Traditional project scheduling methods provide overwhelming amounts of data for large projects. This can make the task of fully communicating project information to diverse audiences and communities challenging. In addition, WSDOT\u2019s design teams, working with multiple and varied partners and internal specialists, need to be able to quickly grasp the nature of a project, its context, and the work activities, locations, and timing that will occur. Linear scheduling has the potential to be an extremely effective tool in tracking cost, duration, and appropriate justification and can enhance WSDOT\u2019s current processes related to project cost risk assessment and value engineering. Other industries regularly use linear scheduling. Phase 1 of this study conducted a literature review of best practices related to linear scheduling for heavy civil engineering projects. In Phase II, the researchers will develop project performance metrics to quantify the benefits of using a linear scheduling program. They will also investigate available tools and software to provide vendor selection guidelines. The findings will build confidence in the adoption and use of a linear scheduling program to further improve project metrics.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Principal Investigator: Amy Kim<\/a>, Civil and Environmental Engineering, UW <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Traditional project scheduling methods provide overwhelming amounts of data for large projects. This can make the task of fully communicating project information to diverse audiences and communities challenging. In addition, WSDOT\u2019s design teams, working with multiple and varied partners and internal specialists, need to be able to quickly grasp the nature of a project, its … Continue reading Linear Scheduling Evaluation and Best Practices, Phase 2<\/span>
Sponsor: WSDOT
WSDOT Technical Monitor: Mark Gabel<\/a>
WSDOT Project Manager: Mustafa Mohamedali<\/a>
Scheduled completion: December 2021<\/p>\n\n\n\n