|
Political
Change and Polarization in Contemporary Bolivia
A
Case Study of Latin America's Shift to the Left
By Andrew Crosson
University
of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Recent
political developments in Bolivia have
placed it at the center of what scholars describe as Latin America’s
'shift to the left'. The 2005 election of Evo Morales, the country's
first indigenous president, represented a major break from the
Boliviam
history of exluding indigenous citizens. I examine the
circumstances that produced such a
dramatic political shift, beginning with a historical consideration of
the asymmetrical socioeconomic and political
relationships that have characterized Bolivia. In the 1980s
and
90s, indigenous groups joined other social movements to protest the
unresponsive nature of traditional political parties and the effects of
neoliberal economic
policies. The rise of Morales’ MAS party, from a
locally-based Civil Society Organization to a national political party,
is a direct result of
the lack of
representative policy making. I consider the growing polarization of
Bolivian politics, which
has become increasingly intense as Bolivian elites radicalize their
opposition to the
Morales Administration. Given the magnitude of these changes,
and
the
transformation of Bolivia’s politics and society, I argue that it is
better understood
as a historical process rather than a transitory ideological
shift. .pdf
No-Party Politics and Persistent
Journalists
Ugandan
Democracy and its Relationship With the Press
By Karina Nicole
Seyler
University
of Washington, Seattle
Despite having a relatively repressive
government,
Uganda’s news media surpasses those in most other African countries in
terms of being vocal, democratic, innovative, and critical of the
current government. However, Uganda’s press is ‘free’ only in
comparison to what it has been in the past. I explore the relationship
between press and politics in Uganda within the context of Uganda’s
fragile democracy. First I review the literature that addresses the
role of the press in the democratization of developing countries.
Second, I analyze the legal provisions relating to freedom of press in
Uganda. Third, I analyze the content of two newspapers: the
government-owned newspaper, The
New
Vision, and an independently owned
newspaper, The Monitor.
This
study illustrates the importance of a free
press and the role of ownership in democratically developing countries.
After discussing the limitations and obstacles that Ugandan journalism
face, I offer general policy suggestions aimed at protecting press
freedoms and strengthening Ugandan democracy. .pdf
Ireland's Civil War
A
Revolutionary Moment or a Disagreement Among Elites?
By Matthew Heintz
University
of Washington, Seattle
In
the early morning hours of December 6, 1921, representatives
of
Ireland’s revolutionary government, sent to negotiate a peace with
Britain, signed a document they believed would provide for Ireland an
unprecedented amount of independence. The “Articles of Agreement for a
Treaty Between Great Britain and Ireland,” removed the British military
presence in Ireland—a fact for nearly seven hundred years—and destroyed
the political and legislative union between Great Britain and Ireland,
effectively ending British domination of Irish life. Naturally, the
Anglo-Irish Treaty, as it came to be called, did not encapsulate all
Irish demands, but was rather a compromise struck between the two
nations. Irish delegates signed the Treaty
knowing that it represented the best terms for which they could have
hoped at the time, feeling that the rest of Ireland would recognize it
as a great step towards independence. Yet despite all of the Treaty’s
merits, it was met with opposition when presented to the Dáil,
Ireland’s revolutionary parliament. Those who supported the Treaty
heralded its practical benefits, while those who opposed it considered
the agreement a betrayal of Irish Nationalist ideals and an abandonment
of the Republic so valiantly declared by the heroes of the Irish nation
in 1916. The signing and ratification of the Treaty is the single most
influential factor precipitating the Irish Civil War. Its symbolic
shortcomings provided grounds for objection and opposition to those who
did not wish to see Ireland stop short of total victory. I consider
here the question of whether the Irish Civil war should be describe as
a 'revolution'. I argue that the Civil War lacked certain
characteristics
commonly associated with revolutionary movements: a specific ideology;
a set of aims consistent with it; and a sense of inevitability. I argue
that ultimately the Irish Civil War should not be seen as a
revolutionary conflict but rather as an
overblown disagreement between Ireland’s elite politicians.
.pdf
The
Rationality of Innacurate Science
Britain,
Cholera, and the Pursuit of Progress in 1883
By Emma Grunberg
University
of Washington, Seattle
During the 1883 cholera epidemic in Egypt,
British
colonial officials tried to prove that the epidemic had originated in
Egypt — not from a British ship travelling through the Suez Canal.
Admitting the latter would have meant quarantining the Canal, slowing
British trade and diminishing profits. Why would the British, the
dominant power in the region, attempt to ‘scientifically’ prove the
local-origin theory against mounting evidence that suggested otherwise?
I argue that the British were concerned about protecting their image as
a modern, civilized power — an image that required them to use the
language of science and rationality even while approaching the question
of cholera from standpoint of political and economic self interest.
Through an analysis of the reports and correspondence of British
officials during the epidemic, I show that, although Britain officials
relied arguments that today seem outdated, they did so in the name of
modernity — a specifically British notion of modernity. This
little-studied episode of colonial history provides a window into the
relationship between British imperial aims and the progress of medical
science.
.pdf
The United States Peace Corps
International
Development Organization or Tool of U.S. Foreign Policy?
By Courtney Hampson
University
of Washington, Seattle
This paper will examine how attitudes toward
the
Peace Corps have changed over its fort-five year history. As a soft
diplomacy tool of the U.S. Government, the Peace Corps has been widely
heralded for achieving its three goals: (1) to help people in
developing countries meet their needs, (2) to help promote a better
understanding of Americans on the part of people served, and (3) to
help promote a better understanding of other peoples on the part of
Americans. Peace Corps has also been widely criticized for not actually
achieving development objectives, while instead being used as a tool
for American interests. Despite these debates, Peace Corps and its
programs and objectives have remained relatively unexamined and
continue to see growth in funding and manpower. Unlike other foreign
policy tools, social science scholars have not systemically studied
Peace Corps’ programs, or the justifications provided for continued
funding, in order to properly conduct this debate. This study examines
the entire history of Congressional Budget Reports about the Peace
Corps will be studied to evaluate how Peace Corps programs are
described and justified. This discourse will be coded and the issues
put into historical context. By comprehensively and systematically
assessing the role of Peace Corps as it is understood by U.S. foreign
policy makers, I seek to provide valuable insights on the shifting
character of soft diplomacy tools. .pdf
|
|