{"id":9794,"date":"2021-05-14T11:39:48","date_gmt":"2021-05-14T18:39:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/?p=9794"},"modified":"2021-05-17T11:54:31","modified_gmt":"2021-05-17T18:54:31","slug":"covid-19-literature-situation-report-may-14-2021","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/2021\/05\/14\/covid-19-literature-situation-report-may-14-2021\/","title":{"rendered":"COVID-19 Literature Situation Report May 14, 2021"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The scientific literature on COVID-19 is rapidly evolving and these articles were selected for review based on their relevance to Washington State decision making around COVID-19 response efforts. Included in these Lit Reps are some manuscripts that have been made available online as pre-prints but have not yet undergone peer review. Please be aware of this when reviewing articles included in the Lit Reps.<\/p>\n<p><em>Today&#8217;s summary is based on a review of 390 articles (372 published, 18 in preprint)<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/LitRep_20210514.pdf\">View the PDF version here.<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<h2>Key Takeaways<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><b>An <\/b><b><i>in vitro<\/i><\/b><b> study of serum neutralization after two doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine found that variants B.1.526, B.1.429, and B.1.1.7+E484K remained susceptible to vaccine-elicited neutralizing antibodies, indicating that the E484K mutation, also found in the B.1.351 and B.1.526 lineages, may not compromise the neutralization of vaccine-induced antibodies.<\/b> <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/NEJMc2106083\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">More<\/span><\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li><b>A retrospective review of a large US commercial medical claims database found that pediatric primary care visits were 60% lower between March 25 and April 21, 2020 compared to the same period in 2019. Problem focused visits (in contrast to routine preventative visits), primarily for respiratory and gastrointestinal infections, were 63% lower. While rates of preventive and vaccination visits in October 2020 exceeded those in 2019, a cumulative deficit of vaccination visits remained, indicating lower vaccination rates among children and potentially higher risk for vaccine-preventable diseases.<\/b> <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.acap.2021.04.031\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">More<\/span><\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li><b>A randomized trial conducted among adults in the UK found that providing vaccine information focused on personal benefits reduced COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among those who were strongly hesitative to a greater degree than providing information about collective benefit.<\/b> <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S2468-2667(21)00096-7\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">More<\/span><\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<div id=\"uw-accordion-shortcode\">\n<h3>Article Summaries<\/h3>\n<div class=\"js-accordion\" data-accordion-prefix-classes=\"uw-accordion-shortcode\">\n<div class=\"js-accordion__panel\" >\n<h2 class=\"js-accordion__header\">T<span style=\"font-weight: 400\">esting and Treatment<\/span><\/h2>\n<div class=\"su-posts su-posts-default-loop\">\n<div id=\"su-post-9802\" class=\"su-post\">\n<h5 class=\"su-post-title\">Interferon-a-2b Aerosol Inhalation Is Associated with Improved Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Coronavirus Disease-2019<\/h5>\n<p>\t\t\t\t<!-- \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"su-post-meta\">\n\t\t\t\t\t: \t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n --><\/p>\n<div class=\"su-post-excerpt\">\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">A retrospective analysis of patients with COVID-19 (N=1,401) found that patients treated with IFN-\u03b1-2b aerosol inhalation in combination with standard treatment had a 61% lower risk of ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, and death, even after adjusting for comorbidities, baseline disease severity, and antiviral use. A subgroup analysis found that delayed IFN treatment was associated with an increased probability of these events, which the authors suggest may indicate that the treatment is most effective when given early in the course of illness. The authors also caution that randomized trials are needed to confirm that effectiveness of IFN therapy.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yu et al. (May 2021). Interferon-a-2b Aerosol Inhalation Is Associated with Improved Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Coronavirus Disease-2019. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. <\/span><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bcp.14898\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bcp.14898<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<!-- <a href=\"\" class=\"su-post-comments-link\"><\/a> --><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"su-post-9800\" class=\"su-post\">\n<h5 class=\"su-post-title\">Ivermectin in Combination with Doxycycline for Treating COVID-19 Symptoms: A Randomized Trial<\/h5>\n<p>\t\t\t\t<!