3 months of the COVID-19 pandemic. 65 of the hospitals had public-facing visitor restriction policies. While 49 of these policies had general &#8220;no-visitor&#8221; statements, 16 allowed at least 1 visitor to accompany all patients. 63 policies included exceptions to their visitor restriction policies, including allowing visitors to pediatrics, obstetrics\/gynecology, and emergency department settings.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Jaswaney et al.\u00a0(Mar 12, 2021). Hospital Policies During COVID-19. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice. <\/span><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/PHH.0000000000001320\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/PHH.0000000000001320<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<!-- <a href=\"\" class=\"su-post-comments-link\"><\/a> --><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"js-accordion__panel\" >\n<h2 class=\"js-accordion__header\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Mental Health and Personal Impact<\/span><\/h2>\n<div class=\"su-posts su-posts-default-loop\">\n<div id=\"su-post-6984\" class=\"su-post\">\n<h5 class=\"su-post-title\">Association of Children\u2019s Mode of School Instruction with Child and Parent Experiences and Well-Being During the COVID-19 Pandemic \u2014 COVID Experiences Survey, United States, October 8\u2013November 13, 2020<\/h5>\n<p>\t\t\t\t<!-- \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"su-post-meta\">\n\t\t\t\t\t: \t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n --><\/p>\n<div class=\"su-post-excerpt\">\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Compared to US parents of children aged 5-12 years receiving in-person instruction only, parents of children receiving virtual instruction were more likely to report poor child well-being, such as decreased physical activity (63% vs 30%) or worsened mental and emotional health (25% vs 16%). Parents of children receiving virtual instruction were also more likely to report poorer well-being, such as loss of work (43% vs 31%), child care challenges (14% vs 7%), and emotional distress (54% vs 39%). Similar patterns were observed when comparing parents of children receiving in-person instruction only to parents of children receiving combined virtual\/in-person instruction. The findings were from a nationwide probabilistic survey conducted between October and November 2020 (n=1,290 parents), where nearly half of parents (46%) reported their child received virtual instruction.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Verlenden et al.\u00a0(Mar 19, 2021). Association of Children\u2019s Mode of School Instruction with Child and Parent Experiences and Well-Being During the COVID-19 Pandemic \u2014 COVID Experiences Survey, United States, October 8\u2013November 13, 2020. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. <\/span><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15585\/mmwr.mm7011a1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15585\/mmwr.mm7011a1<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<!-- <a href=\"\" class=\"su-post-comments-link\"><\/a> --><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"js-accordion__panel\" >\n<h2 class=\"js-accordion__header\">Public Health Policy and Practice<\/h2>\n<div class=\"su-posts su-posts-default-loop\">\n<div id=\"su-post-6986\" class=\"su-post\">\n<h5 class=\"su-post-title\">Neighborhood Disadvantage Measures and COVID-19 Cases in Boston, 2020<\/h5>\n<p>\t\t\t\t<!-- \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"su-post-meta\">\n\t\t\t\t\t: \t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n --><\/p>\n<div class=\"su-post-excerpt\">\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Census tracts in Boston with high incidence of COVID-19 between February and May 2020 had significant colocation of several neighborhood-level factors and the top quintile of cases:\u00a0 percentage of population that was Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, without health insurance, receiving Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits, and living in poverty. They observed a 25% higher incidence of COVID-19 incidence for each 5% increase in percentage of population that is Hispanic and households living in poverty.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Samuels-Kalow et al.\u00a0(Mar 17, 2021). Neighborhood Disadvantage Measures and COVID-19 Cases in Boston, 2020. Public Health Reports. <\/span><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/00333549211002837\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/00333549211002837<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<!-- <a href=\"\" class=\"su-post-comments-link\"><\/a> --><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h2>Other Resources and Commentaries<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1176\/appi.ps.202000574\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Rapid Telepsychiatry Implementation During COVID-19: Increased Attendance at the Largest Health System in the United States<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> \u2013 Psychiatric Services (Mar 18)<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/pubmed\/fdab083\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Prioritizing the Marginalized in the COVID-19 Vaccine Rollout<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> \u2013 Journal of Public Health (Mar 18)<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/PHH.0000000000001274\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Training Networks of Local Health Departments<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> \u2013 Journal of Public Health Management and Practice (Mar 12)<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2021.1816\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Racial\/Ethnic Disparities in Very Preterm Birth and Preterm Birth Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> \u2013 JAMA Network Open (Mar 17)<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/PHH.0000000000001347\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">COVID-19<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> \u2013 Journal of Public Health Management and Practice (Feb 25)<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/PHH.0000000000001297\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Addressing Health Equity and Social Determinants of Health Through Healthy People 2030<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> \u2013 Journal of Public Health Management and Practice (Mar 12)<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4110\/in.2021.21.e4\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Current Status of COVID-19 Vaccine Development: Focusing on Antigen Design and Clinical Trials on Later Stages<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> \u2013 Immune Network (Feb 26)<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/cid\/ciab243\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Antibody Dynamics, Seroreversion, and Persistence After SARS-CoV-2: Another Answer<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> \u2013 Clinical Infectious Diseases (Mar 17)<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.atmosenv.2021.118336\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Discussion: Community Evidence of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Transmission through Air. Atmospheric Environment 2020, 118083<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> \u2013 Atmospheric Environment (Mar 12)<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/NEJMe2104584\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Audio Interview: Efficacy of Current Covid-19 Vaccines against Variant Viruses<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> \u2013 New England Journal of Medicine (Mar 18)<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2021.3370\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">COVID-19 Vaccines vs Variants\u2014Determining How Much Immunity Is Enough<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> \u2013 JAMA (Mar 17)<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s42979-021-00520-z\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">A Survey on Security and Privacy Issues in Contact Tracing Application of Covid-19<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> \u2013 SN Computer Science (Mar 11)<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2021.4121\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Experts Discuss COVID-19\u2014Vaccine Questions, School Openings, and More<\/span><\/a><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/PHH.0000000000001364\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Lessons Learned From Miami-Dade County\u2019s COVID-19 Epidemic<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> &#8211; Journal of Public Health Management and Practice (Mar 12)<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>US parents of children aged 5-12 years who received virtual or combined virtual\/in-person instruction were more likely to report both poor parent and child well-being compared to parents of children who received in-person instruction only. Findings are based on a nationwide survey of 1,290 parents, of whom 46% reported their child was receiving virtual instruction only.<\/p>\n<div><a class=\"more\" href=\"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/2021\/03\/18\/neighborhood-disadvantage-measures-and-covid-19-cases-in-boston-2020\/\">Read more<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":6988,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"topic":[],"class_list":["post-6965","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-covid-19-literature-situation-report"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6965","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6965"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6965\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6990,"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6965\/revisions\/6990"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/6988"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6965"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6965"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6965"},{"taxonomy":"topic","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topic?post=6965"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}