Bunchgrass Ridge

Ecology and restoration of conifer-invaded meadows:
Research and adaptive management

     
Home > Research > 4. Restoration experiment > Recent results: Burn-scar recovery
     
Recent results: Long-term recovery of burn-pile scars
 
Home
Study area
Research
 
1. Conifer invasion
2. Vegetation responses
3. Gopher disturbance
 
4. Restoration experiment
 
  Introduction
  Methods
  Initial results
 

Conclusions

 
Recent resultsNew results
  Burn-scar recovery
 
> Introduction & methods
  Results & conclusions
  Conifer reinvasion
Education
Outreach
Products
Participants
Key findings
   
Also see
Study area
BG Study area link

Gopher effects on recovery
from pile burning

BP Gopher effects link
 
Hosted by
UW link
Privacy | Terms
 
Introduction
Recovery of burn scars
Year 1 (2007)
BP transect 2007
Year 7 (2013)
BP transect
Burn scar 1 and 7 years after pile burning. PVC posts mark corners of quadrats; a sampling frame is visible in the 2007 photo.

A fundamental challenge to restoring tree-invaded grasslands is the disposal of woody residues following tree removal. Broadcast and pile burning are two alternatives. Although pile burning may be easier to implement, it can generates intense, prolonged heating—shown to have adverse effects on forest soils and vegetation. Here we examine the long-term effects of pile burning on vegetation recovery following tree removal from conifer-invaded grasslands. This work extends our initial (3-yr) assessment of soil and vegetation responses (see Local effects of burn piles). Our objectives are

  • to compare the abundance and diversity of plants
    in and adjacent to burn scars;
  • to determine whether initially large differences in burn severity
    at the centers and edges of scars persist after 7 yr; and
  • to interpret community recovery with respect to plant growth form
    and clonality (potential for vegetative spread)

Methods

Burn-pile sampling design
BP Sampling design
Schematic diagram of the sampling design:
C = scar center (higher-intensity burn)
E = scar edge (lower-intensity burn)
U1 and U2 = unburned vegetation at and distant from the edge.
Sampling. Thirty burn scars were resampled in 2013 (7 yr after treatment). Each was sampled with a series of permanent 20 x 50 cm quadrats at four positions: scar center (C), edge (E), unburned edge (U1), and distant from edge (U2) (see diagram, right). Within each quadrat we estimated cover of bare ground, recent gopher disturbance (mounds or winter castings, convex in profile), and all plant species.

Analysis. Species were classified by growth form (grass, sedge, or forb) and clonality (limited/non-clonal or highly clonal). For each quadrat we tallied the number and summed the cover of species sharing each trait.

We used randomized block ANOVA to assess the effect of position on vegetation response (individual scars were treated as blocks). Significant effects were followed by post-hoc comparisons of means among positions. We also developed rank-abundance curves to compare the distribution of abundance and total richness of species among positions.

Top Results & conclusions Next page