-- \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"su-post-meta\">\n\t\t\t\t\t: \t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n --><\/p>\n<div class=\"su-post-excerpt\">\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">A randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial of ivermectin combined with doxycycline for patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 symptoms (N=400) found that treated patients had a shorter median time to recovery (7 vs. 9 days) and were more likely to be SARS-CoV-2 negative by RT-PCR at two weeks follow-up. However, the investigators note that the majority of study participants were &lt;40 years of age, and that in subgroup analysis patients with severe disease did not differ in their disease response to treatment compared to placebo.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Mahmud et al. (May 2021). Ivermectin in Combination with Doxycycline for Treating COVID-19 Symptoms: A Randomized Trial. The Journal of International Medical Research. <\/span><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/03000605211013550\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/03000605211013550<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<!-- <a href=\"\" class=\"su-post-comments-link\"><\/a> --><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"su-post-9798\" class=\"su-post\">\n<h5 class=\"su-post-title\">Community-Based Testing for SARS-CoV-2 \u2014 Chicago, Illinois, May\u2013November 2020<\/h5>\n<p>\t\t\t\t<!-- \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"su-post-meta\">\n\t\t\t\t\t: \t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n --><\/p>\n<div class=\"su-post-excerpt\">\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">A community-based SARS-CoV-2 testing (CBT) program in Chicago found that persons tested at CBT sites (N=250,000) were more likely to have SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to persons tested in other settings. Persons who were tested at the CBT sites were also more likely to be &lt;40 years of age, Hispanic, and live in economically marginalized zip codes. The CBT program included both fixed and mobile testing sites. Mobile sites were deployed to zip codes with the highest 7-day average percentage of positive test results. The authors emphasize that these results demonstrate the capacity of CBTs to more effectively reach marginalized communities disproportionately affected by COVID-19.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">English et al. (May 14, 2021). Community-Based Testing for SARS-CoV-2 \u2014 Chicago, Illinois, May\u2013November 2020. MMWR. <\/span><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15585\/mmwr.mm7019a4\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15585\/mmwr.mm7019a4<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<!-- <a href=\"\" class=\"su-post-comments-link\"><\/a> --><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"su-post-9796\" class=\"su-post\">\n<h5 class=\"su-post-title\">Diagnostic Performance of an Antigen Test with RT-PCR for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in a Hospital Setting \u2014 Los Angeles County, California, June\u2013August 2020<\/h5>\n<p>\t\t\t\t<!-- \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"su-post-meta\">\n\t\t\t\t\t: \t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n --><\/p>\n<div class=\"su-post-excerpt\">\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">An evaluation of the rapid Quidel Sofia 2 SARS Antigen FIA test in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 at a large, tertiary medical center in Los Angeles found a lower sensitivity in symptomatic (72%) and asymptomatic (61%) patients compared to RT-PCR. Specificity of the Antigen test was &gt;98% in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. The authors suggest that persons with symptoms consistent with COVID-19 who test negative with a rapid antigen test should also receive confirmatory RT-PCR testing to reduce the risk of a false negative test result and prevent delays in diagnosis, isolation, and treatment of infected individuals.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Brihn et al. (May 14, 2021). Diagnostic Performance of an Antigen Test with RT-PCR for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in a Hospital Setting \u2014 Los Angeles County, California, June\u2013August 2020. MMWR. <\/span><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15585\/mmwr.mm7019a3\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15585\/mmwr.mm7019a3<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<!-- <a href=\"\" class=\"su-post-comments-link\"><\/a> --><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"js-accordion__panel\" >\n<h2 class=\"js-accordion__header\">Vaccines and Immunity<\/h2>\n<div class=\"su-posts su-posts-default-loop\">\n<div id=\"su-post-9812\" class=\"su-post\">\n<h5 class=\"su-post-title\">Plans to Vaccinate Children for COVID-19 a Survey of US Parents<\/h5>\n<p>\t\t\t\t<!-- \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"su-post-meta\">\n\t\t\t\t\t: \t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n --><\/p>\n<div class=\"su-post-excerpt\">\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Pre-print, not peer-reviewed]<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> A national online survey of US parents (N=2,074) conducted in March 2021 found that 49% planned to vaccinate their children for COVID-19 when available, while 26% of respondents said they would \u201cdefinitely not\u201d vaccinate their children. The most common concerns cited about vaccines were safety, effectiveness, and a perceived lack of need. Female parents, parents with lower educational attainment, and parents with lower income were less likely to report willingness to vaccinate their children. Additionally, respondents who had not been vaccinated and expressed personal vaccine hesitancy were significantly less likely to plan to vaccinate their children. The authors note that the proportion of respondents who had already been vaccinated or planned to be vaccinated was somewhat lower (50%) than among the general population, which may have influenced the study results and could suggest that increasing adult vaccination could increase vaccination uptake among children.