- A WTO panel found a European Union ban on beef produced with cancer-causing hormones to
violate the WTO because the European Union had not definitively demonstrated that the beef
would cause harm to consumers.
The only way truly to integrate environmental priorities into the WTO is to reform the
trade rules and the decision-making system. The Clinton administration must insist that
the WTO does not jeopardize strong environmental protections at the local, state,
national, and international level. To ensure that strong environmental standards are not
at risk, the WTO must be reformed to protect the following five rights:
1. The consumer right to know which products are environmentally friendly.
2. The right to limit the harmful effects of logging, fishing, and production.
3. The right to have strong environmental standards that use precautions to protect
citizen health and the environment.
4. The right to use the governments purchasing power to protect the environment.
5. The public right to access information about and to participate in disputes,
negotiations, and other proceedings that affect public health and the environment.
Before any further expansion of the WTO, the Clinton administration should call for a
complete assessment and repair the damage the WTOs rules and systems cause to health
and the environment. To ensure that no further damage is done during this review and
repair process, a moratorium should be imposed on WTO challenges to health and
environmental protections. The Clinton administration should also stop pushing for the
expansion of the WTOs reach in environmentally sensitive areas, such as forests.
This is not a statement about whether trade is good or bad. It is a demand for change
in the current WTO rules which trade away our environmental standards. If the United
States does not show leadership and make trade rules work for the environment, the public
will not support the administrations policies.