Parental Decision Making: Case 3

A 5-year-old child has just had his second generalized tonic-clonic seizure in a 4-month period. You have recommended starting an anticonvulsant. The child’s parents have concerns about the recommended medication and would prefer to wait and see if their son has more seizures.

How should you respond to the parents’ request?

Maternal-Fetal Conflict

  • What accounts for the rising awareness of maternal-fetal conflict?
  • What happens when medical therapy is indicated for one patient, yet contraindicated for the other?
  • When does a fetus or a newborn become a person?
  • People have rights. Does a fetus have rights?
  • What if maternal decisions seem to be based on unusual beliefs?
  • What about obtaining court orders to force pregnant women to comply?

Interdisciplinary Team Issues: Case 2

A 28-year-old woman presents for diagnostic laparoscopy for pelvic pain. During laparoscopy, the surgeon announces that she intends to proceed to hysterectomy for multiple uterine myomata. The anesthesiologist then declares that he will "wake the patient up" rather than allow the surgeon to proceed, due to lack of consent for the procedure, and questionable medical necessity.

Can the anesthesiologist "tell" the surgeon what to do?
Who is in charge when two physicians on the team disagree?

Interdisciplinary Team Issues: Case 1

An otherwise healthy 54-year-old man presents for radical retropubic prostatectomy, and expresses interest to his anesthesiologist in having postoperative epidural narcotic pain management. The anesthesiologist believes it provides superior pain control, but is informed by the surgeon that the patient "is not to have an epidural."

Is the anesthesiologist obliged to "take an order" from the surgeon? 
Should the anesthesiologist provide the anesthetic he feels is best, regardless of the surgeon's input?

Informed Consent: Case 2

A 55-year-old man has a 3-month history of chest pain and fainting spells. You feel his symptoms merit cardiac catheterization. You explain the risks and potential benefits to him, and include your assessment of his likely prognosis without the intervention. He is able to demonstrate that he understands all of this, but refuses the intervention.

Can he do that, legally? Should you leave it at that?

Informed Consent: Case 1

A 64-year-old woman with MS is hospitalized. The team feels she may need to be placed on a feeding tube soon to assure adequate nourishment. They ask the patient about this in the morning and she agrees. However, in the evening (before the tube has been placed), the patient becomes disoriented and seems confused about her decision to have the feeding tube placed. She tells the team she doesn't want it in. They revisit the question in the morning, when the patient is again lucid. Unable to recall her state of mind from the previous evening, the patient again agrees to the procedure.