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Teasdale et al. (May 13, 2021). Plans to Vaccinate Children for COVID-19 a Survey of US Parents. Pre-print downloaded May 14 from <\/span><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1101\/2021.05.12.21256874\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1101\/2021.05.12.21256874<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<!-- <a href=\"\" class=\"su-post-comments-link\"><\/a> --><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"su-post-9810\" class=\"su-post\">\n<h5 class=\"su-post-title\">BNT162b2-Elicited Neutralization against New SARS-CoV-2 Spike Variants<\/h5>\n<p>\t\t\t\t<!-- \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"su-post-meta\">\n\t\t\t\t\t: \t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n --><\/p>\n<div class=\"su-post-excerpt\">\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">An <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">in vitro<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> study of serum neutralization after two doses of Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine found that variants B.1.526, B.1.429, and B.1.1.7+E484K remained susceptible to vaccine-elicited neutralizing antibodies at a level equivalent to the neutralization of wild-type USA-WA1\/2020 strain. The authors suggest that these results indicate the additional E484K mutation, also found in the B.1.351 and B.1.526 lineages, causes little compromise to neutralization of vaccine-induced antibodies and confirm the importance of mass immunization as a central strategy to control the COVID-19 pandemic.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Liu et al. (May 12, 2021). BNT162b2-Elicited Neutralization against New SARS-CoV-2 Spike Variants. New England Journal of Medicine. <\/span><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/NEJMc2106083\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/NEJMc2106083<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<!-- <a href=\"\" class=\"su-post-comments-link\"><\/a> --><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"su-post-9808\" class=\"su-post\">\n<h5 class=\"su-post-title\">Immunogenicity of COVID-19 MRNA Vaccines in Pregnant and Lactating Women<\/h5>\n<p>\t\t\t\t<!-- \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"su-post-meta\">\n\t\t\t\t\t: \t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n --><\/p>\n<div class=\"su-post-excerpt\">\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">A small (N=46) study of pregnant and lactating persons found that mRNA vaccines produced binding, neutralizing, and functional non-neutralizing antibody responses as well as CD4 and CD8 T-cell responses. Additionally, binding and neutralizing antibodies were also detectable in cord blood, suggesting placental transfer of maternal antibodies and conferral of immunity to infants. Post-vaccination <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">in vitro<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> challenge with variants B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 demonstrated reduced serum neutralizing antibody titers; however, T-cell responses were preserved against both variants. The authors suggest further studies are needed to confirm these results given the small sample size.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Collier et al. (May 13, 2021). Immunogenicity of COVID-19 MRNA Vaccines in Pregnant and Lactating Women. JAMA. <\/span><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2021.7563\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2021.7563<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<!-- <a href=\"\" class=\"su-post-comments-link\"><\/a> --><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"su-post-9806\" class=\"su-post\">\n<h5 class=\"su-post-title\">Antibody Responses to Single-Dose SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Patients Receiving Immunomodulators for Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Disease<\/h5>\n<p>\t\t\t\t<!-- \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"su-post-meta\">\n\t\t\t\t\t: \t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n --><\/p>\n<div class=\"su-post-excerpt\">\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">A study of persons with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID) (N=120) found that 15% failed to produce detectable SARS-CoV-2 antibodies 23-46 days after one dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech or Astra-Zeneca vaccines. In contrast, nearly 100% of persons without IMID who receive one dose of either vaccine have been shown to produce antibodies within this time frame. Persons taking immunomodulating medications had a non-significantly lower odds of detectable antibody response (OR=0.31). All persons with previous confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection produced antibodies. The authors suggest that further studies are needed to examine antibody titers in the population following two doses and to establish titer levels that correspond to protection against COVID-19.