|
|||||
|
Telehealth and Telemedicine
Driving forces, benefits and obstacles
Telehealth is the use of electronic communications networks for the transmission of information and data focused on health promotion, disease prevention, diagnosis, consultation, education, and/or therapy, and the public's overall health including patient/community education and information, population-based data collection and management, and linkages for health care resources and referrals. Although telehealth is sometimes considered broader in scope than telemedicine, there is no clear-cut distinction between the two. Telemedicine is the use of audio, video, and other telecommunications and electronic information processing technologies for the transmission of information and data relevant to the diagnosis and treatment of medical conditions, or to provide health services or aid health care personnel at distant sites. Telediagnosis is the detection of a disease as a result of evaluating data transmitted to a receiving station from instruments monitoring a remote patient and we can define Teleconsultation as the physical separation between multiple providers during a consultation. To develop this kind of distance medicine we require the used of telecommunications, which is the use of wire, radio, visual, or other electromagnetic channels to transmit or receive signals for voice, data and video communications. In conclusion, Telemedicine is defined by the Telemedicine Information Exchange (1997) as the "use of electronic signals to transfer medical data (photographs, x-ray images, audio, patient records, videoconferences, etc.) from one site to another via the Internet, Intranets, PCs, satellites, or videoconferencing telephone equipment in order to improve access to health care." But it can be define also as "the use of advanced telecommunications technologies to exchange health information and provide health care services across geographic, time, social, and cultural barriers. [Slide1] The practice of medicine through telecommunications, or telemedicine, began in the early 1960’s when the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) first put men in space. Physiological measurements of the astronauts were telemetered from both the spacecraft and the space suits during NASA space flights. In 1974, NASA conducted a study with SCI Systems of Houston to determine the minimal television system requirements for accurate telediagnosis [Slide2] In 1989, NASA conducted the first international
telemedicine project, Space
Bridge to Armenia/Ufa, after a powerful earthquake struck the Soviet Republic
of Armenia in December 1988. An offer of medical consultation was extended
to the Soviet Union by several medical centers in the United States.
Telemedicine consultations were conducted under the guidance of the US/USSR
Joint Working Group on Space Biology using video, audio, and facsimile
between a medical center in Yerevan, Armenia and four medical centers
in the United States
[Slide3]. This project was extended to UFA,
,
Russia to aid burn victims there after a fiery railway accident
(Telemedicine Research Center, 1997).
Much of telemedicine in different parts of the world uses
videoconferencing technology, which involves live two-way video and audio
transmission
[Slide4]. Basically, it's a picture telephone. It allows health consumers
to see and speak with health workers and specialists in distant and sometimes
(same) sites, which means quicker diagnosis and a quicker start to the
appropriate treatment.
Between 1995 and 2000, the Network 2 successfully
transformed the health delivery system, providing services to significantly
greater numbers of persons while achieving excellence in health care quality
and customer satisfaction
[Slide5]. This transformation can be achieved through a
systematic process by which well-defined performance targets were
established in those areas crucial to organizational success. In other
words, you need to define the crucial areas that want to include in this
network
[Slide6].
It is also critical to establish innovative Care Line structures that allow
rapid systems transformation, through the development of network-wide goals
and operational strategies. The essence of Network 2's successful
transformation was the ongoing monitoring of key performance. These
indicators were identified as critical determinants of organizational
success.
Significant investments in information and data technology need to be
introduced at the outset, providing senior leaders and staff at all levels
of the organization with the necessary tools to assess organizational
progress and achieve measurable improvements in performance
[Slide7]. The intent is
to build a world class health delivery system by achieving the highest
levels of quality and customer service. Usually an achieving of the 90th
percentile nationally for all standardized measures of patient satisfaction
and quality are adequate
[Slide8].
Use in the real world
Rural telemedicine care: for example, the technician or nurse
practitioner in a rural clinic or hospital asks for assessment in specific
cases in the rural areas.
Specialty Telemedicine care: For training or diagnosis of
different illness or pathologies such as AIDS, obstetrics, joint illness,
uncommon diseases in one particular specialty.
