Normative Claims for a Democratic Science

Spring 2009

In the Spring quarter, the SSNet seminar will address a set of normative questions about why the sciences should be “democratized” and, more specifically, about how the epistemic resources of diverse communities—within and outside the conventional boundaries of established scientific disciplines—can be deployed effectively in the practice of science. We will focus on concrete examples of collaborative research practice in a range of fields in which publics of various kinds figure, not just as beneficiaries of or as a material resource for scientific inquiry, but also as active partners at all stages in the research process, from setting the agenda for a research program through empirical investigation to the dissemination of results. The goal of discussion will be to specify conditions of best practice, and to clearly identify what is to be gained epistemically, as well as socially or politically, from various forms of reciprocity, accountability, and research partnership. 

Core Seminar Organizers


Graduate Fellows Faculty Fellows

Sample Readings

PDF File Updated list of readings for each meeting. Check here for updates before each meeting. (Requires a UW Net ID for access.)

Sample readings include: Burgess and O’Doherty, Deliberative Public Engagement Related to Governing Biobanks (2007); Dryzek and Niemeyer “Reconciling Pluralism and Consensus as Political Ideals” (2006); Epstein, Inclusion: The Politics of Difference in Medical Research (2007); Sharp and Foster, “Grappling with Groups: Protecting Collective Interests in Biomedical Research” (2007); Stokols, “Toward a Science of Transdisciplinary Action Research” (2006); Suchman, Human-Machine Reconfigurations (2006).

Schedule

PDF File Download a printable version of the full Spring Quarter Schedule (including seminar readings) here.