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Al-Janabi et al. (May 2021). Antibody Responses to Single-Dose SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Patients Receiving Immunomodulators for Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Disease. The British Journal of Dermatology. <\/span><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bjd.20479\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bjd.20479<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<!-- <a href=\"\" class=\"su-post-comments-link\"><\/a> --><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"su-post-9804\" class=\"su-post\">\n<h5 class=\"su-post-title\">Effects of Different Types of Written Vaccination Information on COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in the UK (OCEANS-III): A Single-Blind, Parallel-Group, Randomised Controlled Trial<\/h5>\n<p>\t\t\t\t<!-- \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"su-post-meta\">\n\t\t\t\t\t: \t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n --><\/p>\n<div class=\"su-post-excerpt\">\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">A single-blind, parallel-group, randomized trial of UK adults (N=15,014) found that among strongly vaccine hesitant persons, providing information about the personal benefits of the COVID-19 vaccine reduced hesitancy more than providing information about collective benefits. However, the study showed no difference between the messaging strategies among people who were more mildly hesitant about vaccination, or those already willing to be vaccinated. Persons who were strongly hesitant to vaccination cited concerns about the speed of vaccine development and were less likely to cite the collective benefit of being vaccinated.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Freeman et al. (May 2021). Effects of Different Types of Written Vaccination Information on COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in the UK (OCEANS-III): A Single-Blind, Parallel-Group, Randomised Controlled Trial. The Lancet Public Health. <\/span><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S2468-2667(21)00096-7\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S2468-2667(21)00096-7<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<!-- <a href=\"\" class=\"su-post-comments-link\"><\/a> --><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"js-accordion__panel\" >\n<h2 class=\"js-accordion__header\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Clinical Characteristics and Health Care Setting<\/span><\/h2>\n<div class=\"su-posts su-posts-default-loop\">\n<div id=\"su-post-9816\" class=\"su-post\">\n<h5 class=\"su-post-title\">Comparison and Impact of COVID-19 for Patients with Cancer: A Survival Analysis of Fatality Rate Controlling for Age, Sex and Cancer Type<\/h5>\n<p>\t\t\t\t<!-- \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"su-post-meta\">\n\t\t\t\t\t: \t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n --><\/p>\n<div class=\"su-post-excerpt\">\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">A survival analysis of UK cancer patients (N=4,606) found that those with a SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis between March-October 2020 had a higher risk of death compared to patients without SARS-CoV-2. The risk of death within 21 days post SARS-CoV-2 detection was over 10-fold higher than among those without SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with melanoma, hematological malignancies, uterine cancer, and kidney cancer. In all cases, fatality rates were higher in older patients. The authors suggest that these results highlight the importance of screening and early treatment of COVID-19 among cancer patients, and the prioritization of cancer patients for COVID-19 vaccination.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Li et al. (May 12, 2021). Comparison and Impact of COVID-19 for Patients with Cancer: A Survival Analysis of Fatality Rate Controlling for Age, Sex and Cancer Type. BMJ Health &amp; Care Informatics. <\/span><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjhci-2021-100341\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjhci-2021-100341<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<!-- <a href=\"\" class=\"su-post-comments-link\"><\/a> --><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"su-post-9814\" class=\"su-post\">\n<h5 class=\"su-post-title\">Short-Term Antibody Response Afer 1 Dose of BNT162b2 Vaccine in Patients Receiving Hemodialysis<\/h5>\n<p>\t\t\t\t<!-- \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"su-post-meta\">\n\t\t\t\t\t: \t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n --><\/p>\n<div class=\"su-post-excerpt\">\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">A study of persons receiving onsite hemodialysis and health care worker controls (N=210) found that a single dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine failed to elicit detectable IgG antibodies in 57% of hemodialysis patients and 5% of health care workers without previous SARS-CoV-2 infection at 4 weeks following vaccination. Among hemodialysis patients with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, median antibody levels were similar to those of health care workers 3 weeks post-vaccination. However, T-cell response was not assessed in this study. The authors suggest that persons receiving hemodialysis be prioritized for a second dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech at the recommended 3-week dosing interval, and highlight the importance of rigorous infection control procedures in dialysis centers.