Driving forces, benefits and obstacles
For some applications of telemedicine, more
rigorous evaluations will support claims about their value and will
encourage their more widespread use
[Slide9]. For other applications, better
evaluation may discourage adoption, at least until technologies and
infrastructures improve or other circumstances change. That is to be
expected
[Slide10]. The purpose of evaluation—and the purpose of this report—is not to
endorse telemedicine but to endorse the development and use of good
information for decision-making.
It is recognized that telemedicine
applications—like other health services and technologies—will diffuse in
some measure despite limited systematic assessment of their benefits and
costs. This diffusion may also be marked by too much attention to the more
glamorous but not necessarily more cost-effective technologies, although
strong incentives to control costs may be weakening tendencies in this
direction. Conversely, telemedicine applications may also languish for lack
of good evidence documenting their relative value compared to alternative
services or for lack of evaluation research identifying the obstacles
standing in the way of useful and sustainable programs
[Slide11],
[Slide12].
The University of Washington (UW)
Academic
Medical Center has received a three-year, $2.028 million grant from the
National Library of Medicine to develop and evaluate new applications of the
National Information Infrastructure in the care of patients. Commonly called
the "Information Superhighway," the National Information Infrastructure is a
partnership between the
U.S.
government, private industry and public institutions. Its goal is to create
a seamless interweaving of computer and communications technology for
education, commerce, health care, libraries, natural resource management and
other uses.
The WAMI region is an ideal testing ground for
health-care applications of new communications technology
[Slide13], because of the
strong relationships we have already built over the past 25 years with
communities and health professionals across the
Pacific Northwest
[Slide14]
and Alaska through our regionalized medical education program
[Slide15],
[Slide16]
The project, entitled From Bench to Bedside and Beyond,
will measure the effects of a regional information infrastructure on
health-care delivery
[Slide17], research and public health
[Slide18]. It will expand on previous
and current UW projects in the testing of electronic communications and data
transfer technologies in medicine
[Slide19]. These endeavors include a demonstration
project on rural telemedicine consultations and the Integrated Advanced
Information Management System, which has improved access to computerized
resources for UW health sciences departments and local affiliates
[Slide20],
[Slide21]. Several
UW departments with experience in information technology will be involved
[Slide22].
Among the many project goals are:
·
Provide clinicians and public health agencies with
convenient, timely access to vital information when and where they need it.
· Evaluate ways to ensure security during electronic transfer
by checking the identity of the clinician and patient and by encoding the
information.
·
Make retrieval of information more logical from the
caregivers' perspective by linking databases, information resources and
services.
·
Improve the electronic delivery and archiving of medical
images.
·
Offer access to library resources, software tools for
clinical decision making, bibliographic databases, practice guidelines,
expert systems and other automated systems, literature searches such as
Medline, and electronic copies of articles from professional and research
journals.
·
Create better integration for the exchange of data among
public health and clinical practice sites.
·
Develop multi-function workstations for all types of
communication, data access and transfer, and information management.
·
Measure costs and savings that result from increased access
to information.
Computing and communications technologies will drive significant and
dramatic change for “the players, dynamics, rules and requirements” of
medicine and healthcare. No community, provider, or practice will be immune,
and the primary care in the year 2020 will undoubtedly be in some ways
unrecognizable
[Slide23]. As we
utilize the computers sitting on our desk and the digital wireless phone
hanging from our belts, we may be able to envision medical practice in the
next five years as information devices all interconnected through wireless
communications, all exchanging a variety of information types, all informing
a variety of healthcare constitutes, but the vision of the future is far
less clear. In many ways it will be better, in some ways it may be worse,
depending on your point of view. Without doubt it will be different
[Slide24]. It is
temping to consider this rapid change as frightening and disorienting at
best and detrimental to medicine and healthcare at worst. Regardless of
one’s perspective, it is safe to say that it is inevitable. With luck, the
concepts in this module will aid primary care practitioners in developing a
sense of the coming change and embracing the change so that the year 2020
will provide even more rewards than are present today. |
||||
This project is a joint effort of the
University of
Washington School of Public Health and Community Medicine |
|||||
Revised: 03-Jun-2003 | Contact Us |