Sterilization in Europe


International Economics usually covers the concept of sterilization in the context of central banks' intention. That is,  Central Banks "sterilize the effects of foreign currency interventions" when Central Banks buy or sell foreign currency, so minimize the effect on the domestic money supply. 

In Europe the GIPS countries have encountered serious economic crises, that resulted in huge goverment deficits and massive public debt. To allow these countries to remain in the EU, the European Central Bank (ECB) decided to buy their debt and thus keep the interest on the debt managable. Of course every time the ECB purchases government debt, it increases the money supply – much the chegrin of other EU countries who fear inflation. In response the ECB is "sterliziing" these bond purchases. Here is the article: 


Questions:


1. Why does the WSJ say the the ECB sterilizing its money supply?


2. If Eurozone countries start to struggle with a trade deficit that continues for a long period of time, what will eventually happen to their foreign reserves? Draw a graph to illustrate your point.


3. What are some policy options countries can take if they want to correct their trade deficits or their fiscal deficits? 
  

Japanese J-Curve

Fabliha Ibnat suggested a great Bloomberg article on the Japanese J-curve:  

Japan Trade Deficit Hits Record as Yen Inflates Imports: Economy

Japan’s trade deficit swelled to a record 1.63 trillion yen ($17.4 billion) on energy imports and a weaker yen, highlighting one cost of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s policies that are driving down the currency.

Exports climbed 6.4 percent in January from a year earlier, the first rise in eight months, exceeding the median 5.6 percent estimate in a Bloomberg News survey of 24 economists. Imports increased 7.3 percent, the Finance Ministry said in Tokyo today.

Weakness in the yen that aids exporters such as Sharp Corp. and Sony Corp. also means the country pays more to import fossil fuels needed as nuclear reactors stand idle after the Fukushima crisis in 2011. That burden may encourage the government to limit the currency’s slide, with Deputy Economy Minister Yasutoshi Nishimura signaling in a Jan. 24 interview that the government may prefer a yen stronger than 110 per dollar.

“The trade deficit means the yen can’t just keep weakening,” said Takeshi Minami, chief economist at Norinchukin Research Institute Co. in Tokyo. “Abe will probably restart some nuclear plants after the upper house elections in July as, without them, the costs to the economy are too great.”

Nearly 80 percent of Japan’s imports were denominated in foreign currencies in the second half of last year, compared with about 60 percent of exports, according to the Finance Ministry.

[Some] Export Increase

Exports to China rose 3 percent from a year earlier, the first increase since May, while those to the U.S. gained 10.9 percent, today’s data showed. Shipments to the European Union fell 4.5 percent.

“A rebound in global demand, especially the U.S., is helping Japanese exports,” Azusa Kato, an economist at BNP Paribas SA in Tokyo, said before the data.

China Trade

Japan’s government predicts that trade with China, the nation’s biggest export destination, will recover this year after falling in 2012 for the first time in three years because of a territorial dispute between the nations and a slowdown in the Chinese economy.

Japan’s car exports declined 8 percent from a year earlier, while iron and steel shipments increased 24.4 percent. Imports of liquefied natural gas rose 1 percent from a year earlier to the highest since at least May 1999. The average price paid by Japan for a metric ton of natural gas has risen almost 17 percent in yen terms since November, according to Bloomberg calculations based on Ministry of Finance data.

The yen has fallen more than 13 percent against the dollar in the past three months as Prime Minister Shinzo Abe calls for aggressive monetary easing to end deflation.

 Questions: 

1.      Why did Japan experience an increase in exports, but not a decrease in
imports after the yen was devalued? What does this mean for the trade balance?


2.      What imported good is driving this trend, and what does this mean about
Japan’s elasticity towards this good?


3.       Do you think the deteriorating trade deficit a long term trend? Draw a graph to
illustrate what you think might/should happen to the trade balance in the long run. Be very careful to explain the reasons for your preditions regarding the the shape of the trade balance in the future. 

4. Describe the major
thesis, the central idea, or set of ideas in the reading.

5. Identify a concept presented in the article, define or describe it,
and compare or contrast it to an idea that you have read about in any other
article. Discuss how they are similar or different, and how they are related to
each other.

6. Citing specific lines in the article, quote verbatim a statement
or brief passage that is interesting to you or elicits in you some type of
emotional response.  Then identify your emotional response or why you
found it interesting, describe the meaning(s) that the statement or
passage has for you, and provide actual or possible reasons for your
response.



 

Byproducts of Currency Wars: Housing Bubbles

Back to Housing Bubbles

An uncomfortable topic. Nouriel Roubini sees housing bubbles in Switzerland, Sweden, Norway, Finland, France, Germany, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and, back for an encore, the UK (well, London). In emerging markets, bubbles are appearing in Hong Kong, Singapore, China, and Israel, and in major urban centers in Turkey, India, Indonesia, and Brazil. Given global interest rates, the analysis is not surprising…

“Let The Sunshine In” – Just not into the US and Europe. Solar Panel Update

The NYT has an update on the US – Chinese solar panel dispute. 

While green technologies are key to reducing the energy consumption in the US, sadly the focus is only on rules of origin: who produces the green technology, not how much it can help us reduce carbon emissions.  The US would like to keep cheap Chinese solar cells out. After a first victory that imposed huge subsidies for US producers and huge tariffs (24%-36%) on Chinese solar imports, the Chinese turned around and started to source key components from Taiwan. Since only Chinese solar cells had been subject to the US tariff, the new cheap "Taiwanese" cells soon flooded the US market. Much to the chegrin on US solar cell producers who wanted to maintain higher prices in the domestic market. This "loophole" is now to be closed by having high tariffs imposed on any solar modules that contain Chineses parts. The winners: "Solar World Industries of Amercia" (which is actually a subsidiary of a German company!) , the loosers (as usual): consumers and sadly also now the environment.

In Europe the threat of a 67% tariff resulted in a negotiated price floor that Chinese companies agreed to and voluntary export restraints to end the "oversupply" of solar cells.