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Goupil et al. (May 12, 2021). Short-Term Antibody Response Afer 1 Dose of BNT162b2 Vaccine in Patients Receiving Hemodialysis. Canadian Medical Association Journal. <\/span><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1503\/cmaj.210673\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1503\/cmaj.210673<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<!-- <a href=\"\" class=\"su-post-comments-link\"><\/a> --><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"js-accordion__panel\" >\n<h2 class=\"js-accordion__header\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Mental Health and Personal Impact<\/span><\/h2>\n<div class=\"su-posts su-posts-default-loop\">\n<div id=\"su-post-9818\" class=\"su-post\">\n<h5 class=\"su-post-title\">Trajectories of Child Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Longitudinal UK Cohort<\/h5>\n<p>\t\t\t\t<!-- \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"su-post-meta\">\n\t\t\t\t\t: \t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n --><\/p>\n<div class=\"su-post-excerpt\">\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Pre-print, not peer-reviewed]<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> Emotional and behavioral difficulties decreased at a slower rate during the COVID-19 pandemic among young children in the UK (N=708) in a longitudinal birth-cohort study. In pre-pandemic times, predicted trajectories of difficulties peaked at age 2 and declined over the rest of early childhood. During the pandemic, the rate of decline was slower in these children and resulted in significantly more difficulties present in older children. The authors note that emotional and behavioral difficulties in early childhood are associated with psychiatric disorders later in childhood and adolescence.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Paul et al. (May 13, 2021). Trajectories of Child Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Longitudinal UK Cohort. Pre-print downloaded May 14 from <\/span><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1101\/2021.05.11.21257040\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1101\/2021.05.11.21257040<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<!-- <a href=\"\" class=\"su-post-comments-link\"><\/a> --><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"js-accordion__panel\" >\n<h2 class=\"js-accordion__header\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Public Health Policy and Practice<\/span><\/h2>\n<div class=\"su-posts su-posts-default-loop\">\n<div id=\"su-post-9820\" class=\"su-post\">\n<h5 class=\"su-post-title\">Trends in Pediatric Primary Care Visits during the COVID-19 Pandemic<\/h5>\n<p>\t\t\t\t<!-- \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"su-post-meta\">\n\t\t\t\t\t: \t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n --><\/p>\n<div class=\"su-post-excerpt\">\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">A retrospective review of a large US commercial medical claims database found that pediatric primary care visits were 60% lower between March 25 and April 21, 2020 compared to the same period in 2019, and problem-focused visits were 63% lower. Primary care visits and problem-focused visits remained 17% and 31% lower in October 2020 compared to October 2019. The reduction in problem-focused visits was mainly due to a reduction in visits for infectious diseases, including acute respiratory infections and gastroenteritis. The rates of preventive and vaccination visits in October 2020 exceeded those in 2019; however, a cumulative deficit of these visits remained, indicating lower vaccination rates among children and a higher risk for vaccine-preventable disease if this deficit is not addressed.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Schweiberger et al. (May 2021). Trends in Pediatric Primary Care Visits during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Academic Pediatrics. <\/span><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.acap.2021.04.031\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.acap.2021.04.031<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<!-- <a href=\"\" class=\"su-post-comments-link\"><\/a> --><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h2>Other Resources and Commentaries<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.n1087\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Public health impact of delaying second dose of BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 covid-19 vaccine: simulation agent based modeling study<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> \u2013 BMJ (May 12)<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3324\/haematol.2021.278573\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Low Incidence of COVID-19 Severe Complications in a Large Cohort of Children with Sickle Cell Disease: A Protective Role for Basal Interferon-1 Activation<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> \u2013 Haematologica (May 13)<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.n1166\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">How Covid-19 Revealed the Scandal of Medical Oxygen Supplies Worldwide<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> &#8212; BMJ (May 12)<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41587-021-00912-9\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">A Network Analysis of COVID-19 MRNA Vaccine Patents<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> \u2013 Nature Biotechnology (May 12)<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S1473-3099(21)00251-6\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Applying Prospective Genomic Surveillance to Support Investigation of Hospital-Onset COVID-19<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> \u2013 The Lancet Infectious Diseases (May)<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.n1216\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Covid-19: Fever, Chills, and Aches More Common When AstraZeneca and Pfizer Vaccines Are Mixed, Early Data Show<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> \u2013 BMJ (May 12)<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamaoncol.2021.1218\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">COVID-19 Vaccines in Patients With Cancer\u2014A Welcome Addition, but There Is Need for Optimization<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> \u2013 JAMA Oncology (May 13)<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cmi.2021.05.007\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Outbreak Investigation of Symptomatic SARS-COV-2 VOC 202012\/01-Lineage B.1.1.7 Infection in Healthcare Workers, Italy<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> \u2013 Clinical Microbiology and Infection (May)<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/d41586-021-01284-5\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">How the World Failed to Curb COVID<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> \u2013 Nature (May 12)<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18632\/aging.203065\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Old and New Coronaviruses in the Elderly<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> \u2013 Aging (May 12)<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.14740\/jmc3594\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">COVID-19 Pandemic and Uptake in Suicide Attempt Among Young People of Minority Population: A Case Series<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> \u2013 Journal of Medical Cases (Dec 2020)<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/d41586-021-01246-x\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">How COVID Broke the Evidence Pipeline<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> \u2013 Nature (May 13)<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12889-021-10949-9\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">An Italian Individual-Level Data Study Investigating on the Association between Air Pollution Exposure and Covid-19 Severity in Primary-Care Setting<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> \u2013 BMC Public Health (Dec 12)<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/fsh0000600\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Matched Emotional Supports in Health Care (MESH) Framework: A Stepped Care Model for Health Care Workers<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> \u2013 Families, Systems, &amp; Health (May 13)<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/NEJMp2103798\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Covid-19 Infodemic \u2014 Applying the Epidemiologic Model to Counter Misinformation<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> \u2013 New England Journal of Medicine (May 12)<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41587-021-00920-9\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">COVID-19 Testing Turns to T Cells<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> \u2013 Nature Biotechnology (May 12)<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/d41586-021-01255-w\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Evidence-Based Medicine: How COVID Can Drive Positive Change<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> \u2013 Nature (May)<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Report prepared by the UW Alliance for Pandemic Preparedness and Global Health Security and the START Center in collaboration with and on behalf of WA DOH COVID-19 Incident Management Team<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>An in vitro study of serum neutralization after two doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine found that variants B.1.526, B.1.429, and B.1.1.7+E484K remained susceptible to vaccine-elicited neutralizing antibodies, indicating that the E484K mutation, also found in the B.1.351 and B.1.526 lineages, may not compromise the neutralization of vaccine-induced antibodies.<\/p>\n<div><a class=\"more\" href=\"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/2021\/05\/14\/trends-in-pediatric-primary-care-visits-during-the-covid-19-pandemic\/\">Read more<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":5840,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"topic":[],"class_list":["post-9794","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-covid-19-literature-situation-report"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9794","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9794"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9794\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9822,"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9794\/revisions\/9822"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5840"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9794"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9794"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9794"},{"taxonomy":"topic","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/depts.washington.edu\/pandemicalliance\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topic?post=